Patterns of Section 8 Relocation in the Hope vi Program

References

• Abt Associates. 1996. An historical and baseline assessment of HOPE VI: Volume I, cross-site report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Coulton, C. J., & Pandey, S. 1992. Geographic concentration of poverty and the risk to children in urban neighborhoods. American Behavioural Scientist, 35, 238–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane, J. 1991. The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 1226–1259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epp, G. 1996. Emerging strategies for revitalizing public housing communities. Housing Policy Debate, 7 (3), 563–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, P. 1999. Section 8 and the Public Housing Revolution: Where Will the Families Go? Chicago, IL: The Woods Fund of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Smith, R. E., & Tatian, P. A. (1999a, May). Assessing property value impacts of dispersed housing subsidy programs: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Smith, R. E., & Tatian, P. A. 1999b. The impact of neighbors who use Section 8 certificates on property values. Housing Policy Debate, 10 (4), 879–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. 2002. Forced relocation vs, voluntary mobility: The effects of dispersal programmes on households. Housing Studies, 17 (1), 107–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jargowsky, P. A. 1997. Poverty and place; ghettos, barrios, and the American city. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, I. S. 1983. The supply experiment. InJ. Friedman & D. H. Weinberg (Eds.), The great housing experiment (pp. 23–36). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. 1988. The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67 (2), 281–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naparstek, A. J., Dooley, D., & Smith, R. 1997. Community building in public housing: Ties that bind people and their communities. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Naparstek, A. J., Freis, S. R., & Kingsley, G. T. (with Dooley, D., & Lewis, H. E.) 2000. HOPE VI: Community building makes a difference. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. 2000. Why voucher and certificate users live in distressed neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 11 (4), 881–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polikoff, A. 1994. Housing policy and urban poverty. Washington, DC: Center for Housing Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Quercia, R. G., & Galster, G. C. (in press). Threshold effects and neighborhood change. Journal of Planning Education and Research.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainwater, L. 1970. Behind ghetto walls. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. 1995. Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice. Housing Policy Debate, 6, 231–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schill, M., & Wachter, W. 1995. The spatial bias of federal housing law and policy: Concentrated poverty in urban America. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 143, 1285–1341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A., Popkin, S., & Cunningham, M. 2000. Section 8 mobility and neighborhood health. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Varady, D. P., & Walker, C. C. 2000. Vouchering out distressed subsidized developments: Does moving lead to improvements in housing and neighborhood conditions. Housing Policy Debate, 11 (1), 115–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. 1987. The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1996, October). Bookmark from a picture of subsidized households. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar