Evidence‐based teaching: Tools and techniques that promote learning in the psychology classroom

References

• Agarwal, P. K., Karpicke, J. D., Kang, S. H. K., Roediger, H. L., III, & Mcdermott, K. B. (2008). Examining the testing effect with open‐ and closed‐book tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 861–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association (2011). Principles for quality undergraduate education in psychology. American Psychologist, 66, 850–856. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Arum, R., & Roska, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bahrick, H. P., & Hall, L. K. (2005). The importance of retrieval failures to long‐term retention: A metacognitive explanation of the spacing effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 566–577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (2008). Metacognition in comprehension instruction: What we've learned since NRP. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research‐based best practices (2nd ed.). (pp. 65–79). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balgopal, M. M., Wallace, A. M., & Dahlberg, S. (2012). Writing to learn ecology: A study of three populations of college students. Environmental Education Research, 18, 67–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207–1212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐9280.2008.02225.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, M. G., Kross, E., Krpan, K. M., Askren, M. K., Burson, A., Deldin, P. J., Jonides, J. (2012). Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 140, 300–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V. W. (Ed.) (2012). Past, present, and future contribution of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 249–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, T. E., & Hineline, P. N. (2002). Interteaching: A strategy for enhancing the user‐friendliness of behavioral arrangements in the college classroom. Behavior Analyst, 25, 215–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., & Demarree, K. G. (2012). Social metacognition. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buskist, W. , & Groccia, J. (Eds.) (2011). Evidence‐based teaching: New directions in teaching and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., III (2007). Testing improves long‐term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 514–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. (1983). Strategic responses to conditions of decline: Higher education and the private sector. Journal of Higher Education, 54, 359–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella‐malone, H. I., Axe, J. B., & Parker, E. D. (2009). Interteach preparation: A comparison of the effects of answering versus generating study guide questions on quiz scores. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9, 22–35.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K. (2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1547–1552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. K. (2012). Testing enhances the transfer of learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 279–283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412452728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda, N. J., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., Mozer, M. C., & Pashler, H. (2009). Optimizing distributed practice: Theoretical analysis and practical implications. Experimental Psychology, 56, 236–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1027/1618‐3169.56.4.236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354–380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033‐2909.132.3.354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. K., Mcdermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III (2006). Retrieval induced facilitation: Initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 553–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor‐greene, P. A. (2005). Fostering meaningful classroom discussions: Student‐generated questions, quotations, and talking points. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 173–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dement, W. E., & Vaughn, C. (2000). The promise of sleep. New York: Dell.
   Google Scholar
• Dimmitt, C., & Mccormick, C. B. (2012). Metacognition in education. In K. R. Harris , S. Graham , & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 157–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/13273‐007
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, D. S. (1994). Lessons learned from an interdisciplinary writing course: Implications for student writing in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 21, 223–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, D. S. (2011). A short guide to writing about psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, D. S., Mcentarffer, R., & Halonen, J. S. (2004). Empowering psychology students through self‐assessment. In D. S. Dunn , C. M. Mehrotra , & J. S. Halonen (Eds.), Measuring up: Assessment challenges and practices for psychology (pp. 171–186). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. (H. A. Ruger & C. H. Bussenius, Trans.) In C. A. Green (Ed.), Classics in the Teaching of Psychology. Retrieved from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Ebbinghaus/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Emurian, H. H., & Zheng, P. (2010). Programmed instruction and interteaching applications to teaching Java(TM): A systematic replication. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1166–1175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, D. R. (2003). The professor's guide to teaching: Psychological principles and practices. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty‐first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Goto, K., & Schneider, J. (2010). Learning through teaching: Challenges and opportunities in facilitating student learning in food science and nutrition by using the interteaching approach. Journal of Food Science Education, 9, 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gurung, R. A. R., Weidert, J., & Jeske, A. S. (2010). A closer look at how students study (and if it matters). Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10, 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gurung, R. R., & Mccann, L. I. (2012). How should students study? In B. M. Schwartz & R. R. Gurung (Eds.), Evidence‐based teaching for higher education (pp. 99–116). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/13745‐006
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., Anton, B., Beins, B. C., Bernstein, D. J., Blair‐broeker, C. T., Brewer, C. L., … Rocheleau, C. A. (2010). Principles for quality undergraduate education in psychology. In D. F. Halpern (Ed.), Undergraduate education in psychology: A blueprint for the future of the discipline (pp. 161–173). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/12063‐010
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., & Hakel, M. D. (2003). Applying the science of learning to the university and beyond. Change, 35(4), 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272‐4944(02)00109‐3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh, R. H. , & Merrow, J. (Eds.) (2005). Declining by degrees: Higher education at risk. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D. (2012). Retrieval‐based learning: Active retrieval promotes meaningful learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 157–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412443552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331, 772–775. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, III, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17, 471–479. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802647009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korn, J. H., & Sikorski, J. (2010). A guide for beginning teachers of psychology. Retrieved from the Society for the Teaching of Psychology Web site: http://www.teachpsych.org/ebooks/guide2010/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Krug, D., Davis, T., & Glover, J. A. (1990). Massed versus distributed repeated reading: A case of forgetting helping recall? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 366–371. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐0663.82.2.366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, D. P., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. III (2009). Repeated testing improves long‐term retention relative to repeated study: A randomised controlled trial. Medical Education, 43, 1174–1181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2923.2009.03518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeming, F. C. (2002). The exam‐a‐day procedure improves performance in psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 210–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., & Einstein, G. O. (2009). The read–recite–review study strategy: Effective and portable. Psychological Science, 20, 516–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevid, J. S., Pastva, A., & Mcclelland, N. (2012). Writing‐to‐learn assignments in introductory psychology: Is there a learning benefit? Teaching of Psychology, 39, 272–275. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/009862831245662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, P. M., Demetriadis, S. N., Stamelos, I. G., & Tsoukalas, I. A. (2011). The value of writing‐to‐learn when using question prompts to support web‐based learning in ill‐structured domains. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 71–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 3–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0278‐7393.31.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend on time of test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 70–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022‐0663.97.1.70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, K. (2009). The element: How finding your passion changes everything. New York, NY: The Penguin Group.
   Google Scholar
• Saville, B. K. (2010). Using evidence‐based teaching methods to improve education. In S. A. Meyers & J. R. Stowell (Eds.), Essays from e‐xcellence in teaching (pp. 48–54). (Vol. 9), Published on the Society for the Teaching of Psychology Web site. Retrieved from http://www.teachpsych.org/resources/e‐books/eit2009/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Saville, B. K., Lambert, T., & Robertson, S. (2011). Interteaching: Bringing behavioral education into the 21st century. Psychological Record, 61, 153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saville, B. K., Pope, D., Truelove, J., & Williams, J. (in press). The relation between GPA and exam performance during interteaching and lecture. Behavior Analyst Today.
   Google Scholar
• Saville, B. K., & Zinn, T. E. (2009). Interteaching: The effects of quality points on exam scores. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 369–374. doi:https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42‐369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saville, B. K., Zinn, T. E., & Elliott, M. P. (2005). Interteaching versus traditional methods of instruction: A preliminary analysis. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 161–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saville, B. K., Zinn, T. E., Lawrence, N. K., Barron, K. E., & Andre, J. (2008). Teaching critical thinking in statistics and research methods. In D. S. Dunn , J. S. Halonen , & R. A. Smith (Eds.), Teaching critical thinking in psychology: A handbook of best practices (pp. 149–160). Malden, MA: Wiley‐Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Saville, B. K., Zinn, T. E., Neef, N. A., Van Norman, R., & Ferreri, S. J. (2006). A comparison of interteaching and lecture in the college classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 49–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. M. , & Gurung, R. A. R. (Eds.) (2012). Evidence‐based teaching for higher education. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Scoboria, A., & Pascual‐leone, A. (2009). An ‘interteaching’ informed approach to instructing large undergraduate classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9, 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sisti, H. M., Glass, A. L., & Shors, T. J. (2007). Neurogenesis and the spacing effect: Learning over time enhances memory and the survival of new neurons. Learning and Memory, 14, 368–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97. (Reprinted in Cumulative record, definitive edition, pp. 179‐191, 1999, Cambridge, MA: B. F. Skinner Foundation).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, L., & Alvarez, P. (1995). Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: A neurobiological perspective. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 169–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, T. L., Myers, A. C., & Culley, M. R. (2010). Enhanced learning and retention through ‘writing to learn’ in the psychology classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 46–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280903425813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toppino, T. C., & Cohen, M. S. (2010). Metacognitive control and spaced practice: Clarifying what people do and why. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1480–1491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, M. (2010). Interteaching: Students as teachers in lower‐division sociology courses. Teaching Sociology, 38, 28–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkoeijen, P. L., Rikers, R. P., & Özsoy, B. (2008). Distributed rereading can hurt the spacing effect in text memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 685–695. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2012). Distributing learning over time: The spacing effect in children's acquisition and generalization of science concepts. Child Development, 83, 1137–1144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐8624.2012.01781.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojdanoska, M., Cranney, J., & Newell, B. R. (2010). The testing effect: The role of feedback and collaboration in a tertiary classroom setting. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1183–1195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voltaire (1950). Philosophical dictionary (Vol. 1). New York: Carlton House. (Original work published 1764).
   Google Scholar
• Wahlheim, C. N., Dunlosky, J., & Jacoby, L. L. (2011). Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts: An investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging. Memory and Cognition, 39, 750–763. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421‐010‐0063‐y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M. P., & Stickgold, R. (2004). Sleep dependent learning and memory consolidation. Neuron, 44, 121–133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yandell, L. R., & Bailey, W. N. (2011). Online quizzes: Improving reading compliance and student learning. In D. S. Dunn , J. H. Wilson , J. E. Freeman , & J. R. Stowell (Eds.), Best practices for technology‐enhanced teaching and learning (pp. 271–282). New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Zeller, B. E. (2010). ‘We learned so much when you weren't there!’: Reflections on the interteach method and the acephalous classroom. Teaching Theology and Religion, 13, 270–271.
   Google Scholar