218
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Mid‐ and large‐scale geodiversity calculation in fuentes carrionas (nw spain) and serra do cadeado (paraná, brazil): methodology and application for land management

, &
Pages 219-235 | Received 19 Nov 2013, Accepted 24 Jun 2014, Published online: 15 Nov 2016

References

  • Benito‐calvo, A., Pérez‐gonzález, A., Magri, O. and Meza, P., 2009. Assessing regional geodiversity: the Iberian Peninsula. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34 (10), 1433–1445.
  • Bétard, F., 2013. Patch‐scale relationships between geodiversity and biodiversity in hard rock quarries: case study from a disused quartzite quarry in NW France. Geoheritage 5, 59–71.
  • Bigarella, J.J., Mousinho, M.R. and Silva, J.X., 1965. Pediplanos, pedimentos e seus depósitos correlativos no Brasil [Pediplains, pediments and correlative pseudodeposits]. Boletim Paranaense de Geografia [Paranaensian Geography Bulletin], 16–17: 117–151. [In Portuguese]
  • Brazier, V., Bruneau, P.M.C., Gordon, J.E. and Rennie, A.F., 2012. Making space for nature in a changing climate: the role of geodiversity in biodiversity conservation. Scottish Geographical Journal, 128 (3–4), 211–233.
  • Brown, E.J., Prosser, C.D. and Stevenson, N.M., 2013. Geodiversity, conservation and climate change: key principles for adaptation. Scottish Geographical Journal, 128 (3–4), 234–239.
  • Bruschi, V.M., Cendrero, A. and Cuesta, J.A., 2011. A statistical approach to the validation and optimisation of geoheritage assessment procedures. Geoheritage, 3, 131–149.
  • Carcavilla, L., López, J. and Durán, J.J., 2008. Patrimonio geológico y geodiversidad: investigación, conservación, gestión y relación con los espacios naturales protegidos [Geoheritage and geodiversity: research, conservation and management in relation with the natural protected areas]. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid. [In Spanish]
  • Chardon, M., 1984. Montagne et haute montagne alpine. Criteres et limites morphologiques remarquables en haute montagne. Revue de Géographie Alpine, 72 (2–3), 213–224.
  • Dias, J.E., de Oliveira, O.V., da Silva, J.X. and de Barros, M.H., 2005. A geodiversidade do município de Volta Redonda, Rio de Janeiro [The geodiversity of Volta Redonda municipality, Rio de Janeiro]. Caminhos de Geografia [Geography Pathways], 14 (14), 151–160. [In Portuguese]
  • Durán, J.J., Brusi, D., Pallí, L., López‐martínez, J., Palacio, J. and Vallejo, E. 1998. Geología Ecológica, Geodiversidad, Geoconservación y Patrimonio Geológico: La Declaración de Girona [Ecological Geology, Geodiversity, Geoconservation and Geological Heritage: the Girona Statement]. In: Durán, J.J. and Vallejo, M. (eds), Comunicaciones de la IV Reunión Nacional de Patrimonio Geológico, Sociedad Geológica de España [Proceedings of the IV National Meeting on Geological Heritage, Spanish Geological Society]. Miraflores de la Sierra, 69–72. [In Spanish]
  • González, J.J. and Serrano, E., 2008. La valoración del patrimonio geomorfológico en espacios naturales protegidos. Su aplicación al Parque Nacional de los Picos de Europa [The assessment of geomorphological heritage in natural protected areas. Application to the Picos de Europa National Park]. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles [The Spanish Geographers Association Bulletin], 47, 175–194. [In Spanish]
  • Gray, M., 2013. Geodiversity: Valuing and Conserving Abiotic Nature. 2nd Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
  • Gray, M., Gordon, J.E. and Brown, E.J., 2013. Geodiversity and the ecosystem approach: the contribution of geoscience in delivering integrated environmental management. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 124 (4), 659–673.
  • Grigio, A.M., Amaro, V.E., Diodato, M.A. and Castro, A.F., 2011. Determination of indices of multiple and multiple weighted geodiversity of landscape of the Piranhas‐Assu River, Rio Grande do Norte – Brazil. Journal of Coastal Research, 64, 1668–1671.
  • Hjort, J., Heikkinen, K. and Luoto, M., 2012. Inclusion of explicit measures of geodiversity improve biodiversity models in a boreal landscape. Biodiversity Conservation, 21, 3487–3506.
  • Hjort, J. and Luoto, M., 2010. Geodiversity of high‐latitude landscapes in northern Finland. Geomorphology, 115, 109–116.
  • Hjort, J. and Luoto, M., 2012. Can geodiversity be predicted from space? Geomorphology, 153–154, 74–80.
  • Ibáñez, J.J., De‐alba, S., Bermúdez, F.F. and García‐álvarez, A., 1995. Pedodiversity concepts and tools. Catena, 24, 215–232.
  • Ibáñez, J.J. and García‐álvarez, A., 2002. Diversidad: biodiversidad edáfica y geodiversidad [Diversity: pedologic biodiversity and geodiversity]. Edafología [Edaphology], 9 (3), 329–385. [In Spanish]
  • Ibáñez, J.J., Krasilikov, P.V. and Saldaña, A., 2012. Archive and refugia of soil organisms: applying a pedodiversity framework for the conservation of biological and non‐biological heritages. Journal of Applied Ecolology, 49, 1267–1277.
  • Ibáñez, J.J., Pérez, A., Jiménez‐ballesta, R., Saldaña, A. and Gallardo, J., 1994. Evolution of fluvial dissection landscapes in Mediterranean environments. Quantitative estimates and geomorphological, pedological and phytocenotic repercussions. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, 38, 105–119.
  • Kozlowski, S., 2004. Geodiversity. The concept and scope of Geodiversity. Polish Geological Review, 52 (8–2), 833–839.
  • Krasilnikov, P.V., Garcia‐calderon, N.E. and Ibañez, A., 2009. Pedodiversity in mountainous tropical semideciduous forests of Sierra Madre Del Sur, Mexico. Eurasian Soil Science, 42 (13), 1435–1442.
  • Lima, F.F., Brilha, J. and Salamuni, E., 2010. Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: a methodological proposal applied to Brazil. Geoheritage, 2 (3–4), 91–99.
  • Macarthur, R.H. and Wilson, E.O., 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Moreira, J.C., 2011. Geoturismo e Interpretação ambiental. 01. Ponta Grossa [Geotourism and environmental interpretation. 01. Ponta Grossa]. Editora da UEPG, Ponta Grossa. [In Portuguese]
  • Moreira, J.C., 2012. Interpretative panels about the geological heritage – a case study at the Iguassu Falls National Park (Brazil). Geoheritage, 4, 1–14.
  • Nascimento, M.A.L., Ruchkys, U.A. and Mantesso‐neto, V., 2008. Geodiversidade, conservação e geoturismo: trinômio importante para a proteção do patrimônio geológico [Geodiversity, conservation and geoturismo: an important trio for geoheritage protection]. Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia, Brasilia. [In Portuguese]
  • Nieto, L.M., 2001. Geodiversidad: propuesta de una definición integradora [Geodiversity: a conciliatory definition proposal]. Boletín Geológico y Minero [Mining and Geology Buletin], 112 (2), 3–12. [In Spanish]
  • Ondicol, R.P., 2009. Application of an alpine geomorphological mapping system to an Atlantic mountain environment: the Curavacas Massif (Cantabrian Range, Northwest Spain). Journal of Maps, 2009, 194–205.
  • Panizza, M., 2009. The geomorphodiversity of the Dolomites (Italy): a key of geoheritage assessment. Geoheritage, 1, 33–42.
  • Parks, K.E. and Mulligan, M., 2010. On the relationship between a resource based measure of geodiversity and broad scale biodiversity patterns. Biodiversity Conservation, 19, 2751–2766.
  • Pellitero, R., 2011. Evaluación de la geodiversidad en el macizo de Fuentes Carrionas (Cordillera Cantábrica) [Geodiversity assessment in the Fuentes Carrionas massif (Cantabrian Range)]. In: Fernández‐martínez, E. and Castaño de luis, R. (eds), Avances y retos en la conservación del Patrimonio Geológico en España [Progresses and Challenges in Geological Heritage Protection in Spain]. Actas de la IX Reunión de la Comisión de Patrimonio Geológico (Sociedad Geológica de España). Sociedad Geológica de España, Universidad de León. 212–219. [In Spanish]
  • Pellitero, R., 2013. Evolución finicuaternaria del glaciarismo en el macizo de Fuentes Carrionas (Cordillera Cantábrica), propuesta cronológica y paleoambiental [Lateglacial evolution of Fuentes Carrionas massif (Cantabrian Range), palaeoenvironmental and chronological estimations]. Cuaternario y Geomorfología [Quaternary and Geomorphology], 27 (1–2), 7190. [In Spanish]
  • Pellitero, R., González‐amuchastegui, M.J., Ruiz‐flaño, P. and Serrano, E., 2011. Geodiversity and geomorphosite assessment applied to a natural protected area: the Ebro and Rudrón Gorges Natural Park (Spain). Geoheritage, 3, 163–174.
  • Pereira, R.G., 2010. Geoconservação e desenvolvimento sustentável na Chapada Diamantina (Bahia – Brasil) [Geoconservation and sustainable development in the Chapada Diamantina (Bahia‐Brasil)]. Dissertation, Universidade do Minho, Portugal. [In Portuguese]
  • Pereira, D., Pereira, P., Brilha, J. and Santos, L., 2013. Geodiversity assessment of Paraná State (Brazil): an innovative approach. Environmental Management, 52, 541–552.
  • Piekarz, G.F., Manosso, F.C. and Liccardo, A., 2009. O Patrimônio Geológico das Unidades de Conservação: Geoconservação e Geoturismo [Geoheritage of conservation units: geoconservation and geotourism]. In: Boticario Foundation (ed.), Anais VI Congresso Brasileiro de Unidades de Conservação, Curitiba [Annals of the VI Brazilian Congress on Conservation Units]. Ola Editorial, Curitiba, Brazil. 168–175. [In Portuguese]
  • Radford, A.E., Otte, D.K.S., Otte, L.I., Massey, J.R. and Whitson, P.D. 1981. Natural heritage: Classification, inventory and information. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
  • Reynard, E., 2009. The assessment of geomorphosites. In: Reynard, E., Coratza, P. and Regolini, G. (eds), Geomorphosites. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München. 63–72.
  • Rodrigues, C.S. and Silva, T.I., 2012. Dam construction and loss of geodiversity in the Araguari river basin, Brazil. Land Degradation and Development, 23 (4), 419–426.
  • Rojas, J., 2005. Los desafíos del estudio de la geodiversidad [Challenges of geodiversity study]. Revista Geográfica Venezolana [Venezuelan Geographic Review], 46 (1), 143–152. [In Spanish]
  • Rosenzweig, M.L., 1995. Species Diversity in space and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Ruban, D.A., 2010. Quantification of geodiversity and its loss. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 121, 326–333.
  • Saldaña, A. and Ibáñez, J.J., 2004. Pedodiversity analysis at large scales: an example of three fluvial terraces of the Henares River (central Spain). Geomorphology, 62, 123–138.
  • Saldaña, A., Ibáñez, J.J. and Zinck, J.A., 2011. Soilscape analysis at different scales using pattern indices in the Jarama–Henares interfluve and Henares River valley, Central Spain. Geomorphology, 135 (3–4), 284–294.
  • Serrano, E. and Ruiz‐flaño, P., 2007a. Geodiversidad: concepto, evaluación y aplicación territorial. El caso de Tiermes Caracena (Soria) [Geodiversity: concept, assessment and territorial application. The case of Tiermes Caracena (Soria)]. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles [The Spanish Geographers Association Bulletin], 47, 79–98. [In Spanish]
  • Serrano, E. and Ruiz‐flaño, P., 2007b. Geodiversity. A theoretical and applied concept. Geographica Helvetica, 62, 1–8.
  • Serrano, E., González‐trueba, J.J., Pellitero, R., González, M. and Gómez‐lende, M., 2013. Quaternary glacial evolution in the Central Cantabrian Mountains (Northern Spain). Geomorphology, 196, 65–82.
  • Shannon, C.E., 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 23, 379–423.
  • Sharples, C., 1993. A methodology for the Identification of Significant Landforms and Geological Sites for Geoconservation Purposes. Technical report. Forestry Commission Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania.
  • Sharples, C., 2002. Concepts and Principles of Geoconservation (Version 3). Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Tasmania.
  • Silva, J.P., Pereira, D., Aguiar, A. and Rodrigues, C., 2013. Geodiversity assessment of the Xingu drainage basin. Journal of Maps, 9 (2), 254–262.
  • Silva, J., Persson, V.G., Lorini, M.L., Bergamo, R.B.A., Ribeiro, M.R., Costa, A.J.S.T., Iervolino, P. and Abdo, O.E., 2001. Índices de geodiversidade: aplicações de SGI em estudos de biodiversidade [Geodiversity indexes: applications of the SGI in biodiversity studies]. In: Garay, I. and Dias, B.F.S. (eds), Conservação da biodiversidade em ecossistemas tropicais: avanços conceituais e revisão novas metodologias de avaliação e monitoramento [Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Ecosystems: Conceptual Advances and New Methodologies Revision for Assessment and Monitoring]. Vozes, Rio de Janeiro, 299–316. [In Portuguese]
  • Simpson, E.H., 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688.
  • Strugale, M., Rostirolla, S.P., Mancini, F. and Portela‐filho, C.V. 2007. Structural framework and Mesozoic–Cenozoic evolution of Ponta Grossa Arch, Paraná Basin, southern Brazil. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 24 (2–4), 203–227.
  • Thomas, M.F., 2012. Geodiversity and landscape sensitivity: a geomorphological perspective. Scottish Geographical Journal, 128 (3–4), 195–210.
  • Zhang, X., Chen, J., Zhang, G. and Tan, M., 2003. Pedodiversity analysis in Hainan Island. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 13 (2), 181–186.
  • Zwolinski, Z., 2010. The routine of landform geodiversity map design for the Polish Carpathian Mts. Landform Analysis, 11, 77–85.
  • Zwolinski, Z. and Stachowiak, J., 2012. Geodiversity map of the Tatra National Park for geotourism. Quaestiones Geographicae, 31 (1), 99–107.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.