Visual demands in modern Australian primary school classrooms

References

• Marshall EC, Meetz RE, Harmon LL. Through our children's eyes—The public health impact of the vision screening requirements for Indiana school children. J Am Optom Assoc 2010; 81: 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen A, Lieberman S, Stolzberg M, Ritty J. The NYSOA vision screening battery ‐ A total approach. J Am Optom Assoc 1983; 54: 979–984.
   Google Scholar
• Hellerstein LF, Danner R, Maples W, Press L, Schneebeck J, Miller S. Optometric guidelines for school consulting. J Optom Vis Dev 2001; 32: 56–74.
   Google Scholar
• Leone J, Mitchell P, Morgan I, Kifley A, Rose K. Use of visual acuity to screen for significant refractive errors in adolescents: Is it reliable? Arch Ophthalmol 2010; 128: 894–899.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ritty JM, Solan HA, Cool SJ. Visual and sensory‐motor functioning in the classroom: A preliminary report of ergonomic demands. J Am Optom Assoc 1993; 60: 238–244.
   Google Scholar
• Borsting E, Rouse MW. Detecting learning‐related visual problems in the primary care setting. J Am Optom Assoc 1994; 65: 642–650.
   Google Scholar
• Simons H. An analysis of the role of vision anomalies in reading interference. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 369–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilla‐warford N, Allison C. A review of the efficacy of oculomotor vision therapy in improving reading skills. J Optom Vis Dev 2004; 35: 108–115.
   Google Scholar
• Scheiman M, Rouse MW. Optometric management of learning‐related vision problems. St Louis: Mosby‐Elsevier, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Langford A, Hug T. Visual demands in elementary school. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2010; 47: 152–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Optometric Association. Optometric clinical practice guideline care of patient with learning related vision problems. St Louis: American Optometry Association; 2008. Available at: http://www.aoa.org/documents/optometrists/CPG‐20.pdf. [Accessed 19 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Qaiser S, Hassan DA, Ishtiaq H. Effects of classroom physical environment on the academic achievement scores of secondary school students in Kohat Division, Pakistan. Int J Learn Dev 2014; 4: 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner C. Minimum classroom size and number of students per classroom [monograph on the Internet]. The University of Georgia: School Design and Planning Laboratory; 2000. Available at: http://sdpl.coe.uga.edu/research/territoriality.html. [Accessed 8 August 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education UK. Building bulletin 99: Briefing framework for primary school projects. Athlone: Department of Education and Skills; 2005. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/288108/building_bulletin_99_‐_briefing_framework_for_primary_school_projects.pdf. [Accessed 21 September 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman JE, Christensen JF. IES Lighting Handbook: Application volume, New York, NY: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Great Britain Deptartment of Education and Science Architects and Building Branch. Guidelines for environmental design in schools, London: HSMO, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia. Interior Lighting. Part 2.3: Educational and training facilities [monograph on the Internet]. New South Wales: Standards Australia;1994. Available at: http://infostore.saiglobal.com/store/PreviewDoc.aspx?saleItemID=260911. [Accessed 15 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Donahue SP. Prescribing spectacles in children: A pediatric ophthalmologist's approach. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 110–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'leary CI, Evans BJW. Criteria for prescribing optometric interventions: literature review and practitioner survey. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2003; 23: 429–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derespinis PA. Eyeglasses: why and when do children need them? Pediatr Ann 2001; 30: 455–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh‐tootle W. Infants, toddlers and children. In: Benjamin WJ, Borish IM eds. Borish's Clinical Refraction. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1998. p 1060–1118.
   Google Scholar
• Brookman K. Low ametropias. In: Brookman K ed. Refractive Management of Ametropia. Boston: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1996. p 123–143.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins S, Sampson GP, Hendicott P, Wood JM. Review of guidelines for children's vision screenings. Clin Exp Optom 2013; 96: 443–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciner EB, Schmidt PP, Orel‐bixler D, Dobson V, Maguire M, Cyert L, Moore B, Schultz J. Vision screening of preschool children: evaluating the past, looking toward the future. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 571–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. Child health screening and surveillance: A crical review of the literature. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2002. Available at: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/ch42_child_health_screening_surveillance_131223.pdf. [Accessed 21 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Junghans B, Kiely PM, Crewther DP, Crewther SG. Referral rates for a functional vision screening among a large cosmopolitan sample of Australian children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 10–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiman MM, Rouse M. Optometric management of learning related vision disorders. St Louis: Mosby‐Elsevier, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey IL. Visual acuity. In: Benjamin WJ, Borish IM eds. Borish's Clinical Refraction. St Louis: Butterworth –Heinemann, 2006. p 217–246.
   Google Scholar
• Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 327: 307–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovie‐kitchin JE, Oliver NJ, Bruce A, Leighton MS. The effect of print size on reading rate for adults and children. Clin Exp Optom 1994; 77: 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Lueck A, Bailey I, Greer R, Dornbusch H. Magnification needs to optimize reading efficiency for students with low vision. In: Arditi A, Horowitz A, Lang MA, Rosenthal B, Seidman K, Stuen C eds. Vision Rehabilitation: Assessment, Intervention and Outcomes. Exton, Pennsylvania: Swets & Zeitlinger, 2000. p 311–313.
   Google Scholar
• Owsley C. Contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2003; 16: 171–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whittaker SG, Lovie‐kitchin J. Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 54–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemberg D, Lewis TL, Liu CH, Maurer D. Development of spatial and temporal vision during childhood. Vision Res 1999; 39: 2325–2333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 2005; 85: 257–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walline JJ, Carder EDJ. Vision problems of children with individualized education programs. J Behav Opt 2012; 23: 87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Garzia RP. The relationship between visual efficiency problems and learning. In: Scheiman M, Rouse M eds. Optometric Management of Learning‐related Vision Problems. St Louis: Mosby‐Elsevier, 2006. p 209–235.
   Google Scholar
• Cox MJ, Norman JH, Norman P. The effect of surround luminance on measurements of contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999; 19: 401–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosvenor TP. Primary Care Optometry: Anomalies of Refraction and Binocular Vision. St Louis: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez R, Gonzalez M, Pérez M, García J. Evolution of accommodative function and development of ocular movements in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2003; 23: 97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcclelland JF, Saunders KJ. Accommodative lag using dynamic retinoscopy: age norms for school‐age children. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 929–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez R, Pérez M, García J, González M. Statistical normal values of visual parameters that characterize binocular function in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004; 24: 528–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield M. Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential treatments. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 502–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bali J, Neeraj N, Bali R. Computer vision syndrome: A review. J Clin Ophthalmol Res 2014; 2: 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson W. Eye problems and visual display terminals—the facts and the fallacies. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 111–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alabdulkader B, Leat SJ. Reading in children with low vision. Optometry 2010; 3: 68–73.
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Optometry. Position paper on clinical low vision evaluation and treatment of students with visual impairments for parents, educators and other professionals [monograph on the Internet]. St Louis: American Academy of Optometry; 2014. Available at: http://bit.ly/YXzg77. [Accessed 6 April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Li A. Classroom strategies for improving and enhancing visual skills in students with disabilities. Teach Except Child 2004; 36: 38–46.
   Google Scholar