REFERENCES
- Ahearn, E. P. (1997). The use of visual analog scales in mood disorders: A critical review. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 31, 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3956(97)00029-0
- Bandelow, B., Baldwin, D. S., Dolberg, O. T., Andersen, H. F., & Stein, D. J. (2006). What is the threshold for symptomatic response and remission for major depressive disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder? The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 67(9), 1428–1434.
- Bech, P. (2015). The responsiveness of the different versions of the Hamilton Depression Scale. World Psychiatry, 14, 309–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20248
- Bech, P., Lunde, M., Bech‐andersen, G., Lindberg, L., & Martiny, K. (2007). Psychiatric outcome studies (POS): Does treatment help the patients? A Popperian approach to research in clinical psychiatry: 25th anniversary report from the Psychiatric Research Unit, Frederiksborg General Hospital, Denmark. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 61, 4–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039480601151238
- Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory: Twenty‐five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5
- Busner, J., & Targum, S. D. (2007). The clinical global impressions scale: Applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont), 4, 28.
- Cowdry, R. W., & Gardner, D. L. (1991). Mood variability: A study of four groups. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 1505. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.148.11.1505
- Erger, S., May, T., Turnier‐shea, Y., & Pridmore, S. (under review). A naturalistic study of TMS in major depressive disorder.
- Federici, A., Summerfeldt, L. J., Harrington, J. L., Mccabe, R. E., Purdon, C. L., Rowa, K., & Antony, M. M. (2010). Consistency between self‐report and clinician‐administered versions of the Yale‐Brown obsessive–compulsive scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 729–733.
- Guy, W. (1976). Assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised (DHEW publication ABM 76–366). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
- Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 23, 56. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56
- Kroenke, K., & Spitzer, R. L. (2002). The PHQ‐9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatric Annals, 32, 509–515.
- Lee, C. P., Liu, C. Y., & Hung, C. I. (2017). Psychometric evaluation of a 6‐item Chinese version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Mokken scaling and item analysis. Asia‐Pacific Psychiatry, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/appy.12287
- Martin, A., Rief, W., Klaiberg, A., & Braehler, E. (2006). Validity of the brief patient health questionnaire mood scale (PHQ‐9) in the general population. General Hospital Psychiatry, 28, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.07.003
- Østergaard, S. D., Bech, P., & Miskowiak, K. W. (2016). Fewer study participants needed to demonstrate superior antidepressant efficacy when using the Hamilton melancholia subscale (HAM‐D6) as outcome measure. Journal of Affective Disorders, 190, 842–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.047
- O'sullivan, R. L., Fava, M., Agustin, C., Baer, L., & Rosenbaum, J. (1997). Sensitivity of the six‐item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 95, 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09649.x
- Park, S.‐C., Jang, E. Y., Kim, J.‐M., Jun, T.‐Y., Lee, M.‐S., Kim, J.‐B., … Park, Y. C. (2017). Clinical validation of the psychotic depression assessment scale, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale‐6, and brief psychiatric rating scale‐5: Results from the cClinical rResearch Center for Depression Study. Psychiatry Investigation, 14, 568–576. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2017.14.5.568
- Paykel, E. (2008). Partial remission, residual symptoms, and relapse in depression. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 10, 431.
- Pinna, F., Deriu, L., Diana, E., Perra, V., Randaccio, R. P., Sanna, L., … Carpiniello, B. (2015). Clinical global impression‐severity score as a reliable measure for routine evaluation of remission in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders. Annals of General Psychiatry, 14, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-015-0042-6
- Pridmore, S., Erger, S., Rybak, M., Kelly, E., & May, T. (2018). Early relapse (ER) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in inpatients with treatment resistant major depression. Brain Stimulation, 11, 1098–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2018.05.013
- Ruhé, H. G., Dekker, J. J., Peen, J., Holman, R., & De jonghe, F. (2005). Clinical use of the Hamilton depression rating scale: Is increased efficiency possible? A post hoc comparison of Hamilton depression rating scale, maier and bech subscales, clinical global impression, and symptom checklist‐90 scores. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 46, 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2005.03.001
- Wewers, M. E., & Lowe, N. K. (1990). A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Research in Nursing & Health, 13, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770130405
- Williams, J. B. (1988). A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 742–747. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320058007
- Zimmerman, M., Walsh, E., Friedman, M., Boerescu, D. A., & Attiullah, N. (2018). Are self‐report scales as effective as clinician rating scales in measuring treatment response in routine clinical practice. Journal of Affective Disorders, 225, 449–452.