Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thickness for discriminating primary open‐angle glaucoma and normal‐tension glaucoma using optical coherence tomography

References

• Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open‐angle glaucoma. The Lancet 2004; 363 (9422): 1711–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields MB. Normal‐tension glaucoma: is it different from primary open‐angle glaucoma? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2008; 19: 85–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutteridge IF. Normal tension glaucoma: diagnostic features and comparisons with primary open angle glaucoma. Clin Exp Optom 2000; 83: 161–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sack J. The management of normal tension glaucoma. Clin Exp Optom 2000; 83: 185–189.
   Google Scholar
• Martus P, Stroux A, Budde WM et al. Predictive factors for progressive optic nerve damage in various types of chronic open‐angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 999–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitazawa Y, Shirato S, Yamamoto T. Optic disc hemorrhage in low‐tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1986; 93: 853–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DM, Seo JH, Kim SH, et al. Comparison of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects between a low‐teen intraocular pressure group and a high‐teen intraocular pressure group in normal tension glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2007; 16: 293–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkana Y, Anis S, Liebmann J et al. Clinical utility of intraocular pressure monitoring outside of normal office hours in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124: 793–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiuchi T, Motoyama Y, Oshika T. Relationship of progression of visual field damage to postural changes in intraocular pressure in patients with normal‐tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 2150–2155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurita N, Tomidokoro A, Mayama C et al. No apparent association between ocular perfusion pressure and visual field damage in normal‐tension glaucoma patients. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2006; 50: 547–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibovitch I, Kurtz S, Kesler A, et al. C‐reactive protein levels in normal tension glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2005; 14: 384–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991; 254 (5035), 1178–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield DS, Bagga H, Knighton RW. Macular thickness changes in glaucomatous optic neuropathy detected using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121: 41–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa H, Stein DM, Wollstein G et al. Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 2012–2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojima T, Tanabe T, Hangai M et al. Measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and macular volume for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2007; 51: 197–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanal S, Thapa M, Racette L et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucomatous Nepalese eyes and its relation with visual field sensitivity. J Optom 2014; 7: 217–224.
   Google Scholar
• Zeimer R, Asrani S, Zou S, et al. Quantitative detection of glaucomatous damage at the posterior pole by retinal thickness mapping. A pilot study. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 224–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakatani Y, Higashide T, Ohkubo S et al. Evaluation of macular thickness and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for detection of early glaucoma using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 2011;20(4), 252–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurses‐ozden R, Teng C, Vessani R et al. Macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement reproducibility using optical coherence tomography (OCT‐3). J Glaucoma 2004;13(3), 238–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seong M, Sung KR, Choi EH et al. Macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal‐tension glaucoma. [Comparative Study]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 1446–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapa M, Khanal S, Shrestha GB, Sharma AK. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in a healthy Nepalese population by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology 2014; 6(2):131–9.
   Google Scholar
• Khanal S, Davey PG, Racette L, Thapa M. Intraeye retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thickness asymmetry measurements for the discrimination of primary open‐angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma. Journal of Optometry 2015 Dec 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Weijland A, Fankhauser F, Bebie H et al. Automated perimetry. Visual Field Digest. USA: Haag‐Streit publications, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Heidelberg Engineering Academy Quick Guides an Tutorials. Heidelberg; Heidelberg Engineering, Inc; 2015. Available at: http://www.heidelbergengineering.com/us/academy‐education/quick‐guides. [Accessed 27 June 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Subbiah S, Sankarnarayanan S, Thomas PA et al. Comparative evaluation of optical coherence tomography in glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive and normal eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007; 55: 283–287.
   Google Scholar
• Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ et al. The ocular hypertensive treatment study. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 701–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini G, Carbonelli M, Barboni P. Spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis and follow‐up of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2011; 22: 115–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van buren JM. The Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas; 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Bowd C, Weinreb RN, Williams JM et al. The retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in ocular hypertensive, normal, and glaucomatous eyes with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 22–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guedes V, Schuman JS, Hertzmark E et al. Optical coherence tomography measurement of macular and nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous human eyes. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jan 31;110(1):177–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura H, Hangai M, Mori S et al. Hemispherical focal macular photopic negative response and macular inner retinal thickness in open‐angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 151: 494–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok KH, Lee VW, So KF. Retinal nerve fiber loss in high and normal‐tension glaucoma by optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 369–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantakopoulou E, Reeves BC, Fenerty C et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer measures in high‐ and normal‐tension glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 538–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori S, Hangai M, Sakamoto A et al. Spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography measurement of macular volume for diagnosing glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2010; 19: 528–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakatani Y, Higashide T, Ohkubo S et al. Evaluation of macular thickness and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for detection of early glaucoma using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 2011; 20: 252–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firat PG, Doganay S, Demirel EE et al. Comparison of ganglion cell and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in primary open‐angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma with spectral‐domain OCT. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013; 251: 831–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley HA, Addicks EM. Regional differences in the structure of the lamina cribrosa and their relation to glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Arch Ophthalmol 1981; 99: 137–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Price LL et al. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurements and automated visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 138: 218–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 44–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung CK, Chan WM, Yung WH et al. Comparison of macular and peripapillary measurements for the detection of glaucoma: an optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 391–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar