Reverie‐informed research interviewing

References

• Agosta L (2015). A rumor of empathy. Hove and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin J (1994). What angel would hear me? The erotics of transference. Psychoanal Inq 14:535–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin J (2004). Beyond doer and done to: an intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanal Q 73:5–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion W (1962). Learning from experience. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Bion W (1979). Clinical seminars and four papers. Abingdon: Fleetwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bion W, Green A (2005). Cogitations. Year International Psychoanalytical: 233–41.
   Google Scholar
• Birksted‐breen D (2012). Taking time: The tempo of psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal 93:819–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birksted‐breen D (2016). Bi‐ocularity, the functioning mind of the psychoanalyst. Int J Psychoanal 97:25–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blass R (2013). Psychoanalytic controversy: Introduction: What does the presentation of case material tell us about what actually happened in and analysis and how does it do this? Int J Psychoanal 94:1129–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatt S (2008). Polarities of experience: Relatedness and self‐definition in personality development, psychopathology and the therapeutic process. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs C (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright D (2004). The psychoanalytic research interview: Preliminary suggestions. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 52:209–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chessick R (1982). Metaphysics or autistic reverie. Contemp Psychoanal 18:160–72.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke S (2002). Learning from experience, psycho‐social research methods in the social sciences. Qual Res 2:173–95.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper S (1993). Interpretive fallibility and the psychoanalytic dialogue. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 41:9–126.
   Google Scholar
• Dexter L (1970). Elite and specialized interviewing. Evanston, IL: Northwestern UP.
   Google Scholar
• Dicicco‐bloom B, Crabtree B (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education 40(4):314–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzy D (2010). Qualitative interviewing as embodied emotional performance. Qual Inq 16(3):163–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro A (2002). Some implications of Bion's thought: The waking dream and narrative derivatives. Int J Psychoanal 83:597–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro A (2011). Avoiding emotions, living emotions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy P (2000). Grasping the nettle: or why psychoanalytic research is such an irritant. Paper presented at the Annual Research Lecture of the British Psycho‐Analytical Society on 1 March 2000, available at: http://www.psychoanalysis.org.uk/fonagy1.htm (accessed 26 July 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Sharidan Smith AM, translator. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1900). The interpretation of dreams. SE IV:ix–627.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1901). The psychopathology of everyday life. SE VI:vii–296.
   Google Scholar
• Freud S (1912). Recommendations to physicians practising psycho‐analysis. SE XII:109–20.
   Google Scholar
• Froggett L, Hollway W (2010). Psychosocial research analysis and scenic understanding. J Psychoanal Cult Soc 15:281–301.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh S, Baraitser L (2008). Psychoanalysis and psychosocial studies. J Psychoanal Cult Soc 13:346–365.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh S, Emerson P (2005). Interpretation and over‐interpretation: Disputing the meaning of texts. Qual Res 5:307–24.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh S, Phoenix A, Pattman R (2003). Taking a stand: using psychoanalysis to explore the positioning of subjects in discourse. Brit J Social Psych 42:39–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbard G (1995). Countertransference: The emerging common ground. Int J Psychoanal 76:475–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemignani M (2011). Between researcher and researched: An introduction to countertransference in qualitative inquiry. Qual Inq 17(8):701–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium J, Holstein J (2004). The active interview. In: Silverman D, editor. Qualitative Research, 2nd edition, 140–61. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gubrium J, Holstein J (2011). Animating interview narratives. In: Silverman D, editor. Qualitative Research, 3rd edition, 149–67. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heimann P (1950). On counter‐transference. Int J Psychoanal 31:81–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hycner R (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Stud 8:279–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspers M (1994). Issues in phenomenology for researchers of nursing. J Adv Nurs 19:309–314.
   Google Scholar
• Layard R (2005). Mental health: Britain's biggest social problem? Paper presented at the No. 10 Strategy Unit Seminar on Mental Health, 20 January 2005, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lomax J, Morrissey C (1989). The interview as inquiry for psychiatrists and oral historians: convergence and divergence in skills and goals. The Public Historian 11(1):17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lucey H, Melody J, Walkerdine V (2003). Project 4:21 Transitions to womanhood: developing a psychosocial perspective in one longitudinal study. Int J Soc Res Meth 6(3):279–84.
   Google Scholar
• Madill A, Sullivan P (2010). Medical training as adventure‐wonder and adventure‐ordeal: A dialogical analysis of affect‐laden pedagogy. Soc Sci Med 71(12):2195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley N, Ansaldo F, Target M (2013). The meaningful assessment of therapy outcomes: incorporating a qualitative study into a randomized controlled trial evaluating the treatment of adolescent depression. Psychother 51(1):128–37.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenroth C (2010). The research relationship, enactments and ‘counter‐transference’ analysis: On the significance of scenic understanding. Psychoanal Cult Soc 15(3):267–80.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden T (1992). Comments on the transference and countertransference in the initial analytic meeting. Psychoanal Inq 12:225–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden T (1994). The analytic third: working with intersubjective clinical facts. Int J Psychoanal 75:3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden T (1996). Reconsidering three aspects of psychoanalytic technique. Int J Psychoanal 77:883–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden T (1997a). Listening three Frost poems. Psychoanal Dial 7:619–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden T (1997b). Reverie and interpretation. Psychoanal Q 66:567–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden T (1997c). Reverie and metaphor: Some thoughts on how I work as a psychoanalyst. Int J Psychoanal 78:719–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden T (2001). Conversations at the frontier of dreaming. Fort Da 7B:7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden T (2003). On not being able to dream. Int J Psychoanal 84:17–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden T (2005). On psychoanalytic writing. Int J Psychoanal 86:15–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden T (2015). Intuiting the truth of what's happening: On Bion's ‘Notes on memory and desire’. Psychoanal Q 84(2):285–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden T (2016). On language and truth in psychoanalysis. Psychoanal Q 85(2):411–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker I (1998). Social constructionism, discourse, and realism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patton M (2005). Qualitative research. In: Everitt B, Howell D, editors. Encyclopaedia of statistic in behavioural science. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Persons J, Silberschatz G (1998). Are results of randomized controlled trials useful to psychotherapists? J Consult Clin Psych 66(1):126–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter J, Hepburn A (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qual Res Psych 2:281–307.
   Google Scholar
• Ramon S (2009). Comparative methodology in mental health research: Its relevance in social work and social policy. In Ramon S, Zavirsek D, editors. Critical edge issues in social work and social policy, 79–96. Faculty of Social Work, University of Ljubljana.
   Google Scholar
• Rapley T (2004). Interviews. In: Seale C, Silverman D, Gubrium F, editors. Qualitative Research Practice, 15–33. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L (2002). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rizq R (2008). The research couple: A psychoanalytic perspective on dilemmas in the qualitative research interview. Eur J Psychother Counsell Health 10(1):39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Roth A, Fonagy P (2006). What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rustin M (2010). Varieties of psychoanalytic research. Psychoanal Psychother 24:380–97.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman D (2013). Interpreting qualitative data, 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stolorow R, Atwood G (1994). The myth of the isolated mind. Prog Self Psych 10:233–50.
   Google Scholar
• Strømme H, Gullestad E, Stanicke E, Killingmo B (2010). A widening scope on therapist development: Designing a research interview informed by psychoanalysis. Qual Res Psych 7(3):214–32.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor D (2009). Consenting to be robbed so as not to be murdered. Psychoanal Psychother 23:263–75.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott D (1965a). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development. The International Psycho‐Analytic Library, 64:1–276. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho‐Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott D (1965b). A clinical study of the effect of a failure of the average expectable environment on a child's mental functioning. Int J Psychoanal 46:81–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar