The Impact of Welfare Reform on Methadone Treatment: Policy Lessons from Service Providers in New York City

References

• Allard P. Life Sentences: Denying Welfare Benefits to Women Convicted of Drug Offenses. The Sentencing Project, Washington, D.C. 2002
   Google Scholar
• Anderson C. Union's suit on workfare employees goes forward. New York Law Journal January 20, 2000; p. 1
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. Sanctions on Welfare Recipients Vacated, As City, State Violated, Due Process (Martinez v. Turner and Amankwa v. Turner). New York Law Journal: Court Decisions May 14, 1999a
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. Social Services Law; Class Is Decertified In Challenge to Workfare Rules; Marie Mitchell, et al., plaintiffs-respondents, v. Lilliam Barrios-Paoli, etc., et al., defendants-appellants. New York Law Journal: Court Decisions March 23, 1999b
   Google Scholar
• Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Welfare Reform in New York City: The Measure of Success. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, New York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson J., Lee D., Cheryl Dayton-Shotts C., French C. Self-perceived job skills and employment barriers among non-drug using and chronic drug using welfare-to-work participants. Journal of Drug Issues 2001; 31(3)747–756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banchieri v. The City of New York. New York Law Journal: Court Decisions September 26, 2001; p. 17
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein N. Complaint Accuses New York City of Bias Against Mentally Ill. The New York Times April 3, 2002; p. B2
   Google Scholar
• City of New York Human Resources Administration. HRA Facts. City of New York Human Resources Administration, Office of Program Reporting, Analysis and Accountability, New York December, 2002
   Google Scholar
• DATOS. Drug Abuse Treatment Outcomes Study, Unpublished data
   Google Scholar
• Davies P., Iams H., Rupp K. The effect of welfare reform on SSA's disability programs: design of policy evaluation and early evidence. Social Security Bulletin 2000; 63(1)3–11, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
   Google Scholar
• French M. T., Dennis M. L., McDougal G. L., Karuntzos G. T., Hubbard R. L. Training and employment programs in methadone treatment: client needs and desires. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1992; 9: 293–303, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant B. F., Dawson D. A. Alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence among welfare recipients. American Journal of Public Health 1996; 86(10)1450–1454, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handler J. F., Hasenfeld Y. The Moral Construction of Poverty. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif 1997
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. L., Reed M. H. The culture of poverty: an ideological analysis. Sociological Perspectives 1996; 39(4)465–495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld Y. Organizational forms as moral practices: the case of welfare departments. Social Service Review 2000; 74(3)329–351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard R. L., Harwood H. H. National Institute on Drug Abuse Treatment Research Report: Employment Related Services in Drug Treatment Programs. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (1981)
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard R. L., Marsden M. E., Rachal J. V., Harwood H. J., Cavanaugh E. R., Ginzburg H. M. Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill 1989
   Google Scholar
• Jayakody R., Danziger S., Pollack H. Welfare reform, substance use and mental health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2000; 25(4)623–651, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaestner R. Drug use and AFDC participation: is there a connection?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1998; 17(3)495–520, [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis O. LaVida: A Puerto Rican Family in the Culture of Poverty—San Juan and New York. Random House, New York 1966
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky M. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation, New York 1980
   Google Scholar
• Magura S. Personal communication 2003
   Google Scholar
• Magura S., Kang S. Y., Rosenblum A., Foote J., Handelsman L. Gender differences in psychiatric comorbidity among cocaine-using opiate addicts. Journal of Addictive Diseases 1998; 17(3)49–61, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya I. D., Atkinson J. S., Struse H. M. A comparison of psychosocial barriers among welfare recipients: implications for drug treatment. Substance Use & Misuse 2001; 36(6&7)771–788, [CROSSREF]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgenstern J., Riordan A., McCrady B., McVeigh K., Blanchard K., Irwin T. Intensive Case Management Improves Welfare Clients’ Rates of Entry and Retention in Substance Abuse Treatment. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (2001)
   Google Scholar
• New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance. undated. Putting it All Together to Create Changes: Welfare Reform Community Organization Resource Guide
   Google Scholar
• Platt J. J. Vocational rehabilitation of drug abusers. Psychological Bulletin 1995; 117(3)416–433, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack H. A., Danziger S., Seefeldt K. S., Jayakody R. Substance use among welfare recipients: trends and policy responses. Social Service Review 2002; 76(2)256–274, [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt L., Dohan D., Wiley J., Zabkiewicz D. Addiction and welfare dependency: interpreting the connection. Social Problems 2002; 49(2)221–241, [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt L., Weisner C., Wiley J. Substance abuse and the course of welfare dependency. American Journal of Public Health 1998; 88(11)1616, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta S. Workfare victory for a recovering addict holds promise for others. New York Times September, 2000; 10: 39
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg S. Turning Back: The Retreat from Racial Justice in American Thought and Policy. Beacon Press, Boston 1995
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Fact Sheet: The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. Administration for Children and Families. (1996)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (April 28, 1997). “Major Provisions of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996”. (P.L. 104-193)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program (TANF), Fifth Annual Report to Congress. Administration for Children and Families. (February 2003)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. General Accounting Office. “Social Security: Major Changes Needed for Disability Benefits for Addicts.” Report to Congressional Requesters. GAO/HEHS-94-128. Washington, D.C. (1994)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Social Security Administration. Disability Benefits. Publication No. 05-10029
   Google Scholar