Aberrations and accommodation

REFERENCES

• Young T. The Bakerian Lecture on the mechanism of the eye. Philos Trans R Soc London 1801; 91: 23–88.
   Google Scholar
• Atchison DA, Charman WN. Thomas Young's contributions to geometrical optics. Clin Exp Optom 2011; 94: 333–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He JC, Gwiazda J, Thorn F et al. Change in corneal shape and corneal wave‐front aberrations with accommodation. J Vis 2003; 3: 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisó‐fuertes I, Domínguez‐vicent A, del Águila‐carrasco A et al. Corneal changes with accommodation using dual Scheimpflug photography. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 981–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consejo A, Radhakrishnan H, Iskander DR. Scleral changes with accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2017; 37: 263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman WN, Heron G. Fluctuations in accommodation: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1988; 8: 153–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman WN, Heron G. Microfluctuations in accommodation: an update on their characteristics and possible role. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015; 35: 476–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt BC, Shack R. History and principles of Shack‐Hartmann wavefront sensing. J Refract Surg 2001; 17: S573–S577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Hong X. Clinical applications of the Shack‐Hartmann aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 817–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del águila‐carrasco AJ, Marín‐franch I, Bernal‐molina P et al. Accommodation responds to optical vergence and not defocus blur alone. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 1758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchison DA, Bradley A, Thibos LN et al. Useful variations of the Badal optometer. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 279–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López‐gil N, Fernández‐sánchez V. The change of spherical aberration during accommodation and its effect on the accommodation response. J Vis 2010; 10: 12–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El hage S, Le grand Y. Physiological optics. New York: Springer, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Fincham EF, Walton J. The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence. J Physiol 1957; 137: 488–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro R, López‐gil N. Impact of internal curvature gradient on the power and accommodation of the crystalline lens. Optica 2017; 4: 334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López‐gil N, Rucker FJ, Stark LR et al. Effect of third‐order aberrations on dynamic accommodation. Vision Res 2007; 47: 755–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal‐molina P, Marín‐franch I, Del águila‐carrasco AJ et al. Human eyes do not need monochromatic aberrations for dynamic accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2017; 37: 602–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteve‐taboada JJ, Del águila‐carrasco AJ, Bernal‐molina P et al. Dynamic accommodation without feedback does not respond to isolated blur cues. Vision Res 2017; 136: 50–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marín‐franch I, Del águila‐carrasco AJ, Bernal‐molina P et al. There is more to accommodation of the eye than simply minimizing retinal blur. Biomed Opt Express 2017; 8: 4717–4728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goss DA. Nearwork and myopia. Lancet 2000; 356: 1456–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JC, Schmid KL, Brown B. The autonomic control of accommodation and implications for human myopia development: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2003; 23: 401–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weizhong L, Zhikuan Y, Wen L et al. A longitudinal study on the relationship between myopia development and near accommodation lag in myopic children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2008; 28: 57–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benard Y, López‐gil N, Legras R. Subjective depth of field in presence of 4th‐order and 6th‐order Zernike spherical aberration using adaptive optics technology. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 2129–2138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benard Y, López‐gil N, Legras R. Optimizing the subjective depth‐of‐focus with combinations of fourth‐ and sixth‐order spherical aberration. Vision Res 2011; 51: 2471–2477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi F, Robert iskander D, Collins M. Depth of focus and visual acuity with primary and secondary spherical aberration. Vision Res 2011; 51: 1648–1658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López‐gil N, Fernández‐sánchez V, Thibos LN et al. Objective amplitude of accommodation computed from optical quality metrics applied to wavefront outcomes. J Optom 2009; 2: 223–234.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrant J, Roorda A, Wildsoet CF. Determining the accommodative response from wavefront aberrations. J Vis 2010; 10: 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal‐molina P, Vargas‐martín F, Thibos LN et al. Influence of Ametropia and its correction on measurement of accommodation. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57: 3010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plainis S, Ginis HS, Pallikaris A. The effect of ocular aberrations on steady‐state errors of accommodative response. J Vis 2005; 5: 7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha KM, Vabre L, Chateau N et al. Expanding depth of focus by modifying higher‐order aberrations induced by an adaptive optics visual simulator. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 1885–1892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López‐gil N, Martin J, Liu T et al. Retinal image quality during accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013; 33: 497–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Bradley A, López‐gil N. Modelling the impact of spherical aberration on accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013; 33: 482–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal‐molina P, Montés‐micó R, Legras R et al. Depth‐of‐field of the accommodating eye. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 1208–1214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman WN, Radhakrishnan H. Accommodation, pupil diameter and myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2009; 29: 72–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He J, Burns S, Marcos S. Monochromatic aberrations in the accommodated human eye. Vision Res 2000; 40: 41–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchison DA, Collins MJ, Wildsoet CF et al. Measurement of monochromatic ocular aberrations of human eyes as a function of accommodation by the Howland aberroscope technique. Vision Res 1995; 35: 313–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López‐gil N, Fernández‐sánchez V, Legras R et al. Accommodation‐related changes in monochromatic aberrations of the human eye as a function of age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 1736–1743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H, Barnett JK, Vilupuru AS et al. A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accomodation. J Vis 2004; 4: 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Thibos LN. Variation of axial and oblique astigmatism with accommodation across the visual field. J Vis 2017; 17: 24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter HW. The correction of astigmatism for near work. Optom Vis Sci 1945; 22: 121–134.
   Google Scholar
• Bannon RE. A study of astigmatism at the near point with special reference to astigmatic accommodation. Optom Vis Sci 1946; 23: 53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan H, Charman WN. Changes in astigmatism with accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2007; 27: 275–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ukai K, Ichihashi Y. Changes in ocular astigmatism over the whole range of accommodation. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 813–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninomiya S, Fujikado T, Kuroda T et al. Changes of ocular aberration with accommodation. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134: 924–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi B. The Influence of Ocular Astigmatism on Accommodation (Monograph on the Internet). Manchester, UK, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Gambra E, Sawides L, Dorronsoro C et al. Accommodative lag and fluctuations when optical aberrations are manipulated. J Vis 2009; 9: 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald G, Griffin DR. The change in refractive power of the human eye in dim and bright light. J Opt Soc Am 1947; 37: 321–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford RE, Wyszecki G. Axial chromatic aberration of the human eye. J Opt Soc Am 1957; 47: 564–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charman WN, Tucker J. Accommodation and color. J Opt Soc Am 1978; 68: 459–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham EF. The accommodation reflex and its stimulus. Br J Ophthalmol 1951; 35: 381–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwala KR, Kruger ES, Mathews S et al. Spectral bandwidth and ocular accommodation. J Opt Soc Am A 1995; 12: 450–455.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger PB, Aggarwala KR, Bean S et al. Accommodation to stationary and moving targets. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 505–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Stark LR, Cohen S et al. Accommodation to static chromatic simulations of blurred retinal images. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999; 19: 223–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark LR, Lee RS, Kruger PB et al. Accommodation to simulations of defocus and chromatic aberration in the presence of chromatic misalignment. Vision Res 2002; 42: 1485–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger PB. Infrared recording retinoscope for monitoring accomodation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1979; 56: 116–123.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe JM, Owens DA. Is accommodation colorblind? Focusing chromatic contours. Perception 1981; 10: 53–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Switkes E, Bradley A, Schor C. Readily visible changes in color contrast are insufficient to stimulate accommodation. Vision Res 1990; 30: 1367–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger PB, Mathews S, Aggarwala KR et al. Chromatic aberration and ocular focus: Fincham revisited. Vision Res 1993; 33: 1397–1411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logothetis NK, Schiller PH, Charles ER et al. Perceptual deficits and the activity of the color‐opponent and broad‐band pathways at isoluminance. Science 1990; 247: 214–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gur M, Akri V. Isoluminant stimuli may not expose the full contribution of color to visual functioning: spatial contrast sensitivity measurements indicate interaction between color and luminance processing. Vision Res 1992; 32: 1253–1262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone M, Hubel D. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science 1988; 240: 740–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troscianko T, Fahle M. Why do isoluminant stimuli appear slower? J Opt Soc Am A 1988; 5: 871–880.
   Google Scholar
• Dubbelman M, Van der heijde GL, Weeber HA. Change in shape of the aging human crystalline lens with accommodation. Vision Res 2005; 45: 117–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrami M, Heidari A, Pierscionek BK. Alteration in refractive index profile during accommodation based on mechanical modelling. Biomed Opt Express 2016; 7: 99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan A, Pope JM, Verkicharla PK et al. Change in human lens dimensions, lens refractive index distribution and ciliary body ring diameter with accommodation. Biomed Opt Express 2018; 9: 1272–1282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaskulski M, Marín‐franch I, Bernal‐molina P et al. The effect of longitudinal chromatic aberration on the lag of accommodation and depth of field. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2016; 36: 657–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del águila‐carrasco A. Light Vergence Detection in Monocular and Monochromatic Accommodation (Monograph on the Internet). Valencia, Spain; 2017. Available from http://roderic.uv.es/handle/10550/59161.
   Google Scholar
• Qian N. Binocular disparity and the perception of depth. Neuron 1997; 18: 359–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheatstone CXVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philos Trans R Soc London 1838; 128: 371–394.
   Google Scholar
• Ittelson WH, Ames A. Accommodation, convergence, and their relation to apparent distance. J Psychol 1950; 30: 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeda T, Iida T, Fukui Y. Dynamic eye accommodation evoked by apparent distances. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67: 450–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger PB, Pola J. Changing target size is a stimulus for accommodation. J Opt Soc Am A 1985; 2: 1832–1835.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kruger PB, Pola J. Stimuli for accommodation: blur, chromatic aberration and size. Vision Res 1986; 26: 957–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger PB, Pola J. Dioptric and non‐dioptric stimuli for accommodation: target size alone and with blur and chromatic aberration. Vision Res 1987; 27: 555–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips S, Stark L. Blur: a sufficient accommodative stimulus. Doc Ophthalmol 1977; 43: 65–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BJ, Decker KE, Roorda A. Monochromatic aberrations provide an odd‐error cue to focus direction. J Opt Soc Am A 2002; 19: 833.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt HJ. The form of the human pupil. Vision Res 1995; 35: 2021–2036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger PB, López‐gil N, Stark LR. Accommodation and the Stiles‐Crawford effect: theory and a case study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001; 21: 339–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger PB, Stark LR, Nguyen HN. Small foveal targets for studies of accommodation and the Stiles–Crawford effect. Vision Res 2004; 44: 2757–2767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark LR, Kruger PB, Rucker FJ et al. Potential signal to accommodation from the Stiles‐Crawford effect and ocular monochromatic aberrations. J Mod Opt 2009; 56: 2203–2216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roorda A. Adaptive optics for studying visual function: a comprehensive review. J Vis 2011; 11: 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marín‐franch I, Del águila‐carrasco AJ, Levecq X et al. Drifts in real‐time partial wavefront correction and how to avoid them. Appl Optics 2017; 56: 3989–3994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Kruger PB, Hofer H et al. Accommodation with higher‐order monochromatic aberrations corrected with adaptive optics. J Opt Soc Am A 2006; 23: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chin SS, Hampson KM, Mallen EAH. Role of ocular aberrations in dynamic accommodation control. Clin Exp Optom 2009; 92: 227–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin SS, Hampson KM, Mallen EAH. Effect of correction of ocular aberration dynamics on the accommodation response to a sinusoidally moving stimulus. Opt Lett 2009; 34: 3274–3276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flitcroft DI, Judge SJ. The effect of stimulus chromaticity on ocular accommodation in the monkey. J Physiol 1988; 398: 36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwala KR, Nowbotsing S, Kruger PB. Accommodation to monochromatic and white‐light targets. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995; 36: 2695–2705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotulak JC, Morse SE, Billock VA. Red‐green opponent channel mediation of control of human ocular accommodation. J Physiol 1995; 482: 697–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone D, Mathews S, Kruger PB. Accommodation and chromatic aberration: effect of spatial frequency. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1993; 13: 244–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews S, Kruger PB. Spatiotemporal transfer function of human accommodation. Vision Res 1994; 34: 1965–1980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger PB, Nowbotsing S, Aggarwala KR et al. Small amounts of chromatic aberration influence dynamic accommodation. Optom Vis Sci 1995; 72: 656–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger PB, Mathews S, Katz M et al. Accommodation without feedback suggests directional signals specify ocular focus. Vision Res 1997; 3: 2511–2526.
   Google Scholar
• Flitcroft DI. A neural and computational model for the chromatic control of accommodation. Vis Neurosci 1990; 5: 547–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger PB, Mathews S, Aggarwala KR et al. Accommodation responds to changing contrast of long, middle and short spectral‐waveband components of the retinal image. Vision Res 1995; 35: 2415–2429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucker FJ, Kruger PB. Isolated short‐wavelength sensitive cones can mediate a reflex accommodation response. Vision Res 2001; 41: 911–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucker FJ, Kruger PB. The role of short‐wavelength sensitive cones and chromatic aberration in the response to stationary and step accommodation stimuli. Vision Res 2004; 44: 197–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger PB, Rucker FJ, Hu C et al. Accommodation with and without short‐wavelength‐sensitive cones and chromatic aberration. Vision Res 2005; 45: 1265–1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucker FJ, Kruger PB. Accommodation responses to stimuli in cone contrast space. Vision Res 2004; 44: 2931–2944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graef K, Schaeffel F. Control of accommodation by longitudinal chromatic aberration and blue cones. J Vis 2012; 12: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucker FJ, Wallman J. Chick eyes compensate for chromatic simulations of hyperopic and myopic defocus: evidence that the eye uses longitudinal chromatic aberration to guide eye‐growth. Vision Res 2009; 49: 1775–1783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohnsen B. Directional sensitivity of the retina: a layered scattering model of outer‐segment photoreceptor pigments. Biomed Opt Express 2014; 5: 1569–1587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López‐gil N, Jaskulski MT, Vargas‐martín F et al. Retinal blood vessels may be used to detect the sign of defocus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57: 3958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar