Care solution effects on contact lens in vivo wettability

REFERENCES

• Brennan NA, Coles ML, Ang JH. An evaluation of silicone‐hydrogel lenses worn on a daily wear basis. Clin Exp Optom 2006; 8: 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Varikooty J, Schulze MM, Dumbleton K et al. Clinical performance of three silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2015; 92: 301–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best N, Drury L, Wolffsohn JS. Predicting success with silicone‐hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2013; 36: 232–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brujic M. Advances in Contact Lens Wetting 2011. Available at: http://www.refractiveeyecare.com/2011/10/advances‐in‐contact‐lens‐wetting‐2/. [Accessed 28 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Holly FJ, Lemp MA. Tear physiology and dry eyes. Surv Ophthalmol 1977; 22: 69–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keir N, Jones L. Wettability and silicone hydrogel lenses: A review. Eye Contact Lens 2013; 39: 100–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guryča V, Hobzová R, Přádný M et al. Surface morphology of contact lenses probed with microscopy techniques. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2007; 30: 215–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones L, Menzies K, Subbaraman L. Comfortable Contact Lenses: A Case of Mission Impossible? Contac Lens Spectrum 2010. Available at: http://www.clspectrum.com/articleviewer.aspx?articleid=104451. [Accessed 15 Nov 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Epstein A. Ensuring wettability and comfort. Contact Lens Spectrum 2009. Available at: http://www.clspectrum.com/articleviewer.aspx?articleid=103164.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolson PC. Continuous wear contact lens surface chemistry and wearability. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: S30–S32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicolson PC, Vogt J. Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 3273–3283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn AC, Tichy JA, Urueña JM et al. Lubrication regimes in contact lens wear during a blink. Tribology Intern 2013; 63: 45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Jones D, Houlford M. Clinical comparison of three polyhexanide‐preserved multi‐purpose contact lens solutions. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 1997; 20: 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard N, Young G, Coleman S. Subjective and objective measures of corneal staining related to multipurpose care systems. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2003; 26: 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lebow KA, Schachet JL. Evaluation of corneal staining and patient preference with use of three multi‐purpose solutions and two brands of soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: 213–220.
   Google Scholar
• Stiegemeier MJ, Cedrone R, Evans D et al. Clinical performance of ‘no rub' multi‐purpose solutions. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2004; 27: 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell R, Kame G, Leach N et al. Clinical benefits of a new multipurpose disinfecting solution in silicone hydrogel and soft contact lens users. Eye Contact Lens 2012; 38: 93–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z‐J, Croner D, Huth S et al. Wettability of contact lenses: Are wetting angles clinically significant. Rev Cornea Cont Lens 2006; 42‐47.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, King‐smith PE. The impact of contact lens care solutions on the thickness of the tear film and contact lens. Cornea 2005; 24: 825–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilia D, de la Jara PL, Peng N et al. Effect of lens and solution choice on the comfort of contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 411–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diec J, Papas E, Naduvilath T et al. Combined effect of comfort and adverse events on contact lens performance. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 674–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keir N, Woods CA, Dumbleton K et al. Clinical performance of different care systems with silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33: 189–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickham P. Human experimentation. Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Br Med J 1964; 2: 177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagehi R, Tomlinson A, Manahilov V. Application of thin film interferometry to measurement of contact lens wettability in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: ARVO E‐abstract: 6524.
   Google Scholar
• Fagehi R, Tomlinson A, Manahilov V et al. contact lens in vitro wettability by interferometry measures of drying dynamics. Eye Contact Lens 2013; 39: 365–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannoni G, Nichols J. Annual Report on Dry Eye Diseases. Contact Lens Spectrum 2012. Available at: http://www.clspectrum.com/articleviewer.aspx?articleID=107175. [Accessed 10 June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Bruce AS, Mainstone JC, Golding TR. Analysis of tear film breakup on Etafilcon A hydrogel lenses. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 3249–3256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon J‐P. Non‐invasive tearscope plus routine for contact lens fitting. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1998; 21(Suppl 1): S31–S40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliott M, Fandrich H, Simpson T et al. Analysis of the repeatability of tear break‐up time measurement techniques on asymptomatic subjects before, during and after contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1998; 21: 98–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glasson M, Stapleton F, Keay L et al. The effect of short term contact lens wear on the tear film and ocular surface characteristics of tolerant and intolerant wearers. Contact lens Anterior Eye 2006; 29: 41–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glasson MJ, Stapleton F, Keay L et al. Differences in clinical parameters and tear film of tolerant and intolerant contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 5116–5124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding TR, Bruce AS, Mainstone JC. Relationship between tear‐meniscus parameters and tear‐film breakup. Cornea 1997; 16: 649–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Sinnott LT. Tear film, contact lens and patient‐related factors associated with contact lens‐related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 1319–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson A, Fagehi R, Manahilov V. Effect of care solutions on contact lens in vivo wettability at insertion and end of day. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 492 E‐abstract.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzies KL, Jones L. In vitro analysis of the physical properties of contact lens blister pack solutions. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: 493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows D. Measuring wettability. Contact Lens Spectrum 2005. Available at: http://www.clspectrum.com/articleviewer.aspx?articleid=12789. [Accessed 20 June 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Ketelson HA, Meadows DM, Mcqueen N, Stone RP. Enhancing wettability with multi‐purpose solutions. Rev Cornea Cont Lens 2005; 142: 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Donshik P, Madden R, Simmons P. Pursuing comfort in a multi‐purpose solution. Contact Lens Spectrum 2000; 15: 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Wong H, Fatt I, Radke C. Deposition and thinning of the human tear film. J Colloid Interf Sci 1996; 184: 44–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai LC, Tomlinson A, Simmons PA. In vitro and in vivo effects of a lubricant in a contact lens solution. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 319–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavet ME, Harrington KL, Vandermeid KR et al. In vitro biocompatibility assessment of multipurpose contact lens solutions: Effects on human corneal epithelial viability and barrier function. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2012; 35: 163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadam Y, Singh K, Marangoni D et al. Thermodynamic of micelle formation of nonlinear block co‐polymer Tetronic T904 in aqueous salt solution. Colloid Surface A 2010; 369: 121–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansur CR, Barboza SP, González G et al. PLURONIC× TETRONIC polyols: study of their properties and performance in the destabilization of emulsions formed in the petroleum industry. J Colloid Interf Sci 2004; 271: 232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent TC, Laurent UB, Fraser JRE. The structure and function of hyaluronan: An overview. Immunol Cell Bbiol 1996; 74: A1–A7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser J, Laurent T, Laurent U. Hyaluronan: its nature, distribution, functions and turnover. J Intern Med 2003; 242: 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Scheuer CA, Fridman KM, Barniak VL et al. Retention of conditioning agent hyaluronan on hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33: S2–S6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura M, Hikida M, Nakano T et al. Characterization of water retentive properties of hyaluronan. Cornea 1993; 12: 433–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles M, Chantal L, Brennan NA et al. The influence of lens conditioning on signs and symptoms with new hydrogel contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom 2004; 87: 367–371.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simmons PA, Donshik PC, Kelly WF et al. Conditioning of hydrogel lenses by a multipurpose solution containing an ocular lubricant. Eye Contact Lens 2001; 27: 192–194.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein AB. Contact lens care products effect on corneal sensitivity and patient comfort. Eye Contact Lens 2006; 32: 128–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao Z, Carnt NA, Aliwarga Y et al. Care regimen and lens material influence on silicone hydrogel contact lens deposition. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 251–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young G, Garofalo R, Harmer O et al. The effect of soft contact lens care products on lens modulus. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2010; 33: 210–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foulks G, Chalmers R, Keir N et al. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: Report of the Subcommittee on Clinical Trial Design and Outcomes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 157–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK et al. The performance of the contact lens dry eye questionnaire as a screening survey for contact lens‐related dry eye. Cornea 2002; 21: 469–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers RL, Begley CG, Moody K et al. Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire‐8 (CLDEQ‐8) and opinion of contact lens performance. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 1435–1442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar