The first interview: Anxieties and research on initiating psychoanalysis

References

• Basile R, Birksted Breen D, Bonard O, Denis P, Diercks M, Ferro A, Hebbrecht M, Hinze E, Jackson D J, Mariotti P, Mauss Hanke A, Tuckett D (2010). How do psychoanalysts work?The work of the EPF working party on comparative clinical methods 2003–2009. Psychoanal in Europe: Bull Eur Psychoanal Fed 64(Suppl):5–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi R (2003). What kind of evidence makes the analyst change his or her theoretical and technical ideas? In: Leuzinger‐bohleber M, Dreher A U, Canestri J, editors. Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis, 125–36. London: IPA.
   Google Scholar
• Bion W (1957). Differentiation of the psychotic from the non‐psychotic personalities. In: Bion W. Second thoughts, 43–64. London: Karnac, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Bion W (1959). Attacks on linking. In: Bion W. Second thoughts, 93–109. London: Karnac, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Bion W (1961). Experiences in groups. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bion W (1962). Learning from experience. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Bion W (1965). Transformations. London: Karnac
   Google Scholar
• Bion W (1979). Making the best of a bad job. In: Bion F editor. Clinical seminars and other works, 321–31. London: Karnac, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Bion W (1997). Taming wild thoughts. London: Karnac
   Google Scholar
• Bollas C (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Botella C, Botella S (2001). De la recherche en psychanalyse. Rev Fr Psychanal 65(Hors série):355–72.
   Google Scholar
• Britton R (1998). Subjectivity, objectivity and triangular space. In: Britton R. Belief and imagination: Explorations in psychoanalysis, 41–58. London: Routledge. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis.)
   Google Scholar
• Britton R, Steiner J (1994). Interpretation: Selected fact or overvalued idea? Int J Psychoanal 75:1069–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crick P (2013). Thinking and judgement in psychoanalytic assessment and consultation. Psychoanal Psychother 27:199–214.
   Google Scholar
• Crick P (2014). Selecting a patient or initiating a psychoanalytic process? Int J Psychoanal doi: 10.1111/1745‐8315.12142. [Epub ahead of print]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dantlgraber J(1982). Observations on the subjective indication for psychoanalysis. In: Reith B, Lagerlöf S, Crick P, Møller M, Skale E, editors (2012). Initiating psychoanalysis: Perspectives, 194–222. London: Routledge. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis Teaching Series.) [(1982). Bemerkungen zur subjektiven Indikation für Psychoanalyse. Psyche 36:193–225.]
   Google Scholar
• Devereux G (1967). From anxiety to method in the behavioural sciences. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Doehrman M (1976). Parallel processes in supervision and in psychotherapy. Bull Menninger Clin 40:9–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro A (2012). Consultation, reverie and story‐telling. In: Reith B, Lagerlöf S, Crick P, Møller M, Skale E, editors (2012). Initiating psychoanalysis: Perspectives, 261–71. London: Routledge. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis Teaching Series.)
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1919). A child is being beaten. SE 17:175–204.
   Google Scholar
• Gediman H, Wolkenfield F (1980). The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis and supervision: Its reconsideration as a triadic system. Psychoanal Q 49:234–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss AL (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas J (1984). The theory of communicative action, McCarthy T, translator, vol. 1. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Klauber J (1972). Personal attitudes to psychoanalytic consultation. Ch. 9 in: Difficulties in the analytic encounter. London: Free Association Books. [(2012). In: Reith B, Lagerlöf S, Crick P, Møller M, Skale E, editors (2012). Initiating psychoanalysis: Perspectives, 63–74. London: Routledge. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis Teaching Series.)
   Google Scholar
• Lagerlöf S, Sigrell B (1999). A discussion of models for the selection of patients for supervised psychoanalysis. J Clin Psychoanal 8:149–72.
   Google Scholar
• Leuzinger‐bohleber M, Bürgin D (2003). Pluralism and unity in psychoanalytic research: Some introductory remarks. In: Leuzinger‐bohleber M, Dreher A U, Canestri J, editors. Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis, 1–25. London: IPA.
   Google Scholar
• Levine HB (2010). Creating analysts, creating analytic patients. Int J Psychoanal 91:1385–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller M (2014). The analyst's anxieties in the first interview: Barriers against analytic presence. Int J Psychoanal doi: 10.1111/1745‐8315.12178. [Epub ahead of print]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman J, Salomonsson B (2005). ‘Weaving thoughts’: A method for presenting and commenting psychoanalytic case material in a peer group. Int J Psychoanal 86:1281–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden TH (1992). Comments on transference and countertransference in the initial analytic meeting. Psychoanal Inq 12:225–47. [(2012). In: Reith B, Lagerlöf S, Crick P, Møller M, Skale E, editors. Initiating psychoanalysis: Perspectives, 173–88. London: Routledge. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis Teaching Series.)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinodoz D (2001). The psychoanalyst of the future: Wise enough to dare to be mad at times. Int J Psychoanal 82:235–48. [(2012). In: Reith B, Lagerlöf S, Crick P, Møller M, Skale E, editors. Initiating psychoanalysis: Perspectives, 310–27. London: Routledge. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis Teaching Series.)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racalbuto A (2004). The consultation in psychoanalysis and its ‘location’: Working on the frontier. In: Reith B, Lagerlöf S, Crick P, Møller M, Skale E, editors (2012). Initiating psychoanalysis: Perspectives, 245–58. London: Routledge. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis Teaching Series.)
   Google Scholar
• Reith B (2012). What interpsychic conditions lead to full analysis? Some findings from the working party on initiating psychoanalysis. Part 1: The analyst's internal frame. Psychoanal in Europe: Bull Eur Psychoanal Fed 66:94–102.
   Google Scholar
• Reith B (2013). Complementary models of the mind in Freud's The unconscious? In: Akhtar S, O'neil MK, editors. Freud's ‘The unconscious’. Contemporary Freud: Turning points and critical issues, 179–202. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Reith B, Boots J, Crick P, Gibeault A, Jaffe R, Lagerlöf S, Møller M, Skale E, Vermote R, Wegner P (2010). The specific dynamics of initial interviews: Switching the level, or opening up a meaning space? Report on Phase 1 of the WPIP study of initial interviews. Psychoanal in Europe: Bull Eur Psychoanal Fed 64(Suppl.):57–80.
   Google Scholar
• Reith B, Lagerlöf S, Crick P, Møller M, Skale E, editors (2012). Initiating psychoanalysis: Perspectives, 281–91. London: Routledge. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis Teaching Series.)
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein A (1994). A perspective on doing a consultation and making the recommendation of analysis to a prospective analysand. Psychoanal Q 63:680–95. [(2012). In: Reith B, Lagerlöf S, Crick P, Møller M, Skale E, editors. Initiating psychoanalysis: Perspectives, 281–91. London: Routledge. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis Teaching Series.)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein A (2002). Reflections on creative aspects of psychoanalytic diagnosing. Psychoanal Q 71:301–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomonsson B (2012). Psychoanalytic case presentations in a weaving thoughts group: On countertransference and group dynamics. Int J Psychoanal 93:917–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler J (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Int J Psychoanal 64:35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter J (2012). The beginning and the end of the beginning. Psychoanal in Europe: Bull Eur Psychoanal Fed 66:148–55.
   Google Scholar
• Searles HF (1955). The informational value of the supervisor's emotional experiences. In: Collected papers on schizophrenia and related subjects, 157–77. New York, NY: International UP.
   Google Scholar
• Segal H (1997). The uses and abuses of countertransference. In: Steiner J, editor. Psychoanalysis, literature and war: Papers 1972–1995, 111–19. London: Routledge. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis.)
   Google Scholar
• Symington N (1990). The possibility of human freedom and its transmission (with particular reference to the thought of Bion). Int J Psychoanal 71:95–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett D (1994). Developing a grounded hypothesis to understand a clinical process: The role of conceptualization in validation. Int J Psychoanal 75:1159–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett D (2002). Presidential address: The new style conference and developing a peer culture in European psychoanalysis. Eur Psychoanal Fed Bull 56:32–46.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett D (2003). Presidential address: A ten year European scientific initiative. Eur Psychoanal Fed Bull 57:7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett D (2004). Presidential address: Building a psychoanalysis based on confidence in what we do. Eur Psychoanal Fed Bull 58:5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett D, Basile R, Birksted‐breen D, Böhm T, Denis P, Ferro A, Hinz H, Jemstedt A, Mariotti P, Schubert J (2008). Psychoanalysis comparable and incomparable: The evolution of a method to describe and compare psychoanalytic approaches. London: Routledge. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis.)
   Google Scholar
• Varvin S (2003). Psychotherapy with a victim of extreme violence: Clinical case report and quantitative analysis. In: Leuzinger‐bohleber M, Dreher AU, Canestri J, editors. Pluralism and unity? Methods of research in psychoanalysis, 168–83. London: IPA.
   Google Scholar
• Vermote R (2011). The value of ‘late Bion’ to analytic theory and practice. Int J Psychoanal 92:1089–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein R (1990). Psychoanalysis: The common ground. Int J Psychoanal 71:3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner P (1992). The opening scene and the importance of the countertransference in the initial psychoanalytic interview. In: Reith B, Lagerlöf S, Crick P, Møller M, Skale E, editors. Initiating psychoanalysis: Perspectives, 225–42. London: Routledge, 2012. (The New Library of Psychoanalysis Teaching Series.) [Zur Bedeutung der Gegenübertragung im psychoanalytischen Erstinterview. Psyche 46:286–307.]
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott DW (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar