Assessing clinical reasoning in optometry using the script concordance test

References

• Higgs J, Jones M. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. In: Higgs J, Jones M, eds. Clinical Reasoning in the Health Professions. 2nd Ed. Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 2000. p 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Faucher C, Tardif J, Chamberland M. Optometrists' clinical reasoning made explicit: a qualitative study. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 1774–1784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HP. A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implication. Acad Med 1990; 65: 611–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlin B, Tardif J, Boshuizen HP. Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research. Acad Med 2000; 75: 182–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlin B, Roy L, Brailovsky C, Goulet F, van der Vleuten C. The Script Concordance test: a tool to assess the reflective clinician. Teach Learn Med 2000; 12: 189–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibert L, Darmoni SJ, Dahamna B, Weber J, Charlin B. Online clinical reasoning assessment with the Script Concordance test: a feasibility study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005; 5: 18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brazeau‐lamontagne L, Charlin B, Gagnon R, Samson L, van der Vleuten C. Measurement of perception and interpretation skills during radiology training: utility of the script concordance approach. Med Teach 2004; 26: 326–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibert L, Charlin B, Corcos J, Gagnon R, Lechevallier J, Grise P. Assessment of clinical reasoning competence in urology with the script concordance test: an exploratory study across two sites from different countries. Eur Urol 2002; 41: 227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kania RE, Verillaud B, Tran H, Gagnon R, Kazitani D, Huy PT, Herman P et al. Online script concordance test for clinical reasoning assessment in otorhinolaryngology: the association between performance and clinical experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 137: 751–755.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meterissian SH. A novel method of assessing clinical reasoning in surgical residents. Surg Innov 2006; 13: 115‐119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubarsky S, Chalk C, Kazitani D, Gagnon R, Charlin B. The Script Concordance Test: a new tool assessing clinical judgement in neurology. Can J Neurol Sci 2009; 36: 326–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carriere B, Gagnon R, Charlin B, Downing S, Bordage G. Assessing clinical reasoning in pediatric emergency medicine: validity evidence for a Script Concordance Test. Ann Emerg Med 2009; 53: 647–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufour S, Latour S, Chicoine Y, Fecteau G, Forget S, Moreau J, Trepanier A. Use of the script concordance approach to evaluate clinical reasoning in food‐ruminant practitioners. J Vet Med Educ 2012; 39: 267–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschenes MF, Charlin B, Gagnon R, Goudreau J. Use of a script concordance test to assess development of clinical reasoning in nursing students. J Nurs Educ 2011; 50: 381–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlin B, van der Vleuten C. Standardized assessment of reasoning in contexts of uncertainty: the script concordance approach. Eval Health Prof 2004; 27: 304‐319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier JP, Demeester A, Charlin B. Script concordance tests: guidelines for construction. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008; 8: 18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon R, Charlin B, Lambert C, Carriere B, Van der vleuten C. Script concordance testing: more cases or more questions? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009; 14: 367–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubarsky S, Dory V, Duggan P, Gagnon R, Charlin B. Script concordance testing: from theory to practice: AMEE guide no. 75. Med Teach 2013; 35: 184–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stommel M, Wills C. Clinical Research: Concepts and Principles for Advanced Practice Nurses. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon R, Charlin B, Coletti M, Sauve E, van der Vleuten C. Assessment in the context of uncertainty: how many members are needed on the panel of reference of a script concordance test? Med Educ 2005; 39: 284–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004; 79 (10 Suppl): S70–S81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15: 988–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrew DP, Pedersen PM, Mcevoy CD. Research methods and design in sport management. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Boulouffe C, Doucet B, Muschart X, Charlin B, Vanpee D. Assessing clinical reasoning using a script concordance test with electrocardiogram in an emergency medicine clerkship rotation. Emerg Med J 2013; 31: 313–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouh T, Boutros M, Gagnon R, Reid S, Leslie K, Pace D et al. The script concordance test as a measure of clinical reasoning: a national validation study. Am J Surg 2012; 203: 530–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cemaloglu N, Filiz S. The relation between time management skills and academic achievement of potential teachers. Educ Res Quart 2010; 33: 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Macan TH, Shahani C, Dipboye RL, Phillips AP. College students' time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress. J Educ Psychol 1990; 82: 760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dory V, Gagnon R, Vanpee D, Charlin B. How to construct and implement script concordance tests: insights from a systematic review. Med Educ 2012; 46: 552–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing SM. Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data. Med Educ 2004; 38: 1006–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caire F, Sol JC, Moreau JJ, Isidori P, Charlin B. Auto‐évaluation des internes en neurochirurgie par tests de concordance de script (TCS): Processus d'élaboration des tests. Neurochirurgie 2004; 50: 66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan P, Charlin B. Summative assessment of 5th year medical students' clinical reasoning by Script Concordance Test: requirements and challenges. BMC Med Educ 2012; 12: 29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humbert AJ, Johnson MT, Miech E, Friedberg F, Grackin JA, Seidman PA. Assessment of clinical reasoning: A Script Concordance test designed for pre‐clinical medical students. Med Teach 2011; 33: 472–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornos EH, Pleguezuelos EM, Brailovsky CA, Harillo LD, Dory V, Charlin B. The practicum script concordance test: an online continuing professional development format to foster reflection on clinical practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2013; 33: 59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulet F, Jacques A, Gagnon R, Charlin B, Shabah A. Poorly performing physicians: does the Script Concordance Test detect bad clinical reasoning? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2010; 30: 161–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly W, Durning S, Denton G. Comparing a script concordance examination to a multiple‐choice examination on a core internal medicine clerkship. Teach Learn Med 2012; 24:187–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier J‐P, Thiercelin D, Pulcini C, Alunni‐perret V, Gilbert E, Minguet J‐M, Bertrand F. Évaluation du raisonnement clinique en médecine d'urgence: les tests de concordance des scripts décèlentt mieux l'expérience clinique que les questions à choix multiples à contexte riche. Pédag Méd 2006; 7: 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lubarsky S, Charlin B, Cook DA, Chalk C, van der Vleuten CP. Script concordance testing: a review of published validity evidence. Med Educ 2011; 45: 329–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lineberry M, Kreiter CD, Bordage G. Threats to validity in the use and interpretation of script concordance test scores. Med Educ 2013; 47: 1175–1183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lineberry M. Missing the mark: the faulty logic of aggregate scoring in script concordance tests. Med Educ 2014; 48: 1038–1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlin B, Gagnon R, Pelletier J, Coletti M, Abi‐rizk G, Nasr C et al. Assessment of clinical reasoning in the context of uncertainty: the effect of variability within the reference panel. Med Educ 2006; 40: 848–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See KC, Tan KL, Lim TK. The script concordance test for clinical reasoning: re‐examining its utility and potential weakness. Med Educ 2014; 48: 1069–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi SF, Khoshkish S, Soltani‐arabshahi K, Hafezi‐moghadam P, Zahmatkesh G, Heidari P et al. Challenging script concordance test reference standard by evidence: do judgments by emergency medicine consultants agree with likelihood ratios? Int J Emerg Med 2014; 7: 34.
   Google Scholar
• Linn AM, Tonkin A, Duggan P. Standard setting of script concordance tests using an adapted Nedelsky approach. Med Teach 2013; 35: 314–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AB, Pike GR, Humbert AJ. Analyzing script concordance test scoring methods and items by difficulty and type. Teach Learn Med 2014; 26: 135–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar