An Alternative Evaluation Method for Swelling Studies of Bioadhesive Tablet Formulations

References

• Jiménz‐Castellanos M. R., Zia H., Rhodes C. T. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1993; 19: 143–193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chickering D. E., Mathiowitz. Bioadhesive microspheres: I. A novel electrobalance‐based method to study adhesive interactions between individual microspheres and intestinal mucosa. J. Control. Release 1995; 34: 251–261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deasy P. B., O'Neill C. T. Bioadhesive dosage form for peroral administration of timolol base. Pharm. Acta Helv. 1989; 64(8)231–235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miyazaki S., Nakayama A., Oda M., Takada M. Chitosan and sodium alginate based bioadhesive tablets for intraoral drug delivery. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 1994; 17(5)745–747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali J., Khar R. K. Formulation and characterization of a buccoadhesive erodible tablet for the treatment of oral lesions. Die Pharmazie 1998; 53: 329–334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylan B., Çapan Y., Güven O., Kes S., Hıncal A. A. Design and evaluation of sustained‐released and buccal adhesive propranolol hydrochloride tablets. J. Control. Release 1996; 38: 11–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aungst B. J., Rogers N. J., Shefter E. Comparison of nasal, rectal, buccal, sublingual and intramuscular insulin efficacy and the effect of a bile salt absorption promoter. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1987; 244: 23–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duman G., Baykara T. Dissolution and bioavailabity of the bioadhesive dosage form of lidocaine. Int. J. Pharm. Adv. 1995; 1(2)198–205
   Google Scholar
• Kair M., Chien Y. W. Development of anticandidal delivery systems: (II) Mucoadhesive devices for prolonged drug delivery in the oral cavity. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1996; 22(3)243–253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponchel G., Touchard F., Duchene D., Peppas N. A. Bioadhesive analysis of controlled release systems. I. Fracture and interpenetration analysis in poly (acrylic acid)‐containing systems. J. Control. Release 1987; 5: 129–141
   Google Scholar
• Amir H. S. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: a review. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 1998; 1(1)15–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta A., Garg S., Khar R. K. Interpolymer complexation and its effect on bioadhesive strength and dissolution characteristics of buccal drug delivery systems. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1994; 20(3)315–325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park K., Robinson J. R. Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral controlled drug delivery: method to study bioadhesion. Int. J. Pharm. 1984; 19: 107–127.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen I., Green K. L., Smart J. D., Smistad G., Karslen J. Bioadhesion of hydrated chitosans: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int. J. Pharm. 1996; 145: 231–240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart J. D., Kellaway J. W., Worthington H. E.C. An in vitro investigation of mucosa‐adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1984; 36: 295–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duman G., Baykara T. An in vitro investigation of bioadhesive tablets for use in mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Int. J. Pharm. Adv. 1995; 1(1)54–63
   Google Scholar
• Gürsoy A., Sohtorik İ., Uyanık N. Bioadhesive potential of bioadhesive tablets, FABAD. J. Pharm. Sci. 1992; 17: 33–38
   Google Scholar
• Nair M. K., Chien Y. W. Development of anticandidal delivery systems: (II) Mucoadhesive devices for prolonged drug delivery in the oral cavity. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1996; 22(3)243–253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duman G., Baykara T. An in vitro investigation of bioadhesive tablets for use in mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Int. J. Pharm. Adv. 1995; 1(1)54–63
   Google Scholar
• Bottenberg P., Cleymaet R., De Muynck C., Remon J. P., Coomans D., Michotte Y., Slop D. Development and testing of bioadhesive, fluoride‐containing slow‐release tablets for oral use. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1990; 43: 457–464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal T. K. Swelling‐controlled release system for the vaginal delivery of miconazole. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2000; 50: 337–343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürsoy A., Sohtorik I., Uyanık N., Peppas N. A. Bioadhesive controlled release systems for vaginal delivery. STP Pharma 1989; 5(12)886–892
   Google Scholar
• Abril M., Campo M. M., Önenç A., Sanudo C., Alberti P., Negueruela A. I. Beef colour evolution as a function of ultimate pH. Meat Sci. 2001; 58: 69–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önenç A., Alçiçek A., Kaya A. A study on meat color assessment of friesian, friesian × limousine and friesian × piedmontese crossbred yearlings at twelve different blooming time. EAAP 2000, 51th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Cattle Production, The HagueThe Netherland, August, 21–242000, 271, Paper C 6.6
   Google Scholar
• Berberich J., Dee K. H., Hayauchi Y., Portner C. A new method to determine discoloration kinetics of uncoated white tablets occurring during stability testing—an application of instrumental color measurement in the development pharmaceutics. Int. J. Pharm. 2002; 234: 55–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Donald R. Color Physics from Industry. Society of Dyers and Colourists, BradfordUK 1987
   Google Scholar
• Rowe R. C. Gloss measurement on film coated tablets. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1985; 37: 761–765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell K., York P., Rowe R. C., Brown S. R. The use of colour and gloss as controls variables in film coating. Proc. 4th World Meeting ADRITELF/APGI/APV, Florence, April, 8/112002
   Google Scholar
• Stark G., Fawcett J. P., Tucker I. G., Weatherall I. L. Instrumental evaluation of color of solid dosage forms during stability testing. Int. J. Pharm. 1996; 143: 93–100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar