Effect of Peers on Employment and Implications for Drug Treatment

References

• Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. L. No. 104-193, § 103, 110 Stat. 2113 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel D B, Yamahuchi K. Job mobility and drug use: an event history analysis.Am J Sociol 1978; 92(4):836–878. [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Gill A M, Michaels R J. Does drug use lower wages?Ind Labor Relat Rev 1992; 45:419–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Register C A, Williams D. Labor market effects of marijuana and cocaine use among young men.Ind Labor Relat Rev 1992; 45:435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delva J, Neumark Y, Furr C, Anthony J. Drug use among welfare recipients in the United States.Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2000; 26(2):335–342. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson K, Pavetti L. Personal and Family Challenges to the Successful Transition from Welfare to Work. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Zedlewski S. Work-Related Activities and Limitations of Current Welfare Recipients: Assessing the New Federalism. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Jayakody R, Danziger S, Pollack H. Welfare reform, substance abuse, and mental health. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Washington, D. C., September 3, 1998, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Sisco C, Pearson C. Prevalence of alcoholism and drug abuse among female AFDC recipients.Health Soc Work 1994; 19(1):75–77. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant B, Dawson D. Alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence among welfare recipients.Am J Public Health 1996; 86(10):1450–1453. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson A, Meckstroth A. Ancillary services to support welfare to work. Prepared by Mathematic Policy Research for the US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Bray J W, Zarkin G A, Dennis M L, French M T. Symptoms of dependence, multiple substance use, and labor market outcomes.Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2000; 26(1):77–95. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Kuhl J, Beckmann J, eds. Hiedelberg: Springer, 1985, Chapter 2.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991; 50:179–211.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein M. A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications. Paper Presented at the Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd ed. New York: The Free Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Dinges M M, Oetting E. Similarity in drug use patterns between adolescents and their friends.Adolescence 1993; 28(110):253–266. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadyen R, Thomas J. Economic and psychological models of job search behavior of the unemployed.Hum Relat 1997; 50(12):1361–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinokur A, Caplan R. Attitudes and social support: determinants of job-seeking behavior and well-being among the unemployed.J Appl Soc Psychol 1987; 17(12):1007–1024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rife J C, Belcher J R. Social support and job search intensity among older unemployed workers: implications for employment counselors.J Employ Couns 1993; 30(3):98–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbrugge L. The structure of adult friendship choices.Soc Forces 1977; 56(2):576–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiebout C. A pure theory of local expenditures.J Polit Econ 1956; 64:217–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brueckner J, Lee K. Club theory with a peer-group effects.Reg Sci Urban Econ 1989; 19:399–420, August. [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bartolome C. Equilibrium and inefficiency in a community model with peer group effects.J Polit Econ 1990; 98:1226–1259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson V, Mieszkowski P, Sauvageau Y. Peer group effects and educational production function.J Public Econ 1978; 10:97–106. [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summer A, Wolfe B. Do schools make a difference?Am Econ Rev 1977; 67:217–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans W, Oates W, Schwab R. Measuring peer group effects: a study of teenage behavior.J Polit Econ 1992; 100(5):966–991. [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher L, Bauman K. Influence and selection in the friend-adolescent relationship: findings from studies of adolescent smoking and drinking.J Appl Soc Psychol 1988; 18:289–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullers S, Cooper M, Russell M. Social drinking network and adult alcohol involvement: a longitudinal exploration of the direction of influence.Addict Behav 2001; 26(2):181–199. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royce J, Corbett K, Sorensen G, Ockene J. Gender, social pressure, and smoking cessations: the community intervention trial for smoking cessaation (COMMIT) at baseline.Soc Sci Med 1997; 44(3):359–370. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt R, Peterson A. Smoking cessation among high school seniors.Prev Med 1998; 27(3):319–327., [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson J, Trevino R, Montoya I, Richard A. Labor force participation in a sample of substance users.Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2000; 26(3):355–367. [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson J, Lee D, Dayton-Shotts C, French C. Self-perceived job skills and employment barriers among non-drug using and chronic drug-using welfare to work participants.J Drug Issues 2001; 31(3):747–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya I, Atkinson J, Struse H. A comparison of psychosocial barriers among welfare recipients: implications for drug treatment and health services.J Subst Use Misuse 2001; 36(6/7):771–788. [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Arbuckel J. Amos Users' Guide Version 3.6. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation, 1997.
   Google Scholar