Do reduced visual acuity and refractive error affect classroom performance?

REFERENCES

• Zhao J, Pan X, Sui R et al. Refractive error study in children: results from Shunyi District, China. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 427–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maul E, Barroso S, Munoz SR et al. Refractive error study in children: results from La Florida, Chile. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 129: 445–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey EM, Dobson V, Miller JM. Prevalence of high astigmatism, eyeglass wear, and poor visual acuity among native American grade school children. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 206–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinstein RN, Jones LA, Hullet S et al. Refractive error and ethnicity on children. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121: 1141–1147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ip JM, Robaei D, Kifley A et al. Prevalence of hyperopia and associations with eye findings in 6‐ and 12‐year‐olds. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 678–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanasamy S, Vincent SJ, Sampson GP et al. Visual demands in modern Australian primary school classrooms. Clin Exp Optom 2016; 99: 233–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junghans B, Kiely PM, Crewther DP et al. Referral rates for a functional vision screening among a large cosmopolitan sample of Australian children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22: 10–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodack MI, Chung I, Krumholtz I. An analysis of vision screening data from New York City public schools. Optometry 2010; 81: 476–484.
   Google Scholar
• White SLJ, Wood JM, Black AA et al. Vision screening outcomes of Grade 3 children in Australia: differences in academic achievement. Int J Educ Res 2017; 83: 154–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins S, Sampson G, Hendicott P et al. Review of guidelines for children's vision screenings. Clin Exp Optom 2013; 96: 443–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose K, Younan C, Morgan I et al. Prevalence of undetected ocular conditions in a pilot sample of school children. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003; 31: 237–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsting E, Rouse MW. Detecting learning‐related visual problems in the primary care setting. J Am Optom Assoc 1994; 65: 642–650.
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Optometry. Optometric Clinical Practice Guideline: Care of the Patient with Learning Related Vision Problems. 2008. St. Louis, MO: American Optometric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Garzia RP, Nicholson SB. Visual function and reading disability: an optometric viewpoint. J Am Optom Assoc 1990; 61: 88–97.
   Google Scholar
• Babinsky E, Candy TR. Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 4941–4955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritty JM, Solan HA, Cool SJ. Visual and sensory‐motor functioning in the classroom: a preliminary report of ergonomic demands. J Am Optom Assoc 1993; 60: 238–244.
   Google Scholar
• Negiloni K, Kumar ramani K, Reddi SR. Do school classrooms meet the visual requirements of children and recommended vision standards? PLoS One 2017; 12: e0174983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standards Australia. Interior Lighting. Part 2.3: Educational and Training Facilities (Monograph Available on the Internet). New South Wales: Standards Australia, 1994 Available at: http://infostore.saiglobal.com/store/PreviewDoc.aspx?saleItemID=260911. [Cited 12 April 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker SG, Lovie‐kitchin JE. Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 54–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langford A, Hug T. Visual demands in elementary school. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2010; 47: 152–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons HD. An analysis of the role of vision anomalies in reading interference. Optom Vis Sci 1993; 70: 369–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chall JS, Jacobs VA. Writing and reading in the elementary grades: developmental trends among low SES children. Lang Arts 1983; 60: 617–626.
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla‐warford N. A review of the efficacy of oculomotor vision therapy in improving reading skills. J Optom Vis Devel 2004; 35: 108–115.
   Google Scholar
• Flax N. The relationship between vision and learning: general issues. In: Scheiman M, Rouse MW, eds. Optometric Management of Learning‐Related Vision Problems, 2nd ed. St Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, 2006. pp. 183–207.
   Google Scholar
• Chen AH, Bleything W, Lim YY. Relating vision status to academic achievement among year‐2 school children in Malaysia. Optometry 2011; 82: 267–273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulp MT. Relationship between visual motor integration skill and academic perfomance in kindergarten through third grade. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 159–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumholtz I. Results from a pediatric vision screening and its ability to predict academic performance. Optometry 2000; 71: 426–430.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosner J, Rosner J. The relationship between moderate hyperopia and academic achievement: how much plus is enough? J Am Optom Assoc 1997; 68: 648–650.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shin HS, Park SC, Park CM. Relationship between accommodative and vergence dysfunctions and academic achievement for primary school children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2009; 29: 615–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams WR, Latif AH, Hannington L et al. Hyperopia and educational attainment in a primary school cohort. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90: 150–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins S, Sampson GP, Hendicott PL et al. Vision problems and reduced reading outcomes in Queensland schoolchildren. Optom Vis Sci 2017; 94: 345–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons HD, Grisham JD. Vision and reading disability: research problems. J Am Optom Assoc 1986; 57: 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce A, Fairley L, Chambers B et al. Impact of visual acuity on developing literacy at age 4‐5 years: a cohort‐nested cross‐sectional study. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e010434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirani M, Zhang X, Goh LK et al. The role of vision in academic school performance. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2010; 17: 18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusek W, Pierscionek BK, Mcclelland JF. A survey of visual function in an Austrian population of school‐age children with reading and writing difficulties. BMC Ophthalmol 2010; 10: 16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulk GW, Goss DA. Relationship between refractive status and teacher evaluations of school achievement. J Optom Vis Devel 2001; 32: 80–83.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstand S, Koslowe KC, Parush S. Vision, visual‐information processing, and academic performance among seventh‐grade schoolchildren: a more significant relationship than we thought? Am J Occup Ther 2005; 59: 377–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisham JD, Powers M, Riles P. Visual skills of poor readers in high school. Optometry 2007; 78: 542–549.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulp MT, Schmidt PP. A pilot study. Depth perception and near stereoacuity: is it related to academic performance in young children? Binocul Vis Strabismus Q 2002; 17: 129–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulp MT, Ciner E, Maguire M et al. Uncorrected hyperopia and preschool early literacy: results of the Vision in Preschoolers ‐ Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP‐HIP) study. Ophthalmology 2016; 123: 681–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morad Y, Lederman R, Avni I et al. Correlation between reading skills and different measurements of convergence amplitude. Curr Eye Res 2002; 25: 117–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanasamy S, Vincent SJ, Sampson GP et al. Impact of simulated hyperopia on academic‐related performance in children. Optom Vis Sci 2015; 92: 227–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanasamy S, Vincent SJ, Sampson GP et al. Simulated hyperopic anisometropia and reading, visual information processing, and reading‐related eye movement performance in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55: 8015–8023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanasamy S, Vincent SJ, Sampson GP et al. Simulated astigmatism impairs academic‐related performance in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015; 35: 8–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaid P, Simpson T. Association between reading speed, cycloplegic refractive error, and oculomotor function in reading disabled children versus controls. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013; 251: 169–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner J, Rosner J. The relationship between ametropia and elementary school achievement. Br J Optom Disp 1994; 2: 293–296.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar S, Evans MA, Bobier WR. Hyperopia and emergent literacy of young children: pilot study. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 1031–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solan HA, Larson S, Shelley‐tremblay J et al. Role of visual attention in cognitive control of oculomotor readiness in students with reading disabilities. J Learn Disabil 2001; 34: 107–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rijn LJ, Krijnen JSM, Nefkens‐molster AE et al. Spectacles may improve reading speed in children with hyperopia. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91: 397–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JM, Black AA, Hopkins S et al. Vision and academic performance in primary school children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2018; 38: 516–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner J, Rosner J. Comparison of visual characteristics in children with and without learning difficulties. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987; 64: 531–533.
   Google Scholar
• Eames TH. A comparison of eye conditions among 1000 reading failures, 500 ophthalmic patients, and 150 unselected children. Am J Ophthalmol 1948; 31: 713–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garber JM. High corneal astigmatism in Navajo school children and its effect on classroom performance. J Am Optom Assoc 1981; 52: 583–586.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borsting E, Mitchell GL, Kulp MT et al. Improvement in academic behaviours after successful treatment of convergence insufficiency. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 12–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin RE, Collins ME, Repka MX et al. In plain sight: reading outcomes of providing eyeglasses to disadvantaged children. J Educ Stud Placed Risk 2018; 23: 250–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glewwe P, Park A, Zhao M. A better vision for development: eyeglasses and academic performance in rural primary schools in China. J Dev Econ 2016; 122: 170–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glewwe P, West KL, Lee J. The impact of providing vision screening and free eyeglasses on academic outcomes: evidence from a randomized trial in Title I elementary schools in Florida. J Policy Anal Manag 2018; 37: 265–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter SA, Edwards AR, Wallace DK et al. Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children with refractive correction. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 895–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter SA, Edwards AR, Arnold RW et al. Treatment of strabismic amblyopia with refractive correction. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 1060–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart CE, Wallace MP, Stephens DA et al. The effect of amblyopia treatment on stereoacuity. J AAPOS 2013; 17: 166–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson J, Braddick O, Bobier W et al. Two infant vision screening programmes: prediction and prevention of strabismus and amblyopia from photo‐ and video‐refractive screening. Eye 1996; 10: 189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterner B, Gellerstedt M, Sjostrom A. Accommodation and the relationship to subjective symptoms with near work for young school children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2006; 26: 148–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helveston EM, Weber JC, Miller K et al. Visual function and academic performance. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 99: 346–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'grady JG. The relationship between vision and educational performance; a study of year 2 children in Tasmania. Aust J Optom 1984; 67: 126–140.
   Google Scholar
• Jan C, Li SM, Kang MT et al. Association of visual acuity with educational outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol 2019. http://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313294. [Epub ahead of print]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchman VA, Fernald A. Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Dev Sci 2008; 11: F9–F16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinuela‐navarro V, Erichsen JT, Williams C et al. Saccades and fixations in children with delayed reading skills. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2017; 37: 531–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandona R, Dandona L, Srinivas M et al. Refractive error in children in a rural population in India. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 615–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly UM, Stewart NM, Hollinger M. Prevalence and outcomes of childhood visual disorders. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2005; 12: 243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano L, Friedman DS, Repka MX et al. Prevalence of refractive error among preschool children in an urban population: the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 739–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh P‐P, Abqariyah Y, Gopal PP et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in school‐age children in Gombak district, Malaysia. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 678–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Zeng J, Liu Y et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in urban children in southern China. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 43: 793–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Huang W, Friedman DS et al. Slit lamp‐simulated oblique flashlight test in the detection of narrow angles in Chinese eyes: the Liwan eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 5459–5463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali P, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H et al. Refractive errors and amblyopia in children entering school: Shahrood, Iran. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 364–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junghans B, Crewther SG. Little evidence for an epidemic of myopia in Australian primary school children over the last 30 years. BMC Ophthalmol 2005; 5: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy GV, Gupta SK, Ellwein LB et al. Refractive error in children in an urban population in New Delhi. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 623–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'donoghue L, Mcclelland JF, Logan NS et al. Refractive error and visual impairment in school children in Northern Ireland. Brit J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovic‐beganovic A, Zvornicanin J, Vrbljanac V et al. The prevalence of refractive errors and visual impairment among school children in Breko district, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Semin Ophthalmol 2018; 33: 858–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins S, Black AA, White SLJ et al. Validity of the +1.50 plus lens screening test as a predictor of uncorrected moderate hyperopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2019; 39: 141–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton H, Schubert D, Clark D et al. Effects of induced hyperopia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978; 55: 451–455.
   Google Scholar
• Garzia RP, Nicholson SB, Gaines CS et al. Effects of nearpoint visual stress on psycholinguistic processing in reading. J Am Optom Assoc 1989; 60: 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Cotter SA. Management of childhood hyperopia: a pediatric optometrist's perspective. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 103–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leat SJ. To prescribe or not to prescribe? Guidelines for spectacle prescribing in infants and children. Clin Exp Optom 2011; 94: 514–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Moeschberger ML et al. Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 3633–3640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young FA, Leary GA, Baldwin WR et al. Refractive errors, reading performance, and school achievement among Eskimo children. Am J Optom Arch Am A 1970; 47: 384–390.
   Google Scholar
• Grosvenor T. Refractive state, intelligence test scores, and academic ability. Am J Optom Arch Am A 1970; 47: 355–361.
   Google Scholar
• Simons HD, Gassler PA. Vision anomalies and reading skill: a meta‐analysis of the literature. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988; 65: 893–904.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung K, Mohidin N, O'leary DJ. Undercorrection of myopia enhances rather than inhibits myopia progression. Vision Res 2002; 42: 2555–2559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwiazda JE, Hyman L, Norton TT et al. Accommodation and related risk factors associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 2143–2151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang HM, Chang DS, Wu PC. The association between near work activities and myopia in children ‐ a systematic review and meta‐analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0140419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams C, Miller LL, Gazzard G et al. A comparison of measures of reading and intelligence as risk factors for the development of myopia in a UK cohort of children. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 1117–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw S‐M, Tan S‐B, Fung D et al. IQ and the association with myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 2943–2948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robaei D, Rose K, Kifley A et al. Visual acuity and the causes of visual loss in a population‐based sample of 6‐year‐old Australian children. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 1275–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobier WR. Evidence‐based spectacle prescribing for infants and children. J Mod Optic 2007; 54: 1367–1377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farbrother JE. Spectacle prescribing in childhood: a survey of hospital optometrists. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 392–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey EM, Miller JM, Dobson V et al. Prescribing eyeglass correction for astigmatism in infancy and early childhood: a survey of AAPOS members. J AAPOS 2005; 9: 189–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlendorf A, Tabernero J, Schaeffel F. Visual acuity with simulated and real astigmatic defocus. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: 562–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchison DA, Mathur A. Visual acuity with astigmatic blur. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: 798–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little JA, Molloy J, Saunders KJ. The differing impact of induced astigmatic blur on crowded and uncrowded paediatric visual acuity charts. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 492–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey EM, Dobson V, Miller JM et al. Changes in visual function following optical treatment of astigmatism‐related amblyopia. Vision Res 2008; 48: 773–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Vincent SJ, Collins MJ. The visual and functional impacts of astigmatism and its clinical management. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2014; 34: 267–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wutthiphan S. Guidelines for prescribing optical correction in children. J Med Assoc Thailand 2005; 88: 163–169.
   Google Scholar
• Rabbetts RB. Bennett and Rabbetts' Clinical Visual Optics, 3rd ed. Oxford; Boston: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Yap TP, Luu CD, Suttle CM et al. Electrophysiological and psychophysical studies of meridional anisotropies in children with and without astigmatism. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2019; 60: 1906–1913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congdon NG, Patel N, Esteso P et al. The association between refractive cutoffs for spectacle provision and visual improvement among school‐aged children in South Africa. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92: 13–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue SP. Prescribing spectacles in children: a pediatric ophthalmologist's approach. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84: 110–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey EM, Miller JM, Twelker JD et al. Reading fluency in school‐aged children with bilateral astigmatism. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93: 118–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Bhogal G, Shah S. Effect of uncorrected astigmatism on vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 454–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills J, Gillett R, Eastwell E et al. Effect of simulated astigmatic refractive error on reading performance in the young. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 271–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casagrande M, Baumeister M, Buhren J et al. Influence of additional astigmatism on distance‐corrected near visual acuity and reading performance. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 24–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinas M, Sawides L, de Gracia P et al. Perceptual adaptation to the correction of natural astigmatism. PLoS One 2012; 7: e46361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinas M, de Gracia P, Dorronsoro C et al. Astigmatism impact on visual performance: meridional and adaptational effects. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 1430–1442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobashi H, Kamiya K, Shimizu K et al. Effect of axis orientation on visual performance in astigmatic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 1352–1359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trindade F, Oliveira A, Frasson M. Benefit of against‐the‐rule astigmatism to uncorrected near acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997; 23: 82–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remon L, Tornel M, Furlan WD. Visual acuity in simple myopic astigmatism: influence of cylinder axis. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 311–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra PM, Cox MJ, Chisholm CM. The effect of astigmatic axis on visual acuity measured with different alphabets in Roman alphabet readers. Clin Optom 2018; 10: 93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi DM, Mckee SP, Movshon JA. Visual deficits in anisometropia. Vision Res 2011; 51: 48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett BT, Bradley A, Candy TR. The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia. Prog Retin Eye Res 2013; 36: 120–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent SJ, Collins MJ, Read SA et al. The short‐term accommodation response to aniso‐accommodative stimuli in isometropia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015; 35: 552–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovasik JV, Szymkiw M. Effects of aniseikonia, anisometropia, accommodation, retinal illuminance, and pupil size on stereopsis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985; 26: 741–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson T. The suppression effect of simulated anisometropia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1991; 1991: 350–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drasdo N. The ophthalmic correlates of reading disability. Ophthalmic Optic 1971; 11: 948–955.
   Google Scholar
• Eames TH. The effect of anisometropia on reading achievement. Am J Optom Arch Am A 1964; 41: 700–702.
   Google Scholar
• Dadeya S, Shibal F. The effect of anisometropia on binocular visual function. Indian J Ophthalmol 2001; 49: 261–263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks SE, Johnson D, Fischer N. Anisometropia and binocularity. Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 1139–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oguz H, Oguz V. The effects of experimentally induced anisometropia on stereopsis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1999; 37: 214–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter SA, Varma R, Tarczy‐hornoch K et al. Risk factors associated with childhood strabismus: the multi‐ethnic pediatric eye disease and Baltimore pediatric eye disease studies. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 2251–2261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarczy‐hornoch K, Varma R, Cotter SA et al. Risk factors for decreased visual acuity in preschool children: the multi‐ethnic pediatric eye disease and Baltimore pediatric eye disease studies. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 2262–2273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walline JJ, Carder EDJ. Vision problems of children with individualised education programs. J Behav Optom 2012; 23: 87–93.
   Google Scholar