28
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

A comparison of the Plusoptix S08 photorefractor to retinoscopy and cycloretinoscopy

, PhD, , MSc, , PhD & , PhD
Pages 394-399 | Received 28 Dec 2011, Accepted 22 Nov 2012, Published online: 15 Apr 2021

References

  • Schmucker C, Kleijnen J, Grosselfinger R, Riemsma R, Antes G, Lange S, Lagrèze W. Effectiveness of early in comparison to late(r) treatment in children with amblyopia or its risk factors: a systematic review. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2010; 17: 7–17.
  • Campbell CE, Benjamin WJ, Howland HC. Objective refraction: retinoscopy, autorefraction, and photorefraction. In: Benjamin WJ. Borish's Clinical Refraction. 2nd edn. Philadelphia, USA: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 2006. p 752–762.
  • World Health Organization. Elimination of avoidable disability due to refractive errors. (WHO/PBL/00.79). Geneva: WHO, 2000.
  • Howland HC. The optics of static photographic skiascopy. Comments on a paper by K. Kaakinen: A simple method for screening of children with strabismus, anisometropia or ametropia by simultaneous photography of the corneal and the fundus reflexes. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1980; 58: 221–227.
  • Howland HC. Optics of photoretinoscopy: results for ray tracing. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985; 62: 621–625.
  • Atkinson J, Braddick O, Robier B, Anker S, Ehrlich D, King J, Watson P et al. Two infant vision screening programmes: Prediction and prevention of strabismus and amblyopia from photo‐ and videorefractive screening. Eye (Lond) 1996; 10: 189–198.
  • Hsu‐winges C, Hamer RD, Norcia AM, Wesermann H, Chan C et al. Polaroid photorefractive screening of infants. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1989; 26: 254–260.
  • Schimitzek T, Haase W. Efficiency of a video‐autorefractometer used as a screening device for amblyogenic factors. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002; 240: 710–716.
  • Schmidt P, Maguire M, Dobson V, Quinn G, Ciner E, Cyert L, Kulp MT et al. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision in Preschoolers Study. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 637–650.
  • Ying GS, Kulp MT, Maguire M, Ciner E, Cyert L, Schmidt P, Vision in Preschoolers Study Group. Sensitivity of screening tests for detecting vision in preschoolers‐targeted vision disorders when specificity is 94%. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 432–438.
  • Donahue SP, Arnold RW, Ruben JB, AAPOS Vision Screening Committee. Preschool vision screening: What should we be detecting and how should we report it? Uniform guidelines for reporting results of preschool vision screening studies. J AAPOS 2003; 7: 314–316.
  • Satiani NG, Mutti DO. Screening for hyperopia in infants using the PowerRefractor. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: 905–911.
  • Nathan NR, Donahue SP. Modification of Plusoptix referral criteria to enhance sensitivity and specificity during pediatric vision screening. J AAPOS 2011; 15: 551–555.
  • Matta NS, Singman EL, Mccarus C, Matta E, Silbert DI. Screening for amblyogenic risk factors using the Plusoptix S04 photoscreener on the indigent population of Honduras. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 1848–1850.
  • Ayse YK, Onder U, Suheyla K. Accuracy of Plusoptix S04 in children and teens. Can J Ophthalmol 2011; 46: 153–157.
  • Cronje S, Harris WF. Short‐term keratometric variation in the human eye. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 420–424.
  • Rosenfield M, Chiu NN. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 577–579.
  • Dahlmann‐noor AH, Comyn O, Kostakis V, Misra A, Gupta N, Heath J, Brown J et al. Plusoptix Vision Screener: the accuracy and repeatability of refractive measurements using a new autorefractor. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 346–349.
  • Saunders KJ, Westall CA. Comparison between near retinoscopy and cycloplegic retinoscopy in the refraction of infants and children. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 615–622.
  • Chan OY, Edwards M. Comparison of cycloplegic and noncycloplegic retinoscopy in Chinese pre‐school children. Optom Vis Sci 1994; 71: 312–318.
  • Hodi S, Wood IC. Comparison of the techniques of videorefraction and static retinoscopy in the measurement of refractive error in infants. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1994; 14: 20–24.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 85–93.
  • Schimitzek T, Wesemann W. Clinical evaluation of refraction using handheld wavefront autorefractor in young and adult patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 1655–1666.
  • Gabriel GM, Mutti DO. Evaluation of infant accommodation using retinoscopy and photoretinoscopy. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 208–215.
  • Choi M, Weiss S, Schaeffel F, et al. Laboratory, clinical and kindergarten test of a new eccentric infrared photorefractor (PowerRefractor). Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 537–548.
  • Abrahamsson M, Ohlsson J, Björndahl M, Abrahamsson H. Clinical evaluation of an eccentric infrared photorefractor:The PowerRefractor. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003; 81: 605–610.
  • Erdurmus M, Yagci R, Karadag R, Durmus M. A comparison of photorefraction and retinoscopy in children. J AAPOS 2007; 11: 606–611.
  • Dahlmann‐noor AH, Vrotsou K, Kostakis V, Brown J, Heath J, Iron A, Mcgill S et al. Vision screening in children by Plusoptix Vision Screener compared with gold‐standard orthoptic assessment. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 342–345.
  • Paff T, Oudesluys‐murphy AM, Wolterbeek R, Swart‐van den berg M, de Nie JM, Tijssen E, Schalij‐delfos NE. Screening for refractive errors in children: The Plusoptix S08 and the Retinomax K‐plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy. J AAPOS 2010; 14: 478–483.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.