Drug Product Development: A Technical Review of Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information for the Support of Pharmaceutical Compound Licensing Activities

References

• International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements For Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline, The Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use: Quality—M4Qmeetingname, Quality Overall Summary of Module 2, Module 3: Quality, Step 4 of the ICH Process, 9. November, 2000, 1–18, http://www.ich.org/ich5c.html#Quality (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• DiFeo T.J. Pharmaceutical drug substance due diligence—a CMC technical assessment. Pharmaceutical Engineering 2004, in press
   Google Scholar
• Chowhan Z.T. Excipients and their functionality in drug product development. Pharmaceutical Technology 1993; 17(9)72–82
   Google Scholar
• Katzhendler I., Azoury R., Friedman M. Crystalline properties of carbamazepine in sustained release hydrophilic matrix tablets based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Journal of Controlled Release 1998; 54: 69–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley P.J. Excipients as stabilizers. Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Today 1999; 2(6)237–243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shalaev E.Y., Zografi G. How does residual water affect the solid-state degradation of drugs in the amorphous state?. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1996; 85(11)1137–1141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock B.C., Shamblin S.L. Water vapour sorption by pharmaceutical sugars. Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Today 1998; 1(8)345–351
   Google Scholar
• Thoma K., Klimek R. Photoinstability and stabilization of drugs. Possibilities of a generally applicable stabilization principle. Pharmazeutische Industrie 1991; 53(5)504–507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson K., Young D., Pant S. Drug/excipient interactions and their affect on absorption. Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Today 2000; 3(10)336–345
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajewski R.A., Stella V.J. Pharmaceutical applications of cyclodextrins. 2. In vivo drug delivery. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1996; 85(11)1142–1169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug AdministrationCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for Industry, Waiver of In-Vivo Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Based on a Biopharmaceuticals Classification System, Rockville, MD, August, 2000, 1–13, http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/3618fnl.pdf (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Lobenberg R., Amidon G.L. Modern bioavailability, bioequivalence, and biopharmaceutics classification system. New scientific approaches to international regulatory standards. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2000; 50: 3–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinonen U.I., Jalonen H.U., Vihervaara P.A., Laine S.U. Physical and lubrication properties of magnesium stearate. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1992; 81(12)1194–1198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinkova G.N. Studies of beneficial interactions between active medicaments and excipients in pharmaceutical formulations. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1999; 187: 1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pifferi G., Santoro P., Pedrani M. Quality and functionality of excipients. Il Farmaco 1999; 54: 1–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products Note for Guidance on Development Pharmaceutics CPMP/QWP/155/96. January, 281998, 1–8, http://www.emea. eu.int/pdfs/human/qwp/015596en.pdf (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Guidance for Industry, Drug Product, Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls Information, Draft Guidance, Rockville, Maryland, January, 2003, 1–62, http://www.fda. gov/cder/guidance/1215dft.pdf (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Draft Guidance for Industry, “Nonclinical Studies for Development of Pharmaceutical Excipients. September, 2002, 1–78, http://www. fda.gov/cder/guidance/3812dft.pdf (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Heng P.W., Chan L.W. Drug substance and excipient characterization. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Granulation Technology, D.M. Parikh. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY 1997; Vol. 81: 25–57
   Google Scholar
• Giron D., Goldbronn C., Mutz M., Pfeffer S., Piechon P., Schwab P. Solid state characterization of pharmaceutical hydrates. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 2002; 68(2)453–465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Human ServicesFood and Drug Administration21 CFR Part 170.3April 1, 2002 http://www.access. gpo.gov/cgi-bin/cfrassemble.cgi?title=200221 (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• , The Council of the European Communities, Council Directive 89/107/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the Authorization of the Laws of the Member States Concerning Food Additives Authorized for use in Foodstuffs for Human Consumption, as Amended by Directive 94/34/EEC; http://europa.eu.int//comm/food/fs/sfp//addit_flavor /flav07_en.pdf (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Byrn S.R., Xu W., Newman A. Chemical reactivity in solid-state pharmaceuticals: formulation implications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2001; 48: 115–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth D.D., Baertschi S.W., Johnson R.A., Maple S.R., Miller M.S., Hallenbeck D.K., Gregg S.M. Maillard reaction of lactose and fluoxetine hydrochloride, a secondary amine. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1998; 87(1)31–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serajuddin A.T.M., Thakur A.B., Ghoshal R.N., Fakes M.G., Ranadive S.A., Morris K.R., Varia S.A. Selection of solid dosage form composition through drug/excipient compatibility testing. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1999; 88(7)696–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malan C.E.P., de Villiers M.M., Lotter A.P. Application of differential scanning calorimetry and high performance liquid chromatography to determine the effects of mixture composition and preparation during the evaluation of niclosamide-excipient compatibility. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 1997; 15: 549–557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giron D. Contribution of thermal methods and related techniques to the rational development of pharmaceuticals—part 1. Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Today 1998; 1(5)191–199
   Google Scholar
• Balestrieri F., Magri A.D., Magri A.L., Marini D., Sacchini A. Application of differential scanning calorimetry to the study of drug/excipient compatibility. Thermochimica Acta 1996; 285: 337–345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodante F., Vecchio S., Catalani G., Tomassetti M. Compatibility between active components of a commercial drug. Il Farmaco 2002; 57: 833–843
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wissing S., Craig D.Q.M., Barker S.A., Moore W.D. An investigation into the use of stepwise isothermal high sensitivity DSC as a means of detecting drug/excipient incompatibility. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2000; 199: 141–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni G., Amici L., Berbenni V., Marini A., Orlandi A. Drug/excipient compatibility studies search of interaction indicators. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 2002; 68: 561–573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaid F.M., Barker S.A., Fitzpatrick S., Petts C.R., Craig D.Q.M. Further investigations into the use of high sensitivity differential scanning calorimetry as a means of predicting drug/excipient interactions. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2003; 252: 235–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt E.A., Peck K., Sun Y., Geoffroy J.-M. Rapid, practical and predictive excipient compatibility screening using isothermal microcalorimetry. Thermochimica Acta 2001; 380: 175–183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z., Wang Q., Tsai E.W., Qin X.-Z., Ip D. Identification of losartan degradates in stressed tablets by LC-MS and LC-MS/MS. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 1999; 20: 129–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasheve L., Kalinkova G., Minkov E., Krestev V. IR spectroscopic investigations of amoxicillin trihydrate, included on the technological models syrup granules in ethyl cellulose. Journal of Molecular Structure 1984; 115: 323–326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick S., McCabe J.F., Petts C.R., Booth S.W. Effect of moisture on polyvinylpyrrolidone in accelerated stability testing. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2002; 246: 143–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassel B.R., Riga A.T., Biddlecom B. Methodology for the Thermal Analysis of Excipients. Proceedings of the NATAS Annual Conference on Thermal Analysis and Applications, 30th Conference. 2002, 90–95
   Google Scholar
• International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements For Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline, Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria For New Drug Substances and New Drug Products: Chemical Substances. Q6A, Step 4 of the ICH Process. October, 61999, http://www.ich.org/pdfICH/q6a.pdf (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Nema S., Washkuhn R.J., Brendel R.J. Excipients and their use in injectable products. PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology 1997; 51(4)166–171
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Powell M.F., Nguyen T., Baloian L. Compendium of excipients for parenteral formulations. PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology 1998; 52(5)238–311
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akers M.J. Excipient-drug interactions in parenteral formulations. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2002; 91(11)2283–2300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peswani K.S., Lalla J.K. Naproxen parenteral formulation studies. Journal of Parenteral Science and Technology 1990; 44(6)336–342
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakamura K., Yokohama S., Sonobe T. Failure of stability prediction for minodronic acid injectable by accelerated stability testing. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2002; 241: 65–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez G., Pikal M.J., Rodriguez-Hornedo N. Effect of initial buffer composition on pH changes during far-from-equilibrium freezing of sodium phosphate buffer solutions. Pharmaceutical Research 2001; 18(1)90–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz S.A., Bigwarfe P.M., Balasubramanian S.V., Fetterly G.J., Straubinger R.M., Wood T.D. Noncovalent dimerization of paclitaxel in solution: evidence from electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2002; 91(9)2057–2065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson D.B., Conradi R.A., Johnson K. Influence of premicellar and micellar association on the reactivity of methylprednisolone 21-hemieters in aqueous solution. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1983; 72(4)448–454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleditsch E., Waaler P.J. Accelerated stability studies of morphine injections in plastic ampoules. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2001; 212: 275–287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP). Decision Trees for the Selection of Sterilisation Methods, (CPMP/QWP/054/98), London, April, 52000, 1–38, http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/qwp/005498en.pdf (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP). Draft Note for Guidance on Excipients, Antioxidants and Anitmicrobial Preservatives in the Dossier for Application for Marketing Authorization of a Medicinal Product (CPMP/QWP/419/03), London, February, 202003, 1–9, http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/qwp/041903en.pdf (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Akers M.J., Fites A.L., Robison R.L. Formulation design and development of parenteral suspensions. Journal of Parenteral Science and Technology 1987; 41(3)88–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koppolu A. Settling of solids in suspension formulations. Pharmaceutical Technology 2002; 26(12)48, 50–52, 54
   Google Scholar
• Antal E.J., Dick C.F., Wright C.E., Welshman I.R., Block E.M. Comparative bioavailability of two medroxyprogesterone acetate suspensions. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1989; 54: 33–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X., Young T.J., Sarkari M., Williams R.O., Johnston K.P. Preparation of cyclosporine a nonoparticles by evaporative precipitation into aqueous solution. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2002; 242: 3–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilfiker R., von Raumer M., Geoffroy A., Blatter F., Haesslin H.-W. Bioperfomance improvement: small particles and optimal polymorphs. Chimia 2001; 55(9)699–703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabalnov A., Weers J., Arlauskas R., Tarara T. Phospholipids as emulsion stabilizers. 1. Interfacial tensions. Langmuir 1995; 11: 2966–2974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welin-Berger K., Bergenstahl B. Inhibition of ostwald ripening in local anesthetic emulsions by using hydrophobic excipients in the disperse phase. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2000; 200: 249–260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boylan J.C., Fites A.L., Nail S.L. Parenteral products. Drugs and the Pharmaceutical Sciences, Modern Pharmaceutics, 3rd Ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York 1995; Vol. 72: 441–487
   Google Scholar
• Reier G.E. Excipient standardization: user's viewpoint. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 1987; 13(13)2389–2407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittain H.G., Sachs C., Fiorelli K. Physical characterization of pharmaceutical excipients: practical examples. Pharmaceutical Technology 1991; 15(10)38, 40, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52
   Google Scholar
• Malamataris S., Goidas P., Dimitriou A. Moisture sorption and tensile strength of some tableted direct compression excipients. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1991; 68(1–3)51–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger A., Henck J.-O., Hetz S., Rollinger J.M., Weissnicht A.A., Stottner H. Energy/temperature diagram and compression behavior of the polymorphs of d-mannitol. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2000; 89(4)457–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris K.R., Nail S.L., Peck G.E., Byrn S.R., Griesser U.J., Stowell J.G., Hwang S.-J., Park K. Advances in pharmaceutical materials and processing. Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Today 1998; 1(6)235–245
   Google Scholar
• Tan S.B., Newton J.M. Powder flowability as an indication of capsule filing performance. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1990; 61(1–2)145–155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullarney M.P., Hancock B.C., Carlson G.T., Ladipo D.D., Langdon B.A. The powder flow and compact mechanical properties of sucrose and three high-intensity sweeteners used in chewable tablets. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2003; 257: 227–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubost D.C., Kaufman M.J., Zimmerman J.A., Bogusky M.J., Coddington A.B., Pitzenberger S.M. Characterization of a solid state reaction product from a lyophilized formulation of a cyclic heptapeptide. A novel example of an excipient-induced oxidation. Pharmaceutical Research 1996; 13(12)1811–1814
   Google Scholar
• Kasraian K., Kuzniar A.A., Wilson G.G., Wood J.A. Developing an injectable formula containing an oxygen sensitive drug: a case study of danofloxacin injectable. Pharmaceutical Development and Technology 1999; 4(4)475–480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowhan Z.T. A rational approach to setting limit tests and standards on impurities in excipients. Pharmaceutical Technology 1995; 19(8)43–44, 46–48
   Google Scholar
• Bugay D.E. Characterization of the solid-state: spectroscopic techniques. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2001; 48: 43–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Lorenzo C., Gomez-Amoza J.L., Martinez-Pacheco R., Souto C., Concheiro A. Evaluation of low-substituted hydroxypropylcelluloses (L-HPCs) as filler-binders for direct compression. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2000; 197: 107–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petereit H.-U., Weisbrod W. Formulation and process considerations affecting the stability of solid dosage forms formulated with methacrylate copolymers. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 1999; 47: 15–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson J., Lindberg N.-O., Lundstedt T. Multivariate methods in pharmaceutical applications. Journal of Chemometrics 2002; 16: 141–160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armbruster D., Feldsien T. Applying HACCP to pharmaceutical process validation. Pharmaceutical Technology 2000; 24(10)170, 172, 174, 176, 178
   Google Scholar
• Cups T., Fritschel B., Mavroudakis W., Mitchell M., Ridge D., Wyvratt J. PhRMA perspectives on drug substance regulatory filing issues. Starting material, reprocessing, retesting, and critical controls. Pharmaceutical Technology 2003, February, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52
   Google Scholar
• Mollan M.J., Chang N., Celik M. The effect of reworking on the postcompaction properties of microcrystalline cellulose formulations. Pharmaceutical Technology 1995; 19(10)58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70
   Google Scholar
• Chen C.Z., Yegneswaran P.K. Bioburden Monitoring and Establishment of Bioburden Specifications for Bioprocesses. Abstracts of Papers, 225th American Chemical Society National Meeting, New Orleans, LA, March, 23–272003
   Google Scholar
• Krishna G., Hodnick W.F., Lang W., Lin X., Karra S., Mao J., Almassian B. Pharmaceutical development and manufacturing of a parenteral formulation of a novel antitumor agent, VNP40101M. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2001; 2(3)1–9, http://www. aapspharmscitech.org/view.asp?path=pt0203/pt020 314/pt020314.xml&pdf=yes (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Nyqvist H., Nicklasson M. Flow properties of compressible lactose containing small quantities of drug substances. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy 1985; 11(4)745–759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly J.P., Welch J.V. Monitor lyophilization with mass spectrometer gas analysis. Journal of Parenteral Science and Technology 1993; 47(2)70–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lasky F.D., Boser R.B. Designing in quality through design control: a manufacturer's perspective. Clinical Chemistry 1997; 43(5)866–872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templeton A.C., Han Y.-H.R., Mahajan R., Chern R.T., Reed R.A. Rapid headspace oxygen analysis for pharmaceutical packaging applications. Pharmaceutical Technology 2002; 26(7)44–46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 61
   Google Scholar
• Franke H., Hencken P., Ross G., Kreuter J. A two-step procedure for the selection of a suitable rubber stopper for use with parenteral containers. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 1995; 41(6)395–401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Guide to Inspections of Microbiological Pharmaceutical Quality Control Laboratories. July, 1993, http://www.fda.gov/ora/inspect_ref/ igs/micro.html (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Tang S. Microbial limits reviewed: the basis for unique Australian regulatory requirements for microbial quality of nonsterile pharmaceuticals. PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology 1998; 52(3)100–109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brescia B.A. Microbial examination of nonsterile products—harmonization review. American Pharmaceutical Review 2001; 4(4)42, 44, 45, http://www.americanpharmaceutical review.com/past_articles/4_APR_Winter_2001/ Brescia_article.html (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Manu-Tawiah W., Brescia B.A., Montgomery E.R. Setting threshold limits for the significance of objectionable microorganisms in oral pharmaceutical products. PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology 2001; 55(3)171–175
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine. Guidance for Industry for the Submission Documentation for Sterilization Process Validation in Applications for Human and Veterinary Drug Products, Rockville, Maryland, November, 1994, 1–18, http://www.fda.gov/ cder/guidance/cmc2.pdf (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Williams K.L. Developing an endotoxin control strategy for parenteral drug substances and excipients. Pharmaceutical Technology 1998; 22(9)90, 92, 94, 96, 99, 102
   Google Scholar
• The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP), Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products (CVMP). Note for Guidance on Process Validation (CPMP/QWP/848/96), London, March, 12001, 1–6, http://www.emea. eu.int/pdfs/vet/qwp/084896en.pdf (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiologic Health. Guideline on General Principles of Process Validation, Rockville, Maryland, May, 1987, 1–13, http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/pv.htm (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP), Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products (CVMP). Note for Guidance on Minimising the Risk of Transmitting Animal Spongiform Encephalopathy Agents via Human and Veterinary Medicinal Products (EMEA/410/01 rev1), London, May, 312001, 1–11, http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/vet/regaffair/041001en.pdf (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements For Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology, Q2B, Step 4 of the ICH Process. November, 61996, 1–8, http://www.ich.org/pdfICH/Q2B.pdf (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements For Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline, Specifications Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for New Drug Substances and New Drug Products: Chemical Substances, Q6A, Step 4 of the ICH Process. October, 61999, 1–20, http://www. ich.org/pdfICH/q6a.pdf (accessed May 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Laasonen M., Rantanen J., Harmia-Pulkkinen T., Michiels E., Hiltunen R., Rasanen M., Vuorela H. Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for the fast identification of PVC-based films. Analyst 2001; 126: 1122–1128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar