Investigation of attributes which guide choice in cataract surgery services in urban Sydney, Australia

REFERENCES

• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Vision Problems among Older Australians. 2005. [Cited July 2017.] Avaliable at: https://web.archive.org/web/20060830203937/http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/aus/bulletin27/bulletin27.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor HR, Pezzullo ML, Keeffe JE. The economic impact and cost of visual impairment in Australia. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 272–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cataract Surgery. 2014. [Cited July 2017.] Avaliable at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129557373.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cataract Surgery. 2016. [Cited July 2017.] Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/eye-health/cataract-surgery/.
   Google Scholar
• Ikkersheim D, Koolman X. The use of quality information by general practitioners: does it alter choices? A randomized clustered study. BMC Fam Pract 2013; 14: 95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodie JJ, Masood I, Tint N et al. Patients' attitudes towards trainee surgeons performing cataract surgery at a teaching hospital. Eye 2008; 22: 1183–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan M, Venkatesh R, Valaguru V et al. Household preferences for cataract surgery in rural India: a population‐based stated preference survey. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2015; 22: 34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivey P. The effect of waiting time and distance on hospital choice for English cataract patients. Health Econ 2012; 21: 444–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo ST, Edwards RT, Fargher EA et al. Preferences of people with diabetes for diabetic retinopathy screening: a discrete choice experiment. Diabet Med 2012; 29: 869–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark MD, Determann D, Petrou S et al. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 2014; 32: 883–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viney R, Lancsar E, Louviere J. Discrete choice experiments to measure consumer preferences for health and healthcare. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2002; 2: 319–326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abiiro GA, Leppert G, Mbera GB et al. Developing attributes and attribute‐levels for a discrete choice experiment on micro health insurance in rural Malawi. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14: 235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete‐choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health 2013; 16: 3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther OH, Kurstein B, Riedel‐heller SG et al. The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: a stated preference study of young physicians in Germany. Health Serv Res 2010; 45: 212–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coast J, Horrocks S. Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments using qualitative methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 2007; 12: 25–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mangham LJ, Hanson K, Mcpake B. How to do (or not to do) designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low‐income country. Health Policy Plan 2009; 24: 151–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Grounded Theory Review 2008; 7: 436–445.
   Google Scholar
• Sims‐gould J, Byrne K, Tong C et al. Home support workers perceptions of family members of their older clients: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr 2015; 15: 165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross MA, Avery AJ, Foss AJ. Views of older people on cataract surgery options: an assessment of preferences by conjoint analysis. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lim JN, Edlin R. Preferences of older patients and choice of treatment location in the UK: a binary choice experiment. Health Policy 2009; 91: 252–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta SK, Murthy GV. Where do persons with blindness caused by cataracts in rural areas of India seek treatment and why? Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113: 1337–1340.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hyatt A, Lipson‐smith R, Schofield P et al. Communication challenges experienced by migrants with cancer: a comparison of migrant and English‐speaking Australian‐born cancer patients. Health Expect 2017; 20: 886–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott R, Payne K. Essentials of Economic Evaluation in Healthcare. Chicago, IL and London: Pharmaceutical Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E et al. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J 2008; 204: 291–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinaroglu S, Hearld KR, Igici SO. Explanatory factors of quality of care from cataract Patients' perspectives. Semin Ophthalmol 2017; 32: 321–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijkamp MD, Sixma HJ, Afman H et al. Quality of care from the perspective of the cataract patient. QUOTE cataract questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 1924–1931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res 2016; 26: 1753–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. The Average Australian. 2013. [Cited 2017.] Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features30April+2013.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Ministry of Health. NSW State Health Plan: Towards 2021. 2014. [Cited July 2017.] Avaliable at: www.health.sw.gov.au/statehealthplan/Publications/NSW‐state‐health‐plan‐towards‐2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar