REFERENCES
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Cokely, E. T. , Galesic, M. , Schulz, E. , Ghazal, S. , & Garcia‐retamero, R. (2012). Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 25–47.
- Fagerlin, A. , Zikmund‐fisher, B. J. , Ubel, P. A. , Jankovic, A. , Derry, H. A. , & Smith, D. M. (2007). Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the subjective numeracy scale. Medical Decision Making, 27(5), 672–680. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X07304449
- Freling, T. H. , Vincent, L. H. , & Henard, D. H. (2014). When not to accentuate the positive: Re‐examining valence effects in attribute framing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(2), 95–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.12.007
- Gamliel, E. , Kreiner, H. , & Garcia‐retamero, R. (2016). The moderating role of objective and subjective numeracy in attribute framing. International Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 109–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12138
- Garcia‐retamero, R. , & Cokely, E. T. (2011). Effective communication of risks to young adults: Using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(3), 270–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023677
- Garcia‐retamero, R. , & Cokely, E. T. (2013). Communicating health risks with visual aids. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 392–399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413491570
- Garcia‐retamero, R. , & Cokely, E. T. (2014). The influence of skills, message frame, and visual aids on prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(2), 179–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1797
- Garcia‐retamero, R. , & Galesic, M. (2010). How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25, 1323–1329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606‐010‐1484‐9
- Gardner, P. H. , Mcmillan, B. , Raynor, D. K. , Woolf, E. , & Knapp, P. (2011). The effect of numeracy on the comprehension of information about medicines in users of a patient information website. Patient Education and Counseling, 83, 398–403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.006
- Garofalo, J. , & Lester, F. K. Jr. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/748391
- Keren, G. (2011). On the definition and possible underpinnings of framing effects: A brief review and a critical evaluation. In G. Keren (Ed.), Perspectives on framing (pp. 3–33). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta‐analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(1), 23–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2781
- Levin, I. P. , & Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/209174
- Levin, I. P. , Schneider, S. L. , & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
- Lipkus, I. M. , Samsa, G. , & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x0102100105
- Mcneil, B. J. , Pauker, S. G. , Sox, H. C. Jr. , & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. The New England Journal of Medicine, 306(21), 1259–1262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198205273062103
- Payne, J. W. , Sagara, N. , Shu, S. B. , Appelt, K. C. , & Johnson, E. J. (2013). Life expectancy as a constructed belief: Evidence of a live‐to or die‐by framing effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 46(1), 27–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166‐012‐9158‐0
- Peters, E. (2012). Beyond comprehension: The role of numeracy in judgment and decisions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 31–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429960
- Peters, E. , & Levin, I. P. (2008). Dissecting the risky‐choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual‐difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(6), 435–448.
- Peters, E. , Slovic, P. , Vastfjall, D. , & Mertz, C. K. (2008). Intuitive numbers guide decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 619–635.
- Peters, E. , Västfjäll, D. , Slovic, P. , Mertz, C. K. , Mazzocco, K. , & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐9280.2006.01720.x
- Piñon, A. , & Gambara, H. (2005). A meta‐analytic review of framing effect: Risky, attribute and goal framing. Psicothema, 17(2), 325–331.
- Reyna, V. R. , Nelson, W. L. , Han, P. , & Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 943–973. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017327
- Schwartz, L. M. , Woloshin, S. , Black, W. C. , & Welch, H. G. (1997). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 966–972. doi:https://doi.org/10.7326/0003‐4819‐127‐11‐199712010‐00003
- Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683