Influence of corneal parameters in keratoconus on IOP readings obtained with different tonometers

References

• Romero‐jiménez M, Santodomingo‐rubido J, Wolffsohn JS. Keratoconus: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33: 157–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyenberg A, Iliev ME, Eschmann R, Frueh BE. Dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus and postkeratoplasty eyes. Cornea 2008; 27: 305–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbuehi KC. Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of the Topcon CT80 non‐contact tonometer. Clin Exp Optom 2006; 89: 310–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto T, Makino H, Uozato H, Saishin M, Miyamoto S. The influence of corneal thickness and curvature on the difference between intraocular pressure measurements obtained with a non‐contact tonometer and those with a Goldmann applanation tonometer. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000; 44: 691.
   Google Scholar
• Harada Y, Hirose N, Kubota T, Tawara A. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: non‐contact and Goldmann applanation tonometers. J Glaucoma 2008;17:619–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson DH, Goodwin D, Rollins M, Belaustegui A, Anderson C. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude. Optometry 2009; 80: 169–174.
   Google Scholar
• Ozbek Z, Cohen EJ, Hammersmith KM, Rapuano CJ. Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas. Cornea 2006; 25: 890–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damji KF, Muni RH, Munger RM. Influence of corneal variables on accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement. J Glaucoma 2003; 12: 69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer A, Sahin A, Hürmeriç V, Ozge G. Intraocular pressure values obtained by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann tonometry in keratokonic corneas. J Glaucoma 2010; 19: 540–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emre S, Doganay S, Yologlu S. Evaluation of anterior segment parameters in keratoconic eyes measured with the Pentacam system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1708–1712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol 1975; 53: 34–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry and direct intracameral IOP readings. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 85–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 3790–3794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Collins MJ. Intraocular pressure in keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol 2011; 89: 358–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreto J Jr, Babic M, Vessani RM, Susanna R Jr. Dynamic contour tonometry and Goldman applanation tonometry in eyes with keratoconus. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2006; 61: 511–514.
   Google Scholar
• Piñero DP, Alió JL, Alesón A, Escaf vergara M, Miranda M. Corneal volume, pachymetry and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 814–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonnu PA, Ho T, Newson T, El sheikh A, Sharma K, White E, Bunce C et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non‐contact tonometry, the Tono‐Pen XL and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 851–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito K, Tawara A, Kubota T, Harada Y. IOP measured by dynamic contour tonometry correlates with IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and non‐contact tonometry in Japanese individuals. J Glaucoma 2012; 21: 35–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko YC, Liu CJ, Hsu WM. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers. Eye (Lond) 2005; 19: 327–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papastergiou GI, Kozobolis V, Siganos DS. Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes. J Glaucoma 2008; 17: 484–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark HH. Corneal curvature in applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1973; 76: 223–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rask G, Behndig A. Effects of corneal thickness, curvature, astigmatism and direction of gaze on Goldmann applanation tonometry readings. Ophthalmic Res 2006; 38: 49–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagishima M, Kamiya K, Fujimura F, Morita T, Shoji N, Shimizu K. Effect of corneal astigmatism on intraocular pressure measurement using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010; 248: 257–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannion LS, Tromans C, O'donnell C. Reduction in corneal volume with severity of keratoconus. Curr Eye Res 2011; 36: 522–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar