Optical coherence tomography and scleral contact lenses: clinical and research applications

REFERENCES

• Vincent SJ. The rigid lens renaissance: a surge in sclerals. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018; 41: 139–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullum KW. The unique role of scleral lenses in contact lens practice. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1999; 22: S26–S34.
   Google Scholar
• Pullum KW, Trodd TC. The modern concept of scleral lens practice. J Br Cont Lens Assoc 1984; 7: 169–178.
   Google Scholar
• Pullum KW, Whiting MA, Buckley RJ. Scleral contact lenses: the expanding role. Cornea 2005; 24: 269–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der worp E, Bornman D, Ferreira DL et al. Modern scleral contact lenses: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2014; 37: 240–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie LE, Lindsay RG. Contact lens management of keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 2015; 98: 299–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson RM. Karl Otto Himmler, manufacturer of the first contact lens. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2007; 30: 11–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearson RM. The Sämisch Case and the Müllers of Wiesbaden. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 157–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppen C, Kreps EO, Anthonissen L et al. Scleral lenses reduce the need for corneal transplants in severe Keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 185: 43–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izatt J, Hee M, Swanson E et al. Micrometer‐scale resolution imaging of the anterior eye in vivo with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 1994; 112: 1584–1589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierro L, Iuliano L, Gagliardi M et al. Central corneal thickness reproducibility among ten different instruments. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 1371–1379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav R, Lee K‐S, Rolland JP et al. Micrometer axial resolution OCT for corneal imaging. Biomed Opt Express 2011; 2: 3037–3046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Tan O, Brass R et al. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping by Fourier‐domain optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconic eyes. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 2425–2433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isozaki VL, Chiu GB. Transient corneal epithelial bullae associated with large diameter scleral lens wear: a case series. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018; doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2018.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon NC, Godfrey A, Hammond DS. Corneal oedema in a unilateral corneal graft patient induced by high Dk mini‐scleral contact lens. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018; doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2018.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen T, Aaberg S, Geroski D et al. Human sclera: thickness and surface area. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 125: 237–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchison D, Jones C, Schmid K et al. Eye shape in emmetropia and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 3380–3386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duong T. Magnetic resonance imaging of the retina: a brief historical and future perspective. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2011; 25: 137–143.
   Google Scholar
• Bert R, Patz S, Ossiani M et al. High‐resolution MR imaging of the human eye 2005. Acad Radiol 2006; 13: 368–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso‐caneiro D, Vincent SJ, Collins MJ et al. Morphological changes in the conjunctiva, episclera and sclera following short‐term miniscleral contact lens wear in rigid lens neophytes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2016; 39: 53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebneter A, Häner NU, Zinkernagel MS. Metrics of the normal anterior sclera: imaging with optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253: 1575–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Alonso‐caneiro D, Vincent SJ et al. Anterior eye tissue morphology: scleral and conjunctival thickness in children and young adults. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 33796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rada J, Achen V, Penugonda S et al. Proteoglycan composition in the human sclera during growth and aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1639–1648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio M, Grytz R, Morris J et al. Human scleral structural stiffness increases more rapidly with age in donors of African descent compared to donors of European descent. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55: 7189–7198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grytz R, Fazio M, Libertiaux V et al. Age‐ and race‐related differences in human scleral material properties. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55: 8163–8172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Alonso‐caneiro D, Free KA et al. Diurnal variation of anterior scleral and conjunctival thickness. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2016; 36: 279–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent SJ, Alonso‐caneiro D, Collins MJ. Evidence on scleral contact lenses and intraocular pressure. Clin Exp Optom 2017; 100: 87–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nau CB, Schornack MM, Mclaren JW et al. Intraocular pressure after 2 hours of small‐diameter scleral lens wear. Eye Contact Lens 2016; 42: 350–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy PJ, Duncan AL, Glennie AJ et al. The effect of scleral search coil lens wear on the eye. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 332–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson RM. The centenary of the contact lens. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1988; 11: 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Marriott P. An analysis of the global contours and haptic contact lens fitting. Br J Physiol Opt 1966; 23: 1–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jesus DA, Kedzia R, Iskander DR. Precise measurement of scleral radius using anterior eye profilometry. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2017; 40: 47–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall LA, Young G, Wolffsohn JS et al. The influence of corneoscleral topography on soft contact lens fit. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 6801–6806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall LA, Hunt C, Young G et al. Factors affecting corneoscleral topography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 3691–3701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SM, Choi HJ, Choi H et al. Estimation of axial curvature of anterior sclera: correlation between axial length and anterior scleral curvature as affected by angle kappa. BMC Ophthalmol 2016; 16: 176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasahara M, Shoji N, Morita T et al. Comparative optical coherence tomography study of differences in scleral shape between the superonasal and superotemporal quadrants. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2014; 58: 396–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandlitz S, Bäumer J, Conrad U et al. Scleral topography analysed by optical coherence tomography. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2017; 40: 242–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi HJ, Lee S‐M, Lee JY et al. Measurement of anterior scleral curvature using anterior segment OCT. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 793–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier D. Das cornea‐skleral‐profilein kriterium individueller kontaktlinsenanpassung. Die Kontaktlinse 1992; 10: 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzmann M, Caroline PJ, Börret R et al. An analysis of anterior scleral shape and its role in the design and fitting of scleral contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018; 41: 205–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadel D. The influence of limbal and scleral shape on scleral lens design. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018; 41: 321–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan B, Graham AD, Tsechpenakis G et al. A novel analytical method using OCT to describe the corneoscleral junction. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 650–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der worp E, Graf P, Caroline PJ. Exploring beyond the corneal borders. Contact Lens Spectr 2010; 25: 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kojima R, Caroline P, Graff T et al. Eye shape and scleral lenses. Contact Lens Spectr 2013; 28: 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sorbara L, Maram J, Mueller K. Use of the Visante™ OCT to measure the sagittal depth and scleral shape of keratoconus compared to normal corneae: pilot study. J Optom 2013; 6: 141–146.
   Google Scholar
• Sorbara L, Maram J, Fonn D et al. Metrics of the normal cornea: anterior segment imaging with the Visante OCT. Clin Exp Optom 2010; 93: 150–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iskander DR, Wachel P, Simpson PND et al. Principles of operation, accuracy and precision of an eye surface profiler. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2016; 36: 266–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent SJ, Kowalski LP, Alonso‐caneiro D, et al. The influence of centre thickness on miniscleral lens flexure. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018; doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2018.07.003.
   Google Scholar
• Schornack MM, Patel SV. Relationship between corneal topographic indices and scleral lens base curve. Eye Cont Lens 2010; 36: 330–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consejo A, Rozema JJ. Scleral shape and its correlations with corneal astigmatism. Cornea 2018; 37: 1047–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemoules G. A novel method of fitting scleral lenses using high resolution optical coherence tomography. Eye Cont Lens 2008; 34: 80–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnowski K, Grulkowski I, Mohan N et al. Quantitative optical inspection of contact lenses immersed in wet cell using swept source OCT. Opt Lett 2014; 39: 4727–4730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasubramanian V, Glasser A. Distortion correction of Visante optical coherence tomography cornea images. Optom Vis Sci 2015; 92: 1170–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podoleanu A, Charalambous I, Plesea L et al. Correction of distortions in optical coherence tomography imaging of the eye. Phys Med Biol 2004; 49: 1277–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal V, Rollins A, Radhakrishnan S et al. Correction of geometric and refractive image distortions in optical coherence tomography applying Fermat's principle. Opt Express 2004; 10: 397–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin RC, Shure MA, Rollins AM et al. Group index of the human cornea at 1.3 µm wavelength obtained in vitro by optical coherence domain reflectometry. Opt Lett 2004; 29: 83–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bier N. Contact Lens Routine and Practice. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Marriott P, Woodward E. A method of measuring the corneal clearance of a haptic lens. Br J Physiol Opt 1964; 21: 61–83.
   Google Scholar
• Rathi VM, Mandathara PS, Dumpati S et al. Change in vault during scleral lens trials assessed with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2017; 40: 157–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonsino J, Mathe DS. Central vault in dry eye patients successfully wearing scleral lens. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: e248–e251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedlicka J. Initial lens selection. In: Barnett M, Johns LK, eds. Contemporary Scleral Lenses: Theory and Application. Sharjah: Bentham Science Publishers, 2017. pp. 183–200.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent SJ, Alonso‐caneiro D, Collins MJ. Corneal changes following short‐term miniscleral contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2014; 37: 461–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent SJ, Alonso‐caneiro D, Collins MJ. Miniscleral lens wear influences corneal curvature and optics. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2016; 36: 100–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer A, Lotoczky J. Let's settle this once and for all: a comparison of scleral lens settling. Global Specialty Lens Symposium 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman MJ, Gilmartin CA, Bennett ES et al. A comparison of the short‐term settling of three scleral lens designs. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 1462–1466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esen F, Toker E. Influence of apical clearance on mini‐scleral lens settling, clinical performance, and corneal thickness changes. Eye Contact Lens 2017; 43: 230–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent SJ, Alonso‐caneiro D, Collins MJ. The temporal dynamics of miniscleral contact lenses: central corneal clearance and centration. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018; 41: 162–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadel D. Modern scleral lenses: mini versus large. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2017; 40: 200–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courey C, Michaud L. Variation of clearance considering viscosity of the solution used in the reservoir and following scleral lens wear over time. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2017; 40: 260–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray C, Britton S, Yeung D et al. Change in over‐refraction after scleral lens settling on average corneas. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2017; 37: 467–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caroline PJ, Andre M. Scleral lens settling. Cont Lens Spectr 2012; 27: 56.
   Google Scholar
• Otchere H, Jones LW, Sorbara L. Effect of time on scleral lens settling and change in corneal clearance. Optom Vis Sci 2017; 94: 908–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nau CB, Schornack MM. Region‐specific changes in postlens fluid reservoir depth beneath small‐diameter scleral lenses over 2 hours. Eye Contact Lens 2017; doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser E‐S, Van der linden BJJJ, Otten HM et al. Medical applications and outcomes of bitangential scleral lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 1078–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotoczky J, Cosgrove J, Slate F. Do scleral lenses suck? An analysis of what really happens as scleral lenses “Settle.” Global Speciality Lens Symposium. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent SJ, Alonso‐caneiro D, Kricancic H et al. Scleral contact lens thickness profiles: the relationship between average and centre lens thickness. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018; doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2018.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller DG, Chan N, Smith B. Neophyte skill judging corneoscleral lens clearance. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 300–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung D, Sorbara L. Scleral lens clearance assessment with biomicroscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci 2018; 95: 13–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent SJ, Alonso‐caneiro D, Collins MJ et al. Hypoxic corneal changes following eight hours of scleral contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 293–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlt C. Clinical effect of tear layer thickness on corneal edema during scleral lens wear. Maters Thesis, Aalen University, Germany, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Frisani M, Beltramo I, Grec M. Changes in corneal thickness by miniscleral contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015; 38: e38–e39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan B, Zhou Y, Yuen TL et al. Effects of scleral‐lens tear clearance on corneal edema and post‐lens tear dynamics: a pilot study. Optom Vis Sci 2018; 95: 481–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse JS‐H, Wong AC‐K. Atypical limbal epithelial bullae associated with scleral lens wear: a case series. Berlin: European Academy of Optometry and Optics, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon AD, Barr JT, Vannasdale DA. Corneal epithelial bullae after short‐term wear of small diameter scleral lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2017; 40: 116–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud L, Van der worp E, Brazeau D et al. Predicting estimates of oxygen transmissibility for scleral lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2012; 35: 266–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney LG. Luminance of fluorescein solutions. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1972; 49: 200–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Visser E‐S, Visser R, Van LHJJ. Advantages of toric scleral lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 233–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, An L, Reif R et al. In vivo microstructural and microvascular imaging of the human corneo‐scleral limbus using optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express 2011; 2: 3109–3118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabesan R, Johns L, Tomashevskaya O et al. Wavefront‐guided scleral lens prosthetic device for keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 314–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsack JD, Ravikumar A, Nguyen C et al. Wavefront‐guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 1221–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BS EN ISO 18369‐2 : 2017 BSI Standards Publication Ophthalmic optics ‐ Contact lenses.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan NA. Average thickness of a hydrogel lens for gas transmissibility calculations. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1984; 61: 627–635.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan NA. Application of hydrogel lens average thickness. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1984; 61: 636–642.
   Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Crosbie‐walsh J, Brynes D. Application of pachometry to the measurement of rigid contact lens edge profile. J Br Cont Lens Assoc 1987; 10: 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Walker MK, Bergmanson JP, Miller WL et al. Complications and fitting challenges associated with scleral contact lenses: a review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2016; 39: 88–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathi VM, Mandathara PS, Vaddavalli PK et al. Fluid filled scleral contact lens in pediatric patients: challenges and outcome. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2012; 35: 189–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carracedo G, Serramito‐blanco M, Martin‐gil A et al. Post‐lens tear turbidity and visual quality after scleral lens wear. Clin Exp Optom 2017; 100: 577–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallos J. Sattler's veil. Br J Ophthalmol 1946; 30: 607–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bier N. The tolerance factor and Sattler's veil as influenced by a new development of contact lens making. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1947; 24: 611–615.
   Google Scholar
• Ezekiel D. Gas permeable haptic lenses. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1983; 6: 158–161.
   Google Scholar
• Choyce DP. Glass contact lenses effects of ventilation. Br J Ophthalmol 1954; 38: 100–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treissman H. Some observations on the causation and elimination of Sattler's veil. Br J Ophthalmol 1949; 33: 555–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleshoy H, Pullum KW. Corneal response to gas‐permeable impression scleral lenses. J Br Cont Lens Assoc 1988; 11: 31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Pullum KW, Hobley AJ, Parker JH. Hypoxic corneal changes following sealed gas permeable impression scleral lens wear. J Br Cont Lens Assoc 1990; 13: 83–87.
   Google Scholar
• Pullum K, Stapleton F. Scleral lens induced corneal swelling: what is the effect of varying Dk and lens thickness? CLAO 1997; 23: 259–263.
   Google Scholar
• Smith GT, Mireskandari K, Pullum KW. Corneal swelling with overnight wear of scleral contact lenses. Cornea 2004; 23: 29–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullum KW, Hobley AJ, Davison C. 100+ Dk: does thickness make much difference? J Br Cont Lens Assoc 1991; 14: 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent SJ, Alonso‐caneiro D, Collins MJ. The time course and nature of corneal oedema during sealed miniscleral contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2018; doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings N, Simpson TL, Hyun C et al. Swelling of the human cornea revealed by high‐speed, ultrahigh‐resolution optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 4579–4584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giasson CJ, Morency J, Melillo M et al. Oxygen tension beneath scleral lenses of different clearances. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 94: 466–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar