Management of digital eye strain

REFERENCES

• Blehm C, Vishnu S, Khattak A et al. Computer vision syndrome: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 2005; 50: 253–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowrisankaran S, Sheedy JE. Computer vision syndrome: a review. Work 2015; 52: 303–314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins M, Brown B, Bowman K et al. Workstation variables and visual discomfort associated with VDTs. Appl Ergon 1990; 21: 157–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dain S, Mccarthy A, Chan‐ling T. Symptoms in VDU operators. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988; 65: 162–167.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes JR, Sheedy JE, Stelmack JA et al. Computer use, symptoms, and quality of life. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: E738–E755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield M. Computer vision syndrome (a.k.a. digital eye strain). Optometry Pract 2016; 17: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson WD. Eye problems and visual display terminals—the facts and the fallacies. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18: 111–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchino M, Schaumberg DA, Dogru M et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among Japanese visual display terminal users. Ophthalmol 2008; 115: 1982–1988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Vision Council. Eyes Overexposed: The Digital Device Dilemma. Digital Eye Strain Report 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Cole BL, Maddocks JD, Sharpe K. Effect of VDUs on the eyes: report of a 6‐year epidemiological study. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 512–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portello JK, Rosenfield M, Bababekova Y et al. Computer‐related visual symptoms in office workers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 375–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers RL, Begley CG. Dryness symptoms among an unselected clinical population with and without contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006; 29: 25–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• González‐méijome J, Parafita M, Yebra‐pimentel E et al. Symptoms in a population of contact lens and noncontact lens wearers under different environmental conditions. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: E296–E302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan S, Lory B. Prevalence of dry eye among computer users. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 712–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy SC, Low CK, Lim YP et al. Computer vision syndrome: a study of knowledge and practices in university students. Nepal J Ophthalmol 2013; 5: 161–168.
   Google Scholar
• Logaraj M, Madhupriya V, Hegde S. Computer vision syndrome and associated factors among medical and engineering students in Chennai. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2014; 4: 179–185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shantakumari N, Eldeeb R, Sreedharan J et al. Computer use and vision‐related problems among university students in Ajman, United Arab Emirate. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2014; 4: 258–263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tauste A, Ronda E, Molina MJ et al. Effect of contact lens use on computer vision syndrome. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2016; 36: 112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranasinghe P, Wathurapatha WS, Perera YS et al. Computer vision syndrome among computer office workers in a developing country: an evaluation of prevalence and risk factors. BMC Res Notes 2016; 9: 150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meeker M. Internet Trends 2017 – Code Conference. Menlo Park, CA: Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers. 2017 May 31. [Accessed 10 Oct 2017.] Available at: http://www.kpcb.com/internet-trends
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. Mobile Fact Sheet. Washington: Pew Research Center; 2017. [Accessed 10 Oct 2017.] Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact‐sheet/mobile/
   Google Scholar
• Kim J, Hwang Y, Kang S et al. Association between exposure to smartphones and ocular health in adolescents. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2016; 23: 269–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall L, Coles‐brennan C. Digital eye strain: more screen time = more digital eye strain. Contact Lens Spectrum 2015; 30: 38–40.
   Google Scholar
• Chase Buckle. Digital Consumers Own 3.64 Connected Devices. London: Global Web Index; 2016. [Accessed 5 Aug 2016.] Available at: http://www.globalwebindex.net/blog/digital‐consumers‐own‐3.64‐connected‐devices
   Google Scholar
• Wick B, Morse S. Accommodative accuracy to video display monitors. Poster# 28. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79: 218.
   Google Scholar
• Hue JE, Rosenfield M, Saá G. Reading from electronic devices versus hardcopy text. Work 2014; 47: 303–307.
   Google Scholar
• Collier JD, Rosenfield M. Accommodation and convergence during sustained computer work. J Am Optom Assoc 2011; 82: 434–440.
   Google Scholar
• Jaschinski W. Fixation disparity at different viewing distances and the preferred viewing distance in a laboratory near‐vision task. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 18: 30–39.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfield M, Gurevich R, Wickware E et al. Computer vision syndrome: accommodative & vergence facility. J Behav Optom 2010; 21: 119–122.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell F, Robson J, Westheimer G. Fluctuations of accommodation under steady viewing conditions. J Physiol 1959; 145: 579–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman W, Heron G. Fluctuations in accommodation: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1988; 8: 153–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirm B, Gilmartin B. Current perspective on microfluctuations of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992; 12: 252–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray L, Winn B, Gilmartin B. Effect of target luminance on microfluctuations of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1993; 13: 258–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira S, Jorge J, González‐méijome JM. Dynamic accommodative response to different visual stimuli (2D vs 3D) while watching television and while playing Nintendo 3DS console. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 383–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuffreda K, Scheiman M, Ong E et al. Irlen lenses do not improve accommodative accuracy at near. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 298–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmers AJ, Gray LS, Wilkins AJ. The influence of tinted lenses upon ocular accommodation. Vision Res 2001; 41: 1229–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best P, Littleton M, Gramopadhye A et al. Relations between individual differences in oculomotor resting states and visual inspection performance. Ergonomics 1996; 39: 35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watten RG, Lie I, Birketvedt O. The influence of long‐term visual near‐work on accommodation and vergence: a field study. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo) 1994; 23: 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Wee S, Moon N, Lee W et al. Ophthalmological factors influencing visual asthenopia as a result of viewing 3D displays. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 1391–1394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeow P, Taylor S. Effects of short‐term VDT usage on visual functions. Optom Vis Sci 1989; 66: 459–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeow P, Taylor S. Effects of long‐term visual display terminal usage on visual functions. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 930–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaschinski‐kruza W. Fixation disparity at different viewing distances of a visual display unit. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1993; 13: 27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyman KG, Knave BG, Voss M. Work with video display terminals among office employees: IV. Refraction, accommodation, convergence and binocular vision. Scand J Work Environ Health 1985; 11: 483–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmartin B, Hogan R. The relationship between tonic accommodation and ciliary muscle innervation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985; 26: 1024–1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuchiya K, Ukai K, Ishikawa S. A quasistatic study of pupil and accommodation after‐effects following near vision. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1989; 9: 385–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito S, Sotoyama M, Saito S et al. Physiological indices of visual fatigue due to VDT operation: pupillary reflexes and accommodative responses. Ind Health 1994; 32: 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ukai K, Tsuchiya K, Ishikawa S. Induced pupillary hippus following near vision: increased occurrence in visual display unit workers. Ergonomics 1997; 40: 1201–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taptagaporn S, Saito S. How display polarity and lighting conditions affect the pupil size of VDT operators. Ergonomics 1990; 33: 201–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portello JK, Rosenfield M, Chu CA. Blink rate, incomplete blinks and computer vision syndrome. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 482–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S, Henderson R, Bradley L et al. Effect of visual display unit use on blink rate and tear stability. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 888–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlote T, Kadner G, Freudenthaler N. Marked reduction and distinct patterns of eye blinking in patients with moderately dry eyes during video display terminal use. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004; 242: 306–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins MJ, Iskander DR, Saunders A et al. Blinking patterns and corneal staining. Eye Contact Lens 2006; 32: 287–293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Himebaugh NL, Begley CG, Bradley A et al. Blinking and tear break‐up during four visual tasks. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: E106–E114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al‐abdulmunem M, Briggs S. Spontaneous blink rate of a normal population sample. Int Contact Lens Clin 1999; 26: 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bentivoglio AR, Bressman SB, Cassetta E et al. Analysis of blink rate patterns in normal subjects. Mov Disord 1997; 12: 1028–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu CA, Rosenfield M, Portello JK. Blink patterns: reading from a computer screen versus hard copy. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheedy J, Truong S, Hayes J. What are the visual benefits of eyelid squinting? Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 740–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorud H, Helland M, Aarås A et al. Eye‐related pain induced by visually demanding computer work. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: E452–E464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimmura S, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K. Results of a population‐based questionnaire on the symptoms and lifestyles associated with dry eye. Cornea 1999; 18: 408–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols J, Ziegler C, Mitchell G et al. Self‐reported dry eye disease across refractive modalities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 1911–1914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen M, Begley C, Himebaugh N et al. Effect of contact lens wear and a near task on tear film break‐up. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 350–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze MM, Wong A, Haider S et al. Blink rate in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers during digital device use. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93 E‐abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Kojima T, Ibrahim OMA, Wakamatsu T et al. The impact of contact lens wear and visual display terminal work on ocular surface and tear functions in office workers. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 152: 933–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooling R. Dictionary of visual science. Br J Ophthalmol 1990; 74: 511.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins N, Daum K. Visual discomfort and astigmatic refractive errors in VDT use. J Am Optom Assoc 1991; 62: 680.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiggins N, Daum K, Snyder C. Effects of residual astigmatism in contact lens wear on visual discomfort in VDT use. J Am Optom Assoc 1992; 63: 177–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daum KM, Clore KA, Simms SS et al. Productivity associated with visual status of computer users. J Am Optom Assoc 2004; 75: 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gowrisankaran S, Nahar NK, Hayes JR et al. Asthenopia and blink rate under visual and cognitive loads. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield M, Hue JE, Huang RR et al. The effects of induced oblique astigmatism on symptoms and reading performance while viewing a computer screen. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 142–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotegawa Y, Hara N, Ono K et al. Influence of accommodative response and visual symptoms on visual display terminal adult operators with asthenopia through adequately corrected refractive errors. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2008; 112: 376–381.
   Google Scholar
• Das S, Das R, Kumar A. Computer vision syndrome and its risk factors among professional college students of Agartala: a cross sectional study. Int J Sci Res 2016; 5: 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Singh H, Tigga MJ, Laad S et al. Prevention of ocular morbidity among medical students by prevalence assessment of asthenopia and its risk factors. J Evid Based Med Healthc 2016; 3: 532–536.
   Google Scholar
• Noreen K, Batool Z, Fatima T et al. Prevalence of computer vision syndrome and its associated risk factors among under graduate medical students. Pak J Ophthalmol 2016; 32: 141.
   Google Scholar
• Jaschinski W, König M, Mekontso TM et al. Computer vision syndrome in presbyopia and beginning presbyopia: effects of spectacle lens type. Clin Exp Optom 2015; 98: 228–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargava R, Kumar P, Kaur A et al. The diagnostic value and accuracy of conjunctival impression cytology, dry eye symptomatology, and routine tear function tests in computer users. J Lab Physicians 2014; 6: 102–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patil SD, Trivedi HR, Parekh NV et al. Evaluation of dry eye in computer users. Int J Community Med Public Health 2016; 3: 3403–3407.
   Google Scholar
• Mobeen R, Durrani J, Tareen H. Proportion of dry eyes in patients of computer vision syndrome. Ophthalmol Update 2016; 14: 5.
   Google Scholar
• Deepa S. Computer‐related health problems among white‐collar employees: communicating a blueprint. Indian J Sci Technol 2016; 9: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Schaumberg DA, Sullivan DA, Buring JE et al. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136: 318–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaumberg DA, Dana R, Buring JE et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among US men: estimates from the physicians' health studies. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 763–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubota K, Nakamori K. Dry eyes and video display terminals. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowrisankaran S, Sheedy J, Hayes J. Eyelid squint response to asthenopia‐inducing conditions. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 611–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield M. Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential treatments. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 502–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York M, Ong J, Robbins J. Variation in blink rate associated with contact lens wear and task difficulty. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1971; 48: 461–467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison WW, Begley CG, Liu H et al. Menisci and fullness of the blink in dry eye. Optom Vis Sci 2008; 85: 706–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu C, Rosenfield M, Portello JK et al. A comparison of symptoms after viewing text on a computer screen and hardcopy. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 29–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sa E, Ferreira junior M, Rocha L. Risk factors for computer visual syndrome (DES) among operators of two call centers in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Work 2012; 41: 3568–3574.
   Google Scholar
• Butzon SP, Sheedy JE, Nilsen E. The efficacy of computer glasses in reduction of computer worker symptoms. Optometry 2002; 73: 221–230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallin JA, Zhu Z, Jacobsen JL et al. A preliminary study of the effects of computer glasses on reported VDT user symptoms: a field study. J Safety Res 1994; 25: 67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garciai KD, Wierwille WW. Effect of glare on performance of a VDT reading‐comprehension task. Hum Factors 1985; 27: 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mork R, Bruenech JR, Thorud HM. Effect of direct glare on orbicularis oculi and trapezius during computer reading. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 738–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheedy JE, Shaw‐mcminn PG. Diagnosing and Treating Computer‐Related Vision Problems. Philadelphia: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bernan S, Greenhouse D, Baily I et al. Human electroretinogram responses to video displays, fluorescent lighting, and other high frequency sources. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 645–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin P. Evaluation of methodology for evaluating lighting for offices with VDTs. J Illum Eng Soc 1987; 16: 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hedge A, Sims jr WR, Becker FD. Effects of lensed‐indirect and parabolic lighting on the satisfaction, visual health, and productivity of office workers. Ergonomics 1995; 38: 260–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultgren GV, Knave B. Discomfort glare and disturbances from light reflections in an office landscape with CRT display terminals. Appl Ergon 1974; 5: 2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolska A, Switula M. Luminance of the surround and visual fatigue of VDT operators. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 1998; 5: 553–581.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne N, Lascaratos G, Bron A et al. A hypothesis to suggest that light is a risk factor in glaucoma and the mitochondrial optic neuropathies. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 237–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa BL, Fawcett R, Li GY et al. Orally administered epigallocatechin gallate attenuates light‐induced photoreceptor damage. Brain Res Bull 2008; 76: 412–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois D. Digital eye Strain. 2016. [Accessed 2 May 2017.] Available at: https://opticalprism.ca/digital-eye-strain-2/
   Google Scholar
• Algvere PV, Marshall J, Seregard S. Age‐related maculopathy and the impact of blue light hazard. Acta Ophthalmol 2006; 84: 4–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalam K, Khetpal V, Rusovici R et al. A review: role of ultraviolet radiation in age‐related macular degeneration. Eye Contact Lens 2011; 37: 225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knels L, Valtink M, Roehlecke C et al. Blue light stress in retinal neuronal (R28) cells is dependent on wavelength range and irradiance. Eur J Neurosci 2011; 34: 548–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake‐kashima M, Dogru M, Nojima T et al. The effect of antireflection film use on blink rate and asthenopic symptoms during visual display terminal work. Cornea 2005; 24: 567–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegenthaler E, Bochud Y, Bergamin P et al. Reading on LCD vs e‐ink displays: effects on fatigue and visual strain. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambooij M, Fortuin M, Heynderickx I et al. Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: a review. J Imaging Sci Technol 2009; 53: 30201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Goel D, Sharma A. Evaluation of the factors which contribute to the ocular complaints in computer users. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7: 331–335.
   Google Scholar
• Abelson MB, Ousler GW III. How to fight computer vision syndrome. Rev Ophthalmol 1999; 4: 114–116.
   Google Scholar
• Tribley J, Mcclain S, Karbasi A et al. Tips for computer vision syndrome relief and prevention. Work 2011; 39: 85–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ziefle M. Effects of display resolution on visual performance. Hum Factors 1998; 40: 554–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scullica L, Rechichi C, De moja CA. Protective filters in the prevention of asthenopia at a video display terminal. Percept Mot Skills 1995; 80: 299–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman ZA, Sanip S. Computer user: demographic and computer related factors that predispose user to get computer vision syndrome. Int J Bus Humanit Technol 2011; 1: 84–91.
   Google Scholar
• Anshel J, ed. Visual Ergonomics Handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• The Vision Council. Digiteyezed: The daily impact of digital screens on the eye health of Americans. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, Ng A, Thompson B. Continuing education: keeping up with ocular fatigue in the digital era. Contact Lens Spectrum 2016; 31: 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Aggarwal S, Suman N et al. To study the role of ergonomics in the management of computer vision syndrome. J Evid Based Med Healthc 2016; 3: 902–905.
   Google Scholar
• Uchino M, Yokoi N, Uchino Y et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease and its risk factors in visual display terminal users: the Osaka study. Am J Ophthalmol 2013; 156: 759–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Executive. Display Screen Equipment (DSE) Workstation Checklist. 2013. [Accessed 20 Mar 2018.] Available at: http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/ck1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bali J, Neeraj N, Bali RT. Computer vision syndrome: a review. J Clin Ophthalmol Res 2014; 2: 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Amalia H, Suardana GG, Artini W. Accommodative insufficiency as cause of asthenopia in computer‐using students. Universa Med 2016; 29: 78–83.
   Google Scholar
• Aakre BM, Doughty MJ. Are there differences between ‘visual symptoms’ and specific ocular symptoms associated with video display terminal (VDT) use? Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007; 30: 174–182.
   Google Scholar
• Cagnie B, De meulemeester K, Saeys L et al. The impact of different lenses on visual and musculoskeletal complaints in VDU workers with work‐related neck complaints: a randomized controlled trial. Environ Health Prev Med 2017; 22: 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bababekova Y, Rosenfield M, Hue J et al. Font size and viewing distance of handheld smart phones. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: 795–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Maissa C, Pouliquen P et al. Effect of povidone 2 per cent preservative‐free eyedrops on contact lens wearers with computer visual syndrome: pilot study. Eye Contact Lens 2004; 30: 34–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhargava R, Kumar P, Phogat H et al. Oral omega‐3 fatty acids treatment in computer vision syndrome related dry eye. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015; 38: 206–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargava R, Kumar P, Arora Y. Short‐term omega 3 fatty acids treatment for dry eye in young and middle‐aged visual display terminal users. Eye Contact Lens 2016; 42: 231–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur A, Agarwal R, Jain AM et al. Twelve weeks treatment outcome of omega‐3 fatty acid in computer vision syndrome dry eye: an open label, randomized, controlled pilot study. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2016; 5: 3170–3174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CY, Gu N, Lim CY et al. The effect of Vaccinium uliginosum extract on tablet computer‐induced asthenopia: randomized placebo‐controlled study. BMC Complement Altern Med 2016; 16: 296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papas E, Ciolino J, Jacobs D et al. The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: report of the management and therapy subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 183–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardona G, Gómez M, Quevedo L et al. Effects of transient blur and VDT screen luminance changes on eyeblink rate. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2014; 37: 363–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield M, Portello JK. Letter to the editor: computer vision syndrome and blink rate. Curr Eye Res 2016; 41: 577–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohidin N, Ang C, Kah meng C. Reply to letter to the editor: wink glass, incomplete blink and computer vision syndrome. Curr Eye Res 2016; 41: 579–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddell P, Wilkins A, Hainline L. The effect of colored lenses on the visual evoked response in children with visual stress. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 299–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins A, Evans B, Brown J et al. Double‐masked placebo‐controlled trial of precision spectral filters in children who use coloured overlays. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1994; 14: 365–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JB, Gerratt BW, Bassi CJ et al. Short‐wavelength light‐blocking eyeglasses attenuate symptoms of eye Fatigue. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 442–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung TW, Li RW, Kee CS. Blue‐light filtering spectacle lenses: optical and clinical performances. PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0169114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrenson JG, Hull CC, Downie LE. The effect of blue‐light blocking spectacle lenses on visual performance, macular health and the sleep‐wake cycle: a systematic review of the literature. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2017; 37: 644–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakaishi H, Yamada Y. Abnormal tear dynamics and symptoms of eyestrain in operators of visual display terminals. Occup Environ Med 1999; 56: 6–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheedy J, Parsons S. The video display terminal eye clinic: clinical report. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67: 622–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penisten DK, Goss DA, Philpott G et al. Comparisons of dynamic retinoscopy measurements with a print card, a video display terminal, and a PRIO system tester as test targets. J Am Optom Assoc 2004; 75: 231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins A, Nimmo‐smith I. On the reduction of eye‐strain when reading. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1984; 4: 53–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acosta M, Gallar J, Belmonte C. The influence of eye solutions on blinking and ocular comfort at rest and during work at video display terminals. Exp Eye Res 1999; 68: 663–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar