Circadian Blood Pressure Variability in Normotensive Pregnant Women as a Function of Parity, Maternal Age, and Stage of Gestation

References

• Abitbol G., Reinberg A., Mechkouri M. Variability in the period of the blood pressure circadian rhythm in human beings. Chronobiol. Int. 1997; 14: 307–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayala D. E., Hermida R. C., Mojón A., Fernández J. R., Iglesias M. Circadian blood pressure variability in healthy and complicated pregnancies. Hypertension 1997a; 30: 603–610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayala D. E., Hermida R. C., Mojón A., Fernández J. R., Silva I., Ucieda R., Iglesias M. Blood pressure variability during gestation in healthy and complicated pregnancies. Hypertension 1997b; 30: 611–618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barden A. E., Beilin L. J., Ritchie J., Walters B. N., Graham D., Michael C. A. Is proteinuric pre‐eclampsia a different disease in primigravida and multigravida?. Clin Sci. (Colch) 1999; 97: 475–483
   Google Scholar
• Benedetto C., Zonca M., Marozio L., Dolco C., Carandente F., Massobrio M. Blood pressure patterns in normal pregnancy and in pregnancy‐induced hypertension, preeclampsia, and chronic hypertension. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996; 88: 503–510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M. A., Lindheimer M. D., de Swiet M., Van Assche A., Moutquin J. M. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: Statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens. Pregnancy 2001; 20: ix–xiv
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesley L. C. The remote prognostic significance of the level of blood pressure in pregnancy. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 1980; 2: 777–801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesley S. C., Annitto J. E., Cosgrove R. A. The remote prognosis of eclamptic women. Sixth periodic report. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1976; 124: 446–459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson R. E. Studies on blood pressure during pregnancy. 1. Influence of parity and age. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1976; 125: 509–513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey D. A., MacGillivray I. The classification and definition of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1988; 158: 892–898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskenazi B., Fenster L., Sidney S. A multivariate analysis of risk factors for preeclampsia. JAMA 1991; 266: 237–241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskenazi B., Fenster L., Sidney S., Elkin E. P. Fetal growth retardation in infants of multiparous and nulliparous women with preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993; 169: 1112–1118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández J. R., Hermida R. C. Inferential statistical method for analysis of nonsinusoidal hybrid time series with unequidistant observations. Chronobiol. Int. 1998; 15: 191–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández J. R., Mojón A., Hermida R. C. Comparison of parameters from rhythmometric models with multiple components on hybrid data. Chronobiol. Int. 2004; 21: 469–484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleicher N., Boler L. R., Norusis M., Del Granado A. Hypertensive diseases in pregnancy and parity. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1986; 154: 1044–1049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnlaugsson S. R., Geirsson R. T., Snaedal G., Hallgrimsson J. T. Incidence and relation to parity of pregnancy‐induced hypertension in Iceland. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1989; 68: 599–601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan A., Shennan A., Thurston H., de Swiet M., Taylor D. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement in pregnancy: The current state of the art. Hypertens. Preg. 1995; 14: 1–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C. Time‐qualified reference values for 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Blood Press. Monit. 1999; 4: 137–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Ayala D. E. Prognostic value of office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements in pregnancy. Hypertension 2002; 40: 298–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Ayala D. E. Sampling requirements for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy. Hypertension 2003; 42: 619–624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Ayala D. E., Mojón A., Fernández J. R., Silva I., Ucieda R., Iglesias M. High sensitivity test for the early diagnosis of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. IV. Early detection of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia by the computation of a hyperbaric index. J. Perinat. Med. 1997a; 25: 254–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Fernández J. R., Mojón A. High sensitivity test for the early diagnosis of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. III. Computation of time‐specified tolerance intervals as reference for blood pressure excess in the diagnosis of gestational hypertension. J. Perinatal Med. 1997b; 25: 237–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Ayala D. E., Mojón A., Fernández J. R., Silva I., Ucieda R., Iglesias M. Blood pressure excess for the early identification of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Hypertension 1998; 31: 83–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Ayala D. E., Mojón A., Fernández J. R., Alonso I., Silva I., Ucieda R., Iglesias M. Blood pressure patterns in normal pregnancy, gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Hypertension 2000a; 36: 149–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Fernández J. R., Mojón A., Ayala D. E. Reproducibility of the hyperbaric index as a measure of blood pressure excess. Hypertension 2000b; 35: 118–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Ayala D. E., Iglesias M. Predictable blood pressure variability in healthy and complicated pregnancies. Hypertension 2001a; 38: 736–741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Ayala D. E., Mojón A., Fernández J. R. Time‐qualified reference values for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy. Hypertension 2001b; 38: 746–752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Ayala D. E., Fernández J. R., Mojón A., Alonso I., Calvo C. Modeling the circadian variability of ambulatorily monitored blood pressure by multiple‐component analysis. Chronobiol. Int. 2002a; 19: 461–481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Calvo C., Ayala D. E., Fernández J. R., Ruilope L. M., López J. E. Evaluation of the extent and duration of the “ABPM effect” in hypertensive patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002b; 40: 710–717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Mojón A., Fernández J. R., Alonso I., Ayala D. E. The tolerance‐hyperbaric test: A chronobiologic approach for improved diagnosis of hypertension. Chronobiol. Int. 2002c; 19: 1183–1211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Ayala D. E., Iglesias M. Circadian rhythm of blood pressure challengues office values as the “gold standard” in the diagnosis of gestational hypertension. Chronobiol. Int. 2003a; 20: 135–156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Ayala D. E., Mojón A., Fernández J. R., Alonso I., Aguilar M. F., Ucieda R., Iglesias M. Differences in circadian blood pressure variability during gestation between healthy and complicated pregnancies. Am. J. Hypertens. 