36
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research

Impact of age‐related macular degeneration on object searches in realistic panoramic scenes

, PhD, , MD PhD, , MSc & , PhD
Pages 372-379 | Received 30 Mar 2017, Accepted 24 Oct 2017, Published online: 15 Apr 2021

REFERENCES

  • Musel B, Hera R, Chokron S et al. Residual abilities in age‐related macular degeneration to process spatial frequencies during natural scene categorization. Vis Neurosci 2011; 28: 529–541.
  • Cheong AM, Legge GE, Lawrence MG et al. Relationship between visual span and reading performance in age‐related macular degeneration. Vision Res 2008; 48: 577–588.
  • Seiple W, Grant P, Szlyk JP. Reading rehabilitation of individuals with AMD: relative effectiveness of training approaches. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 2938–2944.
  • Chung ST. Size or spacing: which limits letter recognition in people with age‐related macular degeneration? Vision Res 2014; 101: 167–176.
  • Calabrèse A, Bernard JB, Faure G et al. Eye movements and reading speed in macular disease: the shrinking perceptual span hypothesis requires and is supported by a mediation analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55: 3638–3645.
  • Yu D, Legge GE, Park H et al. Development of a training protocol to improve reading performance in peripheral vision. Vision Res 2010; 50: 36–45.
  • Owsley C, Sloane ME. Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of « real‐world » targets. Br J Ophthalmol 1987; 71: 791–796.
  • Tejeria L, Harper RA, Artes PH et al. Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 86: 1019–1026.
  • Thibaut M, Delerue C, Tran THC et al. Misidentifying a tennis racket as keys: object identification in people with AMD. Opthalmic Physiol Opt 2015; 35: 336–344.
  • Berdeaux GH, Nordmann JP, Colin E et al. Vision‐related quality of life in patients suffering from age‐related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 271–279.
  • Hassell JB, Lamoureux EL, Keeffe JE. Impact of age related macular degeneration on quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 593–596.
  • Lamoureux EL, Pallant JF, Pesudovs K et al. Assessing participation in daily living and the effectiveness of rehabiliation in age related macular degeneration patients using the impact of vision impairment scale. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2008; 15: 105–113.
  • Taylor DJ, Hobby AE, Binns AM et al. How does age‐related macular degeneration affect real‐world visual ability and quality of life? A systematic review. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e011504.
  • Eperjesi F, Maiz‐fernandez C, Bartlett HE. Reading performance with various lamps in age‐related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 93–99.
  • Kabanarou SA, Rubin GS. Reading with central scotomas: is there a binocular gain? Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 789–796.
  • Wood JM, Owsley C. Vision and driving: a look at the research road ahead. Clin Exp Optom 2016; 99: 393–394.
  • Timberlake GT, Omoscharka E, Quaney BM et al. Effect of bilateral macular scotomas from age‐related macular degeneration on reach‐to‐grasp hand movement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 2540–2550.
  • Pardhan S, Gonzalez‐alvarez C, Subramanian A. How does the presence and duration of central visual impairment affect reaching and grasping movements? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 233–239.
  • Mackeben M, Fletcher DC. Target search and identification performance in low vision patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 7603–7609.
  • Van der stigchel S, Bethlehem RA, Klein BP et al. Macular degeneration affects eye movement behavior during visual search. Front Psychol 2013; 4: 579.
  • Taylor DJ, Smith ND, Crabb DP. Searching for objects in everyday scenes: measuring performance in people with dry age‐related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 583: 1887–1892.
  • Wiecek E, Jackson ML, Dakin SC et al. Visual search with image modification in age‐related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 6600–6609.
  • Satgunam PN, Woods RL, Luo G et al. Effects of contour enhancement on low‐vision preference and visual search. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: E1364–E1373.
  • Mcilreavy L, Fiser J, Bex PJ. Impact of simulated central scotomas on visual search in natural scenes. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 1385–1394.
  • Kwon M, Ramachandra C, Satgunam P et al. Contour enhancement benefits older adults with simulated central field loss. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 1374–1384.
  • Nuthmann A. How do the regions of the visual field contribute to object search in real‐world scenes? Evidence from eye movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2014; 40: 342–360.
  • Smith ND, Crabb DP, Glen FC et al. Eye movements in patients with glaucoma when viewing images of everyday scenes. Seeing Perceiving 2012; 25: 471–492.
  • Sippel K, Kasneci E, Aehling K et al. Binocular glaucomatous visual field loss and its impact on visual exploration: a supermarket study. PLoS One 2014; 9: e106089.
  • Smith ND, Crabb DP, Garway‐heath DF. An exploratory study of visual search performance in glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 225–232.
  • Crabb DP, Taylor DJ. Searching for unity: real‐world versus item‐based visual search in age‐related eye disease. Behav Brain Sci 2017; 40: e135.
  • Boucart M, Delerue C, Thibaut M et al. Impact of wet macular degeneration on the execution of natural actions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 6832–6838.
  • Bochsler TM, Legge GE, Gage R et al. Recognition of ramps and steps by people with low vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 288–294.
  • Ball KK, Roenker DL, Bruni JR. Developmental changes in attention and visual search throughout adulthood. In: Enns JT, ed. The Development of Attention: Research and Theory. North‐Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1990. pp. 489–507.
  • Ball K, Edwards JD, Ross LA. The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday functions. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2007; 62: 19–31.
  • Holz FG, Bindewald‐wittich A, Fleckenstein M et al. Progression of geographic atrophy and impact of fundus autofluorescence patterns in age‐related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 463–472.
  • Simader C, Sayegh RG, Montuoro A et al. A longitudinal comparison of spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence in geographic atrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 158: 557–566.
  • Querques G, Tran THC, Forte R et al. Anatomic response of occult choroidal neovascularisation to intravitreal ranibizumab. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012; 250: 479–484.
  • Kuyk TK, Liu L, Fuhr PSW. Feature search in persons with severe visual impairment. Vision Res 2005; 45: 3224–3234.
  • Biederman I, Mezzanotte RJ, Rabinowitz JC. Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognit Psychol 1982; 14: 143–177.
  • Torralba A, Oliva A, Castelhano MS et al. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real‐world scenes: the role of global features in object search. Psychol Rev 2006; 113: 766–786.
  • Wolfe JM, Võ MLH, Evans KK et al. Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways. Trends Cogn Sci 2011; 15: 77–84.
  • Bar M. Visual objects in context. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004; 5: 617–629.
  • Võ ML, Henderson JM. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. J Vis 2009; 9: 24.1–24.15.
  • Võ ML, Henderson JM. The time course of initial scene processing for eye movement guidance in natural scene search. J Vis 2010; 10: 14.1–14.13.
  • Oliva A. Visual scene perception. In: Goldstein B, ed. Encyclopedia of Perception. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Edition, 2009; 1–8..
  • Oliva A, Schyns PG. Diagnostic colors mediate scene recognition. Cogn Psychol 2000; 41: 176–210.
  • Tran THC, Rambaud C, Despretz P et al. Scene perception in age‐related macular degeneration (AMD). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 6868–6874.
  • Moores E, Laiti L, Chelazzi L. Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6: 182–189.
  • Belke E, Humphreys GW, Watson DG et al. Top‐down effects of semantic knowledge in visual search are modulated by cognitive but not perceptual load. Percept Psychophys 2008; 70: 1444–1458.
  • Hwang AD, Wang HC, Pomplun M. Semantic guidance of eye movements in real‐world scenes. Vision Res 2011; 51: 1192–1205.
  • Wu CC, Wick FA, Pomplun M. Guidance of visual attention by semantic information in real‐world scenes. Front Psychol 2014; 5: 54.
  • Owsley C. Aging and vision. Vision Res 2011; 51: 1610–1622.
  • Rémy R, Saint‐aubert L, Bacon‐macé N et al. Object recognition in congruent and incongruent natural scenes: a life‐span study. Vision Res 2013; 91: 36–44.
  • Scialfa CT, Esau SP, Joffe KM. Age, target‐distractor similarity, and visual search. Exp Aging Res 1984; 4: 337–358.
  • Kosnik W, Winslow L, Kline D et al. Visual changes in daily life throughout adulthood. J Gerontol 1988; 43: 63–70.
  • Sekuler R, Hutman LP. Spatial vision and aging. I: contrast sensitivity. J Gerontol 1980; 35: 692–699.
  • Scialfa CT, Cordazzo S, Bubric K et al. Aging and visual crowding. J Gerontol 2013; 68: 522–528.
  • Roberts KL, Allen HA. Perception and cognition in the ageing brain: a brief review of the short‐ and long‐term links between perceptual and cognitive decline. Front Aging Neurosci 2016; 8: 39.
  • Folk CL, Lincourt AE. The effects of age on guided conjunction search. Exp Aging Res 1996; 22: 99–118.
  • Babu RJ, Leat SJ, Irving EL. Effect of age and pop out distracter on attended field of view. J Optom 2014; 7: 229–237.
  • Borges M, Coco MI. Access and use of contextual expectations in visual search during aging. In: Proceedings of the EuroAsian Pacific Joint Conference in Cognitive Science (EAP CogSci); 2015; Torino. 2015.
  • Kramer AF, Martin‐emerson R, Larish J et al. Aging and filtering by movement in visual search. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1996; 51: 201–216.
  • Madden DJ, Pierce TW, Allen PA. Adult age differences in the use of distractor homogeneity in visual search. Psychol Aging 1996; 11: 454–474.
  • Goh JO, Suzuki A, Park DC. Reduced neural selectivity increases fMRI adaptation with age during face discrimination. Neuroimage 2010; 51: 336–344.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.