Influence of Manufacturing Process on Tabletting Ability of Powder: Comparison Between Blending, Grinding, and Spray Drying of Two Formulations Made of Theophylline and Lactose/Cellulose or Cellactose®

REFERENCES

• Arnaud Ph., Brossard D., Chaumeil J.C. Effect of the Granulation Process on Nitrofurantoin Granule Characteristics. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1998; 24(1)57–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielden K.E., Newton J.M., Rowe R.C. The Influence of Lactose Particle Size on Spheronization of Extrudate Processed by a Ram Extruder. Int. J. Pharm. 1992; 81: 225–233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamlen M.J., Seager H., Warrack J.K. The Structure and Tablet Properties of Paracetamol Granules Prepared in a Fluidized Bed and by Wet Massing. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Prod. Manuf. 1982; 3(4)108–114
   Google Scholar
• Record P.C. A Review of Pharmaceutical Granulation Technology. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Prod. Manuf. 1980; 1(2)32–39
   Google Scholar
• Riepma K.A., Vromans H., Zuurman K., Lerk C.F. The Effect of Dry Granulation on the Consolidation and Compaction of Crystalline Lactose. Int. J. Pharm. 1993; 97: 29–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seager H., Burt I., Ryder J., Rue P., Murray S., Beal N., Warrack J.K. The Relationship Between Granule Structure, Process of Manufacture and the Tabletting Properties of a Granulated Product. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Prod. Manuf. 1979; 1(1)36–44
   Google Scholar
• Wikberg M., Alderbörn G. Compression Characteristics of Granulated Materials. III. The Relationship Between Air Permeability and Mechanical Strength of Tablets of Some Lactose Granulations. Int. J. Pharm. 1990; 63: 23–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikberg M., Alderbörn G. Compression Characteristics of Granulated Materials. VI. Pore Size Distributions, Assessed by Mercury Penetration, of Compacts of Two Lactose Granulations with Different Fragmentation Propensities. Int. J. Pharm. 1992; 84: 191–195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikberg M., Alderbörn G. Compression Characteristics of Granulated Materials. VII. The Effect of Intragranular Binder Distribution on the Compactibility of Some Lactose Granulations. Pharm. Res. 1993; 10(1)88–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viana M., Caramigeas E., Vachon M.G., N’Dri–Stempfer B., Chulia D. Effect of Formulation Excipients and the Manufacturing Process for Solid Dosage Form on the Initial Dissolution of Theophylline, S.T.P. Pharm. Sci. 2000; 10(5)363–371
   Google Scholar
• Heckel R.W. Density–Pressure Relationships in Powder Compaction. Trans. Met. Soc., AIME 1961; 221: 671–675
   Google Scholar
• Fell J.T., Newton J.M. Effect of Particle Size and Speed of Compaction on Density Changes in Tablets of Crystalline and Spray-Dried Lactose. J. Pharm. Sci. 1971; 60(12)1866–1869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebhatu T., Alderborn G. Relationships Between the Effective Interparticulate Contact Area and the Tensile Strength of Tablets of Amorphous and Crystalline Lactose of Varying Particle Size. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 1999; 8: 235–242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonemochi E., Kitahara S., Maeda S., Yamamura S., Oguchi T., Yamamoto K. Physicochemical Properties of Amorphous Clarithromycin Obtained by Grinding and Spray Drying. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 1999; 7: 331–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vromans M., De Boer A.H., Bolhuis G.K., Lerk C.F., Kussendrager K.D. Studies on Tableting Properties of Lactose; the Effect of Initial Particle Size on Binding Properties and Dehydration Characteristics of α-Lactose Monohydrate. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1986; 12(11–13)1715–1730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderbörn G., Nyström C. Studies on Direct Compression of Tablets. XIV. The Effect of Powder Fineness on the Relation Between Tablet Permeametry Surface Area and Compaction Pressure. Powder Technol. 1985; 44: 37–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabaude C.M.D., Guillot M., Gautier J.-C., Saudemon P., Chulia D. Effects of True Density, Compacted Mass, Compression Speed, and Punch Deformation on the Mean Yield Pressure. J. Pharm. Sci. 1999; 88(7)725–730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monedero M. Perales, Munoz-Ruiz A., Velasco M.V. Antequera, Jimenez-Castellanos M.R. Ballesteros. Study of the Compaction Mechanisms of Lactose-Based Direct Compression Excipients Using Indentation Hardness and Heckel Plots. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1994; 46: 177–181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belda M., Mielck J.B. The Tabletting Behaviour of Cellactose® Compared with Mixtures of Celluloses with Lactoses. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 1996; 42(5)325–330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderbörn G., Duberg M., Nyström C. Studies on Direct Compression of Tablets. X. Measurement of Tablet Surface Area by Permeametry. Powder Technol. 1985; 41: 49–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyström C., Alderbörn G., Duberg M., Karehill P.G. Bonding Surface Area and Bonding Mechanism—Two Important Factors for the Understanding of Powder Compactability. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1993; 19(17&18)2143–2196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikberg M., Alderbörn G. Compression Characteristics of Granulated Materials. II. Evaluation of Granule Fragmentation During Compression by Tablet Permeametry and Porosity Measurements. Int. J. Pharm. 1990; 62: 229–241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt P.C., Rubensdörfer C.J.W. Evaluation of Ludipress as a “Multipurpose Excipient” for Direct Compression. Part I. Powder Characteristics and Tableting Properties. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1994; 20(18)2899–2925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikberg M., Alderbörn G. Compression Characteristics of Granulated Materials. IV. The Effect of Granule Porosity on the Fragmentation Propensity and the Compactibility of Some Granulation. Int. J. Pharm. 1991; 69: 239–253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna A., McCafferty D.F. Effect of Particle Size on the Compaction Mechanism and Tensile Strength of Tablets. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1982; 34: 347–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar