Size does matter: what is the corneo‐limbal diameter?

REFERENCES

• Van der worp E. A five step fitting approach. In: van der Worp E. A Guide to Scleral Lens Fitting, Version 2.0. Forest Grove: Pacific University, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal P, Cotter J. The role of contact lenses in the management of corneal disorders. In: Foster CS, Azar DT, Dohlman CH eds. Smolin and Thoft's the cornea: Scientific Foundations and Clinical Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Denaeyer GW, Jedlicka J, Schornack MM. Scleral lenses. In: Bennett ES, Henry VA eds. Clinical Manual of Contact Lenses. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pullum K. Scleral contact lenses. In: Phillips AJ, Speedwell L eds. Contact Lenses. 5th edn. Edinburgh: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Schornack MM, Patel SV. Scleral lenses in the management of keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens 2010; 36: 39–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser ES, Van der linden BJJJ, Otten HM, Van der lelij A, Visser R. Medical applications and outcomes of bitangential scleral lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 1078–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie LE, Lindsay RG. Contact lens management of keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 2015; 98: 299–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bier N. The cornea. In: Bier N ed. Contact lens routine and practice. 2nd edn. London: Butterworth, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Von helmholtz H. Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics. Translated from the German edition by JPC Southall, The Optical Society of America, 1924.
   Google Scholar
• Obrig TE. Molded contact lenses. Arch Ophthalmol 1938; 19: 735–758.
   Google Scholar
• Obrig TE. Contact Lenses. Philadelphia: The Chilton Company, 1942.
   Google Scholar
• Duke‐elder S, Wybar KC. The cornea. In: Duke‐elder S, Wybar KC, eds. System of ophthalmology. Vol 2: The Anatomy of the Visual System. St Louis: Mosby, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan MJ, Alvarado JA, Weddell JE. The cornea. In: Hogan MJ, Alvarado JA, Weddell JE eds. Histology of the Human Eye. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Fatt I, Weissman BA. Review of ocular anatomy. In: Fatt I, Weissman BA eds. Physiology of the Eye: An Introduction to the Vegetative Functions. 2nd edn. Stoneham: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Bron AJ, Tripathi RC, Tripathi BJ. The cornea and sclera. In: Bron AJ, Tripathi RC, Tripathi BJ eds. Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit. 8th edn. London: Chapman & Hall Medical, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Snell RS, Lemp MA. The eyeball. In: Snell RS, Lemp MA eds. Clinical Anatomy of the Eye. 2nd edn. Malden: Blackwell Science, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Oyster CW. The cornea and the sclera. In: Oyster CW ed. The Human Eye: Structure and Function. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Cornea. In: Duane TD, Jaeger EA eds. Biomedical Foundations of Ophthalmology. Vol 1. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Remington LA. Cornea and sclera. In: Remington LA. Clinical Anatomy and Physiology of the Visual System. 3rd edn. St. Louis: Elsevier Butterworth‐Heinemann, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas RH, Lawrenson JG. Eye. In: Standring S ed. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 41st edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Limited, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmanson JP. Cornea. In: Bergmanson JP ed. Clinical Ocular Anatomy and Physiology. 24th edn. Houston: Texas Eye Research and Technology Center, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Smith P. On the size of the cornea in relation to age, sex, refraction, and primary glaucoma. Trans Ophthal Soc UK 1890; 10: 68–80.
   Google Scholar
• Wessely K. Zur Methodik der Grössenbestimmung des menschlichen Auges nebst Beschreibung eines Instruments zur Messung der Hornhautbreite (Keratometer). Arch Augenheilk. 1911; 69: 265–271, German.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson A. Anterior‐posterior sections of the eye. In: Thomson A eds. The Anatomy of the Human Eye. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1912.
   Google Scholar
• Peter R. Über die Corneagrösse and ihre Vererbung. v. Graefes Arch Ophthalmol 1924; 115: 29–48. German.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser JH. Die Grösse und das Wachstum der Hornhaut im Kindesalter. v. Graefes Arch Ophthalmol 1926; 116: 288–311. German.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen EV. Underøgelser over det indbyrdes Størrelsesforhold mellem Cornea og Lens crystallina hos Mennesket: Med særlig henblik paa dets betydning for intracapsulær cataractextraction. Thesis, København Universitet, Denmark, 1947. Danish.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmer HA, Scammon RE. Growth of the components of the human eyeball. Arch Ophthal 1950; 43: 599–620.
   Google Scholar
• Arffa RC. Grayson's diseases of the cornea. 4th edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Klyce SD, Beuerman RW. Structure and function of the cornea. In: Kaufman HE, Barron BA, Mcdonald MB eds. The Cornea. 2nd edn. Boston: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Trinkaus‐randall V, Edelhauser HF, Leibowitz HM, Freddo TF. Corneal structure and function. In: Leibowitz HM, Waring GO III, eds. Corneal Disorders: Clinical Diagnosis and Management. 2nd edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Trochme SD. Cornea. In: Gold DH, Lewis RA eds. Clinical Eye Atlas. American Medical Association, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Gipson IK, Joyce NC, Zieske JD. The anatomy and cell biology of the human cornea, limbus, conjunctiva, and adnexa. In: Foster CS, Azar DT, Dohlman CH eds. Smolin and Thoft's The Cornea: Scientific Foundations and Clinical Practice. 4th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson DG, Ubels JL, Edelhauser HF. Cornea and sclera. In: Levin LA, Nilsson SFV, Ver hoeve J, Wu SM, Kaufman PL, Alm A. Adler's Physiology of the Eye. 11th edn. Edinburgh: Saunders/Elsevier, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Nishida T, Saika S. Cornea and Sclera: Anatomy and Physiology. In: Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, eds. Cornea: Fundamental Diagnosis and Management. Vol 1. 4th edn. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell RB. Corneal Topography. In: Mandell RB ed. Contact Lens Practice. 4th edn. Springfield: Thomas, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi BJ, Tripathi RC, Borisuth NSC. Microscopic anatomy and ultrastructure of the cornea, conjunctiva and lids. In: Ruben M, Guillon M eds. Contact Lens Practice. London: Chapman & Hall, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Efron N. The Cornea: its Examination in Contact Lens Practice. Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ridder WH III. Anatomy and Physiology. In: Hom MM, Bruce AS, eds. Manual of Contact Lens Prescribing and Fitting with CD‐ROM. 3rd edn. Saint Louis: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips AJ, Speedwell L. Contact Lenses. 5th edn. Edinburgh: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett ES, Perrigin JM, Watanabe RK, Begley CG. Preliminary evaluation. In: Bennett ES, Henry VA eds. Clinical Manual of Contact Lenses. 4th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• van der Worp E. Anatomy and shape of the anterior ocular surface. In: Van der worp E. A Guide to Scleral Lens Fitting, Version 2.0. Forest Grove: Pacific University, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrenson JG. The anterior eye. In: Efron N, ed. Contact Lens Practice. 3rd edn. Edinburgh: Elsevier, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Consejo A, Iskander DR. Corneo‐scleral limbus demarcation from 3D height data. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2016; 39: 450–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin DK, Holden BA. A new method for measuring the diameter of the in vivo human cornea. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982; 59: 436–441.
   Google Scholar
• van Buskirk EM. The anatomy of the limbus. Eye 1989; 3: 101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister M, Terzi E, Ekici Y, Kohnen T. Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 301: 374–380.
   Google Scholar
• Baikoff G, Jodai HJ, Bourgeon G. Measurement of the internal diameter and depth of the anterior chamber: IOL Master versus anterior chamber optical coherence tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 1722–1728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnen T, Thomala MC, Cichocki M, Strenger A. Internal anterior chamber diameter using optical coherence tomography compared with white‐to‐white distance using automated measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 1809–1813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinero DP, Puche ABP, Alio JL. Corneal diameter measurements by corneal topography and angle‐to‐angle measurements by optical coherence tomography: Evaluation of equivalence. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 126–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall LA, Hunt C, Young G, Wolffsohn J. Factors affecting corneoscleral topography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 3691–3701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang HS, Park SK, Kim MS. The biomechanical properties of the cornea and anterior segment parameters. BMC Ophthalmology 2013; 13: 49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson‐curran S, Brennan NA, Igarashi Y, Young G. Comparative evaluation of Asian and white ocular topography. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 1396–1405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier D. Das Corneo‐Skleral‐Profil – ein Kriterium individueller Kontaktlinsenanpassung. Die Kontaktlinse 1992; 10: 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith JA, Li Y, Chalita MR et al. Anterior chamber width measurement by high‐speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 238–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belmonte C, Tervo T, Galler J. Sensory innervation of the eye. In: Kaufman PL, Alm A, Levin LA, Nilsson SF, Ver hoeve JN, Wu SM, eds. Adler's Physiology of the Eye, 11th edn. Edinburgh: Elsevier Inc, 2011; 363–384.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmanson JPG, Walker MK, Johnson LA. Assessing scleral contact lens satisfaction in a keratoconus population. Opt Vis Sci 2016; 93: 855–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal P, Croteau A. Fluid‐ventilated, gas‐permeable scleral lens is an effective option for managing severe ocular surface. Eye Contact Lens 2005; 31: 130–134.
   Google Scholar
• Visser ES, Visser R, Van lier HJ, Otten HM. Modern scleral lenses Part I: clinical features. Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33: 13–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Visser ES, Visser R, Van lier HJ, Otten HM. Modern scleral lenses Part II: patient satisfaction. Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33: 21–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rathi VM, Mandathara PS, Vaddavalli PK, Srikanth D, Sangwan VS. Fluid filled scleral contact lens in pediatric patients: challenges and outcomes. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2012; 35: 189–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser ES, Van der lingen BJ, Otten HM, Van der lelij A, Visser R. Medical applications and outcomes of bitangential scleral lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 1078–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar