Chemometric Investigation of Barley and Malt DataFootnote¹

1 This work was presented as an oral paper at the 2011 ASBC National Meeting in Ft. Myers, FL.

Literature Cited

• Agu, R. C., Some relationships betwen malted barleys of different nitrogen levels and the wort properties, J. Inst. Brew. 109:106–109, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agu, R. C., Some relationships between amylolytic enzymes developed in malted barley, extract recovery, and sugar profile, Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 42:315–318, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Agu, R. C., Some links between and among quality parameters used in assessment of barley adjuncts for food processing, Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 45:268–273, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Agu, R. C., Brosnan, J. M., Bringhurst, T. A., Palmer, G. H., and Jack, F. R., Influence of corn size distribution on the diastatic power of malted barley and its impact on other malt quality parameters, J. Agric. Food Chem. 55:3702–3707, 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society of Brewing Chemists, Methods of Analysis. Barley-2C Assortment, −2D 1000 kernel weight, 3-C Germinative energy, germinative capacity, and water sensitivity-simultaneous determination, −5C Moisture in whole grain by near infrared, 7-D Protein in whole grain by near-infrared; Malt-3 Moisture, −4 Extract, −5A Wort analysis - Nitrogen in laboratory wort, −5B Wort analysis - FAN in laboratory wort, −6C Diastatic power by automated flow analysis, −7C Alpha-amylase by automated flow analysis, −8B Protein by combustion, −12 Malt modification by friability; Wort-9 Wort color, −8 Wort pH, −13 Wort viscosity, −18 β-glucan in Congress wort by fluorescence. The Society, St. Paul, MN, 1992, 8th ed.
   Google Scholar
• Edney, M. J. and Mather, D. E., Quantitative trait loci affecting germination traits and malt friability in a two-rowed by six-rowed barley cross, J. Cereal Sci. 39:283–290, 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, T. S., Solah, V., Glennie Holmes, M. R., and Taylor, H. R., Diastatic power in malted barley: Contributions of malt parameters to its development and the potential of barley grain beta-amylase to predict malt diastatic power, J. Inst. Brew. 101:277–280, 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, C. A. and Duke, S. H., A comparison of standard and nonstandard measures of malt quality, J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 66:11–19, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massart, D. L., Vandeginste, B. G. M., Buydens, L. M. C., De Jong, S., Lewi, P. J., and Smeyers-Verbeke, J., Principal Components In: Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part A. B. G. M. Vandeginste and S. C. Rutan, ed. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1997, Vol. 20A, pp. 519–556, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Munck, L. and Møller, B., A new germinative classification model of barley for prediction of malt quality amplifed by a near infrared transmission spectroscopy calibration for vigour ‘on line’ both implemented by multivariate data analysis, J. Inst. Brew. 110:3–17, 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. P. and Munck, L., Evaluation of malting barley quality using exploratory data analysis. I. Extraction of information from micromalting data of spring and winter barley, J. Cereal Sci. 38:173–180, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. R. and Budde, A. D., Making the cut: Options for making initial evaluations of malting quality in barley, J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 68:183–194, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, K. J., Chemometrics in brewing - a review, J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 59:147–156, 2001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, J. G., Lukes, B. K., Tie, E. C., and Ford, A. T., The relationship between wort beta-glucan, malting conditions and malt analysis, Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 30:80–85, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, J. G., Lukes, B. K., Tie, E. C., and Ford, A. T., Relationships among wort beta-glucan, malting conditions, and malt analysis, J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 51:88–93, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, R. L., Zytniak, R., and Hoskins, P. H., Influence of malt protein content on malting quality characteristics of four barley varieties, J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 43:10–17, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Utku, H., Köksel, H., and Özkara, R., Classification of barleys based on malting quality by image analysis, J. Inst. Brew. 104:351–354, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandeginste, B. G. M., Massart, D. L., Buydens, L. M. C., De Jong, S., Lewi, P. J., and Smeyers-Verbeke, J., Multivariate calibration. In: Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part B. B. G. M. Vandeginste and S. C. Rutan, ed. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1998, Vol. 20B, pp. 349–381, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Vandeginste, B. G. M., Massart, D. L., Buydens, L. M. C., De Jong, S., Lewi, P. J., and Smeyers-Verbeke, J., Supervised Pattern Recognition. In: Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part B. B. G. M. Vandeginste and S. C. Rutan, ed. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1998, Vol. 20B, pp. 207–241, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Weith, L., The relationship between the characteristics and the malt extract yield of malting barleys [Zum Zusammenhang zwischen den Kennzahlen der Braugerste und ihrer Malzextraktausbeute], Brauwissenschaft 31:269–273, 1978.
   Google Scholar