Drinking Control Attempts and Encouragement of Alcohol Use in Couple Relationship—A Qualitative Approach

References

• Women and Men in Finland 1999. Gender Statistics 7, Statistics Finland, Helsinki 1999
   Google Scholar
• Families 2000. Statistics Finland, Helsinki 2001; 12, Population 2001
   Google Scholar
• World Drink Trends 2002. Productschap Voor Gedistilleerde Dranken and Oxfordshire, Schiedam, NL 2002, UK: World Advertising Research Center (WARC)
   Google Scholar
• Aida Y. Communication apprehension and power strategies in marital relationships. Communication Reports 1993; 5(2)116–121
   Google Scholar
• Alasuutari P. Desire and Craving: A Cultural Theory of Alcoholism. State University of New York Press, Albany 1992
   Google Scholar
• Alasuutari P. Researching Culture: Qualitative Method and Cultural Studies. Sage, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Apo S. Viina, valta ja agraarinen perhe (Alcohol, power and the preindustrial community). Alkoholipolitiikka 1995; 60(6)393–402
   Google Scholar
• Beck U. The reinvention of politics: towards a theory of reflexive modernization. Reflexive Modernization: Politics Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, U. Beck, A. Giddens, S. Lash. Polity Press, CambridgeUK 1994; pp. 1–55
   Google Scholar
• Beck U., Beck-Gernsheim E. The Normal Chaos of Love. Polity Press, CambridgeUK 1995
   Google Scholar
• Beck U., Beck-Gernsheim E. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. Sage, London 2002
   Google Scholar
• Brines J., Joyner K. The ties that bind: principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1999; 64: 333–355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannen J. Research note: the study of sensitive subjects. Sociol. Rev. 1988; 36(3)552–563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer J. D., Lockhart B., Rodgers P. Informal social control and crime management in belfast. Brit. J. Sociol. 1998; 49(4)570–585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coser L. A. The notion of control in sociological theory. Social Control: Views from the Social Sciences, J. P. Gibbs. Sage, Beverly Hills, London, New Delhi 1982; pp. 13–22
   Google Scholar
• Cowan G., Drinkard J., MacGavin L. The effects of target, age, and gender on use of power strategies. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1984; 47(6)1391–1398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers A., Bisson J., Palluy J. Wives’ convergence with their husbands’ alcohol use: social conditions as mediators. J. Stud. Alcohol 1999; 60(3)368–377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncombe J., Marsden D. Can we research the private sphere? methodological and ethical problems in the study of the role of intimate emotion in personal relationships. Gender Relations in Public and Private: New Research Perspectives, L. Morris, S. E. Lyon. St. Martin's Press Inc., HoundsmillsUK 1996; pp. 141–151, Macmillan Press and New York
   Google Scholar
• Falbo T., Peplau L. A. Power strategies in intimate relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1980; 38(4)618–628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusfield J. R. Contested Meanings: The Construction of Alcohol Problems. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin 1996
   Google Scholar
• Holmila M. Young families and alcohol use in finland and the soviet union. Contemp. Drug Prob. 1987; 14(4)649–672
   Google Scholar
• Holmila M. Wives, Husbands and Alcohol: A Study of Informal Drinking Control within the Family. The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies, Helsinki 1988
   Google Scholar
• Holmila M. Social control experienced by heavily drinking women. Contemp. Drug Prob. 1991; 18(4)547–571
   Google Scholar
• Holmila M. Kylä kaupungistuvassa yhteiskunnassa: Yhteisöelämän muutos ja jatkuvuus. (A Village in Urbanizing Society: The Change and Continuity of Community Living), Suomen Kirjallisuuden Seura (the Finnish Literature Society), Helsinki 2001
   Google Scholar
• Howard J. A., Blumstein P., Schwartz P. Sex, power, and influence tactics in intimate relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1986; 51(1)102–109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurcom C., Copello A., Orford J. The family and alcohol: effects of excessive drinking and conceptualizations of spouses over recent decades. Substance Use & Misuse 2000; 35(4)473–502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob T., Seilhamer R. A. The impact on spouses and how they cope. Alcohol and the Family, J. Orford, J. Harwin. Groom Helm, London 1982; p. 114–126
   Google Scholar
• Jallinoja R. Perheen aika. (Time for Family), Otava, Helsinki 2000
   Google Scholar
• Komter A. Hidden power in marriage. Gender Soc. 1989; 3(2)187–216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard K. E., Das Eiden R. Husband's and wife's drinking: unilateral or bilateral influences among newlyweds in a general population sample. J. Stud. Alcohol 1999, suppl. 13: 130–138
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonard K. E., Quigley B. M. Drinking and marital aggression in newlyweds: an event-based analysis of drinking and the occurrence of husband marital aggression. J. Stud. Alcohol 1999; 60(4)537–545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren J. Non-Marital Cohabitation and Union Dissolution. Publication Series D 31/1997, The Population Research Institute, Helsinki 1997
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald G., Zanna M. P., Holmes J. G. An experimental test of the role of alcohol in relationship conflict. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2000; 36: 182–193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkelä K. The uses of alcohol and their cultural regulation. Acta Sociol. 1983; 26(1)21–31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkelä K. Kulttuurisen muuntelun yhteisöllinen rakenne Suomessa (Social structure of cultural variation in finland). Sosiologia 1985; 22(4)247–260
   Google Scholar
• McDonald G. W. Family power: the assessment of a decade of theory and research, 1970–1979. J. Marr. Fam. 1980; 42: 841–854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier R. F. Prospects for control theories and research. Social Control: Views from the Social Sciences, J. P. Gibbs. Sage, Beverly Hills 1982; pp. 265–276
   Google Scholar
• Metso L., Mustonen H., Mäkelä P., Tuovinen E. L. Suomalaisten Juomatavat Vuonna 2000: Taulukkoraportti Vuoden 2000 Tutkimuksen Perustuloksista ja Vertailuja Aiempiin Juomatapatutkimuksiin (Finnish Drinking Habits in the Year 2000: Statistical Report from the Elementary Results of the Research and Comparisons to Earlier Drinking Habit Research). Aiheita (Themes) 3/2002; Helsinki: Stakes (National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health), (2002)
   Google Scholar
• Meyers D. T. Self, Society, and Personal Choice. Columbia University Press, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Midanik L. T. Drunkenness, feeling the effects and 5 + measures. Addiction 1999; 94(6)887–897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller D. A Theory of Shopping. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY 1998
   Google Scholar
• Mustonen H., Mäkelä P., Metso L., Simpura J. Muutokset suomalaisten juomatavoissa: Toiveet ja todellisuus (Changes in finnish drinking habits: hopes and reality). Yhteiskuntapolitiikka 2001; 66(3)265–276
   Google Scholar
• Nykyri T. Naisen humalan hurma ja kauhu (Women drinking: the Charm and the horror). Alkoholipolitiikka 1996; 61(3)90–98
   Google Scholar
• Nykyri T. Naisen viha (The Female Anger). University of Jyväskylä, JyväskyläFinland 1998
   Google Scholar
• Orford J., Guthrie S., Nicholls P., Oppenheimer E., Egert S., Hensman C. Self-reported coping behavior of wives of alcoholics and its association with drinking outcome. J. Stud. Alcohol 1975; 36(9)1254–1267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orford J., Harwin J. Preface. Alcohol and the Family, J. Orford, J. Harwin. Groom Helm, London 1982; pp. 7–8
   Google Scholar
• Orford J., Natera G., Davies J., Nava A., Mora J., Rigby K., Bradbury C., Bowie N., Copello A., Velleman R. Tolerate, engage or withdraw: a study of the structure of families coping with alcohol and drug problems in south west england and mexico city. Addiction 1998; 93(12)1799–1813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orthner D. K. The family in transition. Rebuilding the Nest: A New Commitment to the American Family, D. Blankenhorn, S. Bayme, J. B. Elshtain. Family Service America, Milwaukee 1990; pp. 93–118
   Google Scholar
