Initial Validation and Refinement of the Hierarchical Inventory of Personality for Children in the Australian Context

References

• Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
   Google Scholar
• Allik, J. (2005). Personality dimensions across cultures. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 212–232. doi:10.1521/pedi.2005.19.3.212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allik, J., & Mccrae, R. (2004). Towards a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross‐Cultural Psychology, 35, 13–28. doi:10.1177/0022022103260382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleidorn, W., & Ostendorf, F. (2009). A Big Five inventory for children and adolescents: The German version of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). Diagnostica, 55(3), 160–173. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.55.3.160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five‐factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 187–215. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, J. (2010). The five‐factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21(1), 2–25. doi:10.1080/10478401003596626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boag, S. (2011). Explanation in personality psychology: 'Verbal magic' and the five‐factor model. Philosophical Psychology, 24(2), 223–243. doi:10.1080/09515089.2010.548319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnard, P. (2004). Writing a qualitative research report. Nurse Education Today, 24(3), 174–179. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi, A., Roberts, B., & Shiner, R. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 453–484. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, S., & Roodenburg, J. (2015). Acquiescence response bias – yeasaying and higher education. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 32(1), 1–15. doi:10.1017/edp.2015.11
   Google Scholar
• Cull, A., Sprangers, M., Bjordal, K., Aaronson, N., West, K., & Bottomley, A. (2002). EORTC quality of life translation procedure (2nd ed.). Brussels, Belgium: EORTC Quality of Life Group. Retrieved from http://www.ipenproject.org/documents/methods_docs/Surveys/EORTC_translation
   Google Scholar
• Daouk‐öyry, L., & Mcdowal, A. (2012). Using cognitive interviewing for the semantic enhancement of multilingual versions of personality questionnaires. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(4), 407–416. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.735300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De fruyt, F., Mervielde, I., & Van leeuwen, K. (2002). The consistency of personality type classification across samples and five‐factor measures. European Journal of Personality, 16(S1), S57–S72. doi:10.1002/per.444
   Google Scholar
• De pauw, S., & Mervielde, I. (2010). Temperament, personality and developmental psychopathology: A review based on the conceptual dimensions underlying childhood traits. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41(3), 313–329. doi:10.1007/s10578-009-0171-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De pauw, S., Mervielde, I., & Van leeuwen, K. (2009). How are traits related to problem behavior in preschoolers? Similarities and contrasts between temperament and personality. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(3), 309–325. doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9290-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devellis, R. (2012). Scale development theory and application (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deyoung, C., Weisberg, Y. Y., Quilty, L., & Peterson, J. (2013). Unifying the aspects of the big five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation. Journal of Personality, 81(5), 465–475. doi:10.1111/jopy.12020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di blas, L., Serafino, F., & De fruyt, F. (2005). The Italian version of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC): A validation study. Evàlutiva, 82, 41–53. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11368/1692755
   Google Scholar
• Drennan, J. (2003). Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(1), 57–63. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (2010). The Big Five model: Grandiose ideas about surface traits as the foundation of a general theory of personality. Psychological Inquiry, 21(1), 34–39. doi:10.1080/10478401003648682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337–1345. doi:10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross‐cultural adaptation of health‐related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, C., Havill, V., Deal, J., Baker, S., Victor, J., Pavlopoulos, V., … Wen, L. (2003). Personality structure as derived from parental ratings of free descriptions of children: The Inventory of Child Individual Differences. Journal of Personality, 71, 995–1026. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.7106005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawes, D. J., & Dadds, M. R. (2004). Australian data and psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38(8), 644–651. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1614.2004.01427.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, A., & Skrutkowski, M. (2002). Translating instruments into other languages: Development and testing processes. Cancer Nursing, 25(1), 1–7. doi:10.1097/00002820-200202000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkinson, L., Watt, D., & Roodenburg, J. (2014). Australian validation of the Hierarchical‐Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 31(2), 113–124. doi:10.1017/edp.2014.3
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, C., & Donnellan, M. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(3), 332–346. doi:10.1177/1088868310361240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, F. R., John, D., Lüdtke, O., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Short assessment of the big five: Robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 548–567. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le gal, M., Mainguy, Y., Le lay, K., Nadjar, A., Allain, D., & Galissié, M. (2010). Linguistic validation of six patient‐reported outcomes instruments into 12 languages for patients with fibromyalgia. Joint, Bone, Spine, 77(2), 165–170. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Z., & Woodliffe, L. (2010). Donor misreporting: Conceptualizing social desirability bias in giving surveys. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(4), 569–587. doi:10.1007/s11266-010-9153-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieber, E., & Weisner, T. (2014). Dedoose web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data (version 4.5). Los Angeles, CA: Sociocultural Research Consultants. Retrieved from http://www.dedoose.com
   Google Scholar
• Lopez‐fernandez, O., & Molina‐azorin, J. (2011). The use of mixed methods research in the field of behavioural sciences. Quality & Quantity, 45(6), 1459–1472. doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9543-9
   Google Scholar
• Mccrae, R., & Weiss, A. (2007). Observer ratings of personality. In R. W. Robins, R. Fraley, & R. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mccrae, R., Zonderman, A., Costa, P., Bond, M., & Paunonen, S. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 552–566. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervielde, I., & De fruyt, F. (1999). Construction of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). Paper presented at the Personality psychology in Europe, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Mervielde, I., & De fruyt, F. (2002). Assessing children's traits with the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children. In B. De raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big five assessment (pp. 129–142). Hogrefe & Huber: Ashland, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Mervielde, I., De fruyt, F., & De clercq, B. (2005). Hierarchical Personality Inventory for children manual [English translation]. Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance asessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 5–8. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x
   Google Scholar
• Renberg, T., Kettis lindblad, Å., & Tully, M. P. (2008). Testing the validity of a translated pharmaceutical therapy‐related quality of life instrument, using qualitative ‘think aloud’ methodology. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 33(3), 279–287. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00921.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodenburg, J., & Roodenburg, E.M. (2010). Social desirability and acquiescence, trivial or serious confounds for cognitive style? Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the European Learning Styles Information Network, 28–30 June 2010, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitario de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal, pp. 451–459.
   Google Scholar
• Rossier, J., Quartier, V., Enescu, R., & Iselin, A. (2007). Validation of the French Version of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC): Influence of gender and age on personality traits in 8‐ to 12‐year‐olds. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 125–132. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.23.2.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, D., Mullins‐sweatt, S., & Widiger, T. (2013). An Investigation of the factor structure and convergent and discriminant validity of the Five‐Factor Model Rating Form. Assessment, 20(1), 24–35. doi:10.1177/1073191112455455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidani, S., Guruge, S., Miranda, J., Ford‐gilboe, M., & Varcoe, C. (2010). Cultural adaptation and translation of measures: An integrated method. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(2), 133–143. doi:10.1002/nur.20364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simms, L., & Watson, D. (2007). The contruct validation approach to personality scale production. In R. W. Robins, R. Fraley, & R. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods methods in personality psychology (pp. 240–258). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slobodskaya, H. (2007). The associations among the Big Five, Behavioural Inhibition and Behavioural Approach systems and child and adolescent adjustment in Russia. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 913–924. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, V., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268–274. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Tackett, J., Kushner, S., De fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2013). Delineating personality traits in childhood and adolescence: Associations across measures, temperament, and behavioral problems. Assessment, 20(6), 738–751. doi:10.1177/1073191113509686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tackett, J., Slobodskaya, H., Mar, R., Deal, J., Halverson, C., Baker, S., … Besevegis, E. (2012). The hierarchical structure of childhood personality in five countries: Continuity from early childhood to early adolescence. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 847–879. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00748.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, T., Rasmussen, Å., Groenvold, M., Bjorner, J., Watt, S., Bonnema, S., … Feldt‐rasmussen, U. (2008). Improving a newly developed patient‐reported outcome for thyroid patients: Using cognitive interviewing. Quality of Life Research, 17(7), 1009–1017. doi:10.1007/s11136-008-9364-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T. (1992). Categorical versus dimensional classification: Implications from and for research. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 287–300. doi:10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T., & Smith, G. (2010). Personality and psychopathology. In O. John, R. Robins, & L. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (pp. 770–793). New York, NY: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, G., & Miller, K. (2011). Cross‐cultural cognitive interviewing: Seeking comparability and enhancing understanding. Field Methods, 23(4), 331–341. doi:10.1177/1525822X1141609211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar