Future clinical applicability of optical coherence tomography angiography

REFERENCES

• Leitgeb RA, Werkmeister RM, Blatter C et al. Doppler optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res 2014; 41: 26–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao W. Quantitative depth resolved microcirculation imaging with optical coherence tomography angiography (Part 2): microvascular network imaging. Microcirculation 2017; http://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao W. Quantitative depth resolved microcirculation imaging with optical coherence tomography angiography (Part 1): blood flow velocity imaging. Microcirculation 2017; http://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashani AH, Chen CL, Gahm JK et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography: a comprehensive review of current methods and clinical applications. Prog Retin Eye Res 2017; 60: 66–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole ED, Ferrara D, Novais EA et al. Clinical trial endpoints for optical coherence tomography angiography in neovascular age‐related macular degeneration. Retina 2016; 36 Suppl 1: S83–S92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichi F, Sarraf D, Arepalli S et al. The application of optical coherence tomography angiography in uveitis and inflammatory eye diseases. Prog Retin Eye Res 2017; 59: 178–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambhav K, Grover S, Chalam KV. The application of optical coherence tomography angiography in retinal diseases. Surv Ophthalmol 2017; 62: 838–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicinelli MV, Rabiolo A, Sacconi R et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in dry age‐related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol 2018; 63: 236–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan ACS, Tan GS, Denniston AK et al. An overview of the clinical applications of optical coherence tomography angiography. Eye (Lond) 2018; 32: 262–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography. Prog Retin Eye Res 2018; 64: 1–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Tan ACS, Cheung CMG et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography: a review of current and future clinical applications. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 256: 237–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Or C, Sabrosa AS, Sorour O et al. Use of OCT‐A, FA, and ultra‐widefield imaging in quantifying retinal ischemia: a review. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2018; 7: 46–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider EW, Fowler SC. Optical coherence tomography angiography in the management of age‐related macular degeneration. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2018; 29: 217–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastiridou A, Chopra V. Potential applications of optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2018; 29: 226–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupidi M, Cerquaglia A, Chhablani J et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in age‐related macular degeneration: the game changer. Eur J Ophthalmol 2018; 28: 349–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van melkebeke L, Barbosa‐breda J, Huygens M et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma: a review. Ophthalmic Res 2018; 60: 139–151.
   Google Scholar
• Chansangpetch S, Lin SC. Optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma care. Curr Eye Res 2018; 43: 1067–1082.
   Google Scholar
• Liu G, Jia Y, Pechauer AD et al. Split‐spectrum phase‐gradient optical coherence tomography angiography. Biomed Opt Express 2016; 7: 2943–2954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia Y, Tan O, Tokayer J et al. Split‐spectrum amplitude‐decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2012; 20: 4710–4725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang L, Li S, Nie Q et al. Sparsity based denoising of spectral domain optical coherence tomography images. Biomed Opt Express 2012; 3: 927–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong A, Mishra A, Bizheva K et al. General Bayesian estimation for speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography retinal imagery. Opt Express 2010; 18: 8338–8352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangi AF, Coatrieux JL, Peng GC et al. Editorial: special issue on multiscale modeling and analysis in computational biology and medicine‐‐part‐1. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011; 58: 2936–2942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendargo HC, Estrada R, Chiu SJ et al. Automated non‐rigid registration and mosaicing for robust imaging of distinct retinal capillary beds using speckle variance optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express 2013; 4: 803–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, You J, Volkow ND et al. Ultrasensitive detection of 3D cerebral microvascular network dynamics in vivo. Neuroimage 2014; 103: 492–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan B, Wong A, Bizheva K. Enhancement of morphological and vascular features in OCT images using a modified Bayesian residual transform. Biomed Opt Express 2018; 9: 2394–2406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Zhang A, Lee CS et al. Projection artifact removal improves visualization and quantitation of macular neovascularization imaged by optical coherence tomography angiography. Ophthalmol Retina 2017; 1: 124–136.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Zhang M, Hwang TS et al. Reflectance‐based projection‐resolved optical coherence tomography angiography (invited). Biomed Opt Express 2017; 8: 1536–1548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK. Image artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 2015; 35: 2163–2180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa H, Stein DM, Wollstein G et al. Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 2012–2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koozekanani D, Boyer K, Roberts C. Retinal thickness measurements from optical coherence tomography using a Markov boundary model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20: 900–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu S, de Sisternes L, Chen Q et al. Automated geographic atrophy segmentation for SD‐OCT images using region‐based C‐V model via local similarity factor. Biomed Opt Express 2016; 7: 581–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujat M, Chan R, Cense B et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness map determined from optical coherence tomography images. Opt Express 2005; 13: 9480–9491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossage KW, Tkaczyk TS, Rodriguez JJ et al. Texture analysis of optical coherence tomography images: feasibility for tissue classification. J Biomed Opt 2003; 8: 570–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu W, Zhang L, Shi F et al. Automated framework for intraretinal cystoid macular edema segmentation in three‐dimensional optical coherence tomography images with macular hole. J Biomed Opt 2017; 22: 76014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira J, Pereira S, Goncalves L et al. Multi‐surface segmentation of OCT images with AMD using sparse high order potentials. Biomed Opt Express 2017; 8: 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu SJ, Li XT, Nicholas P et al. Automatic segmentation of seven retinal layers in SDOCT images congruent with expert manual segmentation. Opt Express 2010; 18: 19413–19428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan T, Akram MU, Hassan B et al. Automated segmentation of subretinal layers for the detection of macular edema. Appl Optics 2016; 55: 454–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan PP, Kim LA, Mettu PS et al. Fully automated detection of diabetic macular edema and dry age‐related macular degeneration from optical coherence tomography images. Biomed Opt Express 2014; 5: 3568–3577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang A, Carass A, Hauser M et al. Retinal layer segmentation of macular OCT images using boundary classification. Biomed Opt Express 2013; 4: 1133–1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdonough K, Kolmanovsky I, Glybina IV. A neural network approach to retinal layer boundary identification from optical coherence tomography images. In: 2015 I.E. Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB), 2015. pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Venhuizen FG, van Ginneken B, Liefers B et al. Robust total retina thickness segmentation in optical coherence tomography images using convolutional neural networks. Biomed Opt Express 2017; 8: 3292–3316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy AG, Conjeti S, Karri SPK et al. ReLayNet: retinal layer and fluid segmentation of macular optical coherence tomography using fully convolutional networks. Biomed Opt Express 2017; 8: 3627–3642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui X, Zheng Y, Wei B et al. Choroid segmentation from Optical Coherence Tomography with graph‐edge weights learned from deep convolutional neural networks. Neurocomputing 2017; 237: 332–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang L, Cunefare D, Wang C et al. Automatic segmentation of nine retinal layer boundaries in OCT images of non‐exudative AMD patients using deep learning and graph search. Biomed Opt Express 2017; 8: 2732–2744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen FK, Viljoen RD, Bukowska DM. Classification of image artefacts in optical coherence tomography angiography of the choroid in macular diseases. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2016; 44: 388–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi falavarjani K, Al‐sheikh M, Akil H et al. Image artefacts in swept‐source optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; 101: 564–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauermann JL, Woetzel AK, Treder M et al. Prevalences of segmentation errors and motion artifacts in OCT‐angiography differ among retinal diseases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 256: 1807–1816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua J, Lim CXY, Wong TY et al. Diabetic retinopathy in the Asia‐Pacific. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2018; 7: 3–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Fernandez‐loaiza P, Sauma J et al. Classification of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. World J Diabetes 2013; 4: 290–294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruia S, Saxena S, Gemmy cheung CM et al. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography features and classification systems for diabetic macular edema: a review. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2016; 5: 360–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarinci F, Jampol LM, Linsenmeier RA et al. Association of diabetic macular nonperfusion with outer retinal disruption on optical coherence tomography. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133: 1036–1044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarinci F, Nesper PL, Fawzi AA. Deep retinal capillary nonperfusion is associated with photoreceptor disruption in diabetic macular ischemia. Am J Ophthalmol 2016; 168: 129–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon BG, Um T, Lee J et al. Correlation between deep capillary plexus perfusion and long‐term photoreceptor recovery after diabetic macular edema treatment. Ophthalmol Retina 2018; 2: 235–243.
   Google Scholar
• Linsenmeier RA, Zhang HF. Retinal oxygen: from animals to humans. Prog Retin Eye Res 2017; 58: 115–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore J, Bagley S, Ireland G et al. Three dimensional analysis of microaneurysms in the human diabetic retina. J Anat 1999; 194 (Pt 1): 89–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa N, Nozaki M, Takase N et al. New insights into microaneurysms in the deep capillary plexus detected by optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57: OCT348–OCT355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevali A, Sacconi R, Corbelli E et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography analysis of retinal vascular plexuses and choriocapillaris in patients with type 1 diabetes without diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol 2017; 54: 695–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onishi AC, Nesper PL, Roberts PK et al. Importance of considering the middle capillary plexus on OCT angiography in diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018; 59: 2167–2176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaide RF. Volume‐rendered optical coherence tomography of diabetic retinopathy pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol 2015; 160: 1200–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua J, Chin CWL, Hong J et al. Impact of hypertension on retinal capillary microvasculature using optical coherence tomographic angiography. J Hypertens 2018; http://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Carlo TE, Salz DA, Waheed NK et al. Visualization of the retinal vasculature using wide‐field montage optical coherence tomography angiography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2015; 46: 611–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carl Zeiss Meditec AG. ZEISS receives the first US FDA Clearance for Swept‐Source OCT posterior ocular imaging with PLEX Elite 9000. 2016. Available at: https://www.zeiss.com/meditec/int/media‐news/press‐releases/‐us‐fda‐clearance‐for‐swept‐source‐oct‐posterior‐ocular‐imaging‐with‐plex‐elite‐9000.html
   Google Scholar
• Kolb JP, Klein T, Kufner CL et al. Ultra‐widefield retinal MHz‐OCT imaging with up to 100-degrees viewing angle. Biomed Opt Express 2015; 6: 1534–1552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parravano M, De geronimo D, Scarinci F et al. Diabetic microaneurysms internal reflectivity on spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography detection. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 179: 90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreur V, Domanian A, Liefers B et al. Morphological and topographical appearance of microaneurysms on optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol 2018; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishibazawa A, Nagaoka T, Yokota H et al. Characteristics of retinal neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy imaged by optical coherence tomography angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57: 6247–6255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savastano MC, Federici M, Falsini B et al. Detecting papillary neovascularization in proliferative diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography angiography. Acta Ophthalmol 2018; 96: 321–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang JW, Yoo R, Jo YH et al. Correlation of microvascular structures on optical coherence tomography angiography with visual acuity in retinal vein occlusion. Retina 2017; 37: 1700–1709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicinelli MV, Rabiolo A, Marchese A et al. Choroid morphometric analysis in non‐neovascular age‐related macular degeneration by means of optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; 101: 1193–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesper PL, Soetikno BT, Fawzi AA. Choriocapillaris nonperfusion is associated with poor visual acuity in eyes with reticular pseudodrusen. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 174: 42–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi W, Moult EM, Waheed NK et al. Ultrahigh‐speed, swept‐source optical coherence tomography angiography in nonexudative age‐related macular degeneration with geographic atrophy. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 2532–2544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacconi R, Corbelli E, Carnevali A et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in geographic atrophy. Retina 2018; 38: 2350–2355.
   Google Scholar
• Corbelli E, Sacconi R, Rabiolo A et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in the evaluation of geographic atrophy area extension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 5201–5208.
   Google Scholar
• Liakopoulos S, Ongchin S, Bansal A et al. Quantitative optical coherence tomography findings in various subtypes of neovascular age‐related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 5048–5054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehlewein L, Dansingani KK, de Carlo TE et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of type 3 neovascularization secondary to age‐related macular degeneration. Retina 2015; 35: 2229–2235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanzo E, Miere A, Querques G et al. Type 1 choroidal neovascularization lesion size: indocyanine green angiography versus optical coherence tomography angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57: OCT307–OCT313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farecki ML, Gutfleisch M, Faatz H et al. Characteristics of type 1 and 2 CNV in exudative AMD in OCT‐angiography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017; 255: 913–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Mori R, Kawamura A et al. Comparison of OCT angiography and indocyanine green angiographic findings with subtypes of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; 101: 51–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phasukkijwatana N, Tan ACS, Chen X et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of type 3 neovascularisation in age‐related macular degeneration after antiangiogenic therapy. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; 101: 597–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhutto I, Lutty G. Understanding age‐related macular degeneration (AMD): relationships between the photoreceptor/retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch's membrane/choriocapillaris complex. Mol Aspects Med 2012; 33: 295–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde C, Patel M, Lakshmanan A et al. The diagnostic accuracy of spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration: a comparison with fundus fluorescein angiography. Eye (Lond) 2015; 29: 602–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong J, Yu S, Gong Y et al. The diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography angiography for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration: a comparison with fundus fluorescein angiography. J Ophthalmol 2016; 2016: 7521478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue M, Jung JJ, Balaratnasingam C et al. A comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography for the imaging of type 1 neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57: OCT314–OCT323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malamos P, Tsolkas G, Kanakis M et al. OCT‐angiography for monitoring and managing neovascular age‐related macular degeneration. Curr Eye Res 2017; 42: 1689–1697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulou E, Lorusso M, Micelli ferrari L et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography versus dye angiography in age‐related macular degeneration: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 6724818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faridi A, Jia Y, Gao SS et al. Sensitivity and specificity of OCT angiography to detect choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmol Retina 2017; 1: 294–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Novais EA, Adhi M, Moult EM et al. Choroidal neovascularization analyzed on ultrahigh‐speed swept‐source optical coherence tomography angiography compared to spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography angiography. Am J Ophthalmol 2016; 164: 80–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller AR, Roisman L, Zhang Q et al. Comparison between spectral‐domain and swept‐source optical coherence tomography angiographic imaging of choroidal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 1499–1505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Chen CL, Chu Z et al. Automated quantitation of choroidal neovascularization: a comparison study between spectral‐domain and swept‐source OCT angiograms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 1506–1513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coscas GJ, Lupidi M, Coscas F et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography versus traditional multimodal imaging in assessing the activity of exudative age‐related macular degeneration: a new diagnostic challenge. Retina 2015; 35: 2219–2228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulzbacher F, Pollreisz A, Kaider A et al. Identification and clinical role of choroidal neovascularization characteristics based on optical coherence tomography angiography. Acta Ophthalmol 2017; 95: 414–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumbroso B, Rispoli M, Savastano MC. Longitudinal optical coherence tomography‐angiography study of type 2 naive choroidal neovascularization early response after treatment. Retina 2015; 35: 2242–2251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques JP, Costa JF, Marques M et al. Sequential morphological changes in the CNV net after intravitreal anti‐VEGF evaluated with OCT angiography. Ophthalmic Res 2016; 55: 145–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherecheanu AP, Garhofer G, Schmidl D et al. Ocular perfusion pressure and ocular blood flow in glaucoma. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2013; 13: 36–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakazawa T. Ocular blood flow and influencing factors for glaucoma. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2016; 5: 38–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyman LS, Garg RA, Suwan Y et al. Peripapillary perfused capillary density in primary open‐angle glaucoma across disease stage: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; 101: 1261–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chihara E, Dimitrova G, Amano H et al. Discriminatory power of superficial vessel density and prelaminar vascular flow index in eyes with glaucoma and ocular hypertension and normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 690–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triolo G, Rabiolo A, Shemonski ND et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography macular and peripapillary vessel perfusion density in healthy subjects, glaucoma suspects, and glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 5713–5722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoji T, Zangwill LM, Akagi T et al. Progressive macula vessel density loss in primary open‐angle glaucoma: a longitudinal study. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 182: 107–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Jiang C, Ko T et al. Correlation between optic disc perfusion and glaucomatous severity in patients with open‐angle glaucoma: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253: 1557–1564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao HL, Pradhan ZS, Weinreb RN et al. Regional comparisons of optical coherence tomography angiography vessel density in primary open‐angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2016; 171: 75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyota N, Kunikata H, Takahashi S et al. Factors associated with deep circulation in the peripapillary chorioretinal atrophy zone in normal‐tension glaucoma with myopic disc. Acta Ophthalmol 2018; 96: e290–e297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayreh SS. The blood supply of the optic nerve head and the evaluation of it ‐ myth and reality. Prog Retin Eye Res 2001; 20: 563–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Reynaud J, Lockwood H et al. The connective tissue phenotype of glaucomatous cupping in the monkey eye ‐ clinical and research implications. Prog Retin Eye Res 2017; 59: 1–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidl D, Garhofer G, Schmetterer L. The complex interaction between ocular perfusion pressure and ocular blood flow ‐ relevance for glaucoma. Exp Eye Res 2011; 93: 141–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin JW, Sung KR, Uhm KB et al. Peripapillary microvascular improvement and lamina cribrosa depth reduction after trabeculectomy in primary open‐angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 5993–5999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alnawaiseh M, Muller V, Lahme L et al. Changes in flow density measured using optical coherence tomography angiography after iStent insertion in combination with phacoemulsification in patients with open‐angle glaucoma. J Ophthalmol 2018; 2018: 2890357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidl D, Schmetterer L, Garhofer G et al. Pharmacotherapy of glaucoma. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2015; 31: 63–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fard MA, Jalili J, Sahraiyan A et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in optic disc swelling. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 191: 116–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo G, Tebaldi S, Amoroso F et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in optic nerve drusen. Ophthalmic Res 2018; 59: 76–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Ang M, Najjar RP et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in acute non‐arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2017; 101: 1045–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu CH, Kao LY, Sun MH et al. Retinal vessel density in optical coherence tomography angiography in optic atrophy after nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. J Ophthalmol 2017; 2017: 9632647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augstburger E, Zeboulon P, Keilani C et al. Retinal and choroidal microvasculature in nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018; 59: 870–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Jia Y, Spain R et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of optic nerve head and parafovea in multiple sclerosis. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 1368–1373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higashiyama T, Nishida Y, Ohji M. Optical coherence tomography angiography in eyes with good visual acuity recovery after treatment for optic neuritis. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0172168.
   Google Scholar
• Fard MA, Suwan Y, Moghimi S et al. Pattern of peripapillary capillary density loss in ischemic optic neuropathy compared to that in primary open‐angle glaucoma. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0189237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Devarajan K, Das S et al. Comparison of anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography systems for corneal vascularisation. Br J Ophthalmol 2018; 102: 873–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Sim DA, Keane PA et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography for anterior segment vasculature imaging. Ophthalmology 2015; 122: 1740–1747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Cai Y, Tan AC. Swept source optical coherence tomography angiography for contact lens‐related corneal vascularization. J Ophthalmol 2016; 2016: 9685297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Alio del barrio JL, Wilkins MR et al. Serial optical coherence tomography angiography for corneal vascularization. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017; 255: 135–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Baskaran M, Werkmeister RM et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res 2018; 66: 132–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanzel TP, Devarajan K, Lwin NC et al. Comparison of optical coherence tomography angiography to Indocyanine green angiography and slit lamp photography for corneal vascularization in an animal model. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 11493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cursiefen C, Colin J, Dana R et al. Consensus statement on indications for anti‐angiogenic therapy in the management of corneal diseases associated with neovascularisation: outcome of an expert roundtable. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 3–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Cai Y, Macphee B et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography and indocyanine green angiography for corneal vascularisation. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 1557–1563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan RP, Zheng Y, Tey A et al. Quantifying changes in corneal neovascularization using fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 154: 850–858.e2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Cai Y, Shahipasand S et al. En face optical coherence tomography angiography for corneal neovascularisation. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 616–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira dias JR, Zhang Q, Garcia JMB et al. Natural history of subclinical neovascularization in nonexudative age‐related macular degeneration using swept‐source OCT angiography. Ophthalmology 2018; 125: 255–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holz FG, Sadda SR, Staurenghi G et al. Imaging protocols in clinical studies in advanced age‐related macular degeneration: recommendations from classification of atrophy consensus meetings. Ophthalmology 2017; 124: 464–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin JW, Kwon J, Lee J et al. Relationship between vessel density and visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes with high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2018; bjophthalmol‐2018‐312085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar