295
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

A Novel Opioid Maintenance Program for Prisoners: Report of Post-Release Outcomes

, Ph.D., , D.S.W., , M.D. &
Pages 433-454 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Maddux J F, Desmond D P. Careers of opioid users. Praeger Studies on Issues and Research in Substance Abuse. New York: Praeger, 1981.
  • Nurco D N, Hanlon T E, Kinlock T W. Recent research on the relationship between illicit drug use and crime. Behav Sci Law 1991; 9:221–242.
  • Chitwood D, Comerford M, Weatherby N. The initiation of the use of heroin in the age of crack. In: Inciardi J A, Harrison L D, eds. Heroin in the Age of Crack-Cocaine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998:51–76.
  • Inciardi J A, McBride D, Surratt H. The heroin street addict: profiling a national population. In: Inciardi J A, Harrison L D, eds. Heroin in the Age of Crack-Cocaine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998:31–50.
  • Weatherburn D, Lind B. Heroin harm minimization: do we really have to choose between law enforcement and treatment? N S W Crime Just Bull 1999; 46:1–11.
  • Chaiken J M, Chaiken M R. Drugs and predatory crime. In: Tonry M, Wilson J Q, eds. Drugs and Crime (Crime Justice). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990:203–219.
  • Hanlon T E, Nurco D N, Kinlock T W, Duszynski K R. Trends in criminal activity and drug use over an addiction career. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1990; 16:223–238. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
  • Kinlock T, Hanlon T, Nurco D. Heroin use in the United States: history and present developments. In: Inciardi J A, Harrison L D, eds. Heroin in the Age of Crack-Cocaine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998:1–30.
  • Hanlon T, Nurco D, Bateman R, O'Grady K. The response of drug abuser parolees to a combination of treatment and intensive supervision. Prison J 1998; 78:31–44.
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Year-End 1999 Emergency Department Data from the Drug Abuse Warning Network. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA, 2000.
  • Hanlon T E, Nurco D N, Bateman R, O'Grady K. The relative effects of three approaches to the parole supervision of narcotic addicts and cocaine abusers. Prison J 1999; 79:163–181.
  • Leukefeld C G, Tims F, Farabee D. Treatment of Drug Offenders: Policies and Issues. New York: Springer, 2002.
  • Battjes R J, Carswell S. Federal drug abuse treatment research priorities. In: Leukefeld C G, Tims F, Farabee D, eds. Clinical and Policy Responses to Drug Offenders. New York: Springer, 2002:348–361.
  • Inciardi J A, Martin S S, Butzin C A, Hooper R M, Harrison L D. An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. J Drug Issues 1997; 27:261–278. [CSA]
  • Pearson F S, Lipton D S. A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of corrections-based treatments for drug abuse. Prison J 1999; 79:384–410.
  • Gaes G G, Flanigan T J, Motiuk L L, Stewart L. Adult correctional treatment. In: Tonry M, Petersilia J, eds. Prisons (Crime Justice). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999; 26:361–426.
  • Petrosino A, Turpin-Petrosino C, Finckenauer J O. Well-meaning programs can have harmful effects! lessons from experiments of programs such as scared straight. Crime Delinq 2000; 46:354–379. [CSA]
  • Sherman L W. Reducing incarceration rates: the promise of experimental criminology. Crime Delinq 2000; 46:299–314. [CSA]
  • Field G. Continuity of Offender Treatment for Substance Abuse Disorders from Institution to Community. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, 1998, Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 30, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 98-3245.
  • Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). National Drug Control Policy. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, 1999.
  • Ball J C, Ross A. The Effectiveness of Methadone Maintenance Treatment: Patients, Programs, Services, and Outcomes. New York: Springer, 1991.
  • Joseph J, Stancliff T, Langrod J. Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT): a review of historical and clinical issues. Mt Sinai J Med 2000; 67:347–364. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • Platt J, Widman M, Lidz V, Marlowe D. Methadone maintenance treatment: its development and effectiveness after 30 years. In: Inciardi J A, Harrison L D, eds. Heroin in the Age of Crack-Cocaine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998:160–187.
  • Belenko S. Behind bars: Substance Abuse and America's Prison Population. New York: The National Center of Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University, 1998.
  • Magura S, Rosenblum A, Lewis C, Joseph H. The effectiveness of in-jail methadone maintenance. J Drug Issues 1993; 23:75–99. [CSA]
  • Levasseuir L, Marzo J N, Ross N, Blatier C. Frequence des reincarcerations dans une meme maison d'arret: Role des traitements de substitution. Ann Med Interne 2002; 153(3):S14–S19.
  • Dole V, Robinson J, Orraga J, Towns E, Searcy P, Caine E. Methadone treatment of randomly selected criminal addicts. N Engl J Med 1969; 280:1372–1375. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
  • Tomasino V, Swanson A J, Nolan J, Shuman M. The key extended entry program (KEEP): a methadone treatment program for opiate-dependent inmates. Mt Sinai J Med 2001; 68:14–20. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • Gray T A, Wish E D. Substance Abuse and Need for Treatment Among Arrestees (SANTA) in Maryland. College Park, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Research, 1997.
  • Wish E D, Yacoubian G S. Findings from the Baltimore City Substance Abuse Need for Treatment (SANTA) Project, 2001. College Park, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Research, 2001.
  • Kinlock T W, Battjes R J, Schwartz R P. A novel opioid maintenance program for prisoners: preliminary findings. J Subst Abuse Treatment 2002; 22:141–147., [CSA], [CROSSREF]
  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
  • Ladouceur R, Gosselin P, Laberge M, Blaszczynski A. Dropouts in clinical research: do results reflect clinical reality? Behav Ther 2001 February 24:44–46.
  • Del Boca F K, Noll J A. Truth or consequences: the validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction 2000; 95(3):347–360. [CROSSREF]
  • Junger-Tas J, Marshall I H. The self-report methodology in crime research. In: Tonry M, ed. Crime Justice. University of Chicago Press, 1999:291–366.
  • Knight K, Holcum M, Simpson D D. TCU Psychosocial Functioning and Motivation Scales: Manual on Psychometric Properties. Fort Worth, TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1994.
  • Simpson D D. TCU Forms Manual: Drug Abuse Treatment for AIDS-Risk Reduction (DATAR). Fort Worth, TX: Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, 1992.
  • Simpson D D, Joe G W. Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy 1993; 30:357–367.
  • Kinlock T W, O'Grady K E, Hanlon T E. Differentiation of Substance Abuser Inmates on the Basis of Self-Reported Criminality. Paper presented at the 51st annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Toronto, Canada, November, 1999.
  • Nurco D N, Hanlon T E, Kinlock T W, Duszynski K R. The consistency of criminal behavior over preaddiction, addiction, and nonaddiction status periods. Compr Psychiatry 1989; 30:391–402. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
  • Hiller M L, Knight K, Simpson D. Risk factors that predict dropout from corrections-based treatment for drug abuse. Prison J 1999; 79:411–430.
  • Nurco D N. A long-term program of research on drug use and crime. Subst Use Misuse 1998; 33:1817–1837. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
  • Nurco D N, Kinlock T W, Hanlon T E. The nature and status of drug abuse treatment. Md Med J 1994; January; 43:51–57.
  • Agresti A. Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data. New York: Wiley, 1984.
  • Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1990.
  • Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley, 1989.
  • McCullagh P, Nelder J A. Generalized Linear Models. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall, 1989.
  • Wish E, Hoffman J, Nemes S. The validity of self-reports of drug use at treatment admission and at follow-up: comparisons with urinalysis and hair assays. In: Harrison, L D, ed. The Validity of Self-Reports: Implications for Survey Research. Vol 167. NIDA Monograph, Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1997:200–226.
  • Wish E D, Gropper B A. Drug testing in the criminal justice system. In: Tonry M, Wilson J Q, eds. Drugs and Crime (Crime Justice). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990::321–391.
  • Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). The National Drug Control Strategy Annual Report. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, Office of National Drug Control Policy, 2001.
  • Senese J D, Kalinich D B. Activities and rehabilitation programs for offenders. In: Stojkovic S, Lovell R, eds. Corrections: an Introduction. 2nd ed. Cincinnati: Anderson, 1997:199–235.
  • Nurco D N, Hanlon T E, Kinlock T W, Duszynski K R. Differential criminal patterns of narcotic addicts over an addiction career. Criminol 1988; 26:407–423. [CSA]
  • Shaffer J W, Nurco D N, Kinlock T W. A new classification of narcotic addicts based on type and extent of criminal activity. Compr Psychiatry 1984; 25:315–328. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
  • Johnson B D, Goldstein P, Preble E, Schmeidler J, Lipton D S, Spunt B, Miller T. Taking care of business: the economics of crime by heroin abusers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1985.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.