2003b; 16: 200–208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Ayala D. E., Fernández J. R., Mojón A., Iglesias M. Reproducibility of the tolerance‐hyperbaric test for diagnosing hypertension in pregnancy. J. Hypertens. 2004a; 22: 565–572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermida R. C., Fernández J. R., Ayala D. E., Mojón A., Alonso I., Calvo C. Circadian time‐qualified tolerance intervals for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis of hypertension. Chronobiol. Int. 2004b; 21: 149–170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochner‐Celnikier D., Shimonovitz S., Bursztyn M., Zcut D., Yagel S., Ron M. The prognosis of hypertensive diseases of pregnancy accompanied by intrauterine growth retardation in relation to parity. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1993; 72: 531–533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979; 6: 65–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James G. D., Pickering T. G. The influence of behavioral factors on the daily variation of blood pressure. Am. J. Hypertens 1993; 6: 170S–173S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle P. M., Clark S. J., Buckley D., Kissane J., Coats A. J.S., de Swiet M., Redman C. W.G. Second trimester ambulatory blood pressure in nulliparous pregnancy: a useful screening test for pre‐eclampsia? Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1993; 100: 914–919
   Google Scholar
• Lee Feldstein A., Harburg E., Hauenstein L. Parity and blood pressure among four race‐stress groups of females in Detroit. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1980; 111: 356–366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lemmer B. Cardiovascular chronobiology and chronopharmacology. Biologic Rhythms in Clinical and Laboratory Medicine, Y. Touitou, E. Haus. Springer‐Verlag, BerlinGermany 1992; 418–427
   Google Scholar
• Margulies M., Voto L. S., Fescina R., Lastra L., Lapidus A. M., Schwarcz R. Arterial blood pressure standards during normal pregnancy and their relation with mother‐fetus variables. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1987; 156: 1105–1109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marín R., Gorostidi M., Portal C. G., Sánchez M., Sánchez E., Alvarez J. Long‐term prognosis of hypertension in pregnancy. Hypertens. Preg. 2000; 19: 199–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojón A., Fernández J. R., Hermida R. C. Chronolab: An interactive software package for chronobiologic time series analysis written for the Macintosh™ computer. Chronobiol. Int. 1992; 9: 403–412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moutquin J. M., Bilodeau R., Raynault P., Amyot G., Blair J. F., Labelle L., Rainville C., Gagnon L. Prospective study of arterial pressure during pregnancy. Prediction of hypertensive complications. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris) 1982; 11: 833–837
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ness R. B., Kramer R. A., Flegal K. M. Gravidity, blood pressure, and hypertension among white women in the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Epidemiology 1993; 4: 303–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odegard R. A., Vatten L. J., Nilsen S. T., Salvesen K. A., Austgulen R. Risk factors and clinical manifestations of pre‐eclampsia. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2000; 107: 1410–1416
   Google Scholar
• Okonofua F. E., Balogun J. A., Amiengheme N. A., O'Brien S. P. Blood pressure changes during pregnancy in Nigerian women. Int. J. Cardiol. 1992; 37: 373–379
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page E. W., Christianson R. The impact of mean arterial pressure in the middle trimester upon the outcome of pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1976; 125: 740–746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson H. R. Sources of error in recording the blood pressure of patients with hypertension in general practice. BMJ 1984; 289: 1661–1664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penny J. A., Halligan A., Shennan A. H., Lambert P. C., Jones D. R., de Swiet M., Taylor D. J. Automated, ambulatory, or conventional blood pressure measurement in pregnancy: Which is the better predictor of severe hypertension?. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998; 178: 521–526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portaluppi F., Smolensky M. H. Circadian rhythm and environmental determinants of blood pressure regulation in normal and hypertensive conditions. Blood Pressure Monitoring in Cardiovascular Medicine and Therapeutics, W. B. White. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ 2000; 79–118
   Google Scholar
• Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: S1–S22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassano P., Chatellier G., Corvol P., Ménard J. Influence of observer's expectation on the placebo effect in blood pressure trials. Curr. Ther. Res. 1987; 41: 305–312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shennan A., Halligan A. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy. Fetal and Maternal Med. Rev. 1998; 10: 69–89
   Google Scholar
• Shennan A. H., Kissane J., de Swiet M. Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor for use in pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1993; 100: 904–908
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sibai B. M. Pitfalls in diagnosis and management of preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1988; 159: 1–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sica D. A., Wilson D. K. Sodium, potassium, the sympathetic nervous system, and the renin‐angiotensin system: Impact on the circadian variability in blood pressure. Blood Pressure Monitoring in Cardiovascular Medicine and Therapeutics, W. B. White. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ 2000; 171–190
   Google Scholar
• Staessen J., Fagard R., Lijnen P., Thijs L., Vaa Hoof R., Amery A. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical trials. J. Hypertens. 1991; 9(Suppl1)s13–s19
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K., Ishii H., Mukaiyama S., Halberg F. Clinical significance of ABPM over 48 h rather than 24 h. The Statistician 1990; 39: 301–306
   Google Scholar
• Touitou Y., Portaluppi F., Smolensky M. H., Rensing L. Ethical principles and standards for the conduct of human and animal biological rhythm research. Chronobiol. Int. 2004; 21: 161–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollman R. F. Blood pressure, edema and proteinuria in pregnancy. 3. Study design, population and data characteristics. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1976; 7: 89–122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilcox J. Observer factors in the measurement of blood pressure. Nursing Res. 1961; 10: 4–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar