Measurement and research using the Big Five, HEXACO, and narrow traits: A primer for researchers and practitioners

REFERENCES

• Aghababaei, N., Mohammadtabar, S., & Saffarinia, M. (2014). Dirty dozen vs. the H factor: Comparison of the dark triad and honesty–humility in prosociality, religiosity, and happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 6–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait‐names: A psycho‐lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i‐171.
   Google Scholar
• Anglim, J., Bozic, S., Little, J., & Lievens, F. (2018). Response distortion on personality tests in applicants: Comparing high‐stakes to low‐stakes medical settings. Advances in Health Sciences Education, Advanced Online Access.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglim, J., & Grant, S. L. (2014). Incremental criterion prediction of personality facets over factors: Obtaining unbiased estimates and confidence intervals. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 148–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglim, J., & Grant, S. L. (2016). Predicting psychological and subjective well‐being from personality: Incremental prediction from 30 facets over the big 5. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 59–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglim, J., Knowles, E. R., Dunlop, P. D., & Marty, A. (2017). HEXACO personality and schwartz’s personal values: A facet‐level analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglim, J., Morse, G., De vries, R. E., Maccann, C., & Marty, A. (2017). Comparing job applicants to non‐applicants using an item‐level bifactor model on the HEXACO personality inventory. European Journal of Personality, 31, 669–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anusic, I., Schimmack, U., Pinkus, R. T., & Lockwood, P. (2009). The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: The halo‐alpha‐beta model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1,142–1,156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C. (1998). Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 19(3), 289–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Jackson, D. N., Paunonen, S. V., Helmes, E., & Rothstein, M. G. (1995). The criterion validity of broad factor scales versus specific facet scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 29(4), 432–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15(5), 327–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO honesty‐humility, agreeableness, and emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Goldberg, L. R., & De vries, R. E. (2009). Higher order factors of personality: Do they exist? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(2), 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De vries, R. E., Di blas, L., & De raad, B. (2004). A six‐factor structure of personality‐descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Paunonen, S. V., & Lee, K. (2014). On the validity of narrow and broad personality traits: A response to. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 24–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back, M. D. (2018). Continued quality, openness, and curiosity at the european journal of personality. European Journal of Personality, 32(1), 3–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barford, K. A., Zhao, K., & Smillie, L. D. (2015). Mapping the interpersonal domain: Translating between the Big Five, HEXACO, and interpersonal circumplex. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 232–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biderman, M. D., Nguyen, N. T., Cunningham, C. J., & Ghorbani, N. (2011). The ubiquity of common method variance: The case of the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(5), 417–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleidorn, W., Hopwood, C. J., & Wright, A. G. (2017). Using big data to advance personality theory. Current Opinion in Behavioural Sciences, 18, 79–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health‐related behaviours: A meta‐analysis of the leading behavioural contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervone, D. (2005). Personality architecture: Within‐person structures and processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 423–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamorro‐premuzic, T., Akhtar, R., Winsborough, D., & Sherman, R. A. (2017). The datafication of talent: How technology is advancing the science of human potential at work. Current Opinion in Behavioural Sciences, 18, 13–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, L., Connelly, B. S., & Geeza, A. A. (2012). Separating method factors and higher order traits of the Big Five: A meta‐analytic multitrait–multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 408–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J. P., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Modelling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality, 80(1), 219–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Watson, P., Biderman, M., & Ghorbani, N. (2016). Investigating the properties of the general factor (M) in bifactor models applied to Big Five or HEXACO data in terms of method or meaning. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 35, 216–243.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, N. D., & Robie, C. (2011). Further consideration of the use of narrow trait scales. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43(3), 183–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, M. D., Jackson, C. J., Walker, B. R., O’connor, P. J., & Gardiner, E. (2017). Integrating the context‐appropriate balanced attention model and reinforcement sensitivity theory: Toward a domain‐general personality process model. Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 91–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condon, D. (2017). The SAPA personality inventory: An empirically‐derived, hierarchically‐organised self‐report personality assessment model (Draft: March 13th 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Costa, J. P. T., & Mccrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & Maccrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI‐R) and NEO five‐factor inventory (NEO FFI): Professional manual: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & Mccrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(1), 21–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Mccrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, A. O., Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Aggen, S. H., & Borsboom, D. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can’t like parties if you don’t like people. European Journal of Personality, 26(4), 414–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Credé, M., Harms, P., Niehorster, S., & Gaye‐valentine, A. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta‐analysis of the relationship between organisational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1,241–1,255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S. E., Connelly, B. S., Ones, D. S., & Birkland, A. S. (2015). The general factor of personality: The “Big One,” a self‐evaluative trait, or a methodological gnat that will not go away? Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De raad, B., Barelds, D. P., Levert, E., Ostendorf, F., Mlačić, B., Blas, L. D., & Perugini, M. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 160–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De raad, B., Barelds, D. P., Mlačić, B., Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Ostendorf, F., & Szirmák, Z. (2010). Only three personality factors are fully replicable across languages: Reply to Ashton and Lee. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 442–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De raad, B., & Mlacic, B. (2017). Psycholexical studies of personality structure across cultures. In The Praeger handbook of personality across cultures [3 volumes], pp. 161–192. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC‐CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• De raad, B., Perugini, M., & Szirmák, Z. (1997). In pursuit of a cross‐lingual reference structure of personality traits: Comparisons among five languages. European Journal of Personality, 11(3), 167–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De vries, R. E. (2011). No evidence for a general factor of personality in the HEXACO personality inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(2), 229–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyoung, C. G. (2006). Higher‐order factors of the Big Five in a multi‐informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1,138–1,151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyoung, C. G., Weisberg, Y. J., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2013). Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation. Journal of Personality, 81(5), 465–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five‐factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher‐order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1,246–1,256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta‐analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 40–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaughan, E. T., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2012). Examining the utility of general models of personality in the study of psychopathy: A comparison of the HEXACO‐PI‐R and NEO PI‐R. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26(4), 513–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(1), 141–165.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: the Big‐Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1,216–1,229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad‐bandwidth, public‐domain, personality inventory measuring the lower‐level facets of several five‐factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public‐domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillaume‐hanes, E., Morse, P., & Funder, D. (2012). Network models in the organisation of personality. European Journal of Personality, 26(4), 439–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstee, W. K., De raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1992). Hogan personality inventory manual. (2nd ed.). Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Horwood, S., Anglim, J., & Tooley, G. (2015). Type D personality and the Five‐Factor Model: A facet‐level analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 50–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, L. M., & Connelly, B. S. (2013). Personality measurement and use in industrial and organisational psychology. In K. F. Geisinger, B. A. Bracken, J. F. Carlson, J.‐I. C. Hansen, N. R. Kuncel, S. P. Reise, & M. C. Rodriguez (Eds.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology, Vol. 1: Test theory and testing and assessment in industrial and organisational psychology. (pp. 501–531). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 869–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D., Paunonen, S., & Tremblay, P. (2000). Six factor personality questionnaire manual. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & O’ connor, P. J. (2017). Cutting corners at work: An individual differences perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 146–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klehe, U.‐C., Kleinmann, M., Hartstein, T., Melchers, K. G., König, C. J., Heslin, P. A., & Lievens, F. (2012). Responding to personality tests in a selection context: The role of the ability to identify criteria and the ideal‐employee factor. Human Performance, 25(4), 273–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2014). The dark triad, the big five, and the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 2–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Morrison, D. L., Cordery, J., & Dunlop, P. D. (2008). Predicting integrity with the HEXACO personality model: Use of self‐ and observer reports. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 81, 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Gizzarone, M., & Ashton, M. C. (2003). Personality and the likelihood to sexually harass. Sex Roles, 49, 59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loehlin, J. C., & Goldberg, L. R. (2014). Do personality traits conform to lists or hierarchies? Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 139–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markon, K. E., Quilty, L. C., Bagby, R. M., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). The development and psychometric properties of an informant‐report form of the Personality Inventory for DSM‐5 (PID‐5). Assessment, 20(3), 370–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcabee, S. T., Oswald, F. L., & Connelly, B. S. (2014). Bifactor models of personality and college student performance: A broad versus narrow view. European Journal of Personality, 28(6), 604–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccrae, R. R. (2015). A more nuanced view of reliability: Specificity in the trait hierarchy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(2), 97–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the Five‐Factor Model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1995). Trait explanations in personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 9(4), 231–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. B., Burns, G. N., & Periard, D. A. (2015). Criterion validity of complex traits with counterproductive work behaviours: Circumplex versus facet traits. Human Performance, 28(5), 440–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mõttus, R., Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., Riemann, R., & Mccrae, R. R. (2017). Personality traits below facets: The consensual validity, longitudinal stability, heritability, and utility of personality nuances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 474–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mõttus, R., Mccrae, R. R., Allik, J., & Realo, A. (2014). Cross‐rater agreement on common and specific variance of personality scales and items. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five‐factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(6), 1,213–1,233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’neill, T., Paunonen, S., Christiansen, N., & Tett, R. (2013). Breadth in personality assessment: Implications for the understanding and prediction of work behavior. In N. Christiansen & R. Tett (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work. (pp. 299–332). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth–fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 17(6), 609–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. V. (1998). Hierarchical organisation of personality and prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 538–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 524–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. V., Haddock, G., Forsterling, F., & Keinonen, M. (2003). Broad versus narrow personality measures and the prediction of behaviour across cultures. European Journal of Personality, 17(6), 413–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunonen, S. V., Rothstein, M. G., & Jackson, D. N. (1999). Narrow reasoning about the use of broad personality measures for personnel selection. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 20(3), 389–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peabody, D., & De raad, B. (2002). The substantive nature of psycholexical personality factors: A comparison across languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 983–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera, H. N., Izadikhah, Z., O’connor, P., & Mcilveen, P. (2016). Resolving dimensionality problems with WHOQOL‐BREF item responses. Assessment, https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116678925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta‐analysis of the five‐factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (1995). Personality processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(1), 295–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W., Condon, D., Wilt, J., French, J., Brown, A., & Elleman, L. (2017). Web‐ and phone‐based data collection using planned missing designs. In N. Fielding, R. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of online research methods (pp. 578–594). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Revelle, W., & Wilt, J. (2013). The general factor of personality: A general critique. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 493–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F., Moscoso, S., & Berges, A. (2013). Conscientiousness, its facets, and the prediction of job performance ratings: Evidence against the narrow measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21(1), 74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G. (2009). Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: Indications for a Big Six structure. Journal of Personality, 77(5), 1,577–1,614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 847–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G., Hampson, S. E., Goldberg, L. R., & Hampson, S. E. (2000). Cross‐language studies of lexical personality factors. Advances in Personality Psychology, 1, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Saucier, G., & Ostendorf, F. (1999). Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors: A cross‐language replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 613–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G., & Srivastava, S. (2014). What makes a good structural model of personality? Evaluating the Big Five and alternatives. In M. Mikulincer, P.R. Shaver, L. Cooper, R. Larsen (Eds.), Handbook of social and personality psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 283–305) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. B., Hill, A. D., Wallace, J. C., Recendes, T., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Upsides to dark and downsides to bright personality: A multidomain review and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 44, 191–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI‐2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well‐being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., Kaufman, S. B., & Smillie, L. D. (2017). Unique associations between big five personality aspects and multiple dimensions of well‐being. Journal of Personality.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1934). The vectors of mind. Psychological Review, 41(1), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A., Petrides, K. V., Cherkas, L. F., Spector, T. D., & Vernon, P. A. (2009). A general factor of personality: Evidence from the HEXACO model and a measure of trait emotional intelligence. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12(5), 420–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilt, J., Condon, D. M., & Revelle, W. (2011). Telemetrics and online data collection: Collecting data at a distance. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 163–180). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilt, J., Condon, D. M., Brown‐riddell, A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Fundamental questions in personality. European Journal of Personality, 26(6), 629–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, S. A., & Anderson, N. R. (2016). Toward a periodic table of personality: Mapping personality scales between the five‐factor model and the circumplex model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(4), 582–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, K., & Smillie, L. D. (2015). The role of interpersonal traits in social decision making: Exploring sources of behavioural heterogeneity in economic games. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(3), 277–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar