Literature Cited

• American Society of Brewing Chemists. Methods of Analysis, 8th ed. Statistical Analysis-3 Ruggedness testing. The Society, St. Paul, MN, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Andre, J. C., and Moll, M. A new approach to the kinetics of beer oxidation: From physical chemistry to industrial brewing. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 44:151–157, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, T. P., Hammond, R. V., and Persaud, K. C. Applications for an electronic aroma detector in the analysis of beer and raw materials. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 53:39–42, 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrasco, A., and Siebert, K. J. Human visual perception of haze and relationships with instrumental measurements of turbidity. Thresholds, magnitude estimation and sensory descriptive analysis of haze in model systems. Food Qual. Pref. 10:421–436, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, G. P., Sall, C. J., Maurer, J. M., Tutor, G. L., and Pringle, A. T. Use of an experimental design program to examine the influence of wort amino acids or vicinal diketones in lager fermentations. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 29:111–116, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Clapperton, J. F. Sensory characterisation of the flavour of beer. Pages 1–14 in: Progress in Flavour Research: Proceedings of the Second Weurman Flavour Research Symposium. D. G. Land and H. E. Nursten, eds. Applied Science Publishers, Norwich, UK, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Clapperton, J. F., and Piggott, J. R. Differentiation of ale and lager flavours by principal components analysis of flavour characterization data. J. Inst. Brew. 85:271–274, 1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criqui, M. H., and Ringel, B. L. Does diet or alcohol explain the French paradox? Lancet 344:1719–1723, 1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daems, V., and Delvaux, F. Multivariate analysis of descriptive sensory data on 40 commercial beers. Food Qual. Pref. 8:373–380, 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallongeville, J., Marecaux, N., Ducimetiere, P., Ferrieres, J., Arveiler, D., Bingham, A., Ruidavets, J. B., Simon, C., and Amouyel, P. Influence of alcohol consumption and various beverages on waist girth and waist-to-hip ratio in a sample of French men and women. Int. J. Obes. 22:1178–1183, 1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis, G. B. Multivariate Data Analysis in Sensory and Consumer Science. Food and Nutrition Press, Trumbull, CT, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmar, G. P. A multiple linear regression model for bottle heat penetration curves. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 14:71–77, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Einsiedler, F., Schwill-Miedaner, A., and Sommer, K. Experimental tests and modelling of complex biochemical and technical processes by taking mashing as an example. I. Proteolysis. (in German) Monatsschr. Brauwiss. 50:164–171, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Einsiedler, F., Schwill-Miedaner, A., Sommer, K., and Hamalainen, J. Reaction kinetic studies on modelling of starch hydrolysis during mashing. (in German) Brauwelt 137:1598–1603, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Einsiedler, F., Schwill-Miedaner, A., Sommer, K., and Hamalainen, J. Experimental tests and modelling of complex biochemical and technical processes by taking mashing as an example. III. Cytolysis. (in German) Monatsschr. Brauwiss. 51:11–21, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Engasser, J. M., Marc, I., Moll, M., and Duteurtre, B. Kinetic modelling of beer fermentation. Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 18:579–586, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E., Sheehan, M. C., and Stewart, D. C. The impact of malt derived proteins on beer foam quality. II. The influence of malt foam-positive proteins and non-starch polysaccharides on beer foam quality. J. Inst. Brew. 105:171–177, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, J. L., and Simpson, W. J. Measurement and prediction of the susceptibility of lager beer to spoilage by lactic acid bacteria. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 78:419–425, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, G. J., Smedley, S. M., and Atkinson, B. Beer filtration: Instrumentation and strategy for control. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 33:11–15, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Gamarallage, C., Walker, G. M., and Staines, H. J. Use of response surfaces to investigate metal ion interactions in yeast fermentations. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 55:24–29, 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. I., Garcia, L. A., and Diaz, M. Fusel alcohols production in beer fermentation processes. Process Biochem. 29:303–309, 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. I., Garcia, L. A., and Diaz, M. Modelling of diacetyl production during beer fermentation. J. Inst. Brew. 100:179–180, 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, A. I., Garcia, L. A., and Diaz, M. Prediction of ester production in industrial beer fermentation. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 16:66–71, 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garden, S. W., Pruneda, T., Irby, S., and Hysert, D. W. Development of near-infrared calibrations for hop analysis. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 58:73–82, 2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaziano, J. M., Hennekens, C. H., Godfried, S. L., Sesso, H. D., Glynn, R. J., Breslow, J. L., and Buring, J. E. Type of alcoholic beverage and risk of myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 83:52–57, 1999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, T. S., Solah, V., Glennie Holmes, M. R., and Taylor, H. R. Diastatic power in malted barley: Contributions of malt parameters to its development and the potential of barley grain beta-amylase to predict malt diastatic power. J. Inst. Brew. 101:277–280, 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamalainen, J. J., Kaljanen, T., Stenholm, K., and Pietila, K. A simulation model for planning of the mashing process. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 34:313–319, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Harayama, K., Hayase, F., and Kato, H. Evaluation by multivariate analysis of off-flavor in headspace volatiles formed during storage of beer. Agric. Biol. Chem. 55:393–398, 1991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harayama, K., Hayase, F., and Kato, H. Evaluation by a multivariate analysis of the stale flavor formed while storing beer. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 58:1595–1598, 1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, J., and Hamalainen, J. J. A mathematical model for predicting the effects of the steeping programme on water uptake during malting. J. Inst. Brew. 103:177–182, 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, P. S., and Simpson, W. J. Bitterness of congeners and stereoisomers of hop-derived bitter acids found in beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 54:234–237, 1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilett, D. R., Burke, S., and Simpson, W. J. Measurement and prediction of the rate of loss of sulphur dioxide from beer. J. Sci. Food Agric. 70:337–340, 1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, T. New aspect of chemical analysis: Chemometrics—variations in trace elements in malt as shown by factor analysis. (in Norwegian) Brygmesteren 37:149–158, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, T. Malting technology and the properties of malt: A cluster analysis study. J. Inst. Brew. 92:177–180, 1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, T., and Gunderson, R. W. Cluster analysis of beer flavor components. II. A case study of yeast strain and brewery dependency. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 41:78–80, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, T., Gunderson, R. W., Chapon, L., and Batchvarov, V. The colloidal stability of beer; data analysis and multivariate prediction. Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 21:591–597, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, T., Hage, T., Kristensen, R., and Malterud, K. E. Hop utilization in the brewery—An interbrewery comparison. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 47:62–67, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, T., Volden, R., Engan, S., and Aubert, O. A chemometric study of some beer flavour components. J. Inst. Brew. 85:265–270, 1979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura, Y., Hashimoto, N., Nagashima, Y., and Yoshioka, K. Systematic design of flavor quality of a light beer—‘Kirin Beer Light’. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 24:140–145, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, E. J., and Siebert, K. J. High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of hop bittering components in hops, hop extracts, wort and beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 41:51–57, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Knudson, E. J., and Siebert, K. J. Application of ion chromatography to beer, wort, and brewing water. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 42:65–70, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Kolbach, P., and Kremkow, C. Composition, head retention and stability of light-coloured Voll beers. II. Physico-chemical and biological stability. (in German) Monatsschr. Brauerei 22:89–99, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Kralj, D., Zupanec, J., Vasilj, D., Kralj, S., and Psenicnik, J. Variability of essential oils of hops, Humulus lupulus L. J. Inst. Brew. 97:197–206, 1991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzela, R. Control of the levels of flavour active volatile esters and higher alcohols in beers. Ferment 10:35–40, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Langstaff, S. A., Guinard, J. X., and Lewis, M. J. Sensory evaluation of the mouthfeel of beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 49:54–59, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, S., Carroll, M., Johnson, C., Fulwood, R., Kalsbeek, W., and Briefel, R. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and alcohol consumption in US white and black adults: Data from NHANES II. Am. J. Public Health 83:811–6, 1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massart, D. L., Vandeginste, B. G. M., Buydens, L. M. C., De Jong, S., Lewi, P. J., and Smeyers-Verbeke, J. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part A. Vol. 20A in the series Data Handling in Science and Technology. B. G. M. Vandeginste and S. C. Rutan, eds. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, K., and Cuti, J. The use of experimental models for process optimization in malting. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 31:79–82, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Mawatari, M., Nagashima, Y., Aoki, T., Hirota, T., and Yamada, M. Sensory characterization of beer flavor using cluster analysis. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 49:59–64, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, L. P. On-line blending control for beer production using near infrared spectroscopy. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 29:96–100, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• McMurrough, I., Kelly, R., Byrne, J., and O'Brien, M. Effect of the removal of sensitive proteins and proanthocyanidins on the colloidal stability of lager beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 50:67–76, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Meilgaard, M. C. Current progress in sensory analysis. A review. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 49:101–109, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Meilgaard, M. C., and Siebert, K. J. Advanced methods of sensory evaluation. Pages 33–42 in: Flavor Symposium. (Monogr. VII.) European Brewery Convention, Zoeterwoude, The Netherlands, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Melm, G., Tung, P., and Pringle, A. Mathematical modeling of beer foam. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 32:6–10, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Molina Cano, J. L., Ramo, T., Ellis, R. P., Swanston, J. S., Bain, H., Uribe Echeverria, T., and Perez Vendrell, A. M. Effect of grain composition on water uptake by malting barley: A genetic and environmental study. J. Inst. Brew. 101:79–83, 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, M., Flayeux, R., and Lehuede, J. M. Rapid determination of moisture and proteins in malt by IR reflectance spectrometry. (in: French) Bios 7:3–6, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, M., Flayeux, R., and Muller, P. Relationship between beer flavour and the composition of barley and malt. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 18:31–35, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, M., Flayeux, R., That, V., and Noel, J. P. Relationships between physico-chemical parameters of beer and the results of tasting. (in: French) Bios 5:328–333, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Monnez, J. M., Flayeux, R., Muller, P., and Moll, M. An approach to the estimation of brewing quality in barley and malt. J. Inst. Brew. 93:477–486, 1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira da Silva, M., Malfeito Ferreira, M., and Loureiro, V. Long-chain fatty acid composition as a criterion for yeast distinction in the brewing industry. J. Inst. Brew. 100:17–22, 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, R. A mathematical model of the formation of fermentable sugars from starch hydrolysis during high-temperature mashing. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 27:337–344, 2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullet, G. M. Applications of multivariate methods in strategic approaches to product marketing and promotion. Food Technol. 42:152–153, 1988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noel, J. P., and Bauer, G. Relationships between the variables defining the stages of beer manufacture. (in French) Bios 5:355–366, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Patino, H., Kemper, E. A., Miller, J. L., and Michener, W. L. Adjustments to beer density for carbon dioxide partial molal volume and residual carbonation after degassing. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 50:35–37, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Patino, H., Knudsen, F. B., Storer, J., and Theisen, T. Experimental design and modeling of fill and oxygen levels in beer canning. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 27:15–19, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Peppard, T. L. Principal components analysis—Its application in monitoring the consistency of beer quality. J. Inst. Brew. 91:325–328, 1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppard, T. L., Ramus, S. A., Witt, C. A., and Siebert, K. J. Correlation of sensory and instrumental data in elucidating the effect of varietal differences on hop flavor in beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 47:18–26, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, J. J. Multivariate procedures in sensory research: Scope and limitations. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 18:11–21, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, R. J. R., and Freeman, G. J. Beer filtration—Fitting the filter aid to the beer. Ferment 6:64–67, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Sendra, J. M., Todo, V., Pinaga, F., Izquierdo, L., and Carbonell, J. V. Evaluation of the effects of yeast strain and fermentation conditions on the volatile concentration profiles of pilot plant lager beers. Monatsschr. Brauwiss. 47:316–321, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, K. J. Routine use of a programmable calculator for computing alcohol, real extract, original gravity, and calories in beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 38:27–33, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, K. J. Modeling the flavor thresholds of organic acids in beer as a function of their molecular properties. Food Qual. Pref. 10:129–137, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, K. J. Evaluation of a model of organic acid flavor thresholds in beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 58:94–96, 2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, K. J., Carrasco, A., and Lynn, P. Y. Formation of protein-polyphenol haze in beverages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44:1997–2005, 1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebert, K. J., and Knudson, E. J. The relationship of beer high molecular weight protein and foam. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 26:139–146, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, K. J., and Stenroos, L. E. The use of multivariate analysis of beer aroma volatile compound patterns to discern brand-to-brand and plant-to-plant differences. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 47:93–101, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, K. J., and Wisk, T. J. Yeast counting by microscopy or by electronic particle counting. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 42:71–79, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoholm, K., Tenhunen, J., Tammisola, J., Pietila, K., and Home, S. Determination of the fermentability and extract content of industrial worts by NIR. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 54:135–140, 1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith Warner, S. A., Spiegelman, D., Shiaw Shyuan, Y., van den Brandt, P. A., Folsom, A. R., Goldbohm, A., Graham, S., Holmberg, L., Howe, G. R., Marshall, J. R., Miller, A. B., Potter, J. D., Speizer, F. E., Willett, W. C., Wolk, A., and Hunter, D. J. Alcohol and breast cancer in women. A pooled analysis of cohort studies. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 279:535–540, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenroos, L. E., and Siebert, K. J. Application of pattern-recognition techniques to the essential oil of hops. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 42:54–61, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Stucky, G. J., and McDaniel, M. R. Raw hop aroma qualities by trained panel free-choice profiling. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 55:65–72, 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., Bailey, T., Hammond, R., and Merry, G. Potential applications for an electronic aroma detector within the brewing industry. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 32:175–179, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Timmins, E. M., Quain, D. E., and Goodacre, R. Differentiation of brewing yeast strains by pyrolysis mass spectrometry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Yeast 14:885–893, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titica, M., Landaud, S., Trelea, I. C., Latrille, E., Corrieu, G., and Cheruy, A. Modeling the kinetics of higher alcohol and ester production based on CO2 emission with a view to control of beer flavor by temperature and top pressure. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 58:167–174, 2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todo, V., Sendra, J. M., Gonzalez, L. A., Izquierdo, L., and Carbonell, J. V. Differentiation of commercial and pilot beers by their volatile composition. Rev. Esp. Cienc. Tecnol. Aliment. 32:417–429, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, J. B., Ormrod, I. H. L., and Sharpe, F. R. Electronic aroma detection in the brewery. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 53:167–173, 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toner, M. C., and Potter, O. E. Computer simulation of the beta-amylolysis of starch components. J. Inst. Brew. 83:78–81, 1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torline, P., Dercksen, A., and Axcell, B. An electronic look at beer instability. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 36:289–292, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Torline, P. A. Beer quality assessment using multi-variant analyses of both sensory and analytical parameters. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 22:13–18, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• van der Aa Kühle, A., and Jespersen, L. Detection and identification of wild yeasts in lager breweries. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 43:205–213, 1998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hamersveld, E. H., van der Lans, R. G. J. M., Caulet, P. J. C., and Luyben, K. C. A. M. Modeling brewers' yeast flocculation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 57:330–341, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandeginste, B. G. M., Massart, D. L., Buydens, L. M. C., De Jong, S., Lewi, P. J., and Smeyers-Verbeke, J. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part B. Vol. 20B in the series Data Handling in Science and Technology. B. G. M. Vandeginste and S. C. Rutan, eds. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., and Poling, J. Applications of an electronic nose in the brewing industry. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 34:127–132, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Whittle, N., Eldridge, H., and Bartley, J. Identification of the polyphenols in barley and beer by HPLC/MS and HPLC/-electrochemical detection. J. Inst. Brew. 105:89–99, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding, K., Echtermann, K. W., Flemming, W., and Bellmann, A. Utilization of hop bitter principles in the brewing process. (in German) Lebensmittelindustrie 29:163–165, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Winell, B., Äyräpää, T., Lindström, I., Wesshagen, V., Gyllang, H., Åkesson, C., and Stöllman, U. Correlating instrumental and sensory flavour data for the property of fruitiness. Proc. Congr. Eur. Brew. Conv. 17:51–59, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, J. L., Favier, J. F., and Briggs, D. E. Predicting the germinative energy of dormant malting barley during storage. J. Inst. Brew. 100:257–269, 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama, A., Takahashi, N., Ohno, T., and Mawatari, M. Development of an on-line beer variety indicator. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 30:63–65, 1993.
   Google Scholar