• Österberg E. Onko vuosi 2004 kohtalokas alkoholiverollemme? (Is the year 2004 decisive to our alcohol tax?). Yhteiskuntapolitiikka 2002; 67(3)234–243
   Google Scholar
• Pittman D. J., Staudenmeier W. J. Jr., Kaplan A. Alcohol and other drugs: the response of the political and medical institutions. Brit. J. Addict. 1991; 86(8)967–975
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• http://www.stakes.info/files/pdf/taskumatti/quickfacts2003.pdf, Quick Facts 2003 about Alcohol and Drugs. (2003). Helsinki: Stakes. (accessed Jul 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Roberts L. J., Leonard K. E. Gender differences and similarities in the alcohol and marriage relationship. Gender and Alcohol: Individual and Social Perspectives, R. W. Wilsnack, S. C. Wilsnack. Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies, New Brunswick, New Jersey 1997; pp. 289–311
   Google Scholar
• Room R., Greenfield T. K., Weisner C. “People who might have liked you to drink less”: changing responses to drinking by U.S. family members and friends, 1979–1990. Contemp. Drug Prob. 1991; 18(4)573–595
   Google Scholar
• Room R., Mäkelä K. Typologies of the cultural positions of drinking. J. Stud. Alcohol 2000; 61(3)475–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin H. J., Rubin I. S. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Sage, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Ryff C. D., Heincke S. G. Subjective organization of personality in adulthood and aging. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1983; 44(4)807–816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpura J. Suomalainen viinapää tänään (Alcoholism in Finland today). Duodecim 1993; 109: 2065–2073
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpura J., Karlsson T. Trends in drinking patterns among adult population in 15 european countries, 1950 to 2000: a review. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2001; English(suppl. 18)31–53
   Google Scholar
• Skinner K. B., Bahr S. J., Crane R. D., Call V. R. A. Cohabitation, marriage, and remarriage: a comparison of relationship quality over time. J. Fam. Issues 2002; 23(1)74–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stets J. E., Hammons S. A. Gender, control, and marital commitment. J. Fam. Issues 2002; 23(1)3–25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulkunen P., Sutton C., Tigerstedt C., Warpenius K. Introduction. Broken Spirits: Power and Ideas in Nordic Alcohol Control, P. Sulkunen, C. Sutton, C. Tigerstedt, K. Warpenius. NAD Publication No. 39, NAD, Helsinki 2000; pp. 7–14
   Google Scholar
• Suonpää J. Alkoholi ja Parisuhde: Sosiaalinen Kontrolli, Konfliktit, Juomiseen Kannustaminen ja Muutokset Alkoholin Käytössä (Alcohol and Couples. Social Control Conflicts Encouragement of Drinking and Changes in Alcohol Use). Aiheita (Themes) 4/2002, Stakes, Helsinki 2002
   Google Scholar
• Thagaard T. Gender, power and love: a study of interaction between spouses. Acta Sociol. 1997; 40(4)357–376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tigerstedt C. Discipline and public health. Broken Spirits: Power and Ideas in Nordic Alcohol Control. NAD Publication No. 39., P. Sulkunen, C. Sutton, C. Tigerstedt, K. Warpenius. NAD, Helsinki 2000; 93–112
   Google Scholar
• Tigerstedt C. The Dissolution of the Alcohol Policy Field: Studies on the Nordic Countries. Research Reports 1/2001, Department of Social Policy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 2001
   Google Scholar
• Tolkki-Nikkonen M. Parisuhde, Perhesuhde, Olosuhde: Mikä Pitää Avioliiton Koossa 15 Vuoden Jälkeen? (The Relationships of Couple, Family, and Situation: What Keeps a Marriage Together after Fifteen Years?). Gaudeamus, Helsinki 1990
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer J. T. Commitment, deviance and social control. sociol. Quart. 2000; 41(3)315–336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman J. P. The Other Half: Wives of Alcoholics and Their Social-Psychological Situation. Aldine de Gruyter, New York 1991
   Google Scholar
• Zvonkovic A. M., Schmiege C. J., Hall L. D. Influence strategies used when couples make work–family decisions and their importance for marital satisfaction. Fam. Relat. 1994; 43(2)182–188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar