Biomechanical properties of the keratoconic cornea: a review

References

• Ortiz D, Piñero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich‐montiel F, Alió JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post‐laser in situ keratomileusis,and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1371–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoyne CF, Downs JC, Bellezza AJ, Suh JK, Hart RT. The optic nerve head as a biomechanical structure: A new paradigm for understanding the role of IOP‐related stress and strain in the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic nerve head damage. Prog Retin Eye Res 2005; 24: 39–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol 1984; 28: 293–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless M, Coster DJ, Phillips AJ, Loane M. Keratoconus: Diagnosis and management. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1989; 17: 33–60.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998; 42: 297–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcghee CN. 2008 Sir Norman McAlister Gregg Lecture: 150 years of practical observations on the conical cornea–what have we learned? Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009; 37: 160–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljubic A. Keratoconus and its prevalence in Macedonia. Macedonian J Med Sci 2009; 2: 58–62.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas JB, Nangia V, Matin A, Kulkarni M, Bhojwani K. Prevalence and associations of keratoconus in rural maharashtra in central india: The central india eye and medical study. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 148: 760–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupps WJ Jr, Wilson SE. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp Eye Res 2006; 83: 709–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmund C. Corneal elasticity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 1988; 66: 134–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosato DV, Schott NR, Rosato MG. Plastics Institute of America Plastics Engineering, Manufacturing & Data Handbook. New York: Springer; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Barbucci R. Integrated Biomaterials Science. New York: Springer; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwin T, Brookes NH. Morphological changes in keratoconus: Pathology or pathogenesis. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2004; 32: 211–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng CC. Electron microscope study of the pathology of keratoconus: I. Am J Ophthalmol 1963; 55: 18–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somodi S, Hahnel C, Slowik C, Richter A, Weiss DG, Guthoff R. Confocal in vivo microscopy and confocal laser‐scanning fluorescence microscopy in keratoconus. Ger J Ophthalmol 1996; 5: 518–525.
   Google Scholar
• Elsheikh A, Alhasso D, Rama P. Assessment of the epithelium's contribution to corneal biomechanics. Exp Eye Res 2008; 86: 445–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litwin KL, Moreira H, Ohadi C, Mcdonnell PJ. Changes in corneal curvature at different excimer laser ablative depths. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111: 382–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorronsoro C, Pascual D, Pérez‐merino P, Kling S, Marcos S. Dynamic OCT measurement of corneal deformation by an air puff in normal and cross‐linked corneas. Biomed Opt Express 2012; 3: 473–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaguchi S, Fukuchi T, Abe H, Kaiya T, Sugar J, Yue BY. Three‐dimensional scanning electron microscopic study of keratoconus corneas. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 62–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seiler T, Matallana M, Sendler S, Bende T. Does bowman's layer determine the biomechanical properties of the cornea? Refract Corneal Surg 1992; 8: 139–142.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson SE, Hong J. Bowman's layer structure and function: Critical or dispensable to corneal function? A hypothesis. Cornea 2000; 19: 417–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scroggs MW, Proia AD. Histopathological variation in keratoconus. Cornea 1992; 11: 553–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi A, Nakayasu K, Okisaka S, Kanai A. Quantitative analysis of collagen fiber in keratoconus. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 1990; 94: 1068–1073.
   Google Scholar
• Daxer A, Fratzl P. Collagen fibril orientation in the human corneal stroma and its implication in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 121–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon DJ, Foster CS. Collagen crosslinking in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978; 17: 63–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrósio R Jr, Alonso RS, Luz A, Coca velarde LG. Corneal‐thickness spatial profile and corneal‐volume distribution: Tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 1851–1859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravarti S, Magnuson T, Lass JH, Jepsen KJ, Lamantia C, Carroll H. Lumican regulates collagen fibril assembly: Skin fragility and corneal opacity in the absence of lumican. J Cell Biol 1998; 141: 1277–1286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollensak J, Buddecke E. Biochemical studies on human corneal proteoglycans—a comparison of normal and keratoconic eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 1990; 228: 517–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaguchi S, Yue BY, Chang I, Sugar J, Robin J. Proteoglycan molecules in keratoconus corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32: 1846–1853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erie JC, Patel SV, Mclaren JW, Nau CB, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Keratocyte density in keratoconus. A confocal microscopy study. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134: 689–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder MC, Bergmanson JP, Doughty MJ. Keratocytes: No more the quiet cells. J Am Optom Assoc 1998; 69: 180–187.
   Google Scholar
• Ku JY, Niederer RL, Patel DV, Sherwin T, Mcghee CN. Laser scanning in vivo confocal analysis of keratocyte density in keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 845–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim W, Rabinowitz YS, Meisler DM, Wilson SE. Keratocyte apoptosis associated with keratoconus. Exp Eye Res 1999; 69: 475–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong TT, Sethi C, Daniels JT, Limb GA, Murphy G, Khaw PT. Matrix metalloproteinases in disease and repair processes in the anterior segment. Surv Ophthalmol 2002; 47: 239–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsen CC. Tensile mechanical and creep properties of Descemet's membrane and lens capsule. Exp Eye Res 2004; 79: 343–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojeda JL, Ventosa JA, Piedra S. The three‐dimensional microanatomy of the rabbit and human cornea. A chemical and mechanical microdissection‐SEM approach. J Anat 2001; 199: 567–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts C. Biomechanics in keratoconus. In: Adel B. ed. Textbook on Keratoconus: New Insights. London: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, 2012. p 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Mcmonnies CW, Schief WK. Biomechanically coupled curvature transfer in normal and keratoconus corneal collagen. Eye Contact Lens 2006; 32: 51–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Is keratoconus a true ectasia?: An evaluation of corneal surface area. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 1179–1186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andreassen T, Simonsen A, Oxlund H. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. Exp Eye Res 1980; 31: 435–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash I, Greene P, Foster C. Comparison of mechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. Exp Eye Res 1982; 35: 413–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung Y. Stress‐strain‐history relations of soft tissues in simple elongation. In: Fung YC. ed. Biomechanics: Its Fundations and Objectives. Inglewood Cliffs, New ersey: Prentice‐Hall, 1972. p 181–208.
   Google Scholar
• Mcmonnies CW. The possible significance of the baropathic nature of keratectasias. Clin Exp Optom 2013; 96: 97–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsheikh A, Anderson K. Comparative study of corneal strip extensometry and inflation tests. J R Soc Interface 2005; 2: 177–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard RR, Lyon CS, Shepherd MD, Mcbain EH, Mcewen WK. Immediate rigidity of an eye: I. Whole, segments and strips. Exp Eye Res 1970; 9: 137–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedenwald JS. Contribution to the theory and practice of tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 1937; 20: 985–1024.
   Google Scholar
• Hartstein J, Becker B. Research into the pathogenesis of keratoconus: A new syndrome: Low ocular rigidity, contact lenses and keratoconus. Arch Ophthalmol 1970; 84: 728–729.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foster CS, Yamamoto GK. Ocular rigidity in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 1978; 86: 802–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White OW. Ocular elasticity? Ophthalmology 1990; 97: 1092–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalenak JW, White O. More ocular elasticity? Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 411–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupps WJ Jr, Netto MV, Herekar S, Krueger RR. Surface wave elastometry of the cornea in porcine and human donor eyes. J Refract Surg 2007; 23: 66–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Liu J. A quantitative ultrasonic spectroscopy method for noninvasive determination of corneal biomechanical properties. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 5148–5154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarcelli G, Yun SH. In vivo brillouin optical microscopy of the human eye. Opt Express 2012; 20: 9197–9202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford MR, Dupps WJ, Rollins AM, Roy AS, Hu Z. Method for optical coherence elastography of the cornea. J Biomed Opt 2011; 16: 016005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 156–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupps WJ. Hysteresis: New mechanospeak for the ophthalmologist. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 1499–1501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MC, Lee N, Bourla N, Hamilton DR. Corneal biomechanical measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 1886–1891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 3026–3031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan C, O'malley D, O'keefe M. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in keratoectasia: Findings using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Ophthalmologica 2008; 222: 334–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontes BM, Ambrósio Jr R, Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nosé W. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 673–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad A, Lteif Y, Azan E, Gatinel D. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 2912–2916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontes BM, Ambrósio Jr R, Velarde GC, Nosé W. Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes. J Refract Surg 2011; 27: 209–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcmonnies CW. Assessing corneal hysteresis using the ocular response analyzer. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: E343–E349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikielewicz M, Kotliar K, Barraquer RI, Michael R. Air‐pulse corneal applanation signal curve parameters for the characterisation of keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95: 793–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avetisov SE, Novikov IA, Bubnova IA, Antonov AA, Siplivyi VI. Determination of corneal elasticity coefficient using the ORA database. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: 520–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallahan KM, Roy AS, Ambrósio R Jr, Salomao M, Dupps WJ Jr. Discriminant value of custom ocular response analyzer waveform derivatives in keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrósio R Jr, Ramos I, Luz A, Faria FC, Steinmueller A, Krug M, Belin MW et al. Dynamic ultra high speed scheimpflug imaging for assessing corneal biomechanical properties. Rev Bras Oftalmol 2013; 72: 99–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali NQ, Patel DV, Mcghee CN. Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a non contact scheimpflug tonometer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; IOVS‐13‐13715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian L, Huang Y, Wang L, Bai H, Wang Q, Jiang JJ, Wu Y et al. Corneal biomechanical assessment using corneal visualization scheimpflug technology in keratoconic and normal eyes. J Ophthalmol 2014; 2014: 147516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper CL, Boulton ME, Bennett D, Marcyniuk B, Jarvis‐evans JH, Tullo AB, Ridgeway AE. Diurnal variations in human corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 1068–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollensak G. Crosslinking treatment of progressive keratoconus: New hope. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17: 356–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet‐a‐induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135: 620–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlhaas M, Spoerl E, Schilde T, Unger G, Wittig C, Pillunat LE. Biomechanical evidence of the distribution of cross‐links in corneas treated with riboflavin and ultraviolet A light. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 279–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mencucci R, Marini M, Paladini I, Sarchielli E, Sgambati E, Menchini U, Vannelli GB. Effects of riboflavin/UVA corneal cross‐linking on keratocytes and collagen fibres in human cornea. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2010; 38: 49–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoerl E, Wollensak G, Dittert DD, Seiler T. Thermomechanical behavior of collagen‐cross‐linked porcine cornea. Ophthalmologica 2004; 218: 136–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messmer EM, Meyer P, Herwig MC, Loeffler KU, Schirra F, Seitz B, Thiel M et al. Morphological and immunohistochemical changes after corneal cross‐linking. Cornea 2013; 32: 111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan C, Patel DV, Abeysekera N, Mcghee CN. In vivo confocal microscopy analyses of corneal microstructural changes in a prospective study of collagen cross‐linking in keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 469–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollensak G, Wilsch M, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Collagen fiber diameter in the rabbit cornea after collagen crosslinking by riboflavin/UVA. Cornea 2004; 23: 503–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoerl E, Huhle M, Seiler T. Induction of cross‐links in corneal tissue. Exp Eye Res 1998; 66: 97–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporl E, Schreiber J, Hellmund K, Seiler T, Knuschke P. Cross‐linking effects in the cornea of rabbits. Ophthalmologe 2000; 97: 203–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollensak G, Iomdina E. Long‐term biomechanical properties of rabbit cornea after photodynamic collagen crosslinking. Acta Ophthalmol 2009; 87: 48–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Stress‐strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavin‐ultraviolet‐A‐induced cross‐linking. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 1780–1785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling S, Remon L, Pérez‐escudero A, Merayo‐lloves J, Marcos S. Corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross‐linking from porcine eye inflation experiments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 3961–3968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattson MS, Huynh J, Wiseman M, Coassin M, Kornfield JA, Schwartz DM. An in vitro intact globe expansion method for evaluation of cross‐linking treatments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 3120–3128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Spoerl E, Tang J, Liu J. Measurement of corneal changes after collagen crosslinking using a noninvasive ultrasound system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 1207–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanter M, Touboul D, Gennisson J, Bercoff J, Fink M. High‐resolution quantitative imaging of cornea elasticity using supersonic shear imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009; 28: 1881–1893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarcelli G, Kling S, Quijano E, Pineda R, Marcos S, Yun SH. Brillouin microscopy of collagen crosslinking: Non‐contact depth‐dependent analysis of corneal elastic modulus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 1418–1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling S, Marcos S. Contributing factors to corneal deformation in air puff measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 5078–5085.
   Google Scholar
• Beshtawi IM, O'donnell C, Radhakrishnan H. Biomechanical properties of corneal tissue after ultraviolet‐a–riboflavin crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39: 451–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolozsvari L, Nogradi A, Hopp B, Bor Z. UV absorbance of the human cornea in the 240‐ to 400‐nm range. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 2165–2168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Morad Y, Hartstein M, Avni I, Zadok D. Can we measure corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross‐linking in eyes with keratoconus?–a pilot study. Cornea 2009; 28: 498–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedaghat M, Naderi M, Zarei‐ghanavati M. Biomechanical parameters of the cornea after collagen crosslinking measured by waveform analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 1728–1731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra P, Albè E, Mahmoud AM, Trazza S, Hafezi F, Roberts CJ. Intra‐and postoperative variation in ocular response analyzer parameters in keratoconic eyes after corneal cross‐linking. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: 669–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoerl E, Terai N, Scholz F, Raiskup F, Pillunat LE. Detection of biomechanical changes after corneal cross‐linking using ocular response analyzer software. J Refract Surg 2011; 27: 452–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldich Y, Marcovich A, Barkana Y, Mandel Y, Hirsh A, Morad Y, Avni I et al. Clinical and corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross‐linking with riboflavin and UV irradiation in patients with progressive keratoconus: Results after 2 years of follow‐up. Cornea 2012; 31: 609–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Hersh PS. In vivo biomechanical changes after corneal collagen cross‐linking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: 1‐year analysis of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Cornea 2012; 31: 21–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkika M, Labiris G, Giarmoukakis A, Koutsogianni A, Kozobolis V. Evaluation of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after corneal cross‐linking for keratoconus. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012; 250: 565–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanchares E, del Buey MA, Cristóbal JA, Lavilla L, Calvo B. Biomechanical property analysis after corneal collagen cross‐linking in relation to ultraviolet A irradiation time. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249: 1223–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporl E, Terai N, Haustein M, Bohm AG, Raiskup‐wolf F, Pillunat LE. Biomechanical condition of the cornea as a new indicator for pathological and structural changes. Ophthalmologe 2009; 106: 512–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Conrad A, Conrad G. Effects of ultraviolet‐A and riboflavin on the interaction of collagen and proteoglycans during corneal cross‐linking. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 13011–13022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollensak G, Sporl E, Mazzotta C, Kalinski T, Sel S. Interlamellar cohesion after corneal crosslinking using riboflavin and ultraviolet A light. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95: 876–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar