Clinical applicability of the Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimeter in children with and without visual impairment

REFERENCES

• de Souza EC, Berezovsky A, Morales PH et al. Visual field defects in children with congenital glaucoma. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2000; 37: 266–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover S, Fishman GA, Anderson RJ et al. Rate of visual field loss in retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology 1997; 104: 460–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan J, Groenveld M, Sykanda A et al. Behavioural characteristics of children with permanent cortical visual impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol 1987; 29: 571–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd RI. Evolution of perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1936; 15: 713–732.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend JC, Selvin GJ, Griffin JR et al. The Importance of Visual Field Testing. London: Elsevier Health Sciences, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Beck RW, Bergstrom TJ, Lighter PR. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey field analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 77–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakowski R, Aspinall P. Static perimetry in young children. Vision Res 1969; 9: 305–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschopp C, Safran AB, Viviani P et al. Automated visual field examination in children aged 5–8 years: Part I: Experimental validation of a testing procedure. Vision Res 1998; 38: 2203–2210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel DE, Cumberland PM, Walters BC et al. Study of optimal Perimetric testing in children (OPTIC): feasibility, reliability and repeatability of Perimetry in children. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0130895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray I, Perperidis A, Brash H et al. Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): a novel technique for automated static perimetry in children using eye tracking. 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Osaka, 3‐7 July 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn GE, Fea AM, Minguini N. Visual fields in 4‐to 10‐year‐old children using Goldmann and double‐arc perimeters. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1991; 28: 314–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit RJ, Gales K, Griffiths PG. Effectiveness of testing visual fields by confrontation. Lancet 2001; 358: 1339–1340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutlukan E, Damato BE. Computerised perimetry with moving and steady fixation in children. Eye 1993; 7: 554–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukushima J, Hatta T, Fukushima K. Development of voluntary control of saccadic eye movements: I. Age‐related changes in normal children. Brain Dev 2000; 22: 173–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong C, Dai S. Cross‐sectional study on childhood cerebral visual impairment in New Zealand. J AAPOS 2014; 18: 71–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert C, Foster A. Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020: the right to sight. Bull World Health Organ 2001; 79: 227–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good WV, Jan JE, Burden SK et al. Recent advances in cortical visual impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001; 43: 56–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton GN, Jacobson LK. Cerebral visual impairment in children. Semin Neonatol 2001; 6: 477–485.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnston MS, Damato B, Evans A et al. Computerised visual field test for children using multiple moving fixation targets. Med Biol Eng Comput 1989; 27: 612–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam TM, Rahman W, Henson D et al. A novel paediatric game‐based visual‐fields assessor. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95: 921–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen LE, Slater ME, Proffitt RV et al. A new perimeter using the preferential looking response to assess peripheral visual fields in young and developmentally delayed children. J AAPOS. 2012; 16: 261–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray IC. Saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a technique and system for automated static perimetry in children using eye tracking. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Murray IC, Fleck BW, Brash HM et al. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic Perimetry: a method of automated static Perimetry for children using eye tracking. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 2017–2026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perperidis A, Murray I, Brash H et al. Correcting LCD luminance non‐uniformity for threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP). 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Osaka, 3‐7 July 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mcnemar Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 1947; 12: 153–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safran AB, Laffi GL, Bullinger A et al. Feasibility of automated visual field examination in children between 5 and 8 years of age. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 515–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munoz D, Broughton J, Goldring J et al. Age‐related performance of human subjects on saccadic eye movement tasks. Exp Brain Res 1998; 121: 391–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akar Y, Yilmaz A, Yucel I. Assessment of an effective visual field testing strategy for a normal pediatric population. Ophthalmologica 2008; 222: 329–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel DE, Cumberland PM, Walters BC et al. Study of optimal Perimetric testing in children (OPTIC): normative visual field values in children. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 1711–1717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tailor V, Glaze S, Unwin H et al. Saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry in children with neurodisability or isolated visual pathway lesions: observational cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 1427–1432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina‐martín A, Piñero DP, Pérez‐cambrodí RJ. Fixation pattern analysis with microperimetry in nystagmus patients. Can J Ophthalmol 2015; 50: 413–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar