Quality of life and handling experience with the PROSE device: an Indian scenario

REFERENCES

• Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 614–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandona L, Dandona R, Srinivas M et al. Blindness in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 908–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal P, Jacobs D, Johns L. Fluid‐ventilated gas permeable scleral lens: a new paradigm for the management of irregular corneal astigmatism and severe ocular surface disease. J Contemp Ophthalmol 2006; 5: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Titiyal JS, Pal N, Murthy GV et al. Causes and temporal trends of blindness and severe visual impairment in children in schools for the blind in North India. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 941–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ et al. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea 2015; 34: 359–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stason WB, Razavi M, Jacobs DS et al. Clinical benefits of the Boston ocular surface prosthesis. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 149: 54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill, MT, Banks AD, Stinnett SS et al. Vision‐related quality of life in patients with bilateral severe age‐related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 152–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Cochrane AL, Watt NA. Implementation methods for vision related quality of life questionnaires. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 1035–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baran I, Bradley JA, Alipour F et al. PROSE treatment of corneal ectasia. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2012; 35: 222–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planning Commission, Government of India. Population growth trends, projections, challenges and opportunities; 2000. Available at: http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/wrkpapers/wp_hwpaper.pdf. [Accessed May 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR et al. Development of the 25‐list‐item National Eye Institute visual function questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1050–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaleemunnisha S, Sudharshan S, Biswas J. Quality of life in non‐infectious uveitis patients on immunosuppressive therapy. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2014; 21: 225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G et al. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 615–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Prasad I, Jain R et al. Estimating the prevalence of dry eye among Indian patients attending a tertiary ophthalmology clinic. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2010; 104: 247–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arumugam AO, Rajan R, Subramanian M et al. PROSE for irregular corneas at a tertiary eye care center. Eye Contact Lens 2014; 40: 71–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathi VM, Mandathara PS, Dumpati S et al. Boston ocular surface prosthesis: An Indian experience. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011; 59: 279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owsley C, Sloane ME. Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of 'real‐world' targets. Br J Ophthalmol 1987; 71: 791–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimit R, Gire A, Pflugfelder SC et al. Patient ocular conditions and clinical outcomes using a PROSE scleral device. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2013; 36: 159–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal P, Croteau A. Fluid‐ventilated, gas‐permeable scleral contact lens is an effective option for managing severe ocular surface disease and many corneal disorders that would otherwise require penetrating keratoplasty. Eye Contact Lens 2005; 31: 130–134.
   Google Scholar
• Efron N, Morgan PB, Woods CA. International survey of rigid contact lens fitting. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 113–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathi VM, Mandathara PS, Vaddavalli PK et al. Fluid filled scleral contact lens in pediatric patients: challenges and outcome. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2012; 35: 189–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severinsky B, Behrman S, Frucht‐pery J et al. Scleral contact lenses for visual rehabilitation after penetrating keratoplasty: Long term outcomes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2014; 37: 196–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar