Impact of referral refinement on management of glaucoma suspects in Australia

REFERENCES

• Bourne RR, Stevens GA, White RA et al. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990‐2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2013; 1: e339–e349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2081–2090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot B, Macewen C. Surveillance of sight loss due to delay in ophthalmic treatment or review: frequency, cause and outcome. Eye (Lond) 2017; 31: 771–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis A, Baldwin A, Hingorani M et al. A review of 145-234 ophthalmic patient episodes lost to follow‐up. Eye 2016; 31: 422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victoria State Government Health and Human Services. Specialist Clinics Activity and Wait Time Report, June Quarter 2015–2016‐ PRELIMINARY, 2016. [Cited Mar 2017.] Available at: http://performance.health.vic.gov.au/Home/Resources/Publications.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Bellan L, Buske L. Ophthalmology human resource projections: are we heading for a crisis in the next 15-years? Can J Ophthalmol 2007; 42: 34–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnikoff S, Felch W, Gauthier TM et al. The number of ophthalmologists in practice and training worldwide: a growing gap despite more than 200,000 practitioners. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 783–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling B, Chen SD, Salmon JF. Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89: 1102–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell RW, O'brien C. Accuracy of referral to a glaucoma clinic. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1997; 17: 7–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khawaja AP, Sherratt MA, Sparrow JM et al. The royal college of ophthalmologists' glaucoma commissioning guidance: executive summary. Eye 2017; 31: 818–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devarajan N, Williams GS, Hopes M et al. The carmarthenshire glaucoma referral refinement scheme, a safe and efficient screening service. Eye (Lond) 2011; 25: 43–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne RR, French KA, Chang L et al. Can a community optometrist‐based referral refinement scheme reduce false‐positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES). Eye (Lond) 2010; 24: 881–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson DB, Spencer AF, Harper R et al. Community refinement of glaucoma referrals. Eye (Lond) 2003; 17: 21–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'connor PM, Harper CA, Brunton CL et al. Shared care for chronic eye diseases: perspectives of ophthalmologists, optometrists and patients. Med J Aust 2012; 196: 646–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamous KF, Kalloniatis M, Hennessy MP et al. Clinical model assisting with the collaborative care of glaucoma patients and suspects. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 43: 308–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Hennessy MP, Kalloniatis M et al. Implementing collaborative care for glaucoma patients and suspects in Australia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 46: 826–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White A, Goldberg I. Australian and New Zealand glaucoma interest group et al. Guidelines for the collaborative care of glaucoma patients and suspects by ophthalmologists and optometrists in Australia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 42: 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Optometry Board of Australia. Guidelines for use of scheduled medicines 2018. [Cited August 2018.] Available at: http://www.optometryboard.gov.au/Policies-Codes-Guidelines.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Patel UD, Murdoch IE, Theodossiades J. Glaucoma detection in the community: does ongoing training of optometrists have a lasting effect? Eye (Lond) 2006; 20: 591–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council. NHMRC Guidelines for the Screening, Prognosis, Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Glaucoma, 2010. [Cited March 2017.] Available at: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines‐publications/cp113‐cp113b.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Glaucoma: diagnosis and managment 2017. [Cited July 2018.] Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng81.
   Google Scholar
• Ly A, Nivison‐smith L, Hennessy MP et al. Collaborative care of non‐urgent macular disease: a study of inter‐optometric referrals. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2016; 36: 632–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ly A, Nivison‐smith L, Hennessy M et al. The advantages of intermediate‐tier, inter‐optometric referral of low risk pigmented lesions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2017; 37: 661–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coast J, Spencer IC, Smith L et al. Comparing costs of monitoring glaucoma patients: hospital ophthalmologists versus community optometrists. J Health Serv Res Policy 1997; 2: 19–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker H, Ratnarajan G, Harper RA et al. Effectiveness of UK optometric enhanced eye care services: a realist review of the literature. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2016; 36: 545–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel S, Xie J, Foreman J et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in the Australian National Eye Health Survey. Br J Ophthalmol 2019; 103: 191–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbelsteyn D, Mckee K, Bearnes RD et al. What percentage of patients presenting for routine eye examinations require referral for secondary care? A study of referrals from optometrists to ophthalmologists. Clin Exp Optom 2015; 98: 214–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamous KF, Jalbert I, Kalloniatis M et al. Australian optometric and ophthalmologic referral pathways for people with age‐related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma. Clin Exp Optom 2014; 97: 248–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan J, Shahid H, Bourne RR et al. Cambridge community optometry glaucoma scheme. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 43: 221–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnarajan G, Newsom W, Vernon SA et al. The effectiveness of schemes that refine referrals between primary and secondary care‐the UK experience with glaucoma referrals: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) glaucoma pathways project. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e002715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma R, Steinmann WC, Scott IU. Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 215–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y et al. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, SITA standard, and SITA fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 2654–2659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Murdoch IE. NICE ‐ impact on glaucoma case detection. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011; 31: 339–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamous KF, Kalloniatis M, Hayen A et al. Application of clinical techniques relevant for glaucoma assessment by optometrists: concordance with guidelines. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2014; 34: 580–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiely PM, Cappuccio S, Mcintyre E. Optometry Australia scope of practice survey 2015. Clin Exp Optom 2017; 100: 260–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett C, O'brien C, Butler JS et al. Barriers to glaucoma case finding as perceived by optometrists in Ireland. Clin Exp Optom 2018; 101: 90–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangerl B, Hayen A, Mitchell P et al. Therapeutic endorsement enhances compliance with national glaucoma guidelines in Australian and New Zealand optometrists. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2015; 35: 212–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El‐assal K, Foulds J, Dobson S et al. A comparative study of glaucoma referrals in Southeast Scotland: effect of the new general ophthalmic service contract, Eyecare integration pilot programme and NICE guidelines. BMC Ophthalmol 2015; 15: 172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Health. MBS Online Medicare Benefits Schedule. [Cited 23 June 2019.] Available at: http://www.mbsonline.gov.au.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Beltran‐agullo L, Trope GE et al. Assessment of the quality of glaucoma referral letters based on a survey of glaucoma specialists and a glaucoma guideline. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 126–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scully ND, Chu L, Siriwardena D et al. The quality of optometrists' referral letters for glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2009; 29: 26–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbari A, Mayhew A, Al‐alawi MA et al. Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008: CD005471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodossiades J, Murdoch I. Positive predictive value of optometrist‐initiated referrals for glaucoma. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1999; 19: 62–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood AJ, Kirwan JF, Ashleigh Z. Optometrists referrals for glaucoma assessment: a prospective survey of clinical data and outcomes. Eye 2010; 24: 1515–1519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts HW, Rughani K, Syam P et al. The Peterborough scheme for community specialist optometrists in glaucoma: results of 4-years of a two‐tiered community‐based assessment and follow‐up service. Curr Eye Res 2015; 40: 690–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quang do V, Li R, Ma M et al. Investigating cataract referral practices used by Australian optometrists. Clin Exp Optom 2014; 97: 356–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders C, Carter DJ. Right care, right place, right time: improving the timeliness of health care in New South Wales through a public‐private hospital partnership. Aust Health Rev 2017; 41: 511–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Jofre‐bonet M, Panca M et al. An economic comparison of hospital‐based and community‐based glaucoma clinics. Eye (Lond) 2012; 26: 967–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn PJG, Marks JR, Konstantakopoulou E et al. Clinical effectiveness of the manchester glaucoma enhanced referral scheme. Br J Ophthalmol 2018; 103: 1066–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar