Characterization of Binary Mixtures Consisting of Cross‐Linked High Amylose Starch and Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose Used in the Preparation of Controlled Release Tablets

References

• Lenaerts V., Dumoulin Y., Mateescu M. A. Controlled release of theophylline from CLA tablets. J. Control. Release 1991; 15: 39–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmouni M., Lenaerts V., Massuelle D., Doelker D., Leroux J.‐C. Influence of physical parameters and lubricants on the compaction properties of granulated and non‐granulated cross‐linked high amylose starch. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2002; 50(9)1155–1162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussa I. S., Lenaerts V., Cartilier L. H. Effect of some physical parameters on the swelling properties of cross‐linked amylose matrices. Int. J. Pharm. 1998; 173: 35–41
   Google Scholar
• Rahmouni M., Lenaerts V., Leroux J.‐C. (2000) Solute Transport Across Cross‐Linked High Amylose Starch (Contramid®) Hydrogels. 27th Proc. Int. Symp. Control. Release Bioact. Mater., Paris, July, 7–132000. Controlled released society, 724–725
   Google Scholar
• Rahmouni M., Chouinard F., Nekka F., Lenaerts V., Leroux J.‐C. Enzymatic degradation of cross‐linked high amylose starch tablets and its effect on in vitro release of sodium diclofenac. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2001; 51: 191–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford J. L., Rubinstein M. H., Hogan J. E. Formulation of sustained release promethazine hydrochloride tablets using hydroxypropylmethylcellulose matrices. Int. J. Pharm. 1985; 24: 327–338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford J. L., Rubinstein M. H., Hogan J. E. Dissolution of a poorly water soluble drug, indomethacin, from hydroxypropylmethylcellulose controlled release tablets. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1985; 37: 33P–39P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford J. L., Rubinstein M. H., McCaul F., Hogan J. E., Edgar P. J. Importance of drug type, tablet shape and added diluents on drug release kinetics from hydroxypropylmethylcellulose matrix tablets. Int. J. Pharm. 1987; 40: 223–234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranga Rao K. V., Padmalatha Devi K., Buri P. Influence of molecular size and water solubility of the solute on its release from swelling and erosion controlled polymeric matrices. J. Control. Release 1990; 12: 133–141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victoria Velasco M., Ford J. L., Rowe P., Rajabi Siahboomi A. R. Influence of drug:hydroxypropylmethylcellulose ratio, drug and polymer particle size and compression force on the release of diclofenac sodium from HPMC tablets. J. Control. Release 1999; 57: 75–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buri P., Doelker E. Formulation des comprimés à libération prolongée. II. Matrices hydrophiles. Pharm. Acta Helv. 1980; 55: 189–197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alderman D. A. A review of cellulose ethers in hydrophilic matrices for oral controlled‐release dosage forms. Int. J. Pharm. Technol. Prod. Manuf. 1984; 5(3)1–9
   Google Scholar
• Doelker E. N. A. PeppasCellulose derivatives. Hydrogels in Medicine and Pharmacy, . Polymers, CRS Press, Boca Raton 1987; Vol. 2: 115–160
   Google Scholar
• Carr R. L. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem. Eng. 1965; 72: 163–168
   Google Scholar
• Rime A. F., Lescure F., Mordier D., Gurny R., Doelker E. A new high performance data acquisition system interfacing an instrumented tablet machine to a microcomputer. Acta Pharm. Technol. 1990; 36: 264–268
   Google Scholar
• Doelker E. D. Chulia, M. Deleuil, Y. PourcelotAssessment of powder compaction. Powder Technology and Pharmaceutical Processes, . Elsevier, Amsterdam 1994; 403–471
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong N. A., Haines‐Nutt R. F. Elastic recovery and surface area changes in compacted powder systems. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1972; 24: 135P–136P
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckel R. W. An analysis of powder compaction phenomena. Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 1961; 221: 1001–1008
   Google Scholar
• Moore J. W., Flanner H. H. Mathematical comparison of curves with an emphasis on in‐vitro dissolution profiles. Pharm. Technol. 1996; 20(6)64–74
   Google Scholar
• FDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Guidance for Industry. Modified Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms; Scale‐Up and Post‐Approval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls, In Vitro Dissolution Testing, and In Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation. September, 1997, www.FDA‐gov/cder/guidance/1214fnl.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Amidon G. E., Augsburger L. L., Brittain H. G., Byrn S. R., Fox C. D., Peck G. E., Wurster D. E. Physical test methods for powder flow characterization of pharmaceutical materials: A review of methods. Pharmacop. Forum 1999; 25: 8298–8305
   Google Scholar
• Hancock B. C., Carlson G. T., Ladipo D. D., Langdon B. A., Mullarney M. P. The powder flow and compact mechanical properties of two recently developed matrix‐forming polymers. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2001; 53: 1193–1199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniforth J. N., Baichwal A. R., Hart J. P., Heng P. W.S. Effect of addition of water on the rheological and mechanical properties of microcrystalline celluloses. Int. J. Pharm. 1988; 41: 231–236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowhan Z. T. Role of binder in moisture‐induced hardness increase in compressed tablets and its effect on in vitro disintegration and dissolution. J. Pharm. Sci. 1980; 69: 1–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bail P., Morin F. G., Marchessault R. H. Characterization of cross linked high amylose starch excipient. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1999; 26: 193–200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajabi‐Siahboomi A. R., Bowtell R. W., Mansfield P., Hendersen A., Davies M. C., Melia C. D. Structure and behaviour in hydrophilic matrix sustained release dosage forms: 2. NMR‐imaging studies of dimensional changes in the gel layer and core of HPMC tablets undergoing hydration. J. Control. Release 1994; 31: 121–128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar