The concept of intersubjectivity in psychoanalysis: Taking critical stock

References

• Argelander H (1968). Der psychoanalytische Dialog. Psyche‐Z Psychoanal 22:325–39.
   Google Scholar
• Argelander H (1970a). Die szenische Funktion des Ichs und ihr Anteil an der Symptom‐ und Charakterbildung. Psyche‐Z Psychoanal 24:325–45. The scenic function of the ego and its role in symptom and character formation. Int J Psychoanal (2013) 94:337–54.
   Google Scholar
• Argelander H (1970b). The initial interview in psychotherapy. New York, NY: Human Sciences Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Argelander H (1974). Über psychoanalytische Kompetenz. Psyche‐Z Psychoanal 28:1063–76.
   Google Scholar
• Aron L (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aron L, Harris A (2005). Introduction. Relational psychoanalysis, vol. 2: Innovation and expansion. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger M, Baranger W (1961–62). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. Int J Psychoanal 89:795–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedorf T (2003). Dimensionen des Dritten. Sozialphilosophische Modelle zwischen Ethischem und Politischem. Munich: Fink.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe B, Lachmann F (2002). Infant research and adult treatment: Co‐constructing interactions. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin J (1998). The shadow of the other: Intersubjectivity and gender in psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin J (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanal Q 73:5–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenstein I (2001). The link and the other. Int J Psychoanal 82:141–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binswanger L (1942). Grundformen und Erkenntnis menschlichen Daseins. In: Ausgewählte Werke, vol. 2. Heidelberg: Asanger, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Binswanger L (1947). Über die daseinsanalytische Forschungsrichtung in der Psychiatrie. In: Ausgewählte Werke, vol. 3, 231–57, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Binswanger L (1963). Being‐in‐the‐World: Selected papers of Ludwig Binswanger, with a critical introduction to his existential psychoanalysis by Nedleman J, translator. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bohleber W (2010). Destructiveness, intersubjectivity, and trauma. The identity crisis of modern psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten S (2009). The intersubjective mirror in infant learning and evolution of speech. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brown L (2011). Intersubjective processes and the unconscious: An integration of Freudian, Kleinian and Bionian perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buber M (1923). Ich und du. Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider. 9th edition, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Buber M (1954). Das dialogische Prinzip. Gerlingen: Lambert Schneider. 7th edition, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Cavell M (1998). In response to Owen Renik's‚ the analyst's subjectivity and the analyst's objectivity. Int J Psychoanal 79:1195–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chodorow NJ (2004). The American independent tradition: Loewald, Erikson, and the (possible) rise of intersubjective ego psychology. Psychoanal Dialog 14:207–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civitarese G (2008). The intimate room: Theory and technique of the analytic field. London/New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans H, reporter (2008). Panel report: The action in therapeutic action: Nonverbal interventions. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 56:565–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro A (1999). The bi‐personal field: Experiences in child analysis. London/New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro A (2005). Commentary. In: Lewkowicz S, Flechner S, editors. Truth, reality, and the psychoanalyst: Latin American contributions to psychoanalysis, 87–96. London: IPA.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro A (2011). Clinical implications of Bion's thought. In: Mawson C, editor. Bion today, 155–72. London/New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro A, Basile R (2009). The analytic field: A clinical concept. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy P, Target M (2007). Playing with reality: IV. A theory of external reality rooted in intersubjectivity. Int J Psychoanal 88:917–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud S, Binswanger L (1992). Briefwechsel 1908–1938. Fichtner G, editor. Frankfurt: Fischer. [(2003). The Sigmund Freud–Ludwig Binswanger correspondence 1908–1938. Fichtner G, editor; Pomerans AJ, translator; Roberts T, translator, introduction, editorial notes and additional letters. New York, NY: Other Press.]
   Google Scholar
• Frie R (2002). Binswanger, Sullivan und die interpersonelle Psychoanalyse. Luzifer‐Amor 29:105–22.
   Google Scholar
• Frie R (2003). Language and subjectivity: From Binswanger through Lacan. In: Frie R, editor.Understanding experience: Psychotherapy and postmodernism, 137–60. London/New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer HG (1960). Wahrheit und Methode. Gesammelte Werke I [Complete Works I], Tübingen: Mohr & Siebeck, 1990. [(2004). Truth and method. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Continuum.]
   Google Scholar
• Gergely G, Unoka Z (2008). Attachment and mentalization in humans: The development of the affective self. In: Elliot E, Slade A, Bergner S, editors. Mind to mind: Infant research, neuroscience, and psychoanalysis, 50–87. New York, NY: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green A (1975). The analyst, symbolization, and absence in the analytic setting (on changes in analytic practice and analytic experience). Int J Psychoanal 56:1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green A (1999). The work of the negative. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Green A (2000). The intrapsychic and the intersubjective in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal Q 69:1–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog M, Braun H‐J, editors (1993). Einleitung der Herausgeber. In: Binswanger L. Ausgewählte Werke [Selected works], vol. 2, xv–xlvii. Heidelberg: Asanger.
   Google Scholar
• Kaës R (2007). Linking, alliances and shared space: Groups and the psychoanalyst. London: IPA.
   Google Scholar
• Kirshner L (2009). The work of René Kaes: Intersubjective transmission in families, groups, and culture. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 54:1005–13.
   Google Scholar
• Klüwer R (1983). Agieren und Mitagieren. Psyche‐Z Psychoanal 37:828–40.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche J (1988). Die allgemeine Verführungstheorie und andere Aufsätze. Tübingen: edition diskord.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche J (1992). La révolution copernicienne inachevée: travaux 1965–1992. Paris: Aubier.
   Google Scholar
• [(1996). Die unvollendete kopernikanische Revolution in der Psychoanalyse. Frankfurt: Fischer.]
   Google Scholar
• Mclaughlin JT (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 39:595–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden TH (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. Int J Psychoanal 75:3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden TH (2004). The analytic third: Implications for psychoanalytic theory and technique. Psychoanal Q 73:167–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orange D, Atwood G, Stolorow R (1997). Working intersubjectively: Contextualism in psychoanalytic practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puget J (2004). Intersubjektivität. Krise der Repräsentation. Psyche‐Z Psychoanal 58:914–34.
   Google Scholar
• Scharff D, Scharff JS (2011). The interpersonal unconscious. Lanham, MD: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Scheunert G (1959). Zum Problem der Gegenübertragung. Psyche‐Z Psychoanal 13:574–93.
   Google Scholar
• Schottlaender F (1952). Das Problem der Begegnung in der Psychotherapie. Psyche‐Z Psychoanal 6:494–507.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz HP (2012). Intersubjectivity and dialecticism. Int J Psychoanal 93:401–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern D (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stern D (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow R (2002). Impasse, affectivity, and intersubjective systems. Psychoanal Rev 89:329–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stolorow R, Atwood G (1992). Contexts of being: The intersubjective foundations of psychological life. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theunissen M (1977). The other: Studies in the social ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• The scenic function of the ego and its role in symptom and character formation. Int J Psychoanal 94:337–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevarthen C (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In: Bullowa M, editor. Before speech: The beginning of interpersonal communication, 321–47. New York, NY: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Trüb H (1951). Heilung aus der Begegnung. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit der Psychologie C.G. Jungs. Stuttgart: Klett.
   Google Scholar