Does the treatment of amblyopia normalise subfoveal choroidal thickness in amblyopic children?

References

• Nickla DL, Wallman J. The multifunctional choroid. Prog Retin Eye Res 2010; 29: 144–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozzoni MC. Enhanced depth imaging spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 146: 496–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laviers H, Zambarakji H. Enhanced depth imaging‐OCT of the choroid: a review of the current literature. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 252: 1871–1883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attebo K, Mitchell P, Cumming R et al. Prevalence and causes of amblyopia in an adult population. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 154–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigg J, Thomas R, Billson F. Neuronal basis of amblyopia: a review. Indian J Ophthalmol 1996; 44: 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Karaca EE, Çubuk MÖ, Akçam HT et al. Choroidal thickness in Turkish children with anisometric amblyopia. Semin Ophthalmol 2015; 26: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kara O, Altintas O, Karaman S et al. Analysis of choroidal thickness using spectral‐domain OCT in children with unilateral amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2015; 52: 159–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aygit ED, Yilmaz I, Ozkaya A et al. Choroidal thickness of children's eyes with anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia. J AAPOS 2015; 19: 237–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantarci FA, Tatar MG, Uslu H et al. Choroidal and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in adults with anisometropic amblyopia. Eur J Ophthalmol 2015; 25: 437–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenlik A, Güler E, Kulak AE et al. Evaluation of choroidal thickness in amblyopia using enhanced depth ımaging optical coherence tomography. Curr Eye Res 2015; 40: 1063–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori T, Sugano Y, Maruko I et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness and axial length in preschool children with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia. Curr Eye Res 2015; 40: 954–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishi T, Ueda T, Hasegawa T et al. Choroidal thickness in children with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 228–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Zheng J, Yu S et al. Macular choroidal thickness in unilateral amblyopic children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55: 7361–7368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin P, Zou H, Zhu J et al. Choroidal and retinal thickness in children with differen refractive status measured by swept‐source optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2016; 168: 164–176.
   Google Scholar
• Pradeep A, Proudlock FA, Awan M et al. An educational intervention to improve adherence to high‐dosage patching regimen for amblyopia: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 865–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley MJ, Wallace MP, Stephens DA et al.. Personalized versus standardized dosing strategies for the treatment of childhood amblyopia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16: 189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou A, Jiang Y, Chen J et al. Neural mechanisms of selective attention in children with amblyopia. PLoS One 2015; 10: 0125370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhablani JK, Deshpande R, Sachdeva V et al. Choroidal thickness profile in healthy Indian children. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015; 63: 474–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öner V, Bulut A, Büyüktarakçı Ş et al. Influence of hyperopia and amblyopia on choroidal thickness in children. Eur J Ophthalmol 2015. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera L, Perez‐navarro I, Sanchez‐cano A et al. Choroidal thickness and volume in a healthy pediatric population and its relationshp with age, axial length, ametropia and sex. Retina 2015; 35: 2574–2583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulut A, Öner V, Büyüktarakçı Ş et al. Associations between choroidal thickness, axial length and spherical equivalent in a paediatric population. Clin Exp Optom 2016; 99: 356–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallman J, Wildsoet C, Xu A. Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res 2006; 46: 267–283.
   Google Scholar
• Nickla DL, Wildsoet C, Wallman J. Compensation for spectacle lenses involves changes in proteoglycan synthesis in the sclera and choroid. Curr Eye Res 1997; 16: 320–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildsoet C, Wallman J. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vision Res 1995; 35: 1175–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ et al. Choroidal thickness in myopic and non‐myopic children assessed with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 7578–7586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman EC, Read SA, Collins MJ. Axial length and choroidal thickness changes accompanying prolonged accommodation in myopes and emmetropes. Vision Res 2012; 72: 34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo L, Tao J, Xia F et al. In vivo optical imaging of amblyopia: Digital subtraction autofluorescence and split‐spectrum amplitude‐decorrelation angiography. Lasers Surg Med 2016; 48: 660–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Yang XF, Jiao X et al. The diurnal variation pattern of choroidal thickness in macular region of young healthy female individuals using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Int J Ophthalmol 2016; 9: 561–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Noorden GK, Crawford ML. The sensitive period. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1979; 99: 442–446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khan T. Is there a critical period for amblyopia therapy? Results of a study on older anisometropic amblyopes. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdogan erkul S, Kapran Z, Uyar OM. Quantitative analysis of subfoveal choroidal thickness using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography in normal eyes. Int Ophthalmol 2014; 34: 35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldstein SM, Faatz H, Szimacsek M et al. Comparison of penetration depth in choroidal imaging using swept source vs spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Eye (Lond) 2015; 29: 409–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar