The Potential of Contingent Valuation for Public Administration Practice and Research

REFERENCES

• Boardman , A.E. , Greenberg , D.H. , Vining , A.R. and Weimer , D.L. 2001 . Cost–Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice , Upper Saddle River , NJ : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Larson , D.M. 1992 . On Measuring Existence Value . Land Economics , 69 ( 1 ) : 116 – 122 .
   Google Scholar
• 3. Hausman, J.A., Ed. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. North Holland: New York, 1993. Also see Portney, P.R. The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994, 8 (4); 3–17; Diamond, P.A.; Hausman, J.A. Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? ibid; 45–64; Hanemann, M.A. Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation, ibid, 19–43.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle , K.J. and Bergstrom , J.C. 1999 . “ Doubt, Doubts, and Doubters: The Genesis of a New Research Agenda? ” . In Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries , Edited by: Bateman , I.J. and Willis , K.G. 183 – 206 . Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Vining , A.R. and Weimer , D.L. 1998 . “ Passive Use Benefits: Existence, Option, and Quasi-Option Value ” . In Handbook of Public Finance , Edited by: Thompson , F and Green , M . 319 – 345 . New York : Marcel Dekker .
   Google Scholar
• Weisbrod , B.A. 1964 . Collective Consumption Services of Individual Consumption Goods . Quarterly Journal of Economics , 78 ( 3 ) : 71 – 77 .
   Google Scholar
• Krutilla , J. 1967 . Conservation Reconsidered . American Economic Review , 57 ( 4 ) : 777 – 786 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noll , R.G. and Zimbalist , A. 1997 . Sports, Jobs, and Taxes: Impact of Sports Teams and Stadiums , Washington , DC : The Brookings Institution .
   Google Scholar
• 9. The approach was recently applied to a new basketball arena for the University of Kentucky and a minor league baseball stadium. See Johnson, B.K; Whitehead, J.C. Value of Public Goods from Sports Stadiums: The CVM Approach. Contemporary Economic Policy 2000, 18 (1), 48–58.
   Google Scholar
• Garbacz , C. and Thayer , M.A. 1983 . An Experiment in Valuing Senior Companion Program Services . Journal of Human Resources , 18 ( 1 ) : 147 – 153 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke , P.M. 2002 . Testing the Convergent Validity of the Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Methods in Valuing the Benefits of Health Care. Health Economics , 11 ( 2 ) : 117 – 127 .
   Google Scholar
• Boxall , P.C. , Englin , J. and Adamowicz , W.L. 2003 . Valuing Aboriginal Artifacts: A Combined Revealed-Stated Preference Approach . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 45 ( 2 ) : 213 – 230 . [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 13. Most attribute the origins of CV to David, R.K. Recreation Planning as an Economic Problem. Natural Resources Journal 1963, 3 (2), 239–249. Early applications include: Ridker, R.G. Economic Costs of Air Pollution; Praeger: New York, 1967; Hammack, J.; Brown, G.M. Jr. Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bioeconomic Analysis; Johns Hopkins Press: Baltimore, The Potential of Contingent Valuation 85 1974; Cicchetti, C.J.; Smith, V.K. Congestion, Quality Deterioration, and Optimal Use: Wilderness Recreation in the Spanish Peaks Primative Area. Social Science Research 1973, 2, 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Klecka , W.R. and Tuchfarber , A.J. 1978 . Random Digit Dialing: A Comparison to Personal Interviews. Public Opinion Quarterly , 42 ( 1 ) : 105 – 114 .
   Google Scholar
• Kopp , R.J. , Portney , P.R. and Smith , V.K. 1990 . The Economics of Natural Resource Damages after Ohio v. U.S. Department of the Interior . Environmental Law Reporter , 20 ( 4 ) : 10127 – 10131 .
   Google Scholar
• Arrow , K. , Solow , R. , Portney , P. , Leamer , E. , Radner , R. and Schuman , H. 1993 . Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register , 58 ( 10 ) : 4601 – 4614 .
   Google Scholar
• Carson , R. , Flores , N. , Martin , K. and Wright , J. 1996 . Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods. Land Economics , 72 ( 1 ) : 80 – 99 .
   Google Scholar
• Diener , A , O’Brien , B. and Gafni , A. 1998 . Health Care Contingent Valuation Studies: A Review and Classification of the Literature , 7 ( 4 ) : 313 – 326 .
   Google Scholar
• Viscusi , K.W. 1993 . The Value of Risks to Life and Health. . Journal of Economic Literature , 31 ( 4 ) : 1912 – 1946 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly , D. , Hopkins , J. , Loomis , G. , Jones-Lee , M. , Philips , P. , McMahon , K. , Ives , D. , Soby , B. , Ball , D. and Kemp , R. 1994 . The Value of Road Safety: UK Research on the Value of Preventing Non-Fatal Injuries . Journal of Transport Economics and Policy , 28 ( 1 ) : 45 – 60 .
   Google Scholar
• 21. Waters, W.G. II. Values of Travel Time Savings in Road Transport Project Evaluations; In World Transport Research, Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Transport Research, Hensher, D. et al, Eds.; Elsevier: New York, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell , R. and Carson , R. 1989[LP6] Resources for the Future: Washington, DC . Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation MethodValuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the U.S., E.C., and Developing Countries , Edited by: Boardman , Bateman , I. and Willis , K. Oxford , UK : Oxford University Press . Good general introductions include
   Google Scholar
• 23. Carson, R.; Groves, T.; Machina, M. Incentive and Information Properties of Preference Questions. Plenary Address, European Association of Resource and Environmental Economists, Oslo, Norway, June, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• 24. Couper, N. Web Surveys: A Review of Issues and Approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly 2000, 64 (4), 464–494. For a comparison of large panel and recruited panel Internet surveys with a parallel telephone survey, see Berrens, R.; Bohara, A.; Jenkins-Smith, H.; Silva, C.; Weimer, D. The Advent of Internet Surveys for Political Research: A Comparison of Telephone and Internet Samples. Political Analysis 2003, 11 (1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• 25. For an overview, see Groves, R.M.; Couper, M.P. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• 26. Deming, W.E.; Stephan, F.F. On a Least Squares Adjustment of a Sampled Frequency Table When the Expected Marginal Totals are Known. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1940, 11 (4), 427–444; D’Agosting, R.B. Jr.; Rubin, D.B. Estimating and Using Propensity Scores With Partially Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2000, 95 (451), 749–759.
   Google Scholar
• 27. This method was introduced by Bishop, R.C.; Heberlein, T.A. Measuring Values of Extra-Market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1979, 61 (5), 926–930. Also see Cameron, T.A.; James, M.D. Efficient Estimation Methods for “Closed-Ended” Contingent Valuation Surveys. Review of Economics and Statistics 1987, 69 (2), 269–276.
   Google Scholar
• 28. For a flavor of the heated debate during the period when CV was beginning to move into the mainstream of environmental economics, see Kahneman, D.; Knetsch, J.L. Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1992, 22 (1), 57–70; Kerry, V. Comment: Arbitrary Values, Good Causes, and Premature Verdicts 1992, 22 (1), 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• 29. Experiments providing more detailed budget reminders and discussion of substitute goods have produced mixed results. See, for example, Loomis, J. et al. Do Reminders of Substitutes and Budget Constraints Influence Contingent Valuation Estimates? Land Economics, 1994, 70 (4), 499–506 versus Bateman, I.J.; Langford, I.H. Budget-Constraint, Temporal, and Question-Ordering Effects in Contingent Valuation Studies. Environment and Planning A 1997, 29 (7), 1215–1228. Another approach is to inform respondents explicitly about the biases that commonly occur when hypothetical questions are used: Cummings, R.G.; Taylor, L.O. Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method. American Economic Review 1999, 89 (3), 649–665.
   Google Scholar
• Regens , J. 1991 . Measuring Environmental Benefits with Contingent Markets. Public Administration Review , 51 ( 4 ) : 345 – 352 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 31. Kahneman; Knetsch, op cit. Also, see Nunes, P.A.L.D.; Schokkaert, E. Identifying the Warm Glow Effect in Contingent Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003, 45 (2), 231–245. Carson, R. et al. op cit.
   Google Scholar
• 32. Carson, R. et al. op cit.
   Google Scholar
• Hoehn , J.P. and Randall , A. A . 1987 . Satisfactory Benefit Cost Indicator from Contingent Valuation . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 31 ( 3 ) : 226 – 247 . [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Vossler , C.A. and Kerkvliet , J. A . 2003 . 631 – 649 .
   Google Scholar
• 35. Berrens, R.; Bohara, A.; Jenkins-Smith, H.; Silva, C.; Weimer, D. Information and Effort in Contingent Valuation Surveys: Application to Global Climate Change Using National Internet Samples. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2004, 47 (2), 331–363. The full survey instrument can be viewed by entering code 999 at http://www.unm.edu/instpp/gcc/. Note that the instrument includes three random splits: the actual Kyoto Protocol versus a modified protocol that would also impose emission limits on developing countries; a standard budget reminder versus questions asking respondents to estimate their disposable incomes; and basic information about the Kyoto Protocol versus access to enhanced information (27 one-page entries on global climate change and the Kyoto Protocol). Consequently, any single visit to the site will give only one combination of random splits.
   Google Scholar
• 36. Nyquist, Hans. Optimal Design of Discrete Response Experiments in Contingent Valuation. Review of Economics and Statistics 1992, 74 (3), 559–563.
   Google Scholar
• 37. See Boardman et al., op cit., 361–362 for a graphical explanation.
   Google Scholar
• 38. For a thorough overview of estimation issues, see Hanemann, W.M.; Kanninen, B. The Statistical Analysis of Discrete Response CV Data. In Bateman and Willis, op cit, 302–441. See also Park, T.; oomis, J.; Creel, M. Confidence Intervals for Evaluating Benefits Estimates from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies. Land Economics, 1991, 64–73.
   Google Scholar
• 39. Johannesson, M.; Blomquist, G.; Blumenschein, K.; Johansson, P.; Liljas, B.; O’Conor, R. Calibrating Hypothetical Willingness to Pay Responses. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1999, 18 (1), 21–32; Ready, R.; Navrud, S.; Dubdurg, W. How Do Respondents with Uncertain Willingness to Pay Answer Contingent Valuation Questions? Land Economics 2001, 77 (3), 315–26.
   Google Scholar