DRUG AND ALCOHOL OFFENDERS COERCED INTO TREATMENT: A REVIEW OF MODALITIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR RESEARCH ON SOCIAL MODEL PROGRAMS

REFERENCES

• Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. National Treatment Improvement Evaluation Study (NTIES). US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 1996
   Google Scholar
• Gerstein D. R., Johnson R. A., Harwood H. J., Fountain D., Sutter N., Malloy K. Evaluating Recovery Services: The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment (Contract No. 92-001100). Sacramento: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs: Sacramento, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Farabee D., Prendergast M., Anglin D. The Effectiveness of Coerced Treatment for Drug-abusing Offenders. Federal Probation 1998; 62(1)3–10
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt L., Weisner C. Developments in alcoholism treatment. Recent Developments in Alcoholism, M. Galanter. Plenum, New York 1993; 11
   Google Scholar
• Anglin M. D., Hser Y. Criminal Justice and the Drug Abusing Offender: Policy Issues of Coerced Treatment. Behav. Sci. Law 1991; 9: 243–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins J. J., Allison M. A. Legal Coercion and Retention in Drug Abuse Treatment. Hosp. Commun. Psychiatry 1983; 34(12)1145–1149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doyle H., Tobin J., Delaney W. A Study of the Legal Involvement of New Patient Attenders at a Dublin Alcohol Treatment Unit. Irish J. Psychol. Med. 1992; 9(2)93–95
   Google Scholar
• Hiller M. L., Knight K., Devereux J., Hathcoat M. Postreatment Outcomes for Substance Abusing Probationers Mandated to Residential Treatment. J. Psychoactive Drugs 1996; 28(3)291–296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan A. T., Druley K. A. A Comparison Study of Response to Treatment in Court Referred and Voluntary Drug Patients. Hosp. Commun. Psychiatry 1977; 28(4)241–242
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schnoll S. H., Goldstein M. R., Antes D. E., Rinella V. J. The Impact of Legal Involvement on Substance Abusers in a Residential Treatment Setting. Corrective Soc. Psychol. 1980; 26(1)21–28
   Google Scholar
• Simpson D. D., Friend J. Legal Status and Long-term Outcomes for Addicts in the DARP Follow-up Project. Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice, C. G. Leukefeld, F. M. Tims. NIDA Research Monograph 86, US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 1988; 81–98
   Google Scholar
• Howard D. L., McCaughrin W. C. The Treatment Effectiveness of Outpatient Substance Misuse Treatment Organizations Between Court-mandated and Voluntary Clients. Substance Use Misuse 1996; 31(7)85–926
   Google Scholar
• Salmon R. W., Salmon R. J. The Role of Coercion in Rehabilitation of Drug Abusers. Int. J. Addictions 1983; 18(1)9–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglin M. D., Brecht M. L., Maddahian E. Pretreatment Characteristics and Treatment Performance of Legally Coerced Versus Voluntary Methadone Maintenance Admissions. Criminology 1989; 27: 537–557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecht M., Anglin M. D. Treatment Effectiveness for Legally Coerced Versus Voluntary Methadone Maintenance Clients. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 1993; 19(1)89–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leon G. Legal Pressure in Therapeutic Communities. NIDA Research No. 86, C. G. Leukefeld, F. M. Tims. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD 1988; 160–177
   Google Scholar
• Inciardi J. A. The Effects of Treatment on Crime. National Conference on Drug Addiction Treatment: From Research to Practice, Washington, D.C., April, 81998
   Google Scholar
• Martin S. S., Butzin C. A., Inciardi J. A. Assessment of a Multistage Therapeutic Community for Drug-involved Offenders. J. Psychoactive Drugs 1995; 27(1)109–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler H. K. The Success of Therapeutic Communities for Substance Abusers in American Prisons. J. Psychoactive Drugs 1995; 28(2)147–159
   Google Scholar
• Borkman T. J., Kaskutas L. A., Room J., Bryan K., Barrows D. An Historical and Developmental Analysis of Social Model Programs. J. Substance Abuse Treatment 1998; 15(1)7–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaskutas L. A., Keller J. W. Measuring social model in California: How much has changed under managed care?. Contemporary Drug Problems 2000; 26: 607–631
   Google Scholar
• Kaskutas L. A., Greenfield T. K., Borkman T. J., Room J. A. Measuring Treatment Philosophy: A Scale for Substance Abuse Recovery Programs. J. Substance Abuse Treat. 1998; 15(1)27–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Justice Statistics. Substance Abuse and Treatment, State and Federal Prisoners, 1997. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 1998
   Google Scholar
• General Accounting Office. Drug Treatment: State Prisons Face Challenges Providing Services. General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C. 1991
   Google Scholar
• Polcin D. L. Criminal Justice Coercion in the Treatment of Alcohol Problems: An Examination of Two Client Subgroups. J. Psychoactive Drugs 1999; 31(2)137–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe D. B., Kirby K. C., Bonieskie L. M., Glass D. J., Dodds L. D., Husband S. D., Platt J. J., Festinger D. S. Assessment of coercive and noncoercive pressures to enter drug abuse treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1996; 42: 77–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin D. L., Weisner C. Factors Associated with Coercion in Entering Treatment for Alcohol Problems. Drug Alcohol Dependence 1999; 54: 63–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisner C. Coercion in Alcohol Treatment. Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C 1990
   Google Scholar
• Wild T. C., Newton-Taylor B., Alletto R. Perceived Coercion Among Clients Entering Substance Abuse Treatments: Structural and Psychological Determinants. Addictive Behav. 1998; 23(1)81–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farabee D., Prendergast M., Anglin D. The effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation 1998; 62(1)3–10
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Improving the Delivery of Alcohol Treatment and Prevention Services: Executive Summary, NIH Publication No. 97-4224. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism: Bethesda, MD, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Polcin D. L. Coercive Treatment for Misdemeanor Clients with Substance Use Disorders. Calif. J. Counsel. and Develop. 0000; 00: 000–000
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Addictive Medicine. Alcohol, Illicit Drugs Both Factor in Criminal Activity. ASAM News 1999; 14: 2
   Google Scholar
• Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Planning for Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Treatment for Adults in the Criminal Justice System. US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 1995
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard R. J., Rachal J. V., Craddock S. G., Cavanaugh E. R. Treatment Outcome Prospective Study (TOPS): Client characteristics and behaviors before, during and after treatment. Drug abuse treatment evaluation: Strategies, progress, and prospects. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph no. 51, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD
   Google Scholar
• Tims F. M., Ludford J. P. Drug Abuse Treatment Evaluation: Strategies, Progress, and Prospects. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph no. 51, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 1984
   Google Scholar
• De Leon G. Program-based Evaluation Research in Therapeutic Communities. Drug Abuse Treatment Evaluation: Strategies, Progress, and Prospects. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph no. 51, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 1984; 69–87
   Google Scholar
• Lipton D. S. Prison-Based Therapeutic Communities: Their Success with Drug-Abusing Offenders. National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C. 1996
   Google Scholar
• Wexler H. K. Progress in Prison Substance Abuse Treatment: A Five-year Report. J. Drug Issues 1994; 24(2)349–360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkin G. P., Wayson B. L., Wexler H. K., Lipton D. S. Treating Prisoners for Drug Abuse: An Implementation Study of Six Prison Programs. Narcotic and Drug Research, Inc, New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Wexler H. K., Falkin G. P., Lipton D. S. Outcome Evaluation of a Prison Therapeutic Community for Substance Abuse Treatment. Criminal Justice Behav. 1990; 17(1)71–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler H. K., Falkin G. P., Lipton D. S., Rosenblum A. B. Outcome Evaluation of a Prison Therapeutic Community for Substance Abuse Treatment. Drug Abuse Treatment in Prisons and Jails, C. G. Leukefeld, F. M. Tims. NIDA Research Monograph no. 118, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 1992
   Google Scholar
• Field G. The Cornerstone Program: A Client Outcome Study. Federal Probation 1985; 49: 50–55
   Google Scholar
• Gerstein D. R., Harwood H. J. Treating Drug Problems, volume 1: A Study of the Evolution, Effectiveness, and Financing of Public and Private Drug Treatment Systems. Institute of Medicine Committee for the Substance Abuse Coverage Study. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 1990
   Google Scholar
• Goldkamp J. S., Weiland D. Assessing the Impact of Dade County’s Felony Drug Court. National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C. 1993
   Google Scholar
• Borkman T. J. A Comparison of Social Model and Clinical Model Services. Social Model Alcohol Recovery: An Environmental Approach, S. Shaw, T. J. Borkman. Bridge Focus, Inc, Burbank, CA 1990; 45–52
   Google Scholar
• Kaskutas L. A. The Social Model Approach to Substance Abuse recovery. A Program of Research and Evaluation. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Rockville, MD 1999, April
   Google Scholar
• Kaskutas L. A. Social Model Philosophy Scale (SMPS) Manual. Alcohol Research Group, Berkeley, CA 1997
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 1990
   Google Scholar
• Polcin D. L. A Comprehensive Model for Adolescent Chemical Dependency Treatment. J. Counsel. Develop. 1992; 70(3)376–382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin D. L. The Etiology and Diagnosis of Alcohol Dependence: Differences in the Professional Literature. Psychotherapy 1997; 34(3)297–306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polcin D. L., 2001 in press
   Google Scholar
• University of California at San Diego. Recommendations for Evaluation of Social Model Recovery Programs: Report of an Expert Panel. University of California, San Diego Extension, San Diego, CA 1993
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Addictive Medicine. Persons with Alcohol & Other Drug (AOD) Problems and the Criminal Justice System: Public Policy statement. ASAM, Chevy Chase, MD
   Google Scholar
• Kaskutas L. A. The Social Model Approach to Substance Abuse Recovery. A Program of Research and Evaluation. Center for Substance Abuse Treat, Rockville, MD 1999, April
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard R. J., Rachal J. V., Craddock S. G., Cavanaugh E. R. Treatment Outcome Prospective Study (TOPS): Client Characteristics and Behaviors Before, During and After Treatment. Drug Abuse Treatment Evaluation: Strategies, Progress, and Prospects. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph no. 51, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 1984
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse. Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). National Institute on Drug Abuse, Washington, D.C. 1997
   Google Scholar
• Platt J. J., Festinger D. S. Assessment of Coercive and Noncoercive Pressures to Enter Drug Abuse Treatment. Drug Alcohol Dependence 1996; 42: 77–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• San Diego County Department of Health Services. 18-month Participant Outcome Study: Final report. San Diego County, San Diego, CA 1983
   Google Scholar
• Weisner C., Schmidt L. A. The Community Epidemiology Laboratory: Studying Alcohol Problems in Community and Agency Based Populations. Addiction 1995; 90: 329–341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar