Therapeutic treatment of keratoconus: a survey of local optometric practice criteria

References

• Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol 1984; 28: 293–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gore DM, Shortt AJ, Allan BD. New clinical pathways for keratoconus. Eye (Lond) 2013; 27: 329–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcghee CN. 2008 Sir Norman McAlister Gregg Lecture: 150 years of practical observations on the conical cornea—what have we learned? Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009; 37: 160–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weed KH, Macewen CJ, Mcghee CN. The Dundee University Scottish Keratoconus study: demographics, corneal signs, associated diseases, and eye rubbing. Eye (Lond) 2008; 22: 534–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadnik K, Barr JT, Edrington TB, Everett DF, Jameson M, Mcmahon TT, Shin JA et al. Baseline findings in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39: 2537–2546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal VB. Characteristics of keratoconus patients at a tertiary eye center in India. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2011; 6: 87–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998; 42: 297–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millodot M, Shneor E, Albou S, Atlani E, Gordon‐shaag A. Prevalence and associated factors of keratoconus in Jerusalem: a cross‐sectional study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2011; 18: 91–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge C, Chan C, Sutton G. Investigation of keratoconus in an Australian refractive population. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2014 Feb 17. {Epub ahead of print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Optometry Australia. Position Statement Primary Health Care and Optometry, 2010. Available at: http://www.optometrists.asn.au/media/278113/position_statement_primary_health_care_and_optometry.pdf. [Accessed 1 April, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Giedd KK, Mannis MJ, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Personality in keratoconus in a sample of patients derived from the internet. Cornea 2005; 24: 301–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannis MJ, Morrison TL, Zadnik K, Holland EJ, Krachmer JH. Personality trends in keratoconus. An analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 798–800.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira LB, Alchieri JC, Belfort R Jr, Moreira H. [Psychological and social aspects of patients with keratoconus]. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2007; 70: 317–322.
   Google Scholar
• Jonas JB, Nangia V, Matin A, Kulkarni M, Bhojwani K. Prevalence and associations of keratoconus in rural maharashtra in central India: the central India eye and medical study. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 148: 760–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Fotouhi A. Topographic keratoconus is not rare in an Iranian population: the Tehran Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2013; 20: 385–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB, Woods CA. Trends in Australian contact lens prescribing during the first decade of the 21st Century (2000–2009). Clin Exp Optom 2010; 93: 243–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB, Woods CA, International Contact Lens Prescribing Survey Consortium. International survey of rigid contact lens fitting. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 113–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymes SM, Walline JJ, Zadnik K, Gordon MO. Quality of life in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 138: 527–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner H, Barr JT, Zadnik K. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study: methods and findings to date. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007; 30: 223–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim N, Vogt U. Characteristics and functional outcomes of 130 patients with keratoconus attending a specialist contact lens clinic. Eye (Lond) 2002; 16: 54–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weed KH, Macewen CJ, Mcghee CN. The Dundee University Scottish Keratoconus Study II: a prospective study of optical and surgical correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 561–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon MO, Steger‐may K, Szczotka‐flynn L, Riley C, Joslin CE, Weissman BA, Fink BA et al. Baseline factors predictive of incident penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 142: 923–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczotka LB, Barr JT, Zadnik K. A summary of the findings from the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. CLEK Study Group. Optometry 2001; 72: 574–584.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA. A 48‐year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 1986; 101: 267–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill FR, Murphy P, Purslow C. A survey of UK practitioner attitudes to the fitting of rigid gas permeable lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2010; 30: 731–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Academy of Ophthalmology. Corneal Ectasia Summary Benchmarks for Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines. 2013. Available at: http://one.aao.org/summary‐benchmark‐detail/corneal‐ectasia‐summary‐benchmark‐2013. [Accessed 4 June 2014]
   Google Scholar