The conspicuity of pedestrians at night: a review

References

• World Health Organization. Make walking safe: A brief overview of pedestrian safety around the world. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts, 2013: Pedestrians. Washington, DC: Report No: DOT HS 812 124, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Infrastructure Transport and Regional Economics. Pedestrians and road safety. Report No: 70. Canberra, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rumar K. A Worldwide Perspective on Future Automobile Lighting. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Owens DA, Sivak M. Differentiation of visibility and alcohol as contributors to twilight road fatalities. Hum Factors 1996; 38: 680–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan JM, Flannagan MJ. The role of ambient light level in fatal crashes: inferences from daylight saving time transitions. Accid Anal Prev 2002; 34: 487–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens DA, Brooks JC. Drivers' Vision, Age and Gender as Factors in Twilight Road Fatalities. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan, Transport Research Institute, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Rumar K. The basic driver error: Late detection. Ergonomics 1990; 33: 1281–1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivak M, Luoma J, Flannagan MJ et al. Traffic safety in the U.S.: Re‐examining major opportunities. J Safety Res 2007; 38: 337–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibowitz HW, Owens DA. Can normal outdoor activities be carried out during civil twilight? Appl Opt 1991; 30: 3501–3503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens DA, Francis EL, Leibowitz HW. Visibility distance with headlight: a functional approach. Society of Automotive Engineers; SAE Technical Paper Series No 890684. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1989. p 11.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Washington, DC: The United States Naval Observatory. Available at: http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/RST_defs.phpAfed.
   Google Scholar
• Plainis S, Chauhan K, Murray IJ et al. Retinal adaptation under night‐time driving conditions. In: Vision in Vehicles VII, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Plainis S, Murray IJ, Charman WN. The role of retinal adaptation in night driving. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 682–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arumi P, Chauhan K, Charman WN. Accommodation and acuity under night‐driving illumination levels. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1997; 17: 291–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CA, Casson EJ. Effects of luminance, contrast and blur on visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 864–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturr JF, Kline GE, Taub HA. Performance of young and older drivers on a static acuity test under photopic and mesopic luminance conditions. Hum Factors 1990; 32: 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Owens DA. Standard measures of visual acuity do not predict drivers' recognition performance under day or night conditions. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 698–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin RJ, Ng JS, Nguyen AL. Determinants and standardization of mesopic visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 2015; 92: 559–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedell HE. Eccentric regard, task and optical blur as factors influencing visual acuity at low luminances. In: Night vision, current research and future directions. National Research Council Symposium proceedings, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse JM, Barlow HB. Spatial and temporal resolution and analysis. In: Barlow HB ed. The Senses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. p 152–162.
   Google Scholar
• Peli E, Arend L, Labianca AT. Contrast perception across changes in luminance and spatial frequency. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1996; 13: 1953–1959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puell MC, Palomo C, Sanchez‐ramos C et al. Normal values for photopic and mesopic letter contrast sensitivity. J Refract Surg 2004; 20: 484–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gegenfurtner KR, Mayser H, Sharpe LT. Seeing movement in the dark. Nature 1999; 398: 475–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gegenfurtner KR, Mayser HM, Sharpe LT. Motion perception at scotopic light levels. J Opt Soc Am A 2000; 17: 1505–1515.
   Google Scholar
• Pokorny J, Lutze M, Cao D et al. The color of night: Surface color perception under dim illuminations. Vis Neurosci 2006; 23: 525–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zele AJ, Cao D. Vision under mesopic and scotopic illumination. Front Psychol 2014; 5: 1594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockman A, Sharpe LT. Into the twilight zone: The complexities of mesopic vision and luminous efficiency. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2006; 26: 225–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibowitz HW, Rodemer CS, Dichgans J. The independence of dynamic spatial orientation from luminance and refractive error. Percept Psychophys 1979; 25: 75–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks JO, Tyrrell R, Frank TA. The effects of severe visual challenges on steering performance in visually healthy young drivers. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 689–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens DA, Tyrrell RA. Effects of luminance, blur and age on night‐time visual guidance: A test of the selective degradation hypothesis. J Exp Psychol Appl 1999; 5: 115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weale RA. The Senescence of Human Vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Adams AJ, Wong LS, Wong L et al. Visual acuity changes with age: some new perspectives. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988; 65: 403–406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sloane ME, Owsley C, Alvarez SL. Aging, senile miosis and spatial contrast sensitivity at low luminance. Vision Res 1988; 28: 1235–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosnik W, Winslow L, Kline D et al. Visual changes in daily life throughout adulthood. J Gerontol 1988; 43: P63–P70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owsley C, Mcgwin G Jr, Scilley K et al. Development of a questionnaire to assess vision problems under low luminance in age‐related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 528–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabyn JA, Schneck ME, Lott LA et al. Night driving self‐restriction: vision function and gender differences. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 755–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball K, Owsley C, Stavey B et al. Driving avoidance and functional impairment in older drivers. Accid Anal Prev 1998; 30: 313–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attebo K, Mitchell P, Smith W. Visual acuity and the causes of visual loss in Australia: The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1996; 103:357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein R, Klein BEK, Linton KLP et al. The Beaver dam eye study: Visual acuity. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 1310–1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckendrick AM, Sampson GP, Walland MJ et al. Impairments of contrast discrimination and contrast adaptation in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 920–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahav K, Levkovitch‐verbin H, Belkin M et al. Reduced mesopic and photopic foveal contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129: 16–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pesudovs K, Marsack JD, Donnelly WJ et al. Measuring visual acuity‐‐mesopic or photopic conditions and high or low contrast letters? J Refract Surg 2004; 20: S508–S514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puell MC, Barrio AR, Palomo‐alvarez C et al. Impaired mesopic visual acuity in eyes with early age‐related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 7310–7314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barteselli G, Gomez ML, Doede AL et al. Visual function assessment in simulated real‐life situations in patients with age‐related macular degeneration compared to normal subjects. Eye (Lond) 2014; 28: 1231–1238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber N, Mosimann UP, Muri RM et al. Vision and night driving abilities of elderly drivers. Traffic Inj Prev 2013; 14: 477–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haegerstrom‐portnoy G, Brabyn J, Schneck ME et al. The SKILL Card. An acuity test of reduced luminance and contrast. Smith‐Kettlewell Institute Low Luminance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 207–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petzold A, Plant GT. Clinical disorders affecting mesopic vision. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2006; 26: 326–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgis SP, Osgood DJ. Effects of glare and background luminance on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: Implications for driver night vision testing. Hum Factors 1982; 24: 347–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Marszalek R, Lacherez P et al. Configuring retroreflective markings to enhance the night‐time conspicuity of road workers. Accid Anal Prev 2014; 70: 209–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Chaparro A, Carberry T, Chu BS. Effect of simulated visual impairment on night‐time driving performance. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 379–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins KE, Wood JM. Predicting components of closed road driving performance from vision tests. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 647–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Chaparro A, Hickson L. Interaction between visual status, driver age and distracters on daytime driving performance. Vision Res 2009; 49: 2225–2231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM. Age and visual impairment decrease driving performance as measured on a closed‐road circuit. Hum Factors 2002; 44: 482–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Troutbeck R. The effect of restriction of the binocular visual field on driving performance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992; 12: 291–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owsley C, Mcgwin G. Vision impairment and driving. Surv Ophthalmol 1999; 43: 535–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandil FI, Rotter A, Lappe M. Driving is smoother and more stable when using the tangent point. J Vis 2009; 9: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Lacherez P, Tyrrell RA. Seeing pedestrians at night: effect of driver age and visual abilities. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2014; 34: 452–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society of Automotive Engineers. Performance requirements for motor vehicle headlamps. In: Warrendale, Pennsylvania: Society of Automotive Engineers, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108. Lamps, reflective devices and associated equipment. Code of Federal Regulations. Washington DC, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Schoettle B, Sivak M, Flannagan MJ. High‐beam and low‐beam headlighting patterns in the U.S. and Europe at the turn of the millennium. In: Report No UMTRI‐2001‐19: Ann Arbor (MI): The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Andre J, Owens DA. The twilight envelope: a user‐centered approach to describing roadway illumination at night. Hum Factors 2001; 43: 620–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan JM, Flannagan MJ. Characteristics of pedestrian risk in darkness. In: Report No UMTRI‐2001‐33. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan JM, Flnnagan MJ. Differences in geometry of pedestrian crashes in daylight and darkness. J Safety Res 2011; 42: 33–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson PL, Sivak M. Comparison of headlamp visibility distance and stopping distance. Percept Mot Skills 1983; 57: 1177–1178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Tyrrell RA, Carberry TP. Limitations in drivers' ability to recognize pedestrians at night. Hum Factors 2005; 47: 644–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare CT HR. Headlamp beam usage on U.S. highways. In: Report No AR‐66. San Antonio, Texas: Southwest Research Institute, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Buonarosa ML, Sayer JR, Flannagan MJ. Real‐world frequency of use of automotive lighting equipment. Leukos 2008; 5: 139–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mefford ML, Flannagan M, Bogard SE. Real‐world use of high‐beam headlamps. In: Report No UMTRI‐2006011. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Transportation Institute, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Leibowitz HW, Owens DA, Tyrrell RA. The assured clear distance ahead rule: Implications for night‐time traffic safety and the law. Accid Anal Prev 1998; 30: 93–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming B. New automotive electronics technologies. IEEE Vehicular Technol Mag 2012; 7: 4–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jermakian JS. Crash avoidance potential of four passenger vehicle technologies. Accid Anal Prev 2011; 43: 732–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reagan IJ, Brumbelow M, Frischmann T. On‐road experiment to assess drivers' detection of roadside targets as a function of headlight system, target placement and target reflectance. Accid Anal Prev 2015; 76: 74–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moberly N, Langham M. Pedestrian conspicuity at night: Failure to observe a biological motion advantage in a high‐clutter environment. Appl Cognit Psychol 2002; 16: 477–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens DA, Antonoff RJ, Francis EL. Biological motion and night‐time pedestrian conspicuity. Hum Factors 1994; 36: 718–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Chaparro A. Night Driving: How low illumination affects driving and the challenges of simulation. In: Fisher DL, Rizzo M, Caird JK et al. eds. Handbook of Driving Simulation for Engineering, Medicine and Psychology: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Roper VJ, Howard E. Seeing with motor car headlamps. Trans Illum Eng Socy 1938; 33: 417–438.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson HH. Road accidents: Pedestrians' beliefs regarding visibility at night. J Appl Psychol 1944; 28: 109–116.
   Google Scholar
• Balk SA, Tyrrell RA, Brooks JO et al. Highlighting human form and motion information enhances the conspicuity of pedestrians at night. Perception 2008; 37: 1276–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetsel borzendowski SA, Stafford sewall AA, Rosopa PJ et al. Drivers' judgments of the effect of headlight glare on their ability to see pedestrians at night. J Safety Res 2015; 53: 31–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fekety DK, Edewaard DE, Stafford sewall AA, Tyrrell RA. Electroluminescent materials can further enhance the nighttime conspicuity of pedestrians wearing retroreflective materials. Hum Factors 2016; doi: 10.1177/0018720816651535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Tyrrell RA, Marszalek R et al. Using reflective clothing to enhance the conspicuity of bicyclists at night. Accid Anal Prev 2012; 45: 726–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Tyrrell RA, Marszalek R et al. Using biological motion to enhance the conspicuity of roadway workers. Accid Anal Prev 2011; 43: 1036–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrrell RA, Wood JM, Chaparro A et al. Seeing pedestrians at night: visual clutter does not mask biological motion. Accid Anal Prev 2009; 41: 506–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens DA, Wood JM, Owens JM. Effects of age and illumination on night driving: a road test. Hum Factors 2007; 49: 1115–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Tyrrell RA, Chaparro A et al. Even moderate visual impairments degrade drivers' ability to see pedestrians at night. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 2586–2592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Marszalek R, Carberry T et al. Effects of different levels of refractive blur on night‐time pedestrian visibility. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 4480–4485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinar D. The effects of expectancy, clothing reflectance and detection criterion on night‐time pedestrian visibility. Hum Factors 1985; 27: 327–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagavathula R, Gibbons RB. Role of expectancy, motion and overhead lighting on night‐time visibility. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 57th Annual Meeting 2013. 2013. p 1963–1967.
   Google Scholar
• Langham M, Moberly N. Pedestrian conspicuity research: A review. Ergonomics 2003; 46: 345–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhise VD, Farber EI, Saunby CS et al. Modeling Vision with Headways in a Systems Context. In: International Automotive Engineering, Congress and Exposition. Cobo Hall, Detroit: Society of Automotive Engineers, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Hagle BE, Lamy A, Rizkallah JW et al. The prevalence and reliability of visibility aid and other risk factor data for uninjured cyclists and pedestrians in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Accid Anal Prev 2007; 39: 384–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen MJ, Hazlett RD, Tacker HL et al. Actual pedestrian visibility and the pedestrian's estimate of his own visibility. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1970; 47: 44–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blomberg RD, Hale A, Preusser DF. Experimental evaluation of alternative conspicuity‐enhancement techniques for pedestrians and bicyclists. J Safety Res 1986; 17: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinar D. Actual versus estimated night‐time pedestrian visibility. Ergonomics 1984; 27: 863–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute ANS. American National Standard for High‐Visibility Safety Apparel and Headwear. In: Report No ANSI/ISEA 107‐2010. Washington DC: American National Standards Institute, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer JR, Mefford ML. High visibility safety apparel and night‐time conspicuity of pedestrians in work zones. J Safety Res 2004; 35: 537–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys 1973; 14: 201–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake R, Shiffrar M. Perception of human motion. Ann Rev Psychol 2007; 58: 47–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson G. Visual motion perception. Sci Am 1975; 232: 78–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda H, Blake R, Watanabe K. Eccentric perception of biological motion is unscalably poor. Vision Res 2005; 45: 1935–1943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski LT Cutting J. Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point‐light display. Percept Psychophys 1977; 21: 575–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting JE, Kozlowski LT. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bull Psychnomic Soc 1977; 9: 353–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walk RD, Homan C. Emotion and dance in dynamic light displays. Bull Psychonomic Soc 1984; 22: 437–440.
   Google Scholar
• Fox R, Mcdaniel C. The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science 1982; 218: 486–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simion F, Regolin L, Bulf H. A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2008; 105: 809–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake R. Cats perceive biological motion. Psychol Sci 1993; 4: 54–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittrich WH, Lea S, Barrett J, Gurr PR. Categorization of natural movements by pigeons: Visual concept discrimination and biological motion. J Exp Anal Behav 1998; 70: 281–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regolin L, Tommasi L, Vallortigara G. Visual perception of biological motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure. Animal Cognit 2000; 3: 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibowitz HW. The symbiosis between basic and applied research. Am Psychologist 1996; 51: 366–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theeuwes J, Alferdinck JW, Perel M. Relation between glare and driving performance. Hum Factors 2002; 44: 95–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford sewall AA, Whetsel borzendowski SA, Tyrrell RA. The accuracy of drivers' judgments of the effects of headlight glare on their own visual acuity. Perception 2014; 43: 1203–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP et al. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ 2008; 86: 63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallhorn SC, Tanzer DJ, Kaupp SE et al. Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront‐guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 702–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallhorn S, Tanzer D, Sanders DR et al. Night driving simulation in a randomized prospective comparison of Visian toric implantable collamer lens and conventional PRK for moderate to high myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: 321–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochtchina E, Mukesh BN, Wang JJ et al. Projected prevalence of age‐related cataract and cataract surgery in Australia for the years 2001 and 2021: pooled data from two population‐based surveys. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2003; 31: 233–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls GL. Adaptations to nocturnal activity. In: The vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation: Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, USA: Cranbrook Press, 1942. p 206–246.
   Google Scholar
• Warrant E. Vision in the dimmest habitats on earth. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2004; 190: 765–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibowitz HW, Owens DA. Night‐time driving accidents and selective visual degradation. Science 1977; 197: 422–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balk SA, Brooks JO, Klein N et al. Pedestrians' estimates of their own visibility: a simple and effective computer‐based technique. J Safety Res 2012; 43: 101–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrrell RA, Wood JM, Carberry TP. On‐road measures of pedestrians' estimates of their own night‐time conspicuity. J Safety Res 2004; 35: 483–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetsel borzendowski SA, Rosenberg RL, Sewall AS et al. Pedestrians' estimates of their own night‐time conspicuity are unaffected by severe reductions in headlight illumination. J Safety Res 2013; 47: 25–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrrell RA, Patton CW, Brooks JO. Educational interventions successfully reduce pedestrians' overestimates of their own night‐time visibility. Hum Factors 2004; 46: 170–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetsel borzendowski SA, Stafford sewall AA, Fekety DK et al. Effects of an educational intervention on athletes' attitudes toward wearing conspicuity‐enhancing garments at night. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting. Chicago, Illinois, 2014. p 2141–2145.
   Google Scholar