A collaborative care pathway for patients with suspected angle closure glaucoma spectrum disease

REFERENCES

• Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90: 262–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Walland MJ. Management algorithms for primary angle closure disease. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013; 41: 282–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2081–2090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White A, Goldberg I, Australian and New Zealand Glaucoma Interest Group and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. Guidelines for the collaborative care of glaucoma patients and suspects by ophthalmologists and optometrists in Australia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 42: 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Hennessy MP, Kalloniatis M et al. Implementing collaborative care for glaucoma patients and suspects in Australia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 46: 826–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamous KF, Kalloniatis M, Hennessy MP et al. Clinical model assisting with the collaborative care of glaucoma patients and suspects. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 43: 308–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan J, Shahid H, Bourne RR et al. Cambridge community optometry glaucoma scheme. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 43: 221–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnarajan G, Kean J, French K et al. The false negative rate and the role for virtual review in a nationally evaluated glaucoma referral refinement scheme. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015; 35: 577–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trikha S, Macgregor C, Jeffery M et al. The Portsmouth‐based glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future? Eye (Lond) 2012; 26: 1288–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damento GM, Winkler NS, Hodge DO et al. Healthcare utilization by glaucoma patients in a team care model. Semin Ophthalmol 2018; 33: 829–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma S, Arora S, Kassam F et al. Northern Alberta remote teleglaucoma program: clinical outcomes and patient disposition. Can J Ophthalmol 2014; 49: 135–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang LP, Aung T, Chua WH et al. Visual field loss from primary angle‐closure glaucoma: a comparative study of symptomatic and asymptomatic disease. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 1636–1640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asian Pacific Glaucoma Society (APGS). Asia Pacific Glaucoma Guidelines. [Internet] Amsterdam: Kugler Publications. 2016. [Cited 9 Oct 2018.] Available at: http://www.icoph.org/dynamic/attachments/resources/asia_pacific_glaucoma_guidelines_2016_third_edition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NHMRC. Guidelines for the Screening, Prognosis, Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Glaucoma. [Internet] Commonwealth of Australia. 2010. [Cited 9 Oct 2018.] Available at: https://nhmrc.gov.au/about‐us/publications/guidelines‐screening‐prognosis‐diagnosis‐management‐and‐prevention‐glaucoma
   Google Scholar
• Prum BE Jr, Herndon LW Jr, Moroi SE et al. Primary angle closure preferred practice pattern(®) guidelines. Ophthalmology 2016; 123: P1–P40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel ME, Parrish RK 2nd, Gedde SJ. Evidence‐based management of primary angle closure glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2014; 25: 89–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan S, Chen PP, Junk AK et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2018; 125: 1110–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ly A, Nivison‐smith L, Hennessy M et al. The advantages of intermediate‐tier, inter‐optometric referral of low risk pigmented lesions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2017; 37: 661–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ly A, Nivison‐smith L, Hennessy MP et al. Collaborative care of non‐urgent macular disease: a study of inter‐optometric referrals. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2016; 36: 632–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ly A, Phu J, Katalinic P et al. Detecting, assessing and managing ocular disease using routine optical coherence tomography in treatment naïve patients: an evidence‐based approach. Clin Exp Optom 2019; 102: 242–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SD, Singh K, Lin SC et al. Evaluation of the anterior chamber angle in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 1985–1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA et al. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 238–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangerl B, Hayen A, Mitchell P et al. Therapeutic endorsement enhances compliance with national glaucoma guidelines in Australian and New Zealand optometrists. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015; 35: 212–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey CJ, Scally AJ, Green C et al. Factors influencing accuracy of referral and the likelihood of false positive referral by optometrists in Bradford, United Kingdom. J Optom 2016; 9: 158–165.
   Google Scholar
• Ang GS, Ng WS, Azuara‐blanco A. The influence of the new general ophthalmic services (GOS) contract in optometrist referrals for glaucoma in Scotland. Eye (Lond) 2009; 23: 351–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts HW, Rughani K, Syam P et al. The Peterborough scheme for community specialist optometrists in glaucoma: results of 4 years of a two‐tiered community‐based assessment and follow‐up service. Curr Eye Res 2015; 40: 690–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling B, Chen SD, Salmon JF. Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1102–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiely PM, Slater J. Optometry Australia entry‐level competency standards for optometry 2014. Clin Exp Optom 2015; 98: 65–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshioka N, Wong E, Kalloniatis M et al. Influence of education and diagnostic modes on glaucoma assessment by optometrists. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015; 35: 682–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L. Australia and New Zealand survey of glaucoma practice patterns. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008; 36: 19–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskin BJ, Carroll SC, Gamble G et al. Glaucoma management trends in Australia and New Zealand. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006; 34: 208–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan S, Clarke J, Kotecha A. Comparison of optometrist glaucoma referrals against published guidelines. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 472–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne RR, French KA, Chang L et al. Can a community optometrist‐based referral refinement scheme reduce false‐positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES). Eye (Lond) 2010; 24: 881–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma DK, Simpson SM, Rai AS et al. Undetected angle closure in patients with a diagnosis of open‐angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 2017; 52: 373–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seider MI, Pekmezci M, Han Y et al. High prevalence of narrow angles among Chinese‐American glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. J Glaucoma 2009; 18: 578–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamous KF, Kalloniatis M, Hayen A et al. Application of clinical techniques relevant for glaucoma assessment by optometrists: concordance with guidelines. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2014; 34: 580–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Beltran‐agullo L, Trope GE et al. Assessment of the quality of glaucoma referral letters based on a survey of glaucoma specialists and a glaucoma guideline. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 126–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie F, Blaikie A, Cobb C et al. Glaucoma electronic patient record–design, experience and study of high‐risk patients. Eye (Lond) 2005; 19: 956–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ly A, Nivison‐smith L, Zangerl B et al. Advanced imaging for the diagnosis of age‐related macular degeneration: a case vignettes study. Clin Exp Optom 2018; 101: 243–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ et al. Angle‐closure glaucoma in east Asian and European people. Different diseases? Eye (Lond) 2006; 20: 3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar