Response to Re: Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non‐contact biometric devices in myopes

Jing ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Myopia Key Laboratory of the Health Ministry, Shanghai, China,

, MD,

Zhi ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Myopia Key Laboratory of the Health Ministry, Shanghai, China,

, MD PhD,

Lan DingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Myopia Key Laboratory of the Health Ministry, Shanghai, China,

, MD PhD &

Xingtao ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Myopia Key Laboratory of the Health Ministry, Shanghai, China,

, MD PhD

References

Huerva V, Ascaso FJ. Re: Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non‐contact biometric devices in myopes. Clin Exp Optom 2013; 96: 510.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Zhao J, Chen Z, Zhou Z, Ding L, Zhou X. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non‐contact biometric devices in myopes. Clin Exp Optom 2013; 96: 92–99.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Giers U, Epple C. Comparison of A‐scan device accuracy. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990; 16: 235–242.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Cruysberg LP, Doors M, Verbakel F, Berendschot TT, De brabander J, Nuijts RM. Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non‐contact biometer. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 106–110.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Berrow EJ. A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 949–953.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Holzer MP, Mamusa M, Auffarth GU. Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 807–810.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Response to Re: Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non‐contact biometric devices in myopes

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Response to Re: Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non‐contact biometric devices in myopes

References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date