599
Views
45
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Some Conceptual Problems with Critical Pedagogy

Pages 177-201 | Published online: 12 Jan 2015

References

  • Abberley, P. 1987. The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap and Society 2: 5–19.
  • Barnes, C., and M. Oliver. 1995. Disability rights: Rhetoric and reality in the UK. Disability and Society 19: 111–16.
  • Behrmann, J. 1990. Study reveals how disabled fare in years after school. Counterpoint 12: 17–18.
  • Corker, M. 1999. Differences, conflations and foundations: The limits to “accurate” theoretical representation of disabled people’s experience? Disability and Society 14: 627–42.
  • Danforth, S. 1997. On what basis hope? Modern progress and postmodern possibilities, Journal of Mental Retardation 35: 93–106.
  • Danforth, S. 1999. Pragmatism and the scientific validation of practices in American special education. Disability and Society 14: 733–51.
  • Dewey, J. 1926. Experience and nature. Chicago, IL: Open Court Press.
  • Dewey, J. 1934. Art as experience. New York: Berkley Publishing Group.
  • Dewey, J. 1938. Experience and education. New York: MacMillan.
  • Ellis, C. 1997. Evocative autoethnography: Writing emotionally about our lives. In Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice, W. Tierney and Y. Lincoln, eds., pp. 115–42. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Ellsworth, E. 1992. Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through repressive myths of critical pedagogy. In Feminisms and critical pedagogy, C. Luke and J. Gore, eds., pp. 90–119. New York/London: Routledge.
  • Erevelles, N. 2000. Educating unruly bodies: Critical pedagogy, disability studies, and the politics of schooling. Educational Theory 50: 25–48.
  • Ferguson, D. 1995. The real challenge of inclusion: Confessions of a “rabid inclusionist.” Phi Delta Kappan 77: 281–87.
  • Freire, P. 1970/1994. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
  • Gabel, S. 1997. A theory of an aesthetic of disability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
  • Gabel, S. 1999. Depressed and disabled: Some discursive problems with mental illness. In Disability discourse, M. Corker and S. French, eds., pp. 38–46. England: Open University Press.
  • Gabel, S. In press. An aesthetic of disability. In Disability studies in education, S. Gabel, ed. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Gerber, P. 1990. The problem, the future, the challenge: The issue of employability for persons with learning disabilities. In Pathways to employment for people with learning disabilities: A plan for action, D. Brown, P. Gerber, and C. Dowdy, eds., pp. 3–9. Washington, DC: President’s committee on Employment of People with Disabilities.
  • Giroux, H., and P. McLaren, eds. 1994. Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies. New York/London: Routledge.
  • Goldstein, B. 1995. Critical pedagogy in a bilingual special education classroom. Journal of Learning Disabilities 28: 463–75.
  • Governors Planning Council on Developmental Disabilities. 1987. A new way of thinking. St Paul, MN: Governors Council on Developmental Disabilities.
  • Governors Planning Council on Developmental Disabilities. 1992. Youth with disabilities fare poorly after school according to national follow-up study. Futurity May: 1–2.
  • Harding, S. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • hooks, b. 1994. Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York/London: Routledge.
  • Kaye, S. 1997. Education of children with disabilities. Disability Statistics Abstract 19:1–4.
  • Kaye, S. 2000. Disability and the digital divide. Disability Statistics Abstract 22: 1–4.
  • Lather, P. 1991. Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York/London: Routledge.
  • Lensmire, T. 1998. Rewriting student voice. Journal of Curriculum Studies 30: 261–91.
  • Linton, S. 1998. Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.
  • Longmore, P. 1997. Conspicuous contribution and American cultural dilemmas: Telethon rituals of cleansing and renewal. In The body and physical difference, D.
  • Mitchell and S. Snyder, eds., pp. 134–58. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Luke, C. 1992. Feminist politics in radical pedagogy. In Feminisms and critical pedagogy, C. Luke and J. Gore, eds., pp. 25–53. New York/London: Routledge.
  • Luke, C. 1996. Feminisms and pedagogies of everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Luke, C., and J. Gore, eds. 1992. Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York/London: Routledge.
  • Luke, C., and J. Gore, eds. 1994. Pedagogy. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, R. E. Asher and J. M. Simpson, eds., p. 566. Tarrytown, NY: Elsevier Science Pergamon.
  • Malinowitz, H. 1992. Textual orientations: Lesbian and gay students and the making of discourse communities. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Marcuse, H. 1978. The aesthetic dimension: Toward a critique of Marxist aesthetics. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Marks, D. 1999. Dimensions of oppression: Theorising the embodied subject. Disability and Society 14: 611–26.
  • McLaren, P. 1994. Multiculturalism and the postmodern critique: Toward a pedagogy of resistance and transformation. In Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies, H. Giroux and P. McLaren, eds., pp. 192–222. New York/London: Routledge.
  • McLaren, P. 1995. Critical pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era. New York/London: Routledge.
  • McLaren, P. 1998. Revolutionary pedagogy in post-revolutionary times: Rethinking the political economy of critical education. Educational Theory 48: 431–62.
  • McLaren, P., and H. Giroux. 1995. Radical pedagogy and cultural politics: Beyond the discourses of critique and anti-utopianism. In Critical pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era, P. McLaren, ed., pp. 29–57. New York/London: Routledge.
  • Mehan, H., A. Hertweck, and J. L. Meihls. 1986. Handicapping the handicapped: Decision making in students’ educational careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Mitchell, D., and S. Snyder, eds. 1997. The body and physical difference. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Mohanty, C. 1994. On race and voice: Challenges for liberal education in the 1990’s. In Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies, H. Giroux and P. McLaren, eds., pp. 145–60. New York/London: Routledge.
  • Monga, T. 1996. Physical medicine and rehabilitation state of the arts review: Sexuality and disability. Journal of Sex Research 33: 267–70.
  • Noddings, N. 1984. Caring: A feminist approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Peters, S. 1996. The politics of disability identity. In Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights, Len Barton, ed., pp. 215–34. New York: Pergamon.
  • Polkinghorne, D. 1997. Reporting qualitative research as practice. In Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice, W. Tierney and Y. Lincoln, eds., pp. 3–22. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Pugach, M., and C. Warger. 1996. Treating curriculum as a target of reform: Can special and general education learn from each other? In Curriculum trends, special education and reform: Refocusing the conversation, M. Pugach and C. Warger, eds., 1–22. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Rhodes, W. 1995. Liberatory pedagogy and special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities 28: 458–62.
  • Rioux, M., and M. Bach. 1994. Disability is not measles: Studies in cultural history. North York, Canada: L’Institut Roeher.
  • Sasso, G. 2001. The retreat from inquiry and knowledge in special education. Journal of Special Education 34: 178–93.
  • Shakespeare, T. 1996. Disability, identity and difference. In Exploring the divide: Illness and disability, C. Barnes and G. Mercer, eds. Leeds, UK: Disability Press.
  • Shakespeare, T. 1997. Cultural representations of disabled people: Dustbins for disavowal? In Disability studies: Past, present and future, L. Barton and M. Oliver, eds., pp. 217–36. Leeds, UK: Disability Press.
  • Shakespeare, T., and N. Watson. 1997. Defending the social model. Disability and Society 12: 293–300.
  • Shrewsbury, C. 1987. What is feminist pedagogy? Women’s Studies Quarterly 15:6–27.
  • Slee, R. 1997. Imported or important theory? Social interrogations of disablement and special education. British Journal of Sociology of Education 18: 407–49.
  • Sleeter, C., and C. Grant. 1997. Race, class, gender, and disability in current textbooks. In The curriculum studies reader, D. Flinders and S. Thornton, eds., pp. 279–305. New York: Routledge.
  • Smith, D. 1987. The everyday world as problematic. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
  • Taylor, H. 2000. Many people with disabilities feel isolated, left out of their communities and would like to participate more. Harris Poll #34. Creators Syndicate, Inc.
  • Trupin, L., and D. Rice. 1995. Health status, medical care use, and number of disabling conditions in the United States. Disability Statistics Abstract 9: 1–4.
  • Ulmer, G. 1985. Applied grammatology: Post(e)-pedagogy from Jacques Derrida to Joseph Beuys. Baltimore/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • van Manen, M. 1988. The relationship between research and pedagogy. In Contemporary curriculum discourses, W. Pinar, ed., pp. 437–52. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick Publishers.
  • van Manen, M. 1990. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Wardekker, W., and S. Miedema. 1997. Critical pedagogy: An evaluation and a direction for reformulation. Journal of Curriculum Inquiry 27: 45–61.
  • Woollett, A., and A. Phoenix. 1992. Motherhood as pedagogy: Developmental psychology and the accounts of mothers of young children. In Feminisms and pedagogies of everyday life, C. Luke, ed., pp. 80–102. New York/London: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.