56
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Screening for keratoconus suspects among candidates for refractive surgery

, MSc
Pages 492-498 | Received 05 Dec 2013, Accepted 03 Apr 2014, Published online: 15 Apr 2021

References

  • Rabinowitz YS. Ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17: 421–426.
  • Binder PS, Trattler WB. Evaluation of a risk factor scoring system for corneal ectasia after LASIK in eyes with normal topography. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: 241–250.
  • Kanchanaraksa S. Evaluation of diagnostic and screening tests: validity and reliability. John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. 2008; http://ocw.jhsph.edu/courses/fundepi/PDFs/lecture11.pdf
  • Said A, Hamade IH, Tabbara KF. Late onset corneal ectasia after LASIK surgery. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2011; 25: 225–230.
  • Ambrósio R Jr, Nogueira LP, Caldas DL, Fontes BM, Luz A, Cazal JO, Alves MR et al. Evaluation of corneal shape and biomechanics before LASIK. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2011; 51: 11–39.
  • Mcmonnies CW. Mechanisms of rubbing‐related corneal trauma in keratoconus. Cornea 2009; 28: 607–615.
  • Kenney MC, Brown DJ. The cascade hypothesis of keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2003; 26: 139–146.
  • Nomenclature for keratoconus suspects. Refract Corneal Surg 1993; 9: 219–222.
  • Klyce SD. Chasing the keratoconus suspect. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 845–847.
  • Klyce SD. Computer‐assisted corneal topography. High‐resolution graphic presentation and analysis of keratoscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984; 25: 1426–1435.
  • Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, Thompson HW. Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Invest Ophthlmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 2749–2757.
  • Rabinoswitz YS, Rasheed K. KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 1327–1335.
  • Arntz A, Duran JA, Pijoan JI. Subclinical keratoconus diagnosis by elevation topography. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2003; 78: 659–664.
  • Swartz T, Marten L, Wang M. Measuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007; 18: 325–333.
  • Mato JL, Lema I, Diez‐feijoo E. Videokeratoscopic indices in relation to epidemiological exposure to keratoconus. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Opthalmol 2010; 248: 991–998.
  • Piñero DP, Nieto JC, Lopez‐miguel A. Characterization of corneal structure in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 2167–2183.
  • Ambrosio R, Klyce S, Wilson SE. Corneal topographic and pachymetric screening of keratorefractive patients. J Ref Surf 2003; 19: 24–29.
  • Ambrosio R, Alonso RS, Luz A, Velarde LGC. Corneal‐thickness spatial profile and corneal‐volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 1851–1859.
  • Piñero DP, Alió JL, Alesón A, Vergara ME, Miranda M. Corneal volume, pachymetry and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 814–825.
  • Gherghel D, Hosking SL, Mantry S, Banerjee S, Naroo SA, Shah S. Corneal pachymetry in normal and keratoconic eyes: Orbscan II versus ultrasound. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 1272–1277.
  • Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Corneal epithelial thickness profile in the diagnosis of keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 604–610.
  • Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Stability of LASIK in topographically suspect keratoconus confirmed non‐keratoconic by Artemis VHF digital ultrasound epithelial thickness mapping: 1‐year follow‐up. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 569–577.
  • Atchison DA, Mathur A, Read SA, Walker MI, Newman AR, Tanos PP, Mclennan RT et al. Peripheral ocular aberrations in mild and moderate keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 6850–6857.
  • Jinabhai A, Radhakrishnan H, O'donnell C. Repeatability of ocular aberration measurements in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 588–594.
  • Jafri B, Li X, Yang H, Rabinowitz YS. Higher‐order wavefront aberrations and topography in early and suspected keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2007; 23: 774–781.
  • Saad A, Gatinel D. Evaluation of total and corneal wavefront high order aberrations for the detection of forme fruste keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 2978–2992.
  • Buhren J, Kook D, Yoon G, Kohnen T. Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 3424–3432.
  • Fontes BM, Ambrosio Jr LR, Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nose W. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 673–679.
  • Saad A, Lteif Y, Azan E. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 2912–2916.
  • Dupps WJ. Hysteresis: new mechanospeak for the ophthalmologist. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1499–1501.
  • Mcmonnies CW. Assessing corneal hysteresis using the ocular response analyzer. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: E343–E349.
  • Mathers CD, Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Epidemiological evidence: improving validity through consistency analysis. Bull World Health Organ 2002; 80: 611.
  • Shirayama‐suzuki M, Amano S, Honda N, Usui T, Yamagami S, Oshika T. Longitudinal analysis of corneal topography in suspected keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 815–819.
  • Li X, Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K, Yang H. Longitudinal study of the normal eyes in unilateral keratocous patients. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 440–446.
  • Zadnik K, Fink BA, Nichols JJ, Yu JA, Schechtman KB. Between eye asymmetry in keraoconus. Cornea 2002; 21: 671–679.
  • Henriquez MA, Izquierdo L, Mannis MJ. Intereye asymmetry detected by Scheimpflug imaging in subjects with normal corneas and keratoconus. Cornea 2012; 32: 779–782.
  • Gordon‐shaag A, Millodot M, Shneor E. The epidemiology and etiology of keratoconus. Int J Keratoconus Corn Ectatic Dis 2012; 1: 7–15.
  • Arnal E, Peris‐martinez C, Menezo JL, Johnsen‐soriano S, Romero FJ. Oxidative stress in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 8592–8597.
  • Marchitti SA, Chen Y, Thomson DC, Vasiliou V. Ultaviolet radiation: cellular antioxidant responses and the role of ocular aldehyde dehydrogenase enzymes. Eye Contact Lens 2011; 37: 206–213.
  • Cheung IMY, Mcghee CNJ, Sherwin T. A new perspective on the pathobiology of keratoconus: interplay of stromal wound healing and reactive species‐associated processes. Clin Exp Optom 2013; 96: 188–196.
  • Funnell C, Watson K, Stewart O, Dua G. Corneal perforation secondary to UV radiation from a tanning lamp. Cornea 2006; 25: 1224–1226.
  • Georgiou T, Funnell CL, Cassels‐brown A, O'conor R. Influence of ethnic origin on the incidence of keratoconus and associated atopic disease in Asians and white patients. Eye (Lond) 2004; 18: 379–383.
  • Barros SP, Offenbacher S. Epigenetics: connecting environment and genotype to phenotype and disease. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 400–408.
  • Tuft SJ, Hassan H, George S, Frazer DG, Willoughby CE, Liskova P. Keratoconus in 18 pairs of twins. Acta Ophthalmol 2012; 90: e482–e486.
  • Mcmahon TT, Shin JA, Newlin A, Edrington TB, Sugar J, Zadnik K. Discordance for keratoconus in two pairs of monozygotic twins. Cornea 1999; 18: 444–451.
  • Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related non‐inflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol 1984; 28: 293–322.
  • Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998; 42: 297–319.
  • Tenkman LR, Price MO, Price FW Jr. Keratoconus onset after age 50. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 436–438.
  • Mcmonnies CW. Quo vadis keratoconus patients? Do they die at younger ages? Cornea 2013; 32: 496–502.
  • Hori‐komai Y, Toda I, Asano‐kato N, Tsubota K. Reasons for not performing refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 795–797.
  • Xu K, Mckee HD, Jhanji V. Changing perspectives of reasons for not performing laser‐assisted in situ keratomileusis among candidates in a university eye clinic. Clin Exp Optom 2013; 96: 20–24.
  • Bamashmus MA, Saleh MF, Awadalla MA. Reasons for not performing keratorefractive surgery in patients seeking refractive surgery in a hospital‐based cohort in ‘Yemen’. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2010; 17: 349–353.
  • Romagnani S. The increased prevalence of allergy and the hygiene hypothesis: missing immune deviation, reduced immune suppression, or both. Immunology 2004; 112: 352–362.
  • Niederer RL, Perumal D, Sherwin T, Mcghee CN. Laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy reveals reduced innervations and reduction in cell density in all layers of the keratoconic cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 2964–2970.
  • Mcmonnies CW. Where are the older keratoconus patients? Letter to the editor. Cornea 2009; 28: 836.
  • Nowak DM, Gajecka M. The genetics of keratoconus. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2011; 18: 2–6.
  • Lalkhen AG, Mccluskey A. Clinical tests: sensitivity and specificity. Cont Ed Anaesth, Crit Care Pain 2008; 8: 221–223.
  • Gilbert R, Logan S, Move VA, Elliott EJ. Assessing diagnostic and screening tests. West J Med 2001; 174 (6): 405–409.
  • Rabinowitz YS. The genetics of keratoconus. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2003; 16: 607–620.
  • Dimasi DP, Burdon KP, Craig JE. The genetics of central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 94: 971–976.
  • Lu Y, Vitart V, Burdon KP, Khor CC, Bykhovskaya Y, Mirshani A, Hewitt AW et al. Genome‐wide association analyses identify multiple loci associated with central corneal thickness and keratoconus. Nat Genet 2013; 45: 155–165.
  • Edwards M, Mcghee CNJ, Dean S. The genetics of keratoconus. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2001; 29: 345–351.
  • Karseras AG, Ruben M. Aetiology of keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 1976; 60: 522–525.
  • Bawazeer AM, Hodge WG, Lorimer B. Atopy and keratoconus: a multivariate analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 834–836.
  • Mcmonnies CW, Boneham GC. Keratoconus, allergy, itch, eye‐rubbing and hand dominance. Clin Exp Optom 2003; 86: 376–384.
  • Zadnik K, Barr JT, Edrington TB, Everett DF, Jameson M, Mcmahon TT, Shin JA et al. Baseline findings in the collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39: 2537–2546.
  • Weed KH, Macewen CJ, Giles T, Low J, Mcghee CNJ. The Dundee University Scottish Keratoconus study: demographics, corneal signs, associated diseases, and eye rubbing. Eye (Lond) 2008; 22: 534–541.
  • Dotterud LK, Falk ES. Evaluation of a self‐administered questionnaire on atopic diseases. Europ J Public Health 2000; 10: 105–107.
  • Halvorsen R, Jenner A, Hagelin EM, Borres MP. Phadiatop infant in the diagnosis of atopy in children with allergy‐like symptoms. Inter J Pediatrics 2009; 2009: 460737.
  • Mcmonnies CW. Management of chronic habits of abnormal rubbing. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2008; 31: 95–102.
  • Mcmonnies CW. Behaviour modification in the management of chronic habits of abnormal eye rubbing. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009; 32: 55–63.
  • Mcmonnies CW. The possible significance of the baropathic nature of keratectasia. Clin Exp Optom 2013; 96: 197–200.
  • Mcmonnies CW. The significance of intraocular pressure elevation during sleep‐related postures. Clin Exp Optom 2013; DOI:10.1111/cxo.12108. [Epub ahead of print].
  • Epstein RL, Chiu Y‐L, Epstein GL. Pentacam HR criteria for curvature change in keratoconus and postoperative LASIK ectasia. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 890–894.
  • Mcmonnies CW. The evidentiary significance of case reports: eye rubbing and keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 262–269.
  • Berti TB, Ghanem VC, Ghanem RC, Binder PS. Moderate keratoconus with thick corneas. J Refract Surg 2013; 29: 430–435.
  • Liu Z, Pflugfelder SC. The effects of long‐term contact lens wear on corneal thickness, curvature, and surface regularity. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 105–111.
  • Sabermoghaddam AA, Zarei‐ghanavati S, Abrishami M. Effects of chalazion excision on ocular aberrations. Cornea 2013; 32: 757–760.
  • Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 37–50.
  • Saad A, Gatinel D. Subclinical keratoconus: the need for an objective classification system. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: e56–e57.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.