References
- Baranger M, Baranger W (2008). The Analytic Situation as a Dynamic Field. Int. J. Psycho‐Anal. 89:795–826.
- Benjamin J (2004). Beyond Doer and Done to: An Intersubjective View of Thirdness. Psychoanalytic Q. 73:5–46.
- Bion W (1962). Learning from experience. London: Karnac.
- Bion WR (1965). Transformations. London: Karnac.
- Bion W (1967). Second Thoughts. London: Karnac.
- Bolognini S (2011). Secret Passages: The Theory and Technique of Interpsychic Relations. The New Library of Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
- Britton R (1998). Belief and Imagination: Explorations in Psychoanalysis. The New Library of Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
- Britton R (2003). Sex, Death and the Superego: Experiences in Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
- Brown LJ (2011). Intersubjective Processes and the Unconscious. The New Library of Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
- Brun A, Roussillon R (2014). Formes primaires de symbolisation. Paris: Dunod.
- Dantlgraber J (1982). Observations on the subjective indication for psychoanalysis. In: Reith B, Lagerlöf S, Crick P, Møller M, Skale E, editors (2012). Initiating Psychoanalysis: Perspectives, 194–222. The New Library of Psychoanalysis Teaching Series. London: Routledge. [Original German: Bemerkungen zur subjektiven Indikation für Psychoanalyse. Psyche 36: 193‐225.]
- Ferro A (1999). The Bi‐Personal Field: Experiences in Child Analysis. The New Library of Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
- Ferro A (2009). Mind Works: Technique and Creativity in Psychoanalysis. The New Library of Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
- Freud S (1915). The Unconscious. SE 14:159–204.
- Freud S (1917). A Difficulty in the Path of Psycho‐Analysis. SE 17:135–144.
- Isaacs S (1948). The nature and function of phantasy. Int. J. Psycho‐Anal. 29:73–97.
- Milner M (1987). The role of illusion in symbol formation. In: The Suppressed Madness of Sane Men, 83–113. The New Library of Psychoanalysis. London: Tavistock.
- Mitchell S (2000). Relationality: From Attachement to Intersubjectivity. Relational Perspectives Book Series. London: Routledge.
- Ogden T (1986). The Matrix of the Mind. Northvale, NJ: Aronson/London: Karnac.
- Ogden T (1989). The Primitive Edge of Experience. Northvale, NJ: Aronson/London: Karnac.
- Ogden T (1994). Subjects of Analysis. Northvale, NJ: Aronson/London: Karnac.
- Roussillon R (1991). Un paradoxe de la représentation: le médium malléable et la pulsion d'emprise. In: Paradoxes et situations limites de la psychanalyse, 130–146. Paris: P.U.F.
- Roussillon R (1999). Agonie, clivage et symbolisation. Paris: P.U.F.
- Roussillon R (2006). Pluralité de l'appropriation subjective. In: Richard F, Wainrib S, editors. La subjectivation, 59–80. Paris: Dunod.
- Skogstad W (2013). Impervious and Intrusive: The Impenetrable Object in Transference and Countertransference. Int. J. Psycho‐Anal. 94:221–238.
- Viderman S (1979). The analytic space: meaning and problems. Psychoanalytic Q. 4:257–291.
- Wainrib S (2012). Is psychoanalysis a matter of subjectivation? Int. J. Psycho‐Anal. 93:1115–1135.
- Winnicott DW (1971). Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock Publications.