Impact of classifying keratoconus location based on keratometry or pachymetry on progression parameters

REFERENCES

• Randleman JB, Trattler WB, Stulting RD. Validation of the Ectasia Risk Score System for preoperative laser in situ keratomileusis screening. Am J Ophthalmol 2008; 145: 813–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caporossi A, Mazzotta C, Baiocchi S et al. Long‐term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross‐linking for keratoconus in Italy: the Siena eye cross study. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 149: 585–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersh PS, Greenstein SA, Fry KL. Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: one‐year results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 149–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittig‐silva C, Chan E, Islam FM et al. A randomized, controlled trial of corneal collagen cross‐linking in progressive keratoconus: three‐year results. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 812–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aad G, Abbott B, Abdallah J et al. Observation of spin correlation in tt− events from pp collisions at √s=7 TeV using the ATLAS detector. Phys Rev Lett 2012; 108: 212001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Revisiting keratoconus diagnosis and progression classification based on evaluation of corneal asymmetry indices, derived from Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and suspect cases. Clin Ophthalmol 2013; 7: 1539–1548.
   Google Scholar
• Alio JL, Pinero DP, Aleson A et al. Keratoconus‐integrated characterization considering anterior corneal aberrations, internal astigmatism, and corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 552–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinero DP, Alio JL, Barraquer RI et al. Corneal biomechanics, refraction, and corneal aberrometry in keratoconus: an integrated study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 1948–1955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinero DP, Nieto JC, Lopez‐miguel A. Characterization of corneal structure in keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 2167–2183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JA, Kim MS. Progression of keratoconus by longitudinal assessment with corneal topography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 927–935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan JK, Belin MW, Borgstrom M. Assessing progression of keratoconus: novel tomographic determinants. Eye Vis (Lond) 2016; 3: 6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belin MW, Duncan JK. Keratoconus: the ABCD grading system. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2016; 233: 701–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ et al. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea 2015; 34: 359–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocamis SI, Cakmak HB, Cagil N et al. Investigation of the efficacy of the cone location and magnitude index in the diagnosis of keratoconus. Semin Ophthalmol 2016; 31: 203–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munsamy AJ, Moodley VR. A correlation analysis of cone characteristics and central keratometric readings for the different stages of keratoconus. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017; 65: 7–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarac O, Caglayan M, Cakmak HB et al. Factors influencing progression of keratoconus 2 years after corneal collagen cross‐linking in pediatric patients. Cornea 2016; 35: 1503–1507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsler M. Kératocône classique et kératocône fruste; arguments unitaires. Ophthalmologica 1946; 111: 96–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raiskup F, Spoerl E. Corneal crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet A. Part II. Clinical indications and results. Ocul Surf 2013; 11: 93–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire LJ, Lowry JC. Identifying progression of subclinical keratoconus by serial topography analysis. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 112: 41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'brart DP, Chan E, Samaras K et al. A randomised, prospective study to investigate the efficacy of riboflavin/ultraviolet a (370 nm) corneal collagen cross‐linkage to halt the progression of keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95: 1519–1524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal DS, Brar GS, Jain R et al. Corneal collagen crosslinking using riboflavin and ultraviolet‐a light for keratoconus: one‐year analysis using Scheimpflug imaging. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 425–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafezi F, Kanellopoulos J, Wiltfang R et al. Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet A to treat induced keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 2035–2040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra P, Albe E, Trazza S et al. Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross‐linking. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 369–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra P, Albe E, Trazza S et al. Intraoperative and postoperative effects of corneal collagen cross‐linking on progressive keratoconus. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 1258–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra P, Camesasca FI, Albe E et al. Corneal collagen cross‐linking for ectasia after excimer laser refractive surgery: 1‐year results. J Refract Surg 2010; 26: 486–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sanctis U, Loiacono C, Richiardi L et al. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1534–1539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomidokoro A, Oshika T, Amano S et al. Changes in anterior and posterior corneal curvatures in keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 1328–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcmahon TT, Szczotka‐flynn L, Barr JT et al. A new method for grading the severity of keratoconus: the Keratoconus Severity Score (KSS). Cornea 2006; 25: 794–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandell RB. Contact Lens Practice, 4th. ed. Springfield, Illinois: Thomas, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Greenstein SA, Fry KL, Hersh PS. Effect of topographic cone location on outcomes of corneal collagen cross‐linking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 397–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas NH, Pflugfelder SC. Topographic pattern and apex location of keratoconus on elevation topography maps. Cornea 1998; 17: 476–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu ameerh MA, Al refai RM, Al bdour MD. Keratoconus patients at Jordan University Hospital: a descriptive study. Clin Ophthalmol 2012; 6: 1895–1899.
   Google Scholar
• Chatzis N, Hafezi F. Progression of keratoconus and efficacy of pediatric (corrected) corneal collagen cross‐linking in children and adolescents. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 753–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty R, Agrawal A, Deshmukh R et al. Effect of post crosslinking haze on the repeatability of Scheimpflug‐based and slit‐scanning imaging devices. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017; 65: 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mclaren JW, Wacker K, Kane KM et al. Measuring corneal haze by using Scheimpflug photography and confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57: 227–